Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 vs Intel Core 2 Duo P8600
Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 ► remove
The Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 is a high end dual core CPU for laptops (at the time of introduction). Compared to the faster T9900 it does not support the new power saving C1E state. The newer Core 2 Duo P9700 offers a similar performance but features a lower TDP of 28 Watt.
Due to the high clock speed, the T9600 offers enough performance for demanding games (in 2009) and applications.
The T9600 uses a Penryn core that features 2 integer units, 1 floating point unit, 1 load unit, and 1 store unit in a 14-stages long pipeline. Due to the Wide Dynamic Execution Technology, the core is able to simultaneously execute up to four instructions.
The integrated Enhanced Speedstep is able to downclock the core dynamically (in idle mode).
The Core 2 Duo T9600 can be used in a Socket P socket with 479 pins.
Intel Core 2 Duo P8600 ► remove
The Intel Core 2 Duo P8600 is a dual core processor for laptops. It features 2.4 GHz and a shared level 2 cache of 3 MB. Due to the smaller cache (Core 2 Duo T-Models got usually 6 MB at this clock rate), the TDP is only 25 Watt (instead of the 35 Watt of the T-models).
Due to the relatively high clock speed, modern games (in 2009) should not be limited by the CPU speed (in conjunction with a middle class graphics card). High end gamers should choose a higher clocked Dual Core instead (when using a high end GPU). Compared to the fastest Turion II Ultra M640, the P8600 should be still faster.
The P8600 uses a Penryn (Montevina Update) core that features 2 integer units, 1 floating point unit, 1 load unit, and 1 store unit in a 14-stages long pipeline. Due to the Wide Dynamic Execution Technology, the core is able to simultaneously execute up to four instructions.
The integrated Enhanced Speedstep is able to downclock the core dynamically as low as 1200 MHz to save power (in idle mode).
The Core 2 Duo P8600 can be used in a Socket P socket with 479 pins: Socket P / Micro Flip-Chip Pin Grid Array (Micro-FCPGA) requires 479-pin surface mount Zero Insertion Force (ZIF) socket (mPGA479M socket) or Micro Flip-Chip Ball Grid Array (Micro-FCBGA) for surface mount (479-ball)
Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 Intel Core 2 Duo P8600 Intel Core 2 Duo Intel Core 2 Duo Penryn Penryn : Core 2 Duo Penryn 2800 MHz 2400 MHz 1066 1066 6 MB 3 MB 2 / 2 2 / 2 35 25 410 274 45 1.05-1.2125 V 45 1-1.25 V 107 mm2 81 mm2 105 °C 105 °C Socket P (BGA479, PGA478) Socket P (BGA479, PGA478) Architecture x86 x86 $316 U.S. $209 U.S. Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 Intel Core 2 Duo P8600 128 KB SSE4.1, Virtualization Technology, Execute Disable Bit, Enhanced Speedstep, Ehnaced Halt State (C1E), 64 Bit, Trusted Execution Technology
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
118 Points (3%)
Apple MacBook Pro 13 inch 2010-04 GeForce 320M 4096 450 / MHz OS X 10.12 118
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
65 Points (24%)
Apple MacBook Pro 13 inch 2010-04 GeForce 320M 4096 450 / MHz OS X 10.12 65
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 1.34 avg: 1.4 median: 1.4 (3%) max: 1.4 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 3060 avg: 3204 median: 3106.5 (28%) max: 3541
min: 2545 avg: 2644 median: 2618 (23%) max: 2995
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 5538 avg: 5936 median: 5801 (10%) max: 6785
min: 4619 avg: 4965 median: 4910 (8%) max: 5714
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 877.11 avg: 900 median: 899.6 (11%) max: 922.1 s
1100 s (13%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 27 avg: 28.1 median: 27.7 (6%) max: 29.7 s
min: 32.5 avg: 34.2 median: 34.6 (7%) max: 35.4 s
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 2465 avg: 2524 median: 2517 (14%) max: 2598 Points
min: 1972 avg: 2135 median: 2155 (12%) max: 2212 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 16 avg: 16.3 median: 16 (3%) max: 16.98 s
min: 20.546 avg: 21 median: 20.8 (5%) max: 21.481 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 39 avg: 39.8 median: 39.5 (2%) max: 40.98 s
min: 48.797 avg: 50.3 median: 50 (2%) max: 52.791 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 1032.5 avg: 1051 median: 1034 (5%) max: 1087.85 s
1160 s (5%)
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
min: 25986 avg: 26074 median: 26073.5 (12%) max: 26161 MIPS
