Notebookcheck Logo

Intel UHD Graphics P630 vs Qualcomm Adreno 643 vs Qualcomm Adreno 612

Intel UHD Graphics P630

► remove from comparison Intel UHD Graphics P630

The Intel UHD Graphics P630 (GT2) is a professional integrated graphics card, which can be found in various Xeon desktop and notebook processors of the Coffee-Lake generation. The "GT2" version of the GPU offers 24 Execution Units (EUs) and the clocks depend on the CPU model. Due to its lack of dedicated graphics memory or eDRAM cache, the UHD P630 has to access the main memory (2x 64-bit DDR3L-1600 / DDR4-2133). Compared to the older HD Graphics P630 (Kaby-Lake), the newer UHD GPU is identical but can be clocked slightly higher. Compared to the regular UHD 630, the P630 supports ECC main memory and is intended for professional applications.

Performance

The exact performance of the UHD Graphics P630 depends on various factors like TDP, L3 Cache, memory (DDR3/DDR4) and maximum clock rate of the specific model. However, it should be fairly similar to the HD Graphics 530 and HD Graphics 630 and therefore only suited for low demanding games like Overwatch or Farming Simulator 2017 (low details).

Features

The features of the UHD P630 are the same as for the HD 630 and therefore H.265/HEVC Main10 profile at 10-bit color depth are supported in hardware. Furthermore, HDCP 2.2 is also supported in all chips, which allows Netflix 4K videos, for instance. HDMI 2.0 however is still only supported with an external converter chip (LSPCon).

Power Consumption

The UHD Graphics P630 can be found in several notebook and desktop processors of different TDP classes.

Qualcomm Adreno 643

► remove from comparison Qualcomm Adreno 643

The Qualcomm Adreno 643 is an integrated graphics unit (iGPU) that is used in the Qualcomm QCM6490 and QCS6490. The SoC is not only intended for use in Android-based smartphones and tablets, but also for IoT products with Linux, Ubuntu or Windows 11 IoT Enterprise. In the QCM6490 and QCS6490 the 643 clocks at 812 MHz.

Qualcomm Adreno 612

► remove from comparison

The Qualcomm Adreno 612 is a mobile graphics card for mid-range smartphones and tablets (mostly Android based). It is included in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SoCs and based on the Adreno 600 architecture (like the Adreno 630, which should be fully compatible in software).

The performance is similar to the old Adreno 512 graphics card and therefore only in the lower mid-range of modern smartphone SoCs.

The GPU supports modern standards like Vulkan 1.0 (according to Wikipedia), OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0 and DirectX 11 (FL 11_1).

