Notebookcheck Logo

Nvidia RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU vs Apple M2 10-Core GPU vs Apple M2 Pro 16-Core GPU

Nvidia RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU

► remove from comparison NVIDIA Nvidia RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU

The Nvidia RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU, not to be confused with the A1000, P1000 or T1000, is a lower-end professional graphics card for use in laptops that sports 2,560 CUDA cores and 6 GB of GDDR6 VRAM. It would be fair to say that this is a GeForce RTX 4050 (Laptop) in disguise; consequently, both are powered by the AD107 chip and are fast enough to handle most games at 1080p with quality set to High. The product was launched in February 2024; it leverages TSMC's 5 nm process and the Ada Lovelace architecture. The Nvidia-recommended TGP range for the card is very wide at 35 W to 140 W leading to bizarre performance differences between different systems powered by what is supposed to be the same product.

Quadro series graphics cards ship with much different BIOS and drivers than GeForce cards and are targeted at professional users rather than gamers. Commercial product design, large-scale calculations, simulation, data mining, 24 x 7 operation, certified drivers - if any of this sounds familiar, then a Quadro card will make you happy.

Architecture and Features

Ada Lovelace brings a range of improvements over older graphics cards utilizing the outgoing Ampere architecture. It's not just a better manufacturing process and a higher number of CUDA cores that we have here; under-the-hood refinements are plentiful, including an immensely larger L2 cache, an optimized ray tracing routine (a different way to determine what is transparent and what isn't is used), and other changes. Naturally, these graphics cards can both encode and decode some of the most widely used video codecs, AVC, HEVC and AV1 included; they also support a host of proprietary Nvidia technologies, including Optimus and DLSS 3, and they can certainly be used for various AI applications.

The RTX 1000 Ada features 20 RT cores of the 3rd generation, 80 Tensor cores of the 4th generation and 2,560 CUDA cores. Increase those numbers by 20%, and you get the RTX 2000 Ada - as long as we pay no attention to clock speed differences, of course. Unlike costlier Ada Generation professional laptop graphics cards, the RTX 1000 comes with just 6 GB of non-ECC VRAM; the lack of error correction makes this card less suitable for super-important tasks and round-the-clock operation. The VRAM is just 96-bit wide, delivering a not-so-impressive bandwidth of ~192 GB/s.

The RTX 1000 Ada Generation makes use of the PCI-Express 4 protocol, just like Ampere-based cards did. 8K SUHD monitors are supported, however, DP 1.4a video outputs may prove to be a bottleneck down the line.

Performance

While we are yet to test a single laptop powered by an RTX 1000 Ada as of late February, we have plenty of performance data for the RTX 4050 Laptop. Based on that, we expect a run-of-the-mill RTX 2000 Ada to deliver:

  • a Blender 3.3 Classroom CUDA score of around 54 seconds
  • a 3DMark 11 GPU score of around 27,000 points
  • around 50 fps in GTA V (1440p - Highest settings possible, 16x AF, 4x MSAA, FXAA)
  • upwards of 30 fps in Cyberpunk 2077 (1440p - High settings, Ultra RT, "Quality" DLSS)

Nvidia's marketing materials mention "up to 12.1 TFLOPS" of performance, a downgrade compared to 14.5 TFLOPS delivered by the RTX 2000 Ada.

Your mileage may vary depending on how competent the cooling solution of your laptop is and how high the TGP power target of the RTX 1000 Ada is.

Power consumption

Nvidia no longer divides its laptop graphics cards into Max-Q and non-max-Q models. Instead, laptop makers are free to set the TGP according to their needs, and the range can sometimes be shockingly wide. This is exactly the case with the RTX 1000, as the lowest value recommended for it sits at just 35 W while the highest is 300% higher at 140 W (this most likely includes Dynamic Boost). The slowest system built around an RTX 1000 Ada can easily be half as fast as the fastest one.

Last but not the least, the improved 5 nm process (TSMC 4N) the RTX 1000 is built with makes for decent energy efficiency, as of early 2024.

