Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 vs AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS vs AMD Ryzen 9 8945H

AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360

► remove from comparison AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360

The Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 is a relatively powerful Strix Point family processor that debuted in October 2024. The hybrid architecture APU has 8 CPU cores onboard (a mix of three Zen 5 and five Zen 5c cores) running at 2.0 to 5.0 GHz, along with the 12 CU RDNA 3.5 Radeon 880M graphics adapter and the 50 TOPS XDNA 2 neural engine. The AMD Secure Processor (which in a nutshell is an on-package ARM co-processor) is onboard as well as are a few other higher-end features such as AMD-Vi. Other key features include PCIe 4, USB 4 and up to LPDDR5x-8000 RAM support, including ECC RAM.

Architecture and Features

Strix Point family APUs are powered by Zen 5 and Zen 5c microarchitecture cores found in two separate clusters, the latter being a slightly slower, smaller and more energy-efficient version of the former. One of the differences between Zen 5 and Zen 5c is cache size; Zen 5 cores have larger caches to work with.

Either way, mobile Zen 5 implementation is reportedly (ChipsAndCheese) closer to desktop Zen 4 than to desktop Zen 5 due to differing cache sizes, vast differences in AVX-512 throughput and other factors.

Elsewhere, the Ryzen AI 7 PRO chip supports DDR5-5600 and LPDDR5x-8000 RAM, giving system designers a choice between lower latency and higher throughput respectively. The chip is natively compatible with USB 4 (and therefore Thunderbolt). It has PCIe 4.0 support for a throughput of 1.9 GB/s per lane, just like its 8000 series predecessors did. The integrated XDNA 2 NPU, which is a lot more complex than first-gen XDNA was, delivers up to 50 INT8 TOPS for accelerating various AI workloads.

As is usual for laptop CPUs, the Ryzen 7 AI PRO chip is not user-replaceable as it gets soldered down for good.

Performance

We fully expect this PRO series processor to be 15% to 25% slower than the 10-core Ryzen AI 9 365 chip for Core Ultra 7 155U-like multi-thread benchmark scores. Of course, a lot depends on how high the power targets are which can differ vastly between designs.

Graphics

The Radeon 880M is the direct successor to the 780M. It packs several differences under the hood, such as faster caches; its 12 RDNA 3.5 architecture CUs/WGPs (768 unified shaders) run at up to 2,900 MHz. With well over 30 fps in both Once Human and The First Descendant (1080p - Low), this AMD iGPU is certainly fast enough for a fair bit of casual as well as competitive gaming.

Naturally, the Radeon is capable of driving four SUHD 4320p60 monitors. It can also efficiently encode and decode the most popular video codecs such as AVC, HEVC, VP9 and AV1. The latest addition to that list, the VVC codec, is not supported unlike it is with Intel Lunar Lake chips.

Power consumption

The 360 is supposed to have a low-term TDP power target of 28 W, with laptop makers free to crank it up to up to 54 W. Which they will most likely do to maximize performance.

The 4 nm TSMC process that these CPUs are built with makes for above average, as of late 2024, energy efficiency.

AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS

► remove from comparison Ryzen 7X4X/8X4X CPU

The Ryzen 7 8745HS is a China-only Hawk Point family chip that never received an official launch. Targeted at gaming and productivity laptops but widely used in mini-PCs, too, the 8745HS features 8 cores (16 threads thanks to SMT support) running at up to 4.9 GHz, along with the still fairly capable Radeon 780M iGPU. There is no NPU here.

As an APU meant for use within China, this Ryzen 7 should be fully compliant with the Chinese government-approved cryptography standards.

The only difference between the 8745HS and the 8745H is the slightly lower default wattage of the latter, potentially leading to slightly lower clock speeds.

Performance

We fully expect this Zen 4 architecture processor to be about as fast as the Ryzen 7 7745HX (8 Zen 4 cores, 3.6 GHz to 5.1 GHz) meaning its multi-thread performance is a little better than the Core Ultra 9 185H but a few percentage points behind the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370.

Architecture and Features

Unlike Zen 3, Zen 4 features AVX512 support along with other improvements, like larger caches/registers/buffers across the board. Elsewhere, the 8745HS has 16 MB of L3 cache and a fast RAM controller (up to LPDDR5x-7500 and up to DDR5-5600). There are 20 PCI-Express 4 lanes for connecting devices such as NVMe SSDs (1.97 GB/s per lane) and graphics cards; USB 4 / Thunderbolt support is onboard, too. Please note that the APU isn't overclockable and neither is it user-replaceable. It gets soldered on to the motherboard for good (FP7r2 or FP8 socket interfaces).

