Notebookcheck Logo

Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 vs UNISOC Tangula T700 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 636

Qualcomm Snapdragon 662

► remove from comparison Qualcomm SD 662

The Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 is a lower mid-range ARM-based SoC largely found in Android tablets and smartphones. It features 8 Kryo 260 cores (custom design, 64-Bit capable) that are divided in two clusters. A fast cluster of four cores with up to 2 GHz (Kryo 260 Gold - Cortex-A73 derivate) and a power saving efficiency cluster with up to 1.8 GHz (Kryo 260 Silver - Cortex A53 derivate). Both clusters can also be used together.

In addition to the 8 CPU cores, the SoC integrates a mid range Adreno 610 GPU with a LPDDR4 memory controller (dual-channel)  and supports Wi-Fi (802.11ac + MIMO, max. 867 Mbps), Bluetooth 5, and LTE (X12 LTE modem with up to 600 Mbps download and 150 Mbps upload).

Power Consumption

Thanks to the new 11 nm LPP process, the energy efficiency should be quite good.

UNISOC Tangula T700

► remove from comparison  Tangula T700

The Unisoc Tangula T700 (former Spreadtrum) is an entry level octa core SoC with two fast ARM Cortex A75 cores at up to 1.8 GHz and six power efficient ARM Cortex A55 cores at up to 1.8 GHz. The SoC furthermore includes a LTE modem (TDD-LTE, FDD-LTE, TDSCDMA, WCDMA, CDMA, GSM), an ARM Mali G52MP2 GPU and a tri core ISP. Furthermore, the T700 supports 90 Hz displays.

The chip is manufactured at TSMC in 12nm FinFET.

Qualcomm Snapdragon 636

► remove from comparison Qualcomm SD 636

The Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (SDM636) is a mid-range octa-core SoC with eight custom Kryo 260 cores at up to 1.8 GHz, an Adreno 509 GPU, a LPDDR4-2666 memory controller (1333 MHz) and a X12 LTE (Cat 12/13, 300 Mbps down, 150 Mbps up) modem. Furthermore, the chip supports 802.11ac WiFi and Bluetooth 5.0. It is manufactured in 14nm FinFet. Qualcomm states a 40% faster performance compared to the old Snapdragon 630 (8x ARM Cortex-A53).

