Notebookcheck

Notebookcheck's Top 10 Smartphones under 120 Euros

November 2017 update. Here you will find the best smartphones under 120 Euros (~$135) reviewed by Notebookcheck over the last few months. Our list of top models is regularly updated, maintained and commented on and should assist in purchasing decisions.

Working For Notebookcheck

Are you a loyal reader of notebookcheck? Are you a techie who knows how to write? Then join our Team!

Especially wanted: 
German-English-Translator - Details here
Review Editor - 
Details here
News Editor - Details here

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For the original German article, see here.

The flagship smartphones from the established manufacturers always get the most attention. However, not everyone is willing to pay 500 Euros (~$562) or more. Many people are actually looking for suitable smartphones in the inexpensive entry-level segment, and the price is obviously one major factor. There is no doubt that on paper the specifications reveal significant differences compared to the super smartphones, especially in terms of performance, display and picture quality of the integrated cameras. However, this does not mean that you cannot be happy with a smartphone priced at 100 Euros (~$112) if you have moderate expectations. We list the best smartphones with a current street price of less than 120 Euros (~$135) that have been reviewed by Notebookcheck over the last 14 months (if the device is still available).

Top 10 Budget Smartphones as of November 2017

Pos.DateRatingImageModelHeightWeightSizeResolutionOSBest Price
105/201681%Coolpad Porto SCoolpad Porto S
Mediatek MT6735
ARM Mali-T720
1 GB Memory, 8 GB eMMC
7.6 mm125 g5"1280x720Android 5.1 Lollipop
202/201780%Lenovo C2Lenovo C2
Mediatek MT6735
ARM Mali-T720 MP2
1 GB Memory, 8 GB eMMC
8.6 mm139 g5"1280x720Android 6.0 Marshmallow
309/2017
New
80%Lenovo Moto E4Lenovo Moto E4
Mediatek MT6737
ARM Mali-T720 MP2
2 GB Memory, 16 GB eMMC
8.9 mm151 g5"1280x720Android 7.1 Nougat
408/201780%LG K4 2017LG K4 2017
Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909
Qualcomm Adreno 304
1 GB Memory, 8 GB eMMC
8 mm136 g5"854x480Android 6.0 Marshmallow
508/2017
New
80%Lenovo Moto C PlusLenovo Moto C Plus
Mediatek MT6737
ARM Mali-T720 MP2
1 GB Memory, 16 GB eMMC
10 mm162 g5"1280x720Android 7.0 Nougat
611/201679%Huawei Y5 IIHuawei Y5 II
Mediatek MT6735
ARM Mali-T720 MP2
1 GB Memory, 8 GB eMMC
8.9 mm135 g5"1280x720Android 5.1 Lollipop
708/201679%TP-Link Neffos C5TP-Link Neffos C5
Mediatek MT6735
ARM Mali-T720 MP2
2 GB Memory, 16 GB eMMC
8.8 mm141 g5"1280x720Android 5.1 Lollipop
807/201678%Wiko Lenny 3Wiko Lenny 3
Mediatek MT6580M
ARM Mali-400 MP2
1 GB Memory, 16 GB eMMC
9.9 mm177 g5"1280x720Android 6.0 Marshmallow
903/201778%ZTE Blade A510ZTE Blade A510
Mediatek MT6735P
ARM Mali-T720
1 GB Memory, 8 GB eMMC
8,2 mm130 g5"1280x720Android 6.0 Marshmallow
1010/201678%Leagoo M5Leagoo M5
Mediatek MT6580M
ARM Mali-400 MP2
2 GB Memory, 16 GB eMMC
8.7 mm178 g5"1280x720Android 6.0 Marshmallow

Top 10 smartphones from the last 10 months – current reviews are listed first

Editors' Comments

The Moto E4 and the Moto C Plus are two new entries, while the Microsoft Lumia 550 and the Oukitel U7 Plus leave the list.

1st

Coolpad Porto S
Coolpad Porto S

After the Chinese manufacturer Coolpad had a weak start in Germany with its Modena smartphone, the newer products are nothing to sneeze at. The 5.0-inch IPS display of the Coolpad Porto S with smaller HD resolution (1280x720 pixels) offers a good image definition and rich colors. The build quality is good and the camera generates surprisingly good recordings in daylight.

While the internal storage of 8 GB is quite low, the storage capacity can be expanded with a MicroSD card. Unfortunately, it is not possible to move apps there. If you do not need to expand the storage capacity, you can also use the second SIM slot for another SIM card. In view of its low price, the Porto S gives a good smartphone for your money.

