Notebookcheck Logo

Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 vs UNISOC Tangula T700 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 662

Qualcomm Snapdragon 636

► remove from comparison Qualcomm SD 636

The Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (SDM636) is a mid-range octa-core SoC with eight custom Kryo 260 cores at up to 1.8 GHz, an Adreno 509 GPU, a LPDDR4-2666 memory controller (1333 MHz) and a X12 LTE (Cat 12/13, 300 Mbps down, 150 Mbps up) modem. Furthermore, the chip supports 802.11ac WiFi and Bluetooth 5.0. It is manufactured in 14nm FinFet. Qualcomm states a 40% faster performance compared to the old Snapdragon 630 (8x ARM Cortex-A53).

UNISOC Tangula T700

► remove from comparison  Tangula T700

The Unisoc Tangula T700 (former Spreadtrum) is an entry level octa core SoC with two fast ARM Cortex A75 cores at up to 1.8 GHz and six power efficient ARM Cortex A55 cores at up to 1.8 GHz. The SoC furthermore includes a LTE modem (TDD-LTE, FDD-LTE, TDSCDMA, WCDMA, CDMA, GSM), an ARM Mali G52MP2 GPU and a tri core ISP. Furthermore, the T700 supports 90 Hz displays.

The chip is manufactured at TSMC in 12nm FinFET.

Qualcomm Snapdragon 662

► remove from comparison Qualcomm SD 662

The Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 is a lower mid-range ARM-based SoC largely found in Android tablets and smartphones. It features 8 Kryo 260 cores (custom design, 64-Bit capable) that are divided in two clusters. A fast cluster of four cores with up to 2 GHz (Kryo 260 Gold - Cortex-A73 derivate) and a power saving efficiency cluster with up to 1.8 GHz (Kryo 260 Silver - Cortex A53 derivate). Both clusters can also be used together.

In addition to the 8 CPU cores, the SoC integrates a mid range Adreno 610 GPU with a LPDDR4 memory controller (dual-channel)  and supports Wi-Fi (802.11ac + MIMO, max. 867 Mbps), Bluetooth 5, and LTE (X12 LTE modem with up to 600 Mbps download and 150 Mbps upload).

Power Consumption

Thanks to the new 11 nm LPP process, the energy efficiency should be quite good.

