Notebookcheck Logo
Samsung Galaxy A11 review

Samsung could have put more effort into this update – Samsung Galaxy Tab A11 tablet review

Progress denier?

Compared to the two-year-old Galaxy Tab A9, the Galaxy Tab A11 offers only minimal changes: The SoC, design, and limited storage – everything remains the same. Do the small updates to the camera and display at least manage to impress?
Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt (translated by Andrew Dickson) Published 🇩🇪
Android ARM Samsung Tablet

Verdict - Samsung Galaxy Tab A11

Untapped potential. It almost seems as if Samsung has had to gloss over its lack of progress with euphemistic statements such as "The Samsung Galaxy Tab A11 adopts the Galaxy Tab A9's design."

Although we can't expect miracles considering the Galaxy Tab A11's affordable price range, its timelessly designed metal chassis and fairly narrow screen bezels create a good-looking tablet - despite the unchanged design.

The performance also remains impressive compared to similar tablets from other manufacturers. However, you'll still have to put up with stuttering and lengthy loading times.

The small battery still only equates to mediocre battery life. However, the 90 Hz display is actually a noticeable upgrade over the predecessor, and the front camera now takes slightly improved selfies.

The update situation is questionable, but we ought to expect a few years of support.

While we would have liked to see more tangible improvements, the Galaxy Tab A11 is still an attractive and usable entry-level tablet with GPS tracking and optional LTE.

Pros

+ fast 90 Hz display
+ speedy UFS 2.2 storage
+ microSD card reader
+ LTE version available
+ metal chassis
+ affordable price
+ low surface temperatures
+ no PWM flickering

Cons

- hardly any new features compared to its predecessor
- unclear update commitment
- only 4 GB of RAM...
- ...and limited storage on our model
- low pixel density (179 ppi)
- blue tint on the display
- mediocre cameras
- no fingerprint sensor
- slow charging

Price and availability

At the time of reviewing, the tablet is unavailable on Samsung's online store. 

The tablet will also be available on Amazon shortly.

Amazon Logo
$190.00
SAMSUNG Galaxy Tab A9+ 5G (128GB, 8GB, Cellular) 11" 90Hz, Snapdragon, Android 13 Tablet (Fully Unlocked International Model for Global, Makes Calls T-Mobile Only) X216 (w/Fast Charger, Graphite)
  • $109.48
    Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 (SM-X110), 64GB 4GB RAM, WiFi Only, Factory Unlocked GSM, International Version (15W Wall Charger Bundle) (Navy)
  • $11.99
    JETech Case for Samsung Galaxy Tab A11 / Tab A9 8.7-Inch 2025/2023, Slim Translucent Back Tri-Fold Folio Stand Protective Tablet Cover (Black)

Cheap and portable, that has always been the philosophy behind the Galaxy Tab A, and in 2025, very little has changed with the tablet. This is despite the fact that there was never a Galaxy Tab A10, which means its predecessor, the Galaxy Tab A9, is already more than two years old.

However, there are minor improvements, and we aim to discover how these affect everyday use.

Specifications

Samsung Galaxy Tab A11 (Galaxy Tab A Series)
Processor
Mediatek Helio G99 8 x 2 - 2.2 GHz, Cortex-A76 / A55
Graphics adapter
Memory
4 GB 
Display
8.70 inch 15:9, 1340 x 800 pixel 179 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, IPS, glossy: yes, 90 Hz
Storage
64 GB eMMC Flash, 64 GB 
, 50 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, Audio Connections: 3.5mm audio port, Card Reader: microSD, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: acceleration, compass
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.3
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8 x 211 x 124.7 ( = 0.31 x 8.31 x 4.91 in)
Battery
5100 mAh Lithium-Ion, 15 Watt charging
Operating System
Android 15
Camera
Primary Camera: 8 MPix
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: stereo speakers, SIM tool, charging cable, 24 Months Warranty, fanless
Weight
335 g ( = 11.82 oz / 0.74 pounds) ( = 0 oz / 0 pounds)
Price
179 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Case – Metal with plastic strips

On its website, Samsung claims that the Galaxy Tab A11 "adopts" the design of its predecessor, the Galaxy Tab A9. Another way of putting it is that it simply reused the same chassis without making any changes: The dimensions are exactly the same, the appearance hasn't changed, but the Tab A11 is officially 3 grams heavier. Although this isn't something you'll notice in everyday use.

It doesn't necessarily have to be a bad thing to continue using an iconic design. And the Galaxy Tab A11, much like its predecessor, comes with a metal back. However, the side-located thick plastic strips, used for better antenna reception, could have been made a bit more discreet, and the front also has a rather mediocre screen-to-body ratio of 81%.

The Galaxy Tab A11 is reasonably stable when held in the hand and well-built. On trying to twist it, you might provoke a creaking noise, and moderate pressure will also be visible on the screen's liquid crystal.