Pricecompare

Porto S

2nd

Lenovo C2
Lenovo C2

Lenovo's C2 comes with the common configuration for an entry-level smartphone. With its older quad-core SoC, 1 GB of working memory, and 8 GB of flash memory, the smartphone base is solid but the buyer should not expect any quantum leaps from it. The bright IPS screen has the low HD resolution (1280x720 pixels). Fortunately, two SIM slots plus an additional micro-SD slot are present. The battery is also replaceable.

Considering its low price, the C2 does not exhibit any real weaknesses. Only the installed microphones could be a bit better. Unfortunately, they only presented a mixed call quality.

Pricecompare

C2

3rd

Motorola Moto E (4th generation, 2017)
Motorola Moto E (4th generation, 2017)

The Motorola Moto E4 features a 5-inch touchscreen, which creates decent images with the small HD resolution. The memory equipment is comparatively good with 2 GB RAM and 16 GB internal storage, which can be expanded via microSD card. You can also replace the battery and there is a fingerprint scanner. The other specs are average for this class, so the performance is not very high. The use of pure Android 7.1 Nougat is therefore a good thing for the user. The camera performance is not great, either.

Pricecompare

4th

LG K4 Dual (2017)
LG K4 Dual (2017)

The LG K4 Dual (2017) currently is the cheapest smartphone in the line-up of the Koreans. It wants to attract customers with a compact build, fully-fledged dual SIM, and a replaceable battery. The low storage capacity can be expanded with a microSD card and the display is much better than the predecessors. Only its low resolution is slightly annoying.

The smartphone performed well in geolocation. The battery runtimes are also really good. However, it lacks NFC and a fingerprint sensor, which is not surprising in view of the low RRP.

Pricecompare

5th

Motorola Moto C Plus
Motorola Moto C Plus

The Moto C is sitting one step underneath the Moto E, but the specs are quite similar. You get a 5-inch 720p display, the same SoC and 16 GB storage, but only 1 GB RAM and no fingerprint scanner. The battery is integrated, but has a generous capacity of 4000 mAh, which manages long battery runtimes.

The cameras of the Motorola Moto C Plus are on the typically poor level, but are sufficient in good lighting conditions.

Pricecompare

Moto C Plus

6th

Huawei Y5 II
Huawei Y5 II

The Huawei Y5 II belongs to Huawei's classical entry-level series. The compact smartphone is available in five different colors and has a robust design. Memory and SoC are typical for its class. The 5.0-inch IPS display features a low HD resolution (720p).

We liked that it comes with two SIM slots as well as an additional MicroSD slot. The battery runtimes are good. The smartphone provides a bright display, which, however, could have a higher contrast. Unfortunately, Android 5.1 Lollipop is already obsolete and the manufacturer did not promise an update.

Pricecompare

Y5 II

7th

TP-Link Neffos C5
TP-Link Neffos C5

The Chinese network components supplier TP-Link has entered the smartphone market with a successful product. The entry-level Neffos C5 brings great specifications on paper and wants to attract customers with higher memory capacities and a good processor normally found in pricier smartphones. In addition, it supports dual SIM and comes with an additional micro-SD slot.

However, you have to accept cutbacks, especially in the realms of case quality and cameras. The performance of the SoC remains behind expectations but is still good compared to similarly priced competitors. The C5 is a real bargain as it costs just under 100 Euros (~$112).

Pricecompare

Neffos C5

8th

Wiko Lenny 3
Wiko Lenny 3

The hardware of the Wiko Lenny 3 is quite typical for an entry-level smartphone. It comes with a 5.0-inch HD display, a weak SoC, 1 GB of RAM, but a relatively big 15 GB flash memory. A metal back panel gives the device, which is available in bright colors, a valuable look.

We liked the dual-SIM functionality, the precise GPS module and especially the good battery runtimes. Those who like playing more demanding games than Candy Crush etc. should not buy the Lenny 3, since its GPU is too weak. In addition, the smartphone does not support LTE.

Pricecompare

Lenny 3

9th

ZTE Blade A510
ZTE Blade A510

The Chinese manufacturer ZTE presented a rock-solid entry-level smartphone with its ZTE Blade A510 late 2016. However, it does not stand out from the masses of competitors with any special features.

We primarily liked the bright IPS screen. Although its calibration is a bit too cool, it is still impressive outdoors. Furthermore, the Blade A510 is one of the few devices in its category that has a convincing call quality.