ModelQualcomm Snapdragon 636UNISOC Tangula T700Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
SeriesQualcomm Snapdragon Qualcomm Snapdragon
CodenameKryo 260Cortex-A75 / A55Kryo 260
Series: Snapdragon Kryo 260
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6652.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 260
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6621.8 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 260
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6602.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 260
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 « 1.8 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 260
UNISOC T6191.8 - 2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T6182 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T6161.8 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T6121.8 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T6101.8 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T6061.6 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC Tangula T700 « 1.8 - 1.8 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A75 / A55
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6652.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 260
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 « 1.8 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 260
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6602.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 260
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6361.8 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 260
Clock1800 MHz1800 - 1800 MHz1800 - 2000 MHz
Cores / Threads8 / 88 / 88 / 8
Technology14 nm12 nm11 nm
FeaturesAdreno 509 GPU, X12 LTE Modem, Hexagon 680 DSP, Spectra 160 ISPARM Mali G52 MP2, Vivimagic 5.0 Tri-Core-ISP, LTE / 4G Modem, VDSPAdreno 610 GPU, X11 LTE Modem, Hexagon 683 DSP, Specra 340T ISP
iGPUQualcomm Adreno 509ARM Mali-G52 MP2Qualcomm Adreno 610
ArchitectureARMARMARM
Announced
Manufacturerwww.qualcomm.comwww.qualcomm.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.5, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - Tangula T700
0.5 pt (37%)
Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.5, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - SD 662
0.5 pt (36%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
100%
1 SD 636 +
min: 15766     avg: 17020     median: 16939 (14%)     max: 19365 Points
113%
1 SD 662 +
min: 18647     avg: 19225     median: 19223.5 (16%)     max: 19804 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
min: 2258     avg: 2372     median: 2345 (28%)     max: 2644 Points
min: 2815     avg: 2888     median: 2888 (34%)     max: 2961 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
min: 2288     avg: 2386     median: 2359 (27%)     max: 2683 Points
min: 2844     avg: 2903     median: 2902.5 (33%)     max: 2961 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
100%
1 SD 662 +
min: 330     avg: 331.5     median: 331.5 (9%)     max: 333 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
100%
1 SD 662 +
min: 1111     avg: 1129     median: 1129 (4%)     max: 1147 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 347     avg: 351.5     median: 351.5 (15%)     max: 356 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 1291     avg: 1342     median: 1342 (2%)     max: 1393 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 SD 636 +
278 Points (1%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 SD 636 +
1256 Points (4%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 SD 636 +
min: 1323     avg: 1351     median: 1337 (13%)     max: 1506 Points
110%
1 SD 662 +
1472 Points (15%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 SD 636 +
min: 4781     avg: 4960     median: 4941 (5%)     max: 5426 Points
100%
1 SD 662 +
4938 Points (5%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
100%
1 SD 636 +
2016 Points (16%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
100%
1 SD 636 +
2801 Points (25%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
100%
1 SD 636 +
8155 Points (16%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
100%
1 SD 636 +
4063 Points (8%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
100%
1 SD 636 +
5063 Points (13%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 4105     avg: 4688     median: 4739.5 (6%)     max: 5066 ms
3722 ms (4%)
min: 3779     avg: 4379     median: 4502 (5%)     max: 4650 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
9121 ms (100%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 8163     avg: 8665     median: 8559 (8%)     max: 9746 Points
10382 Points (9%)
min: 8893     avg: 9495     median: 9485.5 (9%)     max: 10247 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 46     avg: 54.4     median: 54 (11%)     max: 61 Points
65 Points (14%)
min: 51     avg: 53.2     median: 52 (11%)     max: 59 Points
AnTuTu v6 - AnTuTu v6 Total Score
100%
1 SD 636 +
min: 92015     avg: 98051     median: 95445 (33%)     max: 125213 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 Total Score
100%
1 SD 636 +
min: 115565     avg: 118863     median: 116748 (21%)     max: 138661 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 UX
27466 Points (23%)
44936 Points (38%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 MEM
30326 Points (24%)
37643 Points (30%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 GPU
24483 Points (4%)
36709 Points (7%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 CPU
62945 Points (23%)
67597 Points (24%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 Total Score
145220 Points (14%)
186885 Points (18%)
min: 167471     avg: 177411     median: 177145 (17%)     max: 185542 Points
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 Total Score
164867 Points (10%)
120%
1 SD 662 +
min: 194505     avg: 200601     median: 198172 (12%)     max: 211557 Points
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 CPU
65438 Points (18%)
101%
1 SD 662 +
min: 64163     avg: 66339     median: 66230 (18%)     max: 68731 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
min: 157795     avg: 157981     median: 157981 (21%)     max: 158167 Points
2078 Points (0%)
16222 Points (2%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
min: 3056     avg: 3090     median: 3071.5 (16%)     max: 3160 Points
5412 Points (29%)
min: 3090     avg: 3167     median: 3201 (17%)     max: 3211 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
min: 3406     avg: 5546     median: 5299.5 (11%)     max: 8180 Points
12328 Points (26%)
min: 8075     avg: 8811     median: 8076 (17%)     max: 10283 Points
8438 Points (55%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
100%
1 SD 636 +
min: 6040     avg: 6624     median: 6457 (32%)     max: 7618 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
10033 Points (16%)
107%
1 SD 662 +
min: 10366     avg: 11330     median: 10740 (17%)     max: 12884 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
min: 8743     avg: 8745     median: 8744.5 (40%)     max: 8746 Points
65%
1 SD 662 +
min: 3195     avg: 5608     median: 5689.5 (26%)     max: 7554 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random write internal
100%
1 SD 662 +
min: 21.7     avg: 22.3     median: 22.3 (16%)     max: 22.9 MB/s
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq write internal
100%
1 SD 662 +
min: 111.1     avg: 112.5     median: 112.5 (3%)     max: 113.8 MB/s
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random read internal
100%
1 SD 662 +
min: 15.3     avg: 15.5     median: 15.5 (19%)     max: 15.6 MB/s
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq read internal
100%
1 SD 662 +
min: 403     avg: 414.5     median: 414.5 (12%)     max: 426 MB/s
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
100%
1 SD 662 +
328 Points (13%)
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 0     avg: 4     median: 4 (2%)     max: 8.02 Watt
100%
1 SD 662 +
min: 3.34     avg: 3.6     median: 3.6 (2%)     max: 3.83 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
100%
1 SD 662 +
min: 1.32     avg: 1.6     median: 1.6 (2%)     max: 1.953 Watt

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 → 100% n=14

Average Benchmarks UNISOC Tangula T700 → 130% n=14

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 → 107% n=14

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.27
log 15. 23:27:47

#0 checking url part for id 9956 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 13247 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 12771 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 13 Jun 2024 05:33:43 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.056s ... 0.057s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.057s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 9956 +0.004s ... 0.061s

#8 got single benchmarks 9956 +0.029s ... 0.09s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 13247 +0.016s ... 0.106s

#10 got single benchmarks 13247 +0.01s ... 0.116s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 12771 +0.013s ... 0.129s

#12 got single benchmarks 12771 +0.04s ... 0.169s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.169s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.291s ... 0.46s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.46s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)