Samsung Galaxy A11 review
Samsung Galaxy A11 review
Samsung Galaxy A11 review
Samsung Galaxy A11 review
Samsung Galaxy A11 review
Samsung Galaxy A11 review
Samsung Galaxy A11 review

Size comparison

235 mm / 9.25 in 154 mm / 6.06 in 9.5 mm / 0.374 in 424 g0.935 lbs215.4 mm / 8.48 in 136.8 mm / 5.39 in 8 mm / 0.315 in 344 g0.758 lbs211.6 mm / 8.33 in 125.5 mm / 4.94 in 8.8 mm / 0.3465 in 373 g0.822 lbs211 mm / 8.31 in 124.7 mm / 4.91 in 8 mm / 0.315 in 335 g0.739 lbs211 mm / 8.31 in 124.7 mm / 4.91 in 8 mm / 0.315 in 332 g0.732 lbs210 mm / 8.27 in 148 mm / 5.83 in 1 mm / 0.03937 in 2.9 g0.00639 lbs

Features - Not much space

What's interesting about the Galaxy Tab A11 is that there's once again an LTE version. What isn't quite as pleasing is that the limited storage capacity remains unchanged compared to the two-year-old Galaxy Tab A9. Here is the confirmed pricing of the UK WiFi models:

  • Galaxy Tab A11 WiFi | 64 GB | 4 GB of RAM | £149
  • Galaxy Tab A11 WiFi | 128 GB | 8 GB of RAM | £189

We're reviewing the model that comes with 64 GB of storage and Wi-Fi.

It also features a USB-C port, which uses the USB 2.0 protocol internally, allowing a maximum data rate of 480 Mbps. This prevents the transmission of wired video signals.

Left: SIM slot
Left: SIM slot
Right: Standby button, volume rocker
Right: Standby button, volume rocker
Top: Speaker
Top: Speaker
Bottom:3.5mm audio port, USB-C port, microphone, speaker
Bottom:3.5mm audio port, USB-C port, microphone, speaker

microSD Card Reader

At least Samsung has installed a microSD reader, allowing the user to expand the limited storage space if needed.

The reader actually transfers data relatively quickly, meaning we can confidently recommend it as an additional storage option.

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9
Mediatek Helio G99 (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
48.7 MB/s +3%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11
Mediatek Helio G99 (Angelbird V60)
47.2 MB/s
Lenovo Tab
Mediatek Helio G85 (Angelbird V60)
39.8 MB/s -16%
Average of class Tablet
  (10.2 - 57.4, n=60, last 2 years)
35.8 MB/s -24%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mediatek Helio G85 (Angelbird V60)
34.4 MB/s -27%
Lenovo Tab M9
Mediatek Helio G80 (Angelbird V60)
19.8 MB/s -58%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

0510152025303540455055606570758085Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø30.8 (10.9-41.7)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø38.8 (29.5-49.9)
Lenovo Tab Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø38.3 (29.9-45.4)
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø36 (19.5-46.3)
Lenovo Tab M9 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 32 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø28.5 (14.1-42.8)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø55.5 (26.7-77.3)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø76.3 (41.4-80.6)
Lenovo Tab Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø74.2 (15.5-80.5)
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø68.8 (13.6-78)
Lenovo Tab M9 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 32 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø76.6 (18.7-85.5)

Software – Unclear update situation

Samsung pre-installs Android 15 on its Galaxy Tab A11 and overlays its proprietary OneUI version 7.0 user interface. Dating back to August 2025 at the time of this review, the security patches could do with another update. These are said to be released every quarter.

It's difficult to find out anything regarding the promised update period. Samsung has actually gone quite far here and explicitly promised several years of software updates for many models. However, we couldn't find such a promise on the official website for the Galaxy Tab A11. Our request to Samsung concerning this topic was not answered prior to this review's publication.

After two years, the predecessor is at least getting an update to Android 16, so you can also expect a minimum of two further operating system versions for the Galaxy Tab A11. However, with Samsung severely limiting its update promise for the similarly priced Galaxy A17, the Tab A11 could suffer a similar fate. 

Samsung Galaxy Tab A11 software
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11 software
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11 software
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11 software
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11 software
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11 software

Sustainability

Uncertainty regarding the update availability could hinder extended use. Samsung does, however, disclose that no recycled materials are used in its Galaxy Tab A11. Nevertheless, no further sustainability data is available.

In Samsung's official replacement part store, you can find parts for the predecessor, which means the Galaxy Tab A11 should also be included here soon.

The packaging is plastic-free and very flat, thus reducing CO² emissions during transportation.

Communication and GNSS – Also available as an LTE model

WiFi 5 is the fastest existing Wi-Fi standard and is commonly found in this price range. Our test speeds with the Asus ROG Rapture AXE11000 reference router were acceptable, although there were occasional drops in data rates.

In addition, only around 200 Mbps can be expected for transmission. Received speeds are around 300 Mbps. This should be sufficient for everyday internet use, but anyone wishing to take full advantage of their gigabit internet connection will have to look elsewhere.

A WWAN model with mobile internet access via the cellular network is also available, but we only received the WiFi model for testing purposes. Modern 5G is still not supported by the Galaxy Tab A11, and even the WWAN model only supports LTE at most.