Intel UHD Graphics P630Qualcomm Adreno 643Qualcomm Adreno 612
Adreno 600 Series
Iris Plus Graphics 655 48 @ 0.3 - 1.2 GHz
Iris Plus Graphics 650 48 @ 0.3 - 1.1 GHz64/128 Bit
Iris Plus Graphics 645 48 @ 0.3 - 1.15 GHz
Iris Plus Graphics 640 48 @ 0.3 - 1.05 GHz64/128 Bit
UHD Graphics 630 24 @ 0.3 - 1.15 GHz64/128 Bit
UHD Graphics P630 24 @ 0.3 - 1.2 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 630 24 @ 0.3 - 1.15 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics P630 24 64/128 Bit
UHD Graphics 620 24 @ 0.3 - 1.15 GHz
HD Graphics 620 24 @ 0.3 - 1.05 GHz64/128 Bit
UHD Graphics 617 24 @ 0.3 - 1.15 GHz64/128 Bit
UHD Graphics 615 24 @ 0.3 - 1 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 615 24 @ 0.3 - 1.05 GHz64/128 Bit
Adreno 660
Adreno 650 @ 0.25 - 0.67 GHz
Adreno 690
Adreno 685
Adreno 680
Adreno 644
Adreno 643 @ 0.81 GHz
Adreno 642
Adreno 642L
Adreno 640
Adreno 630
Adreno 620
Adreno 619
Adreno 619L
Adreno 618
Adreno 616
Adreno 613 @ 0.96 GHz
Adreno 612
Adreno 610
Adreno 660
Adreno 650 @ 0.25 - 0.67 GHz
Adreno 690
Adreno 685
Adreno 680
Adreno 644
Adreno 643 @ 0.81 GHz
Adreno 642
Adreno 642L
Adreno 640
Adreno 630
Adreno 620
Adreno 619
Adreno 619L
Adreno 618
Adreno 616
Adreno 613 @ 0.96 GHz
Adreno 612
Adreno 610
CodenameCoffee-Lake-GT2
ArchitectureGen. 9.5Adreno 600
Pipelines24 - unified
Core Speed300 - 1200 (Boost) MHz812 MHz
Memory Bus Width64/128 Bit
Shared Memoryyesyesyes
APIDirectX 12_1, OpenGL 4.4DirectX 12, OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, Vulkan 1.xDirectX 12.1, OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan
technology14 nm6 nm14 nm
FeaturesQuickSyncOpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, Direct3D 12 (FL 12_1)
Date of Announcement01.10.2017 12.08.2021 15.12.2015
CPU in UHD Graphics P630GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Intel Xeon W-10885M8 x 2400 MHz, 45 W350 MHz1200 MHz
Intel Xeon E-2176G6 x 3700 MHz, 80 W350 MHz1200 MHz
Intel Xeon E-2276M6 x 2800 MHz, 45 W350 MHz1200 MHz
Intel Xeon W-10855M6 x 2800 MHz, 45 W350 MHz? MHz
min. - max.350 MHz? - 1200 MHz
CPU in Adreno 643GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm QCM64908 x 1960 MHz812 MHz? MHz
CPU in Adreno 612GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6788 x 1700 MHz? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6758 x 1600 MHz? MHz? MHz
min. - max.? MHz? MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 26320     avg: 28142     median: 26734 (3%)     max: 31129 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 1621     avg: 1897     median: 1737 (8%)     max: 2344 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 1571     avg: 1784     median: 1614 (4%)     max: 2245 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
6499 Points (27%)
min: 1057     avg: 1207     median: 1110 (5%)     max: 1499 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
7131 Points (18%)
min: 851     avg: 1030     median: 955 (2%)     max: 1303 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0)
min: 1606     avg: 1849     median: 1745 (16%)     max: 2285 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Graphics
min: 1427     avg: 1715     median: 1594 (10%)     max: 2173 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
min: 937     avg: 1108     median: 978 (5%)     max: 1480 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
min: 823     avg: 952     median: 829 (3%)     max: 1286 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
3135 Points (2%)
482 Points (0%)
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
887 Points (1%)
143 Points (0%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
8.2 fps (3%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
18 fps (3%)
min: 3     avg: 3.6     median: 3.3 (1%)     max: 4.8 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
49 fps (4%)
min: 9     avg: 9.4     median: 9.1 (1%)     max: 10 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
40 fps (4%)
min: 8     avg: 8.5     median: 8.2 (1%)     max: 9.2 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
69 fps (1%)
min: 14     avg: 15.7     median: 15 (0%)     max: 18 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
90 fps (4%)
min: 20     avg: 22     median: 21 (1%)     max: 25 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 643
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
159 fps (1%)
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 612
min: 41     avg: 43     median: 41 (0%)     max: 47 fps
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
192996 Points (19%)
43224 Points (4%)
Antutu v10 - AnTuTu v10 GPU
182032 Points (15%)
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
51.8 fps (1%)
14.3 fps (0%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 GPU OpenCL
2937 Points (1%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 GPU Vulkan
3054 Points (1%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
min: 9815     avg: 16853     median: 16853 (6%)     max: 23891 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
min: 1491     avg: 8575     median: 8575 (14%)     max: 15659 Points
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
5.9 Watt (2%)

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 643 → 0% n=0

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 612 → 0% n=0

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Genshin Impact

Genshin Impact

2020
low
Adreno 643:
58  fps
med.
Adreno 643:
40  fps
ultra
Adreno 643:
38  fps
Armajet

Armajet

2020
high
Adreno 612:
30  fps
PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
Adreno 643:
60  fps
Adreno 612:
40  fps
med.
Adreno 643:
40  fps
high
Adreno 643:
40  fps
Adreno 612:
30  fps
Shadow Fight 3

Shadow Fight 3

2018
high
Adreno 612:
60  fps
Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
Adreno 643:
60  fps
Adreno 612:
60  fps
Asphalt 9: Legends

Asphalt 9: Legends

2013
low
Adreno 612:
20 30 ~ 25 fps
high
Adreno 612:
16 30 ~ 23 fps
Intel UHD Graphics P630Qualcomm Adreno 643Qualcomm Adreno 612
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
Genshin Impact584038
PUBG Mobile6040404030
Dead Trigger 26060
Intel UHD Graphics P630Qualcomm Adreno 643Qualcomm Adreno 612
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps


















< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

1
1

2


1
1

1







< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

1





1
1









For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.33
log 14. 03:19:29

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 9906 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 11804 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 9876 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1755134369s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 13 Aug 2025 05:19:07 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.004s ... 0.005s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.005s

#8 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.005s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 9906 +0.02s ... 0.025s

#10 got single benchmarks 9906 +0s ... 0.025s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 11804 +0s ... 0.025s

#12 got single benchmarks 11804 +0.004s ... 0.029s

#13 getting avg benchmarks for device 9876 +0s ... 0.029s

#14 got single benchmarks 9876 +0.008s ... 0.037s

#15 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.037s

#16 min, max, avg, median took s +0.014s ... 0.051s

#17 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.051s

#18 Got 16 rows for game benchmarks. +0.003s ... 0.054s

#19 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.054s

#20 got data and put it in $dataArray +0s ... 0.055s

#21 benchmarks composed for output. +0.002s ... 0.057s

#22 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.057s

#23 return log +0s ... 0.057s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)