Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core 2 Duo T7500 vs Intel Core 2 Duo T7400

Intel Core 2 Duo T7500

► remove from comparison Intel T7500

The Core 2 Duo T7500 is a middle class dual core CPU for laptops. It is based on the Merom core and features 4MB Level 2 cache.

At the time of announcement, the T7500 was a very fast CPU and had enough performance for games and applications in 2008. In 2009, the Core 2 Duo T7500 performed similar to a middle class Core 2 Duo P7570 or Turion II Ultra M640/M660.

Modern Penryn based Core  2 Duo are a bit faster per MHz (with similar Cache sizes) and are more power efficient.

Intel Core 2 Duo T7400

► remove from comparison

The Intel Core 2 Duo T7400 is a mobile dual core processor based on the Merom core. In 2006, the T7400 was a mid-range to high-end laptop processor. In 2010, the performance is only in the entry level segment. Later announced Penryn based Core 2 Duo processors are manufactured in 40nm and feature a higher speed per clock rate. Therefore, the Core 2 Duo P7450 is a bit faster and also more power efficient.

ModelIntel Core 2 Duo T7500Intel Core 2 Duo T7400
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 Duo
CodenameMeromMerom
Series: Core 2 Duo Merom
Intel Core 2 Duo T7800 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7700 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7600 compare2.33 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo T75002.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T74002.16 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5900 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7300 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5850 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5870 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7200 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5800 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7250 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5750 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7700 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP7700 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7100 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5600 compare1.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5550 compare1.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5500 compare1.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5300 compare1.73 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP7500 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5200 compare1.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7500 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7300 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7100 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7800 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7700 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7600 compare2.33 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T75002.2 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo T74002.16 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5900 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7300 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5850 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5870 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7200 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5800 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7250 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5750 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7700 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP7700 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7100 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5600 compare1.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5550 compare1.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5500 compare1.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5300 compare1.73 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP7500 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5200 compare1.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7500 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7300 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7100 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2
Clock2200 MHz2160 MHz
FSB800667
L1 Cache128 KB
L2 Cache4 MB4 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 2
TDP35 Watt34 Watt
Transistors291 Million291 Million
65 nm, 1.075 - 1.250V65 nm, 1.0375-1.3V
Die Size143 mm2143 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketPBGA479, PPGA478PBGA479, PPGA478
FeaturesVirtualization (VT-x), Intel 64, Idle States, Enhanced Speedstep, Execute Disable Bit
Architecturex86x86
$234 U.S.$286 U.S.
Announced
ManufacturerIntel Core 2 Duo T7500Intel Core 2 Duo T7400

Benchmarks

Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 T7500 +
min: 0.93     avg: 1     median: 1 (2%)     max: 1.12 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 T7500 +
min: 2190     avg: 2304     median: 2307.5 (21%)     max: 2389 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
1 T7500 +
min: 4182     avg: 4284     median: 4272.5 (6%)     max: 4473 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 T7500 +
37.5 s (8%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 1634     avg: 1879     median: 1906 (4%)     max: 1940 Points
min: 1633     avg: 1817     median: 1861 (4%)     max: 1895 Points
Sysmark 2004SE - Sysmark 2004SE Score
100%
1 T7400 +
257 Points (99%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 22     avg: 22.7     median: 23 (5%)     max: 23 s
min: 23     avg: 24     median: 24 (5%)     max: 25 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 54     avg: 54.7     median: 54.7 (2%)     max: 55.3 s
min: 58     avg: 59.3     median: 58 (2%)     max: 62 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
1344 s (6%)
min: 1523     avg: 1531     median: 1531 (7%)     max: 1539 s
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
min: 19950     avg: 20064     median: 20063.5 (10%)     max: 20177 MIPS
min: 13249     avg: 18264     median: 18263.5 (9%)     max: 23278 MIPS
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
min: 13944     avg: 13945     median: 13945 (11%)     max: 13946 MFLOPS
min: 9696     avg: 12732     median: 12732 (10%)     max: 15768 MFLOPS
Cinebench 9 Score - Cinebench 9 Score
100%
1 T7400 +
683 Points (47%)
SPEC CPU2000 int - SPEC CPU2000 int
100%
1 T7400 +
2230 Points (92%)
SPEC CPU2000 fp - SPEC CPU2000 fp
100%
1 T7400 +
2080 Points (94%)
PCMark 04 - PCMark 04 - Standard
5984 Points (80%)
min: 7174     avg: 7329     median: 7376 (99%)     max: 7438 Points
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
min: 2095     avg: 4545     median: 4629 (29%)     max: 5785 Points
min: 3716     avg: 4445     median: 4683 (29%)     max: 4859 Points
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Prozessor
100%
1 T7500 +
5.1 Points (73%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T7500 → 100% n=8

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T7400 → 100% n=8

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.18
log 26. 17:40:48

#0 checking url part for id 322 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 164 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 25 Sep 2022 13:14:15 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.006s ... 0.006s

#5 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.007s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.007s

#7 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.007s

#8 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.007s

#9 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.007s

#10 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.007s

#11 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.007s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.008s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#21 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#22 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#23 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#24 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#25 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.008s

#26 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.008s

#27 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#28 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#29 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#31 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.008s

#32 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#33 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.008s

#34 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.008s

#35 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.008s

#36 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.008s

#37 composed specs +0s ... 0.008s

#38 did output specs +0s ... 0.008s

#39 getting avg benchmarks for device 322 +0s ... 0.009s

#40 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.009s

#41 got single benchmarks 322 +0.046s ... 0.056s

#42 getting avg benchmarks for device 164 +0.001s ... 0.056s

#43 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.057s

#44 got single benchmarks 164 +0.017s ... 0.074s

#45 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.074s

#46 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.074s

#47 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.074s

#48 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.075s

#49 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.075s

#50 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.075s

#51 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.075s

#52 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.075s

#53 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.075s

#54 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.075s

#55 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.075s

#56 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.075s

#57 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.075s

#58 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.075s

#59 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.075s

#60 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.076s

#61 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.076s

#62 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.076s

#63 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.076s

#64 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.076s

#65 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.076s

#66 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.076s

#67 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.076s

#68 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.076s

#69 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.076s

#70 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.077s

#71 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.077s

#72 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.077s

#73 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.077s

#74 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.077s

#75 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.077s

#76 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.077s

#77 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.077s

#78 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.077s

#79 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.077s

#80 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.078s

#81 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.078s

#82 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.078s

#83 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.078s

#84 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.078s

#85 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.078s

#86 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.078s

#87 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.079s

#88 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.079s

#89 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.079s

#90 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.079s

#91 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.079s

#92 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.08s

#93 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.08s

#94 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.08s

#95 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.08s

#96 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.08s

#97 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.08s

#98 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.08s

#99 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.08s

#100 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.081s

#101 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.081s

#102 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.081s

#103 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.082s

#104 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.082s

#105 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.083s

#106 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.083s

#107 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.084s

#108 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.084s

#109 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.084s

#110 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.084s

#111 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.084s

#112 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.084s

#113 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.084s

#114 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.084s

#115 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.084s

#116 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.084s

#117 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.084s

#118 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.084s

#119 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.084s

#120 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.084s

#121 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.084s

#122 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.084s

#123 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.084s

#124 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.084s

#125 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.084s

#126 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.085s

#127 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.085s

#128 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.085s

#129 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.085s

#130 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.085s

#131 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.086s

#132 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.086s

#133 return log +0.004s ... 0.089s

Please share our article, every link counts!
.170
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)