Networking
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
197.4 (min: 104) MBit/s ∼36%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
327 (min: 274) MBit/s ∼54%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
372 (min: 189) MBit/s ∼69%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
368 (min: 359) MBit/s ∼61%
Lenovo Tab
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
289 (min: 237) MBit/s ∼53%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
371 (min: 342) MBit/s ∼61%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
246 (min: 171) MBit/s ∼45%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
369 (min: 338) MBit/s ∼61%
Lenovo Tab M9
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
369 (min: 346) MBit/s ∼68%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
326 (min: 271) MBit/s ∼54%
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
 
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
341 (min: 10.5) MBit/s ∼63%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
329 (min: 20.1) MBit/s ∼54%
Average of class Tablet
 
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
542 (min: 10.5) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
605 (min: 20.1) MBit/s ∼100%
050100150200250300Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11; iperf3 transmit AXE11000: Ø197.4 (104-218)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11; iperf3 receive AXE11000: Ø327 (274-344)
GPS outdoor test
GPS outdoor test
Available satellite networks
Available satellite networks

Outdoors, it took a while for the tablet to locate us, but eventually, the tracking was accurate to within 2 meters. The tablet also supports SBAS for even more precise tracking.

Additionally, we undertook a bike ride to gather insights into a real-life scenario. The Galaxy Tab A11 experienced some tracking glitches; for example, it sent us through a garden at one point and couldn't fully track the turning point. According to the Tab A11, we "floated" over the water when crossing the bridge.

As a result, the Tab A11 might be too inaccurate for navigational purposes.

Samsung Galaxy Tab A11 location – overview
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11 location – overview
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11 location – turning point
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11 location – turning point
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11 location – bridge
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11 location – bridge
Garmin Venu 2 location – overview
Garmin Venu 2 location – overview
Garmin Venu 2 location – turning point
Garmin Venu 2 location – turning point
Garmin Venu 2 location – bridge
Garmin Venu 2 location – bridge

Cameras – A few additional pixels for the front camera

Front camera image
Front camera image

There's even a small change in the cameras compared to its predecessor. A slightly higher-resolution 5-megapixel camera for selfies can now be found on the front. At first glance, the images look quite decent, but don't expect too much detail, since bright areas quickly become overexposed.

The 8-megapixel main camera, however, remains unchanged, and the resulting images are quite grainy, revealing only a few details. The sky in the surrounding image also appears to be a white surface, whereas phones show significantly more detail. In low light, the sharpness appears only average, but the brightness is at least acceptable.

Videos can be recorded at a maximum of 1080p and 30fps, but the autofocus is very slow, and the resulting videos reveal very few details.

Image comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Front camera plantFront camera environmentFront camera low light

The main camera also had to prove itself in the lab - once under full studio lighting and once at just 1 lux.

As soon as the light level is too low, the images become blurry, with even well-lit photos quickly becoming blurry around the edges. Text against a red background also quickly loses contrast.

ColorChecker
8 ∆E
9.9 ∆E
16.1 ∆E
8.7 ∆E
13.3 ∆E
9.5 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
14.1 ∆E
9.8 ∆E
3.6 ∆E
8.9 ∆E
5.6 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
10 ∆E
2.9 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
13.2 ∆E
9 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
9.1 ∆E
7.7 ∆E
8.4 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy Tab A11: 8.94 ∆E min: 2.9 - max: 16.11 ∆E
ColorChecker
30 ∆E
55.5 ∆E
40.2 ∆E
35.3 ∆E
46.1 ∆E
62.8 ∆E
54.2 ∆E
36.1 ∆E
44.6 ∆E
29.4 ∆E
65.5 ∆E
64.1 ∆E
31.9 ∆E
48.1 ∆E
38.2 ∆E
77.1 ∆E
44.6 ∆E
42.5 ∆E
94.8 ∆E
71.4 ∆E
52.5 ∆E
36.9 ∆E
24.4 ∆E
13.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy Tab A11: 47.5 ∆E min: 13.91 - max: 94.84 ∆E

Accessories and warranty – 2-year peace of mind

There is no charger inside the box, but a USB cable and a SIM tool are on board.

In Germany, Samsung provides its affordable tablet with a 2-year warranty 

Input devices and operation – Faster inputs

One of the Galaxy Tab A11's biggest noticeable innovations is its operation. The screen now has a maximum refresh rate of 90 Hz, which makes operation significantly smoother. Despite having the same SoC, the tablet often feels considerably more responsive than its predecessor.

Support for an active stylus is still absent.

The device lacks a fingerprint sensor for unlocking using biometric data. However, facial recognition is available via the front camera, which does a good job.

Keyboard landscape
Keyboard landscape
Keyboard portrait
Keyboard portrait

Display – Few pixels on a large surface

Subpixel arrangement
Subpixel arrangement

Aside from the refresh rate of up to 90 frames per second, the display remains unchanged from the Galaxy Tab A9. The TFT panel is still 8.7 inches in size and has a resolution of 1,340 x 800 pixels. The pixel density is a low 179 PPI, which means that individual pixels can sometimes be seen on angled edges, and generally, the display appears blurry.

