The Intel Core 2 Duo T7250 was a mid range dual core processor for laptops. It is based on the old Merom core featuring only 2 MB level 2 cache and Virtualization functions VT-x. The similar called T7200 offers a larger level 2 cache (4MB) and a lower clocked FSB and therefore is a bit faster on the average. However, due to the smaller cache and the lower core voltage, the T7250 should be a bit more power efficient.
The Intel Core 2 Duo T5900 is a Merom based dual core processor for laptops. It was later succeeded by the Penryn based Core 2 Duo T6600, which is produced in 45nm and due to core enhancements a bit faster.
The Intel Core 2 Duo T7400 is a mobile dual core processor based on the Merom core. In 2006, the T7400 was a mid-range to high-end laptop processor. In 2010, the performance is only in the entry level segment. Later announced Penryn based Core 2 Duo processors are manufactured in 40nm and feature a higher speed per clock rate. Therefore, the Core 2 Duo P7450 is a bit faster and also more power efficient.
Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T7250 → 100%n=6
Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T5900 → 105%n=6
Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T7400 → 104%n=6
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card - Average benchmark values for this graphics card * Smaller numbers mean a higher performance 1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
v1.26
log 26. 21:23:07
#0 checking url part for id 340 +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 439 +0s ... 0s
#2 checking url part for id 164 +0s ... 0s
#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s
#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 25 Apr 2024 05:38:32 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s
#5 composed specs +0.016s ... 0.017s
#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.017s
#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 340 +0.002s ... 0.019s
#8 got single benchmarks 340 +0.037s ... 0.056s
#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 439 +0.002s ... 0.058s
#10 got single benchmarks 439 +0.008s ... 0.066s
#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 164 +0.002s ... 0.068s
#12 got single benchmarks 164 +0.029s ... 0.098s
#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.098s
#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.072s ... 0.17s