Apple M2 10-Core GPU

► remove from comparison Apple M2 10-Core GPU

The Apple M2 GPU is an integrated graphics card offering 10 cores designed by Apple and integrated in the Apple M2 SoC. It uses the unified memory architecture of the M2 SoC (up to 24 GB LPDDR5-6400 with 100 GB/s bandwidth) and should offer 160 execution units.

According to Apple it offers a 25% higher performance at slightly higher power consumption. The theoretical performance is rated at 3.6 Teraflops and therefore 1 TFLOP higher than the M1 8-core GPU. In our benchmarks, the GPU was able to top the M1 with up to 40%, but still stays behind the 14-core GPU in the M1 Pro. Compared to other iGPUs from AMD and Intel, the M2 benefits greatly from the unified memory architecture and the high bandwidth.

The M2 chip is manufactured in the second generation 5nm process at TSMC (most likely N5P). The power consumption is around 13.5 Watt (in our tests under load of the MBP13) and up to 15W according to Apple.

Apple M2 Pro 16-Core GPU

► remove from comparison Apple M2 Pro 16-Core GPU

The Apple M2 Pro 16-Core-GPU is an integrated graphics card by Apple offering all 16 of the 19 cores in the M2 Pro 10-Core Chip.

The graphics card has no dedicated graphics memory but can use the fast LPDDR5-6400 unified memory with a 256 bit bus (up to 200 GBit/s).

According to Apple, the performance of the 19-core-GPU should be 30% higher than the old 16-core-GPU in the M1 Pro. Therefore, the cut down 16-core version should still beat the old full-featured 16-core M1 Pro slightly and the old 14-core more clearly.

The GPU is intended to use Apple Metal 2 API and could still be based on the older PowerVR architectures (last used in the Apple A10). A new feature in the MacBook Pro 14 of 2023 is the support for HDMI 2.1 and 8k output.

The Apple M2 Pro is manufactured in the second generation 5nm process at TSMC.