The average brightness of 438 cd/m² is at the usual level for this price range, although slightly lower than its predecessor.

We didn't detect any PWM flickering, which means that even users sensitive to such issues should be able to use the tablet without any problems.

446
cd/m²
439
cd/m²
431
cd/m²
425
cd/m²
453
cd/m²
442
cd/m²
429
cd/m²
432
cd/m²
444
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 453 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 437.9 cd/m² Minimum: 4.2 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 94 %
Center on Battery: 453 cd/m²
Contrast: 1461:1 (Black: 0.31 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 6.87 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.8}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 6.9 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5.1}
78.6% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.216
CCT: 8458 K
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11
IPS, 1340x800, 8.7"
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9
LCD TFT, 1340x800, 8.7"
Lenovo Tab
IPS, 1920x1200, 10.1"
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
IPS, 1340x800, 8.7"
Lenovo Tab M9
IPS, 1340x800, 9"
Screen
4%
28%
19%
19%
Brightness middle (cd/m²)
453
486
7%
433
-4%
499
10%
405
-11%
Brightness (cd/m²)
438
462
5%
393
-10%
479
9%
368
-16%
Brightness Distribution (%)
94
92
-2%
85
-10%
90
-4%
83
-12%
Black Level * (cd/m²)
0.31
0.35
-13%
0.24
23%
0.37
-19%
0.17
45%
Contrast (:1)
1461
1389
-5%
1804
23%
1349
-8%
2382
63%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
6.87
6.2
10%
2.09
70%
3.68
46%
5.15
25%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
11.89
10.4
13%
3.74
69%
6.82
43%
10.12
15%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
6.9
5.7
17%
2.8
59%
1.9
72%
3.7
46%
Gamma
2.216 99%
2.12 104%
2.311 95%
2.184 101%
2.287 96%
CCT
8458 77%
7911 82%
6104 106%
6787 96%
7379 88%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8205 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Our measurements with the spectrophotometer and the CalMAN software revealed a distinct blue tint on the display. Unfortunately, there's no way to change the display's color settings, apart from a blue filter, which doesn't improve color accuracy.

Anyone valuing accurate color representation will probably not be satisfied with the Galaxy Tab A11, since its colors generally appear quite cool.

CalMAN gray scales
CalMAN gray scales
CalMAN color accuracy
CalMAN color accuracy
CalMAN saturation
CalMAN saturation
CalMAN sRGB color space
CalMAN sRGB color space
CalMAN AdobeRGB color space
CalMAN AdobeRGB color space
CalMAN DCI P3 color space
CalMAN DCI P3 color space

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
23.7 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 12.9 ms rise
↘ 10.8 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 52 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.3 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
33.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 18.7 ms rise
↘ 15.1 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 45 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (31.8 ms).

Outdoors, the tablet is reasonably easy to read on cloudy days. However, as soon as the sun peeks through the clouds, distinct reflections can be seen on the display, making the content barely visible.

The TFT display's viewing angles are quite good, although it does dim slightly at relatively wide viewing angles.

Outdoor use
Outdoor use
Viewing angle
Viewing angle

Performance – High entry-level performance

The MediaTek Helio G99 is a popular SoC in this price range, and even though Samsung has already used it in the two-year-old Galaxy Tab A9, it still offers comparatively high levels of performance compared to other entry-level tablets.

However, don't expect miracles. Stuttering and long loading times are quite common, partly due to the limited RAM, which tops out at just 4 GB.