Graphics

The Radeon 780M (12 CUs / 768 shaders, up to 2,600 MHz) can drive 4 monitors simultaneously with resolutions as high as SUHD 4320p. It will also have little issue hardware-encoding and hardware-decoding the most widely used video codecs (AV1, AVC, HEVC). As far as gaming is concerned, many titles are still playable at 1080p as of early 2025 albeit with most settings dialed down do Lowest or Low.

Power consumption

This Ryzen 7 series chip has a long-term power limit (default TDP) of 35 W to 54 W, giving system makers a choice between improving battery life and making the system they're designing faster. Either way, an active cooling solution is a must for a laptop or a mini-PC built around this APU.

AMD Ryzen 9 8945H

► remove from comparison AMD R9 8945H

The Ryzen 9 8945H is a rebadged Ryzen 9 7940HS with higher clock speeds on the Ryzen AI NPU. To be more specific, this is a powerful Hawk Point family laptop chip that has eight Zen 4 cores running at 4.0 GHz to 5.2 GHz. All of its cores are SMT-enabled for a total of 16 processing threads.

Compared to the 8945HS, the H seems to be a local variant for China and offers the same specifications.

The Radeon 780M serves as the integrated graphics adapter.

Architecture & Features

Hawk Point family chips are powered by the Zen 4 architecture, much like Phoenix and Dragon Range family chips are. That's not to say there is no difference between the three. With Hawk Point, AMD is betting big on generative AI; these chips are promised to deliver an up to 40% increase in generative AI performance over 7040 series APUs making apps like DaVinci Resolve and Adobe Photoshop even more powerful.

Unlike Zen 3, Zen 4 features AVX512 support and, thanks to a plethora of other improvements including larger caches/registers/buffers across the board, is slated to bring a double-digit IPC improvement over the former.

Elsewhere, the 8945H has 16 MB of L3 cache and support for super-fast RAM (up to LPDDR5x-7500 or DDR5-5600; no ECC support). The processor is compatible with USB 4 and thus with Thunderbolt; PCIe support is limited to the 4.0 spec for a throughput of 1.97 GB/s per lane. 20 lanes are available.

OS support is limited to 64-bit editions of Windows 11 and Windows 10 and of course to Linux. Note that the chip isn't overclockable and neither is it user-replaceable as it gets soldered down for good (FP7, FP7r2, FP8 socket interfaces).

Performance

The 8945H is an R9 7940HS in disguise, so it's realistic to expect the chip to be just slightly faster than the Core i9-12900HK and also the Ryzen 7 7840HS, as far as multi-thread performance is concerned.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of your system is.

Graphics

The Radeon 780M has 12 CUs (768 shaders) running at up to 2,800 MHz. This is a very fast iGPU, as of late 2023. It will let you use up to 4 monitors with resolutions as high as SUHD 4320p, and it is also capable of HW-encoding and HW-decoding the most widely used video codecs including AVC, HEVC and AV1. More importantly, it is fast enough for proper 1080p gaming as long as one is fine with low to medium detail settings.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are, how competent the cooling solution of the system is, how fast the RAM of the system is (there is no dedicated VRAM here).

Power consumption

This Ryzen 9 series chip has a long-term power limit (default TDP) of 35 W to 54 W, giving laptop makers a choice between longer battery life and higher performance. Either way, an active cooling solution is a must for a system powered by this chip.

The 8945H is built with TSMC's 4 nm process for high, as of late 2023, energy efficiency.

ModelAMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360AMD Ryzen 7 8745HSAMD Ryzen 9 8945H
CodenameStrix Point (Zen 5)Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4)Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4)
SeriesAMD Strix Halo/Point (Zen 5/5c, Ryzen AI 300)AMD Hawk Point (Zen 4/4c)AMD Hawk Point (Zen 4/4c)
Series: Hawk Point (Zen 4/4c) Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4)
AMD Ryzen AI 9 3652 - 5 GHz10 / 20 cores
AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 « 2 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen Z2 Extreme2 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 H 2704 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 2704 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 8945H4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 2603.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 H 2603.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS « 3.8 - 4.9 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 2404.3 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS4.3 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS3.5 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 H 2704 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 2704 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 8945H « 4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 2603.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 H 2603.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS3.8 - 4.9 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 2404.3 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS4.3 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS3.5 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
Clock2000 - 5000 MHz3800 - 4900 MHz4000 - 5200 MHz
L2 Cache8 MB8 MB8 MB
L3 Cache16 MB16 MB16 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 16
3 x 5.0 GHz AMD Zen 5
5 x 3.3 GHz AMD Zen 5c
8 / 16
8 x 4.9 GHz AMD Zen 4
8 / 16
8 x 5.2 GHz AMD Zen 4
TDP28 Watt35 Watt45 Watt
TDP Turbo PL254 Watt
Technology4 nm4 nm4 nm
SocketFP8FP7r2/FP8FP7/FP7r2/FP8
FeaturesDDR5-5600/LPDDR5x-8000 RAM, PCIe 4, USB 4, XDNA 2 NPU (50 TOPS), Secure Processor, SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4ADDR5-5600/LPDDR5x-7500 RAM, PCIe 4, USB 4, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4ADDR5-5600/LPDDR5x-7500 RAM, PCIe 4, Ryzen AI, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
iGPUAMD Radeon 880M ( - 2900 MHz)AMD Radeon 780M ( - 2600 MHz)AMD Radeon 780M ( - 2800 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comwww.amd.comwww.amd.com
Die Size178 mm2178 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
L1 Cache512 KB

