Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 5 2600 vs AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U

AMD Ryzen 5 2600

► remove from comparison AMD R5 2600

The AMD Ryzen 5 2600 is a six-core desktop processor that can handle twelve threads simultaneously thanks to Simultaneous Multithreading (SMT). This technology is equivalent to Intel's Hyper-Threading. Launched in April 2018, the Ryzen 5 2600 is the second fastest Ryzen 5 processor and is much more economical than its flagship sibling. The Ryzen 5 2600 has a 65 W TDP, which is nearly 40% more efficient than the 95 W TDP Ryzen 5 2600 X. This energy efficiency comes at a cost to performance though.

The Ryzen 5 2600 has a base clock speed of 3.4 GHz, which can be boosted by Extended Frequency Range (XFR) up to 3.9 GHz. The power gain is still high in multi-threaded applications, although this is some way off the Ryzen 5 2600X. The Ryzen 5 2600 benefits from AMD's new Zen+ architecture, with a greater number of instructions per cycle (IPC) and higher clock speeds than last year's Zen chips. The Ryzen 5 2600's six cores are divided into two clusters that are connected by Infinity Fabric, a subset of HyperTransport. Each cluster has its own L3 cache.

The Ryzen 5 2600 has good performance in games. Moreover, the Ryzen 5 2600 has a higher base clock than the Ryzen 7 2700. Seeing as many games currently lack multi-core support, this means that the Ryzen 5 2600 performs better than its technically superior sibling.

Detailed information, benchmarks and values can be found in our review of the Ryzen 5 2600.

AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U

► remove from comparison AMD R5 PRO 2500U

The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U is a mobile APU for thin and light business laptops that was announced in January 2017. Compared to the similar consumer Ryzen 5 2500U, the PRO 2500U offers additional security features and longer part availability / warranty.

It includes four Zen cores clocked at 2 to 3.6 GHz and offers 4 MB L3-Cache. The integrated graphics card is called Radeon RX Vega 8 and offers 8 CUs (512 Shaders) clocked at up to 1100 MHz. The TDP is configurable between 12 and 25 Watt (15 Watt nominal). More information on Raven Ridge can be found in our launch article.

ModelAMD Ryzen 5 2600AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U
SeriesAMD Ryzen 5AMD Raven Ridge (Ryzen 2000 APU)
CodenamePinnacle Riege (Zen+)Zen
Clock3400 - 3900 MHz2000 - 3600 MHz
L2 Cache3 MB2 MB
L3 Cache16 MB4 MB
Cores / Threads6 / 124 / 8
TDP65 Watt15 Watt
Transistors4940 Million4500 Million
Technology12 nm14 nm
Die Size213 mm2
max. Temp.95 °C105 °C
SocketAM4 (LGA1331)AM4
FeaturesDDR4-2933 RAM, PCIe 3, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comwww.amd.com
Series: Raven Ridge (Ryzen 2000 APU) Zen
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G compare3.6 - 3.9 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 2700U compare2.2 - 3.8 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U compare2.2 - 3.8 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G compare3.5 - 3.7 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 2600H compare3.2 - 3.6 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U compare2 - 3.6 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U « 2 - 3.6 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen Embedded V1605B compare2 - 3.6 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 2300U compare2 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U compare2 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen Embedded R1606G compare2.6 - 3.5 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 2200U compare2.5 - 3.4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2200U compare2.5 - 3.4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen Embedded R1505G compare2.4 - 3.3 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Athlon 300U compare2.4 - 3.3 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
L1 Cache384 KB
iGPUAMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) ( - 1100 MHz)
Architecturex86