Geekbench 6.5
Single-Core
Average of class Tablet
  (185 - 3715, n=100, last 2 years)
1373 Points +85%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
742 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
738 Points -1%
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (704 - 742, n=18)
725 Points -2%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
403 Points -46%
Lenovo Tab
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
402 Points -46%
Multi-Core
Average of class Tablet
  (848 - 14690, n=100, last 2 years)
4370 Points +109%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
2088 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
2065 Points -1%
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (1784 - 2088, n=18)
1962 Points -6%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1449 Points -31%
Lenovo Tab
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1396 Points -33%
Antutu v10 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet
  (164396 - 2854581, n=71, last 2 years)
1080007 Points +181%
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (383511 - 422936, n=9)
403419 Points +5%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
384002 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
383511 Points 0%
Lenovo Tab
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
278813 Points -27%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Average of class Tablet
  (3195 - 27428, n=86, last 2 years)
11901 Points +31%
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (8885 - 11379, n=24)
9848 Points +8%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
9102 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
9083 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
7985 Points -12%
Lenovo Tab
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
7622 Points -16%
Lenovo Tab M9
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
6709 Points -26%
CrossMark - Overall
Average of class Tablet
  (227 - 2155, n=59, last 2 years)
924 Points +58%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
586 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
573 Points -2%
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (526 - 602, n=13)
568 Points -3%
Lenovo Tab
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
394 Points -33%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
386 Points -34%
Lenovo Tab M9
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
348 Points -41%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Average of class Tablet
  (195 - 13159, n=66, last 2 years)
5528 Points +76%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
3142 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
3120 Points -1%
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (2855 - 3240, n=14)
3028 Points -4%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2270 Points -28%
Lenovo Tab
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2087 Points -34%
Lenovo Tab M9
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
2072 Points -34%
System
Average of class Tablet
  (904 - 18343, n=66, last 2 years)
8759 Points +29%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
6782 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
6776 Points 0%
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (5261 - 6782, n=14)
6237 Points -8%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
4932 Points -27%
Lenovo Tab
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
4213 Points -38%
Lenovo Tab M9
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
4045 Points -40%
Memory
Average of class Tablet
  (401 - 17963, n=66, last 2 years)
6562 Points +56%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
4201 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
4152 Points -1%
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (3454 - 5140, n=14)
3852 Points -8%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2662 Points -37%
Lenovo Tab M9
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
2343 Points -44%
Lenovo Tab
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2253 Points -46%
Graphics
Average of class Tablet
  (88 - 57192, n=66, last 2 years)
14259 Points +430%
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (2683 - 3002, n=14)
2799 Points +4%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
2692 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
2683 Points 0%
Lenovo Tab M9
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
1818 Points -32%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1810 Points -33%
Lenovo Tab
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1780 Points -34%
Web
Average of class Tablet
  (10 - 2370, n=66, last 2 years)
1471 Points +14%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
1288 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
1273 Points -1%
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (1150 - 1325, n=14)
1259 Points -2%
Lenovo Tab
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1122 Points -13%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1118 Points -13%
Lenovo Tab M9
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
1069 Points -17%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Average of class Tablet
  (2597 - 76843, n=67, last 2 years)
15115 Points +133%
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (6323 - 9695, n=13)
8445 Points +30%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
6479 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
6453 Points 0%
Lenovo Tab
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
4472 Points -31%
Lenovo Tab M9
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
3992 Points -38%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
3899 Points -40%
AImark - Score v3.x
Average of class Tablet
  (138 - 55794, n=58, last 2 years)
4760 Points +376%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
1001 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
982 Points -2%
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (842 - 1001, n=10)
911 Points -9%
Lenovo Tab
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
737 Points -26%
Lenovo Tab M9
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 3072
311 Points -69%

The graphics solution also performs only moderately well when it comes to graphics performance. At the display's low native resolution, you can certainly play games at reasonably smooth frame rates, as the benchmarks show. However, as soon as things get more demanding, the frame rates quickly plummet.

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB eMMC Flash
358 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
345 Points -4%
Lenovo Tab M9
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 32 GB eMMC Flash
180 Points -50%
Lenovo Tab
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
180 Points -50%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
178 Points -50%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
330 Points +2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB eMMC Flash
322 Points
Lenovo Tab
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
182 Points -43%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
180 Points -44%
Lenovo Tab M9
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 32 GB eMMC Flash
177 Points -45%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1235 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1225 Points -1%
Lenovo Tab
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
710 Points -43%
Lenovo Tab M9
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 32 GB eMMC Flash
705 Points -43%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
694 Points -44%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB eMMC Flash
60 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
59 fps -2%
Lenovo Tab M9
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 32 GB eMMC Flash
52 fps -13%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
51 fps -15%
Lenovo Tab
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
41 fps -32%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
63 fps +2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB eMMC Flash
62 fps
Lenovo Tab
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
42 fps -32%
Lenovo Tab M9
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 32 GB eMMC Flash
41 fps -34%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
40 fps -35%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
58 fps +2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB eMMC Flash
57 fps
Lenovo Tab M9
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 32 GB eMMC Flash
42 fps -26%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
39 fps -32%
Lenovo Tab
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
24 fps -58%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
40 fps +54%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB eMMC Flash
26 fps
Lenovo Tab
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
24 fps -8%
Lenovo Tab M9
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 32 GB eMMC Flash
23 fps -12%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
22 fps -15%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
50 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB eMMC Flash
50 fps
Lenovo Tab M9
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 32 GB eMMC Flash
29 fps -42%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
28 fps -44%
Lenovo Tab
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
15 fps -70%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
25 fps +4%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB eMMC Flash
24 fps
Lenovo Tab
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
15 fps -37%
Lenovo Tab M9
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 32 GB eMMC Flash
14 fps -42%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
14 fps -42%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
27 fps +4%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB eMMC Flash
26 fps
Lenovo Tab M9
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 32 GB eMMC Flash
15 fps -42%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
14 fps -46%
Lenovo Tab
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
8.9 fps -66%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
15 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB eMMC Flash
15 fps
Lenovo Tab
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
9.3 fps -38%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
8.9 fps -41%
Lenovo Tab M9
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 32 GB eMMC Flash
8.6 fps -43%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
18 fps +6%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB eMMC Flash
17 fps
Lenovo Tab M9
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 32 GB eMMC Flash
8.1 fps -52%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
8.1 fps -52%
Lenovo Tab
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
5.3 fps -69%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB eMMC Flash
5.7 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5.6 fps -2%
Lenovo Tab
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
3.3 fps -42%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
3.2 fps -44%
Lenovo Tab M9
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 32 GB eMMC Flash
3.1 fps -46%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
26 fps +4%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB eMMC Flash
25 fps
Lenovo Tab M9
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 32 GB eMMC Flash
12 fps -52%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
11 fps -56%
Lenovo Tab
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
8.4 fps -66%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
14 fps +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB eMMC Flash
13.8 fps
Lenovo Tab
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
8.6 fps -38%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
8.5 fps -38%
Lenovo Tab M9
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 32 GB eMMC Flash
8.2 fps -41%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2.5 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2.4 fps -4%
Lenovo Tab M9
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 32 GB eMMC Flash
1.4 fps -44%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1.4 fps -44%
Lenovo Tab
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1.4 fps -44%