ModelQualcomm Snapdragon 662UNISOC Tangula T700Qualcomm Snapdragon 636
SeriesQualcomm Snapdragon Qualcomm Snapdragon
CodenameKryo 260Cortex-A75 / A55Kryo 260
Series: Snapdragon Kryo 260
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6652.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 260
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 « 1.8 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 260
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6602.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 260
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6361.8 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 260
UNISOC T6191.8 - 2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T6182 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T6161.8 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T6121.8 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T6101.8 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T6061.6 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC Tangula T700 « 1.8 - 1.8 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A75 / A55
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6652.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 260
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6621.8 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 260
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6602.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 260
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 « 1.8 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 260
Clock1800 - 2000 MHz1800 - 1800 MHz1800 MHz
Cores / Threads8 / 88 / 88 / 8
Technology11 nm12 nm14 nm
FeaturesAdreno 610 GPU, X11 LTE Modem, Hexagon 683 DSP, Specra 340T ISPARM Mali G52 MP2, Vivimagic 5.0 Tri-Core-ISP, LTE / 4G Modem, VDSPAdreno 509 GPU, X12 LTE Modem, Hexagon 680 DSP, Spectra 160 ISP
iGPUQualcomm Adreno 610ARM Mali-G52 MP2Qualcomm Adreno 509
ArchitectureARMARMARM
Announced
Manufacturerwww.qualcomm.comwww.qualcomm.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.5, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - SD 662
0.5 pt (36%)
Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.5, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - Tangula T700
0.5 pt (37%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
100%
1 SD 662 +
min: 18647     avg: 19225     median: 19223.5 (16%)     max: 19804 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
min: 1588     avg: 2240     median: 2272 (27%)     max: 2534 Points
min: 2815     avg: 2888     median: 2888 (34%)     max: 2961 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
min: 2146     avg: 2330     median: 2384 (27%)     max: 2502 Points
min: 2844     avg: 2903     median: 2902.5 (33%)     max: 2961 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
100%
1 SD 662 +
min: 330     avg: 331.5     median: 331.5 (10%)     max: 333 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
100%
1 SD 662 +
min: 1111     avg: 1129     median: 1129 (4%)     max: 1147 Points
min: 347     avg: 351.5     median: 351.5 (15%)     max: 356 Points
min: 1291     avg: 1342     median: 1342 (2%)     max: 1393 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 SD 636 +
278 Points (1%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 SD 636 +
1256 Points (4%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 SD 662 +
1472 Points (15%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 SD 662 +
4938 Points (6%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
100%
1 SD 636 +
2016 Points (16%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
100%
1 SD 636 +
2801 Points (25%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
100%
1 SD 636 +
8155 Points (16%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
100%
1 SD 636 +
4063 Points (8%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
100%
1 SD 636 +
5063 Points (13%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 3779     avg: 4379     median: 4502 (5%)     max: 4650 ms
3722 ms (4%)
min: 4105     avg: 4688     median: 4739.5 (6%)     max: 5066 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
9121 ms (100%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 8893     avg: 9495     median: 9485.5 (9%)     max: 10247 Points
10382 Points (9%)
min: 8163     avg: 8665     median: 8559 (8%)     max: 9746 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 51     avg: 53.2     median: 52 (11%)     max: 59 Points
65 Points (14%)
min: 46     avg: 54.4     median: 54 (11%)     max: 61 Points
AnTuTu v6 - AnTuTu v6 Total Score
100%
1 SD 636 +
min: 92015     avg: 98051     median: 95445 (33%)     max: 125213 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 Total Score
100%
1 SD 636 +
min: 115565     avg: 118863     median: 116748 (21%)     max: 138661 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 UX
min: 26857     avg: 35819     median: 37388 (31%)     max: 38718 Points
44936 Points (38%)
27466 Points (23%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 MEM
min: 32579     avg: 37486     median: 34946 (28%)     max: 46499 Points
37643 Points (30%)
30326 Points (24%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 GPU
min: 25724     avg: 33052     median: 33402 (6%)     max: 43315 Points
36709 Points (7%)
24483 Points (4%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 CPU
min: 68508     avg: 70945     median: 71065 (26%)     max: 72576 Points
67597 Points (24%)
62945 Points (23%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 Total Score
min: 167471     avg: 177411     median: 177145 (17%)     max: 185542 Points
186885 Points (18%)
145220 Points (14%)
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 Total Score
100%
1 SD 662 +
min: 194505     avg: 200601     median: 198172 (12%)     max: 211557 Points
164867 Points (10%)
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 CPU
100%
1 SD 662 +
min: 64163     avg: 66339     median: 66230 (18%)     max: 68731 Points
65438 Points (18%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
16222 Points (2%)
2078 Points (0%)
min: 157795     avg: 157981     median: 157981 (21%)     max: 158167 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random write internal
100%
1 SD 662 +
min: 21.7     avg: 22.3     median: 22.3 (16%)     max: 22.9 MB/s
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq write internal
100%
1 SD 662 +
min: 111.1     avg: 112.5     median: 112.5 (3%)     max: 113.8 MB/s
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random read internal
100%
1 SD 662 +
min: 15.3     avg: 15.5     median: 15.5 (19%)     max: 15.6 MB/s
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq read internal
100%
1 SD 662 +
min: 403     avg: 414.5     median: 414.5 (12%)     max: 426 MB/s
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
100%
1 SD 662 +
min: 10366     avg: 11330     median: 10740 (17%)     max: 12884 Points
10033 Points (16%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
100%
1 SD 662 +
min: 3195     avg: 5608     median: 5689.5 (26%)     max: 7554 Points
min: 8743     avg: 8745     median: 8744.5 (40%)     max: 8746 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
min: 3090     avg: 3167     median: 3201 (17%)     max: 3211 Points
5412 Points (29%)
min: 3056     avg: 3090     median: 3071.5 (16%)     max: 3160 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
min: 8075     avg: 8811     median: 8076 (17%)     max: 10283 Points
12328 Points (26%)
min: 3406     avg: 5546     median: 5299.5 (11%)     max: 8180 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
min: 5866     avg: 6258     median: 6139 (40%)     max: 7184 Points
8438 Points (55%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
100%
1 SD 662 +
min: 7247     avg: 7986     median: 8000.5 (40%)     max: 8714 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
100%
1 SD 662 +
328 Points (13%)
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
100%
1 SD 662 +
min: 3.34     avg: 3.6     median: 3.6 (2%)     max: 3.83 Watt
min: 0     avg: 4     median: 4 (2%)     max: 8.02 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
100%
1 SD 662 +
min: 1.32     avg: 1.6     median: 1.6 (2%)     max: 1.953 Watt

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 → 100% n=14

Average Benchmarks UNISOC Tangula T700 → 114% n=14

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 → 152% n=14

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.26
log 30. 13:41:28

#0 checking url part for id 12771 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 13247 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 9956 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 28 Apr 2024 05:39:51 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.055s ... 0.057s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.057s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 12771 +0.016s ... 0.073s

#8 got single benchmarks 12771 +0.041s ... 0.114s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 13247 +0.012s ... 0.126s

#10 got single benchmarks 13247 +0.01s ... 0.136s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 9956 +0.003s ... 0.139s

#12 got single benchmarks 9956 +0.031s ... 0.17s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.17s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.235s ... 0.405s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.406s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)