Nvidia RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPUApple M2 10-Core GPUApple M2 Pro 16-Core GPU
Apple M2 Series
NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU 9728 @ 0.93 - 1.68 GHz256 Bit @ 20000 MHz
NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU 7424 192 Bit @ 16000 MHz
NVIDIA RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU 5120 192 Bit @ 16000 MHz
NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU 4608 128 Bit @ 16000 MHz
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU 3072 128 Bit @ 16000 MHz
Nvidia RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU 2560 96 Bit @ 16000 MHz
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU 2048 64 Bit @ 12000 MHz
M2 Max 38-Core GPU 38
M2 Max 30-Core GPU 30
M2 Pro 19-Core GPU 19 @ 0.44 - 1.4 GHz
M2 Pro 16-Core GPU 16
M2 10-Core GPU 10 @ 1.4 GHz
M2 8-Core GPU 8 @ 1.4 GHz
M2 Max 38-Core GPU 38
M2 Max 30-Core GPU 30
M2 Pro 19-Core GPU 19 @ 0.44 - 1.4 GHz
M2 Pro 16-Core GPU 16
M2 10-Core GPU 10 @ 1.4 GHz
M2 8-Core GPU 8 @ 1.4 GHz
CodenameGN21-X2
ArchitectureAda Lovelace
Pipelines2560 - unified10 - unified16 - unified
TMUs80
ROPs32
Raytracing Cores20
Tensor / AI Cores80
CacheL2: 12 MB
Memory Speed16000 effective = 2000 MHz
Memory Bus Width96 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR6LPDDR5-6400LPDDR5-6400
Max. Amount of Memory6 GB
Shared Memorynonono
Memory Bandwidth192 GB/s
APIDirectX 12 Ultimate, Shader 6.7, OpenGL 4.6, OpenCL 3.0, Vulkan 1.3
Power Consumption115 Watt (35 - 115 Watt TGP)15 Watt
technology5 nm5 nm5 nm
PCIe4.0 x16
Displays4 Displays (max.), HDMI 2.1, DisplayPort 1.4a
Notebook Sizelargemedium sized
Date of Announcement27.02.2024 06.06.2022 17.01.2023
Link to Manufacturer Pageimages.nvidia.com
Core Speed1398 (Boost) MHz
PredecessorM1 8-Core GPU
CPU in M2 10-Core GPUGPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Apple M28 x 2424 MHz, 20 W? MHz1398 MHz
CPU in M2 Pro 16-Core GPUGPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Apple M2 Pro 10-Core10 x 2424 MHz? MHz? MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
min: 21302     avg: 24095     median: 24880 (13%)     max: 25317 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 5328     avg: 6623     median: 6846.5 (8%)     max: 6987 Points
11224 Points (13%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom METAL *
min: 205     avg: 221     median: 221 (23%)     max: 237 Seconds
132 Seconds (14%)
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + Apple M2 10-Core GPU
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 128.65     avg: 132.8     median: 131 (8%)     max: 140.5 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + Apple M2 Pro 16-Core GPU
141.9 fps (8%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + Apple M2 10-Core GPU
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
99.5 % (100%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + Apple M2 Pro 16-Core GPU
99.5 % (100%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 35.6     avg: 45.6     median: 48 (20%)     max: 48.6 fps
78.7 fps (32%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 77     avg: 100.4     median: 107.8 (20%)     max: 110 fps
181.1 fps (33%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 241     avg: 281.5     median: 289.3 (21%)     max: 296 fps
493 fps (37%)
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 136     avg: 201.6     median: 220 (25%)     max: 232 fps
389 fps (44%)
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 247     avg: 324     median: 339.5 (7%)     max: 374.6 fps
659 fps (14%)
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 449.5     avg: 520     median: 535 (31%)     max: 557.2 fps
1011 fps (59%)
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Apple M2 10-Core GPU
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 697.9     avg: 876     median: 911.5 (7%)     max: 931.9 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Apple M2 Pro 16-Core GPU
1815 fps (14%)
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
min: 654168     avg: 728087     median: 728086 (91%)     max: 802005 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 GPU OpenCL
min: 27880     avg: 27900     median: 27900 (8%)     max: 27920 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 GPU Metal
min: 45460     avg: 45703     median: 45703 (29%)     max: 45946 Points
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 22.8     avg: 27.8     median: 26.9 (4%)     max: 34.4 Watt
47.8 Watt (7%)
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 Power Consumption *
min: 27.8     avg: 32.5     median: 30.8 (7%)     max: 38.9 Watt
46.6 Watt (10%)
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
16.7 Watt (6%)
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency
1 fps per Watt (100%)
1 fps per Watt (96%)
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 1.116     avg: 1.1     median: 1.1 (92%)     max: 1.207 fps per Watt
0.9 fps per Watt (78%)
Emissions Witcher 3 Fan Noise + Apple M2 10-Core GPU
Emissions - Witcher 3 Fan Noise
34.6 dB(A) (55%)

Average Benchmarks Apple M2 10-Core GPU → 0% n=

Average Benchmarks Apple M2 Pro 16-Core GPU → 0% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Diablo Immortal

Diablo Immortal

2022
ultra Ultra
M2 10-Core GPU:
59.3  fps
Call of Duty Mobile

Call of Duty Mobile

2020
low
M2 10-Core GPU:
118.8  fps
ultra
M2 10-Core GPU:
58.5  fps
Genshin Impact