22444 MIPS (11%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
min: 19701 avg: 20127 median: 20126.5 (15%) max: 20552 MFLOPS
16370 MFLOPS (13%)
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
min: 5911 avg: 6761 median: 6798 (43%) max: 7573 Points
min: 3731 avg: 5437 median: 5443 (34%) max: 6939 Points
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Prozessor
5.6 Points (80%)
5.3 Points (76%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
6 Points (77%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 5700 avg: 5703 median: 5703 (7%) max: 5706 Points
min: 4306 avg: 4556 median: 4594 (5%) max: 4735 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
2209 Points (18%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
2676 Points (24%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
4933 Points (10%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
2810 Points (6%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
3466 Points (9%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
2302 (4%)
Lenovo 2765TDG 8192 2302
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
1248 (26%)
Lenovo 2765TDG 8192 1248
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
2624 (4%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
1454 (30%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 2098 avg: 3453 median: 3453 (6%) max: 4808 ms
Apple MacBook Pro 13 inch 2010-04 GeForce 320M 4096 450 / MHz Safari 10.1 2098
MacBook Pro 13 2010 MacOS X 10.8.4 GeForce 320M 4096 Safari 6.0.5 4808
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
min: 305.8 avg: 308 median: 308.5 (3%) max: 311.1 ms
MacBook Pro 13 2010 MacOS X 10.8.4 GeForce 320M 4096 Safari 6.0.5 305.8
Apple MacBook Pro 13 inch 2010-04 GeForce 320M 4096 450 / MHz Safari 10.1 311.1
Sunspider - Sunspider 0.9.1 Total Score *
276 ms (3%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
13028 Points (22%)
Apple MacBook Pro 13 inch 2010-04 GeForce 320M 4096 450 / MHz Safari 10.1 13028
Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 → 100% n=13 Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo P8600 → 90% n=13
-
-
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
v1.16
log 29. 06:41:16
#0 checking url part for id 397 +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 399 +0s ... 0s
#2 redirected to Ajax server, took 0 +0s ... 0s
#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 24 Nov 2020 12:05:54 +0100 +0s ... 0s
#4 composed specs +0.013s ... 0.014s
#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.014s
#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 397 +0s ... 0.014s
#7 got single benchmarks 397 +0.01s ... 0.024s
#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 399 +0s ... 0.024s
#9 got single benchmarks 399 +0.045s ... 0.069s
#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.069s
#11 skipping 244/706 for average % as not all devices got results +0.014s ... 0.083s
#12 skipping 244/705 for average % as not all devices got results +0s ... 0.083s
#13 skipping 62/250 for average % as not all devices got results +0s ... 0.083s
#14 skipping 59/224 for average % as not all devices got results +0s ... 0.083s
#15 skipping 136/457 for average % as not all devices got results +0s ... 0.083s
#16 skipping 136/456 for average % as not all devices got results +0s ... 0.083s
#17 skipping 136/455 for average % as not all devices got results +0s ... 0.083s
#18 skipping 136/454 for average % as not all devices got results +0s ... 0.083s
#19 skipping 136/453 for average % as not all devices got results +0s ... 0.083s
#20 skipping 235/683 for average % as not all devices got results +0s ... 0.083s
#21 skipping 235/682 for average % as not all devices got results +0s ... 0.083s
#22 skipping 235/852 for average % as not all devices got results +0s ... 0.083s
#23 skipping 235/851 for average % as not all devices got results +0s ... 0.083s
#24 skipping 241/699 for average % as not all devices got results +0s ... 0.083s
#25 skipping 124/649 for average % as not all devices got results +0s ... 0.083s
#26 skipping 124/437 for average % as not all devices got results +0s ... 0.083s
#27 skipping 253/728 for average % as not all devices got results +0s ... 0.083s
#28 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.083s
#29 return log +0.005s ... 0.088s
Please share our article, every link counts!
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)
Deutsch
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
Magyar
-