Vivo Y20 Series
Processor: Mediatek Mediatek Helio G85, Qualcomm Snapdragon SD 680Graphics Adapter: ARM Mali-G52 MP2, Qualcomm Adreno 610
Display: 6.64 inch
Weight: 0.19kg, 0.192kg
Price: 150 euro
Average of 1 scores (from 4 reviews)
Vivo Y27
Specifications
Notebook: Vivo Y27Processor: Mediatek Mediatek Helio G85
Graphics Adapter: ARM Mali-G52 MP2
Display: 6.64 inch, 20:9, 2388 x 1080 pixels
Weight: 0.19kg
Price: 150 euro
Links:
Pricecompare
Foreign Reviews
Source: Mega Obzor RU→EN
Positive: Good price; modern design; quick charging; decent performance. Negative: Poor video recording.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/05/2023
Vivo Y27s
Specifications
Notebook: Vivo Y27sProcessor: Qualcomm Snapdragon SD 680
Graphics Adapter: Qualcomm Adreno 610
Display: 6.64 inch, 19.8:9, 2388 x 1080 pixels
Weight: 0.192kg
Links:
Pricecompare
Average Score:
Reviews
Source: TechLekh
One small suggestion would be to fix the position of the Wi-Fi QR scanner. Currently, it’s at the bottom, and if there are enough available Wi-Fi networks, it moves to the bottom, forcing us to scroll to find it. It’s not a major issue, but since every other phone has it at the top, I thought it’s worth mentioning. Moving on, Funtouch OS offers a plethora of customization options. You can change the home screen style and layout! The UI color you get with Android 13 is present. There’s a feature called dynamic effect that allows you to customize light effects for notifications and animations such as when entering the home screen, using face recognition, charging, and inserting a USB. However, vivo has not shared any promises regarding software support for the vivo Y27s.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/14/2024
Source: Gadgetbyte Nepal
So, in the end, the Vivo Y27s comes out to be a decent option for the NPR 25,000 price tag. The 90Hz IPS panel, 256GB storage, and Snapdragon 680 you get with this phone are just good enough. But, Vivo really needs to work on the camera side of things. On top of that, Vivo should have offered an AMOLED panel and stereo speakers with Y27s, given the competition in this price range. This smartphone is launching at INR 15,000 in India, so it is not overpriced at all. So, yeah! Overall, the Vivo Y27s is just an “okayish” phone!
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/24/2023
Rating: Total score: 71% price: 60% performance: 75% display: 70% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80%
Foreign Reviews
Source: Mega Obzor RU→EN
Positive: Good price; nice cameras; beautiful display; headphone jack; memory card slot. Negative: Mediocre design.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/23/2024
Comment
Vivo:
Non demanding games should be playable with these graphics cards.
ARM Mali-G52 MP2: Integrated mid range graphics card with 2 clusters. ARM states that the G52 series is 30% faster and 15% more efficient compared to the G51 series on the same process node.
Only some 3D games with very low demands are playable with these cards.
Qualcomm Adreno 610: Integrated (in the Snapdragon 665) graphics card based on the Adreno 600 architecture. The performance of the GPU is between the Adreno 510 and 512/612 and therefore in the lower mid range. Supports DirectX11_1, Vulkan 1.0, OpenCL 2.0, OpenGL ES 3.2.
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
Mediatek Mediatek:
Helio G85: ARM based octa-core SoC with 2x big ARM Cortex-A75 cores at up to 2 GHz and 6x small and power efficient ARM Cortex-A55 cores at up to 1.8 GHz. Integrates a Cat-7 (DL) / Cat-13 (UL) LTE Modem (4G), ARM Mali-G72 MP3 GPU and a ARM Mali G52 MC2 with up to 950 MHz.
Qualcomm Snapdragon:
SD 680: Fast mid-range ARM SoC with 8 CPU Kryo 265 cores (four fast 2.4 GHz ARM Cortex-A73 based cores in a cluster and four power saving ARM Cortex-A53 based cores at 1.8 GHz) and a rather slow Adreno 610 GPU. Manufactured in 6 nm.
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
» To find out how fine a display is, see our DPI List.
No weight comment found (one expected)!
71%: This rating is poor. More than three quarters of the models are rated better. That is rather not a purchase recommendation. Even if verbal ratings in this area do not sound that bad ("sufficient" or "satisfactory"), they are usually euphemisms that disguise a classification as a below-average laptop.
» Further information can be found in our Notebook Purchase Guide.