When browsing the internet, you can look forward to quite decent performance. Even larger pages don't take too long to load. However, when scrolling, you'll often have to wait for images to appear.

Jetstream 2 - 2.0 Total Score
Average of class Tablet (22.3 - 393, n=69, last 2 years)
140.9 Points +59%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11 (Chrome 141)
88.878 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 (Chrome 212)
71.728 Points -19%
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (46.9 - 90.3, n=12)
71.3 Points -20%
Lenovo Tab (Chrome 133)
61.274 Points -31%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches (Chrome 131)
51.638 Points -42%
Lenovo Tab M9 (Chrome 110)
38.697 Points -56%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result 2.0
Average of class Tablet (2.59 - 603, n=60, last 2 years)
172.1 runs/min +94%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11 (Chrome 141)
88.6 runs/min
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 (Chrome 212)
61.2 runs/min -31%
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (24.1 - 90.1, n=12)
60.9 runs/min -31%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches (Chrome 131)
48.6 runs/min -45%
Lenovo Tab (Chrome 133)
46.7 runs/min -47%
Lenovo Tab M9 (Chome 110)
30 runs/min -66%
Speedometer 3 - Score 3.0
Average of class Tablet (1.25 - 36.8, n=59, last 2 years)
13.7 runs/min +123%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11 (Chrome 141)
6.14 runs/min
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (3.66 - 6.27, n=5)
5.11 runs/min -17%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches (Chrome 131)
3.11 runs/min -49%
Lenovo Tab (Chrome 133)
3.01 runs/min -51%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Average of class Tablet (26 - 315, n=75, last 2 years)
129.1 Points +48%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11 (Chrome 141)
87 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 (Chrome 212)
81 Points -7%
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (39 - 89, n=13)
74.2 Points -15%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches (Chrome 131)
59 Points -32%
Lenovo Tab (Chrome 133)
58 Points -33%
Lenovo Tab M9 (Chrome 110)
45 Points -48%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet (763 - 111219, n=103, last 2 years)
39055 Points +54%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11 (Chrome 141)
25416 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 (Chrome 212)
22187 Points -13%
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (17228 - 26476, n=24)
22118 Points -13%
Lenovo Tab (Chrome 133)
15443 Points -39%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches (Chrome 131)
13605 Points -46%
Lenovo Tab M9 (Chrome 110)
12163 Points -52%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Lenovo Tab M9 (Chrome 110)
3467.2 ms * -117%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches (Chrome 131)
2742 ms * -71%
Lenovo Tab (Chrome 133)
2711.6 ms * -69%
Average of class Tablet (319 - 27101, n=84, last 2 years)
2696 ms * -69%
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (1600 - 2444, n=13)
1973 ms * -23%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 (Chrome 212)
1922.1 ms * -20%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11 (Chrome 141)
1600 ms *

* ... smaller is better

The UFS 2.2 storage found in the Galaxy Tab A11 is a great feature for an entry-level tablet and is significantly faster than some competing devices, especially when handling large files.

Samsung Galaxy Tab A11Samsung Galaxy Tab A9Lenovo TabXiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inchesLenovo Tab M9Average 64 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Tablet
AndroBench 3-5
0%
-39%
-50%
-50%
-66%
97%
Sequential Read 256KB (MB/s)
925.1
916.45
-1%
294
-68%
289
-69%
274.3
-70%
Sequential Write 256KB (MB/s)
395.6
398.32
1%
255.3
-35%
263.6
-33%
184.4
-53%
178.4 ?(40 - 396, n=209)
-55%
Random Read 4KB (MB/s)
179.5
182.74
2%
119.5
-33%
71.1
-60%
95.2
-47%
Random Write 4KB (MB/s)
129.9
128.92
-1%
102
-21%
82.7
-36%
91
-30%

Games – Gaming is possible

The Samsung Galaxy Tab A11 isn't exactly a gaming pro, but if you lower your expectations a bit and select minimum details, you'll be able to experience Genshin Impact, for example, at a fairly smooth 35-53fps.

PUBG Mobile remains reasonably playable even at high details and around 30 frames per second.

We tested the frame rates using the GameBench software.