Pricecompare

Blade A510

10th

Leagoo M5
Leagoo M5

The Leagoo M5 could be the right phone for those who do not mind importing products from the Far East. As it is also currently offered by third-party dealers at Amazon, buyers get additional security. The smartphone is especially resistant against drops and display damage. Its 5.0-inch HD display conforms to the class level. The SoC is relatively weak, but the rest of the components are relatively rich with 2 GB of RAM and 16 GB of flash memory. In addition, the fingerprint reader is a small highlight.

The brightness of the panel could be slightly higher. In addition, the M5 is slightly bulky and relatively heavy. Moreover, it does not support LTE. We recommend reading our article CE marking and customs if you are considering importing it, in order to avoid nasty surprises.

Pricecompare

M5

Size Comparison

Measurement Results

Coolpad Porto S
Mali-T720, MT6735, 8 GB eMMC Flash
Lenovo C2
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6735, 8 GB eMMC Flash
Lenovo Moto E4
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737, 16 GB eMMC Flash
LG K4 2017
Adreno 304, 210 MSM8909, 8 GB eMMC Flash
Lenovo Moto C Plus
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Huawei Y5 II
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6735, 8 GB eMMC Flash
TP-Link Neffos C5
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6735, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Wiko Lenny 3
Mali-400 MP2, MT6580M, 16 GB eMMC Flash
ZTE Blade A510
Mali-T720, MT6735P, 8 GB eMMC Flash
Leagoo M5
Mali-400 MP2, MT6580M, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Response Times
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
42 (18, 24)
48 (26, 22)
24 (13, 11)
46 (22.8, 23.2)
36 (17, 19)
28 (11, 17)
77 (31, 46)
54 (32, 22)
636 (476, 160)
33 (14, 19)
Response Time Black / White *
46 (26, 20)
48 (22, 26)
32 (15, 17)
15.6 (13.2, 12.4)
34 (15, 19)
24 (6, 18)
34 (16, 18)
33 (18, 15)
48 (18, 30)
28 (11, 17)
PWM Frequency
Screen
Brightness
403
449
474
372
472
443
491
343
524
387
Brightness Distribution
92
92
87
92
90
90
89
85
94
92
Black Level *
0.5
0.35
0.3
0.35
0.23
0.84
0.58
0.47
0.62
0.53
Contrast
814
1309
1627
1100
2139
554
876
796
852
757
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
7.9
6.5
5.4
6.2
5.4
7.8
7
6
5.2
9.7
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
8.9
7.7
5.5
7
3.7
8.4
6.1
6.7
5.7
13.3
Gamma
2.46 98%
2.15 112%
2.27 106%
2.08 115%
2.05 117%
2.07 116%
2.15 112%
2.19 110%
1.99 121%
2.3 104%
CCT
8332 78%
8518 76%
7397 88%
8257 79%
7182 91%
8438 77%
8068 81%
8073 81%
6631 98%
10359 63%
Heat
Maximum Upper Side *
39.9
34.3
35
42.1
32.6
42.5
41.5
37.5
37.4
46.4
Maximum Bottom *
40.1
36.2
34.5
43.5
29.2
39.9
39.4
35.6
36.1
48.1
Idle Upper Side *
37
29.3
32
33.5
31
37.4
36.3
35.9
36.1
39.2
Idle Bottom *
30.7
28.1
29.4
29.8
29.2
33.5
31.9
31.9
31.8
39.7
Battery Runtime
Reader / Idle
1302
1102
944
WiFi v1.3
504
662
522
606
858
503
453
549
416
406
Load
287
316
253
155
Power Consumption
Idle Minimum *
1.16
0.71
0.87
0.64
0.8
0.54
0.72
0.76
0.61
0.81
Idle Average *
2.21
1.62
2.38
1.14
1.87
1.58
1.87
2.16
1.75
2.26
Idle Maximum *
2.24
1.64
2.47
1.25
1.89
1.7
2
2.35
1.83
2.39
Load Average *
3.34
3.24
2.63
2.26
2.18
2.98
5.99
4.65
4.49
6.97
Load Maximum *
3.95
3.36
3.86
2.36
3.61
4.98
6.45
5.35
5.14
7.03

* ... smaller is better

Benchmarks

AnTuTu Benchmark v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Coolpad Porto S
25415 Points ∼11%
Lenovo C2
23825 Points ∼10%
Lenovo Moto E4
30856 Points ∼14%
LG K4 2017
19230 Points ∼8%
Lenovo Moto C Plus
29911 Points ∼13%
Huawei Y5 II
23795 Points ∼10%
TP-Link Neffos C5
32681 Points ∼14%
Wiko Lenny 3
25237 Points ