Intel Core 2 Duo T5500 vs Intel Core 2 Duo T7500

Intel Core 2 Duo T5500

► remove from comparison

The Intel Core 2 Duo T5550 is an entry-level dual core processor for laptops. It is based on the Merom-2M core and therefore manufactured in 65nm. It does not support Virtualization functions VT-x of the Merom core and offers only a low clock speed and 2MB level 2 cache.

Intel Core 2 Duo T7500

► remove from comparison Intel T7500

The Core 2 Duo T7500 is a middle class dual core CPU for laptops. It is based on the Merom core and features 4MB Level 2 cache.

At the time of announcement, the T7500 was a very fast CPU and had enough performance for games and applications in 2008. In 2009, the Core 2 Duo T7500 performed similar to a middle class Core 2 Duo P7570 or Turion II Ultra M640/M660.

Modern Penryn based Core  2 Duo are a bit faster per MHz (with similar Cache sizes) and are more power efficient.

Intel Core 2 Duo T5500Intel Core 2 Duo T7500
Intel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 Duo
MeromMerom
Series: Core 2 Duo Merom
Intel Core 2 Duo T7800 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7700 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7600 compare2.33 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T75002.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7400 compare2.16 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5900 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7300 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5850 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5870 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7200 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5800 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7250 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5750 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7700 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP7700 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7100 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5600 compare1.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5550 compare1.83 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo T55001.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5300 compare1.73 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP7500 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5200 compare1.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7500 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7300 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7100 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7800 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7700 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7600 compare2.33 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo T75002.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7400 compare2.16 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5900 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7300 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5850 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5870 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7200 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5800 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7250 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5750 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7700 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP7700 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7100 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5600 compare1.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5550 compare1.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T55001.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5300 compare1.73 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP7500 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5200 compare1.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7500 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7300 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7100 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2
1660 MHz2200 MHz
667800
2 MB4 MB
2 / 22 / 2
34 35
291 291
65 1.0375-1.3V65 1.075 - 1.250V
143 mm2143 mm2
100 °C100 °C
PBGA479, PPGA478PBGA479, PPGA478
Architecturex86x86
Intel Core 2 Duo T5500Intel Core 2 Duo T7500
128 KB
Virtualization (VT-x), Intel 64, Idle States, Enhanced Speedstep, Execute Disable Bit
$234 U.S.

Benchmarks

Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 T7500 +
min: 0.93     avg: 1     median: 1 (2%)     max: 1.12 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 1656     avg: 1717     median: 1660 (15%)     max: 1836
min: 2190     avg: 2304     median: 2307.5 (21%)     max: 2389
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 3026     avg: 3190     median: 3069 (5%)     max: 3476
min: 4182     avg: 4284     median: 4272.5 (7%)     max: 4473
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 T7500 +
37.5 s (8%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 1339     avg: 1387     median: 1392 (8%)     max: 1426 Points
min: 1634     avg: 1879     median: 1906 (11%)     max: 1940 Points
Sysmark 2004SE - Sysmark 2004SE Score
100%
1 T5500 +
204 (78%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 31.34     avg: 32.7     median: 32.7 (7%)     max: 34 s
min: 22     avg: 22.7     median: 23 (5%)     max: 23 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
83 s (4%)
min: 54     avg: 54.6     median: 54.6 (2%)     max: 55.271 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
1923 s (9%)
1344 s (6%)
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
min: 15145     avg: 16727     median: 15195 (7%)     max: 19840 MIPS
min: 19950     avg: 20064     median: 20063.5 (10%)     max: 20177 MIPS
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
min: 7386     avg: 9338     median: 10261 (8%)     max: 10367 MFLOPS
min: 13944     avg: 13945     median: 13945 (11%)     max: 13946 MFLOPS
Cinebench 9 Score - Cinebench 9 Score
100%
1 T5500 +
532 Points (36%)
PCMark 04 - PCMark 04 - Standard
min: 4776     avg: 5083     median: 4898 (66%)     max: 5787 Points
5984 Points (80%)
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
min: 2916     avg: 3353     median: 3323 (21%)     max: 3992 Points
min: 2095     avg: 4545     median: 4629 (29%)     max: 5785 Points
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Prozessor
100%
1 T7500 +
5.1 Points (73%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T5500 → 100% n=10

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T7500 → 125% n=10

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2021, 2020
v1.16
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)