Genshin Impact
Genshin Impact
PUBG Mobile
PUBG Mobile
05101520253035404550Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11; Genshin Impact; lowest 120 fps: Ø43 (35-53)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11; Genshin Impact; highest 120 fps: Ø24.4 (12-33)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11; PUBG Mobile; Smooth: Ø39.2 (36-41)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11; PUBG Mobile; HD: Ø29.5 (27-31)

Emissions – Hardly any heat production on the chassis

Temperature

The surface temperatures remained well within limits even after prolonged use, reaching a maximum of 33.1°C on the front of the device.

The 3DMark stress test also showed only very slight performance losses after numerous benchmark repetitions.

Max. Load
 30.2 °C
86 F
28.7 °C
84 F
26.7 °C
80 F
 
 33.1 °C
92 F
28.6 °C
83 F
26.7 °C
80 F
 
 31.2 °C
88 F
29.8 °C
86 F
26.6 °C
80 F
 
Maximum: 33.1 °C = 92 F
Average: 29.1 °C = 84 F
27.6 °C
82 F
27.9 °C
82 F
30.4 °C
87 F
27.1 °C
81 F
28.3 °C
83 F
32.1 °C
90 F
27 °C
81 F
27.1 °C
81 F
30.7 °C
87 F
Maximum: 32.1 °C = 90 F
Average: 28.7 °C = 84 F
Power Supply (max.)  39.9 °C = 104 F | Room Temperature 20 °C = 68 F | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 29.1 °C / 84 F, compared to the average of 30 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 33.1 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 32.1 °C / 90 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.8 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.

3DMark Stress Tests

3DMark - Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.5 % +2%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
99 % +2%
Lenovo Tab
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
98.8 % +2%
Lenovo Tab M9
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 32 GB eMMC Flash
98.3 % +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 64 GB eMMC Flash
97.3 %
Heat map front
Heat map front
Heat map rear
Heat map rear

Speakers

Two speakers are located on the left and right-hand sides of the tablet, and holding the Galaxy Tab A11 horizontally creates a slight stereo effect.

The speakers aren't particularly loud, reaching a maximum of approximately 82.8 dB(A) in our test with a special microphone at a distance of 15 centimeters. The sound quality probably won't blow you away, but the bass is lacking, and even the low mids aren't particularly pronounced.

However, the speakers didn't overdrive in our tests and, overall, they sounded quite balanced considering their limited range. This made it easy to listen to a piece of music or a movie soundtrack.

If you prefer to connect speakers or headphones, you'll find the tablet is home to both a 3.5 mm audio jack and Bluetooth. Unfortunately, the selection of audio codecs for wireless sound transmission (SBC, AAC, aptX, SSC, and LDAC) is quite limited. Not even aptX HD is on board, so the selection of the HD audio-capable codecs, such as the aforementioned SSC, LDAC and limited AAC, is already very limited.

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2037.141.12533.539.73132.537.5403234.95032.839.36325.729.98016.721.81001724.212518.129.316017.736.520018.342.125017.747.231517.752.54001653.350017.357.563024.863.380023.665.7100018.874.2125017.475.4160018.273.3200016.573.2250014.272.8315015.871.9400018.364.3500020.861.5630019.467.8800019.265.81000020.259.7125002256.2160001952.4SPL31.482.8N1.549.7median 18.2median 61.5Delta1.29.339.244.134.442.430.832.733.431.33438.629.830.228.919.519.22321.332.218.240.913.845.21452.313.354.3115510.95910.363.515.865.816.166.317.36811.469.911.268.411.571.41269.912.966.713.56614.166.71568.815.864.216.554.117.346.126.179.80.745.6median 14median 64.22.59hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSamsung Galaxy Tab A11Lenovo Tab M9
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 8.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.3% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (26.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 83% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 13% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 81% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 15% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Lenovo Tab M9 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 58% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 35% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 52% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 40% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Battery runtimes – Not exactly an endurance runner

Power consumption

While the Galaxy Tab A11 consumes slightly more power than the Galaxy Tab A9 when idle, it is somewhat less power-hungry under heavier loads. We suspect that more up-to-date drivers and software optimizations have managed to reduce consumption.

The tablet still charges at a maximum of 15 watts. The Tab A11 is shipped without a charger in Europe, but it worked quite smoothly with our existing chargers. We were able to fully recharge the tablet in about 2 hours and 30 minutes when the battery was completely depleted.

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.1 / 0.2 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 1.3 / 2.1 / 2.8 Watt
Load midlight 5.2 / 7.5 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11
5100 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9
5100 mAh
Lenovo Tab
5100 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
6650 mAh
Lenovo Tab M9
5100 mAh
Average Mediatek Helio G99
 
Average of class Tablet
 
Power Consumption
-11%
3%
31%
14%
-6%
-65%
Idle Minimum * (Watt)
1.3
0.7
46%
1.7
-31%
0.9
31%
1.6
-23%
1.552 ?(0.7 - 5.6, n=13)
-19%
Idle Average * (Watt)
2.1
2.94
-40%
1.9
10%
1.2
43%
1.7
19%
2.29 ?(1.1 - 6.1, n=13)
-9%
Idle Maximum * (Watt)
2.8
3.03
-8%
2.2
21%
1.7
39%
1.8
36%
Load Average * (Watt)
5.2
7.49
-44%
4.6
12%
3.5
33%
2.8
46%
5.44 ?(2.9 - 10, n=13)
-5%
Load Maximum * (Watt)
7.5
8.02
-7%
7.2
4%
6.9
8%
8.1
-8%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