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360
38.8 pt (65%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R7 8745HS
38.3 pt (64%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R9 8945H
40.4 pt (67%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
108.5 Points (61%)
min: 96     avg: 98.5     median: 98.5 (55%)     max: 101 Points
103.3 Points (58%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
708 Points (13%)
min: 696     avg: 783     median: 782.5 (15%)     max: 869 Points
960 Points (18%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
13794 Points (13%)
min: 13928     avg: 15082     median: 15082 (14%)     max: 16236 Points
min: 17423     avg: 17604     median: 17604 (16%)     max: 17785 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
1958 Points (82%)
min: 1598     avg: 1650     median: 1649.5 (69%)     max: 1701 Points
min: 1812     avg: 1813     median: 1813 (76%)     max: 1814 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
766 Points (83%)
min: 623     avg: 641     median: 640.5 (70%)     max: 658 Points
min: 638     avg: 654     median: 654 (71%)     max: 670 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
5398 Points (13%)
min: 5546     avg: 5949     median: 5948.5 (15%)     max: 6351 Points
min: 6859     avg: 6908     median: 6907.5 (17%)     max: 6956 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
2023 Points (13%)
min: 2120     avg: 2349     median: 2349 (15%)     max: 2578 Points
min: 2605     avg: 2734     median: 2777 (18%)     max: 2819 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
271 Points (75%)
min: 254     avg: 258.5     median: 258.5 (72%)     max: 263 Points
min: 283     avg: 283.5     median: 283.5 (79%)     max: 284 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
25.5 Points (33%)
min: 26.63     avg: 28.6     median: 28.6 (37%)     max: 30.54 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
3.5 Points (83%)
min: 3.01     avg: 3.1     median: 3.1 (74%)     max: 3.18 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
8410 Points (51%)
min: 6919     avg: 7109     median: 7109 (43%)     max: 7299 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
44438 Points (32%)
min: 42597     avg: 44583     median: 44583 (32%)     max: 46569 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
76704 Points (49%)
min: 73346     avg: 80094     median: 80094 (51%)     max: 86842 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
15443 Points (19%)
min: 13252     avg: 13560     median: 13559.5 (17%)     max: 13867 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
287.9 s (3%)
min: 70.237     avg: 78.5     median: 78.5 (1%)     max: 86.762 s
64 s (1%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
6.6 s (1%)
min: 2.895     avg: 3     median: 3 (1%)     max: 3.168 s
2.6 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
4389 Points (7%)
min: 6655     avg: 6744     median: 6743.5 (11%)     max: 6832 Points
7339 Points (12%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
52491 MIPS (30%)
min: 61021     avg: 62467     median: 62466.5 (36%)     max: 63912 MIPS
min: 72851     avg: 73037     median: 73036.5 (42%)     max: 73222 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
5417 MIPS (64%)
min: 6058     avg: 6196     median: 6196 (73%)     max: 6334 MIPS
min: 6615     avg: 6640     median: 6639.5 (78%)     max: 6664 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
123.3 fps (41%)
min: 116.3     avg: 132     median: 132 (44%)     max: 147.6 fps
158.9 fps (53%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
296.9 fps (68%)
min: 253.5     avg: 259.5     median: 259.5 (60%)     max: 265.5 fps
284.5 fps (66%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
17.2 fps (30%)
min: 16.3     avg: 17.4     median: 17.4 (30%)     max: 18.4 fps
min: 21.9     avg: 22.2     median: 22.2 (39%)     max: 22.4 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1.1 GB/s (32%)
min: 1.2     avg: 1.3     median: 1.3 (37%)     max: 1.3 GB/s
1.3 GB/s (38%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
1.9 GB/s (33%)
min: 1.8     avg: 1.9     median: 1.9 (33%)     max: 2 GB/s
2 GB/s (34%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
10.7 GB/s (28%)
min: 11     avg: 12     median: 12 (31%)     max: 12.9 GB/s
15.7 GB/s (41%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
388 Seconds (5%)
min: 308     avg: 360     median: 360 (5%)     max: 412 Seconds
min: 286     avg: 289.5     median: 289.5 (4%)     max: 293 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
243 Seconds (2%)
min: 197     avg: 223     median: 223 (2%)     max: 249 Seconds
min: 178     avg: 180     median: 180 (1%)     max: 182 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.5 sec (10%)
min: 0.4716     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (10%)     max: 0.4824 sec
min: 0.4298     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (9%)     max: 0.4346 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 12566     avg: 13889     median: 14260 (30%)     max: 14842 Points
15945 Points (34%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
8.4 s (2%)
min: 7.327     avg: 7.5     median: 7.5 (2%)     max: 7.767 s
6.8 s (1%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
18.4 s (1%)
min: 18.261     avg: 18.9     median: 18.9 (1%)     max: 19.501 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