Genshin Impact

2020
ultra
M2 10-Core GPU:
65  fps
Armajet

Armajet

2020
high
M2 10-Core GPU:
118.4  fps
low 1280x720
M2 10-Core GPU:
53.1 66.8 73 ~ 64 fps
M2 Pro 16-Core GPU:
80.8  fps
med. 1920x1080
M2 10-Core GPU:
34 34.2 36 ~ 35 fps
M2 Pro 16-Core GPU:
52  fps
high 1920x1080
M2 10-Core GPU:
22 23.8 28 ~ 25 fps
M2 Pro 16-Core GPU:
38  fps
ultra 1920x1080
M2 10-Core GPU:
15 16.4 17.6 ~ 16 fps
M2 Pro 16-Core GPU:
28.9  fps
low 1280x720
M2 10-Core GPU:
88.6 89 136 138 ~ 113 fps
M2 Pro 16-Core GPU:
258  fps
med. 1920x1080
M2 10-Core GPU:
39 45.3 46.3 47 ~ 44 fps
M2 Pro 16-Core GPU:
75  fps
high 1920x1080
M2 10-Core GPU:
22 26.3 29 29.5 ~ 27 fps
M2 Pro 16-Core GPU:
48  fps
ultra 1920x1080
M2 10-Core GPU:
15.9 16 21 21.3 ~ 19 fps
M2 Pro 16-Core GPU:
36  fps
QHD 2560x1440
M2 Pro 16-Core GPU:
22  fps
low 1280x720
M2 10-Core GPU:
60 76 102 ~ 79 fps
M2 Pro 16-Core GPU:
159  fps
med. 1920x1080
M2 10-Core GPU:
28 31 39 40 ~ 35 fps
M2 Pro 16-Core GPU:
72  fps
high 1920x1080
M2 10-Core GPU:
25 27 36 36 ~ 31 fps
M2 Pro 16-Core GPU:
65  fps
ultra 1920x1080
M2 10-Core GPU:
21 23 31 32 ~ 27 fps
M2 Pro 16-Core GPU:
57  fps
QHD 2560x1440
M2 10-Core GPU:
20  fps
M2 Pro 16-Core GPU:
36  fps
PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
high
M2 10-Core GPU:
39.8  fps
high 1920x1080
M2 10-Core GPU:
34  fps
M2 Pro 16-Core GPU:
51  fps
ultra 1920x1080
M2 10-Core GPU:
28  fps
M2 Pro 16-Core GPU:
45  fps
GTA V

GTA V

2015
low 1024x768
M2 Pro 16-Core GPU:
76  fps
med. 1366x768
M2 Pro 16-Core GPU:
73  fps
high 1920x1080
M2 Pro 16-Core GPU:
46  fps
Asphalt 8: Airborne

Asphalt 8: Airborne

2013
high
M2 10-Core GPU:
67.7  fps
Asphalt 9: Legends

Asphalt 9: Legends

2013
high
M2 10-Core GPU:
44.2  fps
Apple M2 10-Core GPUlowmed.highultraQHD4K
Diablo Immortal59.3
Call of Duty Mobile118.858.5
Genshin Impact65
Armajet118.4
Borderlands 364352516
Total War: Three Kingdoms113442719
Shadow of the Tomb Raider7935312720
PUBG Mobile39.8
The Witcher 33428
Asphalt 8: Airborne67.7
Asphalt 9: Legends44.2
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps


4

3

2
4
2
4
2
1
1





Apple M2 Pro 16-Core GPUlowmed.highultraQHD4K
Borderlands 380.8523828.9
Total War: Three Kingdoms25875483622
Shadow of the Tomb Raider15972655736
The Witcher 35145
GTA V767346
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps


2
2

1
3

4
1
1
3

1
1




For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.26
log 28. 22:38:52

#0 checking url part for id 12424 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11368 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 11570 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 28 Apr 2024 05:41:30 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.179s ... 0.18s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.18s

#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.18s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 12424 +0.037s ... 0.217s

#9 got single benchmarks 12424 +0s ... 0.217s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 11368 +0.002s ... 0.219s

#11 got single benchmarks 11368 +0.015s ... 0.234s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 11570 +0.001s ... 0.235s

#13 got single benchmarks 11570 +0.007s ... 0.242s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.242s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.089s ... 0.331s

#16 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.331s

#17 Got 73 rows for game benchmarks. +0.019s ... 0.35s

#18 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.35s

#19 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.008s ... 0.357s

#20 benchmarks composed for output. +0.03s ... 0.387s

#21 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.387s

#22 return log +0.002s ... 0.39s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)