01234567Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø4.89 (3.25-7.01)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.703 (1.27-2.12)

Power consumption: GFXbench (150 cd/m²)

00.20.50.70.91.11.41.61.82.12.32.52.733.23.43.63.94.14.3Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø4.39 (4.2-4.56)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.703 (1.27-2.12)

Battery life

In terms of battery life, the Galaxy Tab A11 isn't able to significantly differentiate itself from its predecessor, despite its slightly better power consumption figures. In our practical Wi-Fi test, it kept going for about 14 hours and 29 minutes - all in all, a few minutes longer. Under load, however, the lights went out a few minutes earlier.

If you look at other tablets, the Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7, and its larger battery than the 5,100 mAh housed inside the Galaxy Tab A11, proves that more is possible in this price range, and thus, also significantly better runtimes can be expected.

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
32h 25min
WiFi Websurfing
14h 29min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
19h 18min
Load (maximum brightness)
4h 21min
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11
5100 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9
5100 mAh
Lenovo Tab
5100 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
6650 mAh
Lenovo Tab M9
5100 mAh
Battery runtime
1%
-16%
20%
-5%
Reader / Idle (h)
32.4
32.2
-1%
32.5
0%
37.3
15%
35.5
10%
H.264 (h)
19.3
19.3
0%
12.7
-34%
21.1
9%
16.5
-15%
WiFi v1.3 (h)
14.5
14.3
-1%
11.8
-19%
20.4
41%
15.9
10%
Load (h)
4.4
4.6
5%
4
-9%
5
14%
3.4
-23%

Notebookcheck overall rating

The 90 Hz screen is a nice addition to Samsung's affordable tablet.

Apart from that, there's a lack of innovation, and the update situation is, at the very least, unclear.

Samsung Galaxy A11 review
Samsung Galaxy A11 review

Samsung Galaxy Tab A11 - 10/13/2025 v8
Florian Schmitt

Chassis
79 / 98 → 81%
Keyboard
69 / 80 → 86%
Pointing Device
84%
Connectivity
36 / 69 → 52%
Weight
86 / 40-88 → 95%
Battery
90%
Display
75%
Games Performance
5 / 65 → 8%
Application Performance
54 / 92 → 58%
AI Performance
5%
Temperature
95%
Noise
100%
Audio
68 / 91 → 75%
Camera
44 / 90 → 49%
Average
58%
76%
Tablet - Weighted Average
CO2 Emissions
No Data
Materials
0%
Packaging
85%
Power Use
95.3%
Repairability
51%
Software Updates
45%
Recycle Logo Total Sustainability Score: 46.1%

Possible alternatives compared

Image
Model / Review
Price
Weight
Drive
Display
1.
76.4%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11
Mediatek Helio G99 ⎘
ARM Mali-G57 MP2 ⎘
4 GB Memory, 64 GB eMMC
Amazon:
1. $190.00
SAMSUNG Galaxy Tab A9+ 5G (1...
2. $109.48
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 (SM-X1...
3. $11.99
JETech Case for Samsung Gala...
List Price: 179€
335 g64 GB eMMC Flash8.70"
1340x800
179 PPI
IPS
2.
84.1% v7 (old)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9
Mediatek Helio G99 ⎘
ARM Mali-G57 MP2 ⎘
4 GB Memory, 64 GB UFS 2.1
Amazon: $110.78
List Price: 179€
332 g64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash8.70"
1340x800
179 PPI
LCD TFT
3.
77.3%
Lenovo Tab
Lenovo Tab
Mediatek Helio G85 ⎘
ARM Mali-G52 MP2 ⎘
4 GB Memory, 64 GB eMMC
Amazon:
1. $169.99
Lenovo Idea Tab - College Ta...
2. $182.00
Lenovo Tab M11, 11” Displa...
3. $119.99
Lenovo Tab One - Lightweight...
List Price: 150€
424 g64 GB eMMC Flash10.10"
1920x1200
224 PPI
IPS
4.
76.8%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mediatek Helio G85 ⎘
ARM Mali-G52 MP2 ⎘
4 GB Memory, 64 GB eMMC
Amazon:
List Price: 150€
373 g64 GB eMMC Flash8.70"
1340x800
179 PPI
IPS
5.
82.2% v7 (old)
Lenovo Tab M9
Lenovo Tab M9
Mediatek Helio G80 ⎘
ARM Mali-G52 MP2 ⎘
3 GB Memory, 32 GB eMMC
Amazon: $109.00
List Price: 160€
344 g32 GB eMMC Flash9.00"
1340x800
173 PPI
IPS

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

static version load dynamic
Loading Comments
Comment on this article
Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Reviews > Samsung could have put more effort into this update – Samsung Galaxy Tab A11 tablet review
Florian Schmitt, 2025-10-14 (Update: 2025-10-14)