424.1 s (2%)
724 s (3%)
621 s (3%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 60822     avg: 75015     median: 81786 (63%)     max: 82438 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
15769 Points (39%)
min: 18094     avg: 18883     median: 18786 (46%)     max: 19770 Points
min: 20449     avg: 22111     median: 22111 (54%)     max: 23773 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 75153     avg: 80190     median: 80377 (65%)     max: 85041 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 74475     avg: 79731     median: 80119 (65%)     max: 84598 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 82213     avg: 83020     median: 83423 (67%)     max: 83423 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 17585     avg: 19129     median: 19399 (49%)     max: 20403 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
21341 Points (38%)
min: 22958     avg: 25619     median: 25815 (46%)     max: 28084 Points
min: 27032     avg: 27721     median: 27721 (49%)     max: 28410 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
8042 Points (34%)
min: 8644     avg: 9841     median: 9408 (40%)     max: 11471 Points
min: 11800     avg: 11812     median: 11811.5 (50%)     max: 11823 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core
2699 Points (67%)
min: 2439     avg: 2504     median: 2522 (63%)     max: 2550 Points
min: 2692     avg: 2702     median: 2701.5 (67%)     max: 2711 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core
12344 Points (48%)
min: 9801     avg: 10477     median: 9956 (39%)     max: 11675 Points
min: 12638     avg: 12650     median: 12650 (49%)     max: 12662 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
3105 Points (99%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
21003 Points (86%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
1995 Points (78%)
min: 1802     avg: 1847     median: 1865 (73%)     max: 1875 Points
min: 1991     avg: 1993     median: 1993 (78%)     max: 1995 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
10661 Points (19%)
min: 9645     avg: 10037     median: 9864 (18%)     max: 10601 Points
min: 11949     avg: 11989     median: 11988.5 (21%)     max: 12028 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1914 Points (8%)
min: 1733     avg: 1769     median: 1761 (8%)     max: 1813 Points
1927 Points (8%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
10575 Points (33%)
min: 9697     avg: 10014     median: 9815 (31%)     max: 10531 Points
11903 Points (38%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
8042 Points (80%)
min: 7336     avg: 7475     median: 7430 (74%)     max: 7659 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
40993 Points (41%)
min: 40481     avg: 41166     median: 40493 (40%)     max: 42524 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
454 ms (1%)
min: 537     avg: 563     median: 563 (1%)     max: 589 ms
505 ms (1%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
96399 Points (71%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
254 Points (70%)
min: 233     avg: 242     median: 242 (66%)     max: 251 Points
263 Points (72%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
300 Points (54%)
min: 282     avg: 286     median: 286 (51%)     max: 290 Points
308 Points (55%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
1676 Points (63%)
min: 1599     avg: 1619     median: 1618.5 (61%)     max: 1638 Points
1800 Points (67%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
45.2 Watt (8%)
min: 50.9     avg: 71.7     median: 71.7 (12%)     max: 92.5 Watt
107.5 Watt (19%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 50.5     avg: 76     median: 76 (14%)     max: 101.4 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
5.7 Watt (4%)
min: 7.44     avg: 8     median: 8 (5%)     max: 8.46 Watt
19.8 Watt (13%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
4.7 Watt (5%)
11.7 Watt (13%)
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
min: 25.4     avg: 33.7     median: 33.7 (25%)     max: 42 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 → 100% n=37

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS → 112% n=37

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 9 8945H → 129% n=37

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.33
log 19. 22:02:25

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 18004 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 19649 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 17942 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1755633745s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 19 Aug 2025 05:19:27 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.008s ... 0.009s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.009s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 18004 +0.004s ... 0.012s

#9 got single benchmarks 18004 +0.005s ... 0.017s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 19649 +0.003s ... 0.02s

#11 got single benchmarks 19649 +0.007s ... 0.027s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 17942 +0.001s ... 0.028s

#13 got single benchmarks 17942 +0s ... 0.029s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.029s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.062s ... 0.091s

#16 return log +0s ... 0.091s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)