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R5 2600
29.7 pt (41%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
100%
1 R5 2600 +
380 Points (42%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
100%
1 R5 2600 +
2793 Points (7%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 1245     avg: 1254     median: 1248 (8%)     max: 1270 Points
min: 541     avg: 561     median: 553 (3%)     max: 589 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 155.9     avg: 157.4     median: 157.3 (47%)     max: 159 Points
min: 132     avg: 135     median: 134 (40%)     max: 139 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
13.7 Points (18%)
min: 6.04     avg: 6.3     median: 6.1 (8%)     max: 6.74 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
1.8 Points (44%)
min: 1.5     avg: 1.5     median: 1.6 (39%)     max: 1.58 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
4726 Points (29%)
min: 4204     avg: 4312     median: 4349 (26%)     max: 4382 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
28173 Points (20%)
min: 12294     avg: 14380     median: 14336 (10%)     max: 16509 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
45033 Points (31%)
min: 20209     avg: 20660     median: 20659.5 (14%)     max: 21110 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
8024 Points (10%)
min: 6921     avg: 7052     median: 7052 (9%)     max: 7183 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
140.9 s (2%)
min: 386.4     avg: 386.6     median: 386.6 (5%)     max: 386.7 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
5.5 s (1%)
min: 12.25     avg: 12.4     median: 12.4 (2%)     max: 12.47 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
4517 Points (7%)
min: 2677     avg: 2700     median: 2699.5 (4%)     max: 2722 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
30898 MIPS (18%)
2794 MIPS (2%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
4020 MIPS (48%)
4102 MIPS (49%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
75 fps (26%)
min: 32.42     avg: 33.9     median: 33.9 (12%)     max: 35.4 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
205.3 fps (47%)
min: 68.4     avg: 97.7     median: 97.7 (23%)     max: 127 fps
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 7.79     avg: 7.8     median: 7.8 (14%)     max: 7.82 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.7 GB/s (0%)
min: 0.376     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (0%)     max: 0.409 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
1 GB/s (17%)
min: 0.54     avg: 0.6     median: 0.6 (10%)     max: 0.662 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
7.5 GB/s (20%)
min: 3.3     avg: 3.4     median: 3.4 (9%)     max: 3.5 GB/s
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 374.2     avg: 375     median: 375 (3%)     max: 375.7 Seconds
min: 900     avg: 1007     median: 1007 (7%)     max: 1114 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
100%
1 R5 2600 +
0.7 sec (14%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
9290 Points (20%)
min: 3945     avg: 5161     median: 5635 (12%)     max: 5904 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
11.2 s (2%)
min: 12.56     avg: 12.7     median: 12.7 (3%)     max: 12.84 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
24.3 s (1%)
min: 28.85     avg: 29.4     median: 29.3 (1%)     max: 29.84 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
615 s (3%)
min: 714     avg: 729     median: 728.5 (3%)     max: 743 s
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 R5 2600 +
43794 Points (38%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
12405 Points (34%)
min: 5540     avg: 5874     median: 5673 (15%)     max: 6608 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
69692 Points (57%)
min: 34587     avg: 35370     median: 35245 (29%)     max: 36279 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
69478 Points (56%)
min: 30318     avg: 33819     median: 35419 (29%)     max: 35721 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
70522 Points (59%)
min: 28138     avg: 29521     median: 29789 (25%)     max: 30637 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
11219 Points (28%)
min: 3259     avg: 5254     median: 5586.5 (14%)     max: 6584 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
17063 Points (30%)
min: 6370     avg: 8014     median: 8405 (15%)     max: 8877 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
6265 Points (26%)
min: 1922     avg: 2225     median: 2322 (10%)     max: 2432 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1014     avg: 1119     median: 1118.5 (47%)     max: 1223 Points
887 Points (37%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 5767     avg: 6070     median: 6069.5 (11%)     max: 6372 Points
3135 Points (6%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 R5 2600 +
1020 Points (4%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 R5 2600 +
5885 Points (19%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 4631     avg: 5109     median: 5109 (51%)     max: 5587 Points
min: 3353     avg: 3492     median: 3492 (35%)     max: 3631 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 20633     avg: 23018     median: 23018 (26%)     max: 25403 Points
min: 9096     avg: 9629     median: 9343 (10%)     max: 10447 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 3430     avg: 3480     median: 3480 (47%)     max: 3530 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 9398     avg: 9760     median: 9759.5 (24%)     max: 10121 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
min: 12111     avg: 12422     median: 12421.5 (22%)     max: 12732 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
min: 3218     avg: 3326     median: 3326 (65%)     max: 3434 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 12561     avg: 12956     median: 12956 (20%)     max: 13351 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 3486     avg: 3600     median: 3600 (54%)     max: 3714 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
min: 5889     avg: 6820     median: 6820 (55%)     max: 7751 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
min: 5363     avg: 6035     median: 6034.5 (55%)     max: 6706 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
min: 16158     avg: 16310     median: 16310 (32%)     max: 16462 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
min: 10070     avg: 10169     median: 10168.5 (20%)     max: 10267 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
min: 10841     avg: 11156     median: 11156 (29%)     max: 11471 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
951 ms (1%)
min: 1376     avg: 1488     median: 1429 (2%)     max: 1659 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
138.1 ms (2%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 23903     avg: 24308     median: 24308 (22%)     max: 24713 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
100%
1 R5 2600 +
179 Points (37%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 R5 2600 +
157.5 Watt (27%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 R5 2600 +
149.5 Watt (27%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
100%
1 R5 2600 +
8.5 Points per Watt (6%)

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 5 2600 → 100% n=36

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U → 64% n=36

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 08. 19:42:12

#0 checking url part for id 10032 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 10130 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 07 May 2024 05:39:01 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.024s ... 0.025s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.025s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 10032 +0.019s ... 0.044s

#7 got single benchmarks 10032 +0.014s ... 0.058s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 10130 +0.002s ... 0.06s

#9 got single benchmarks 10130 +0.015s ... 0.076s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.076s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.346s ... 0.422s

#12 return log +0.025s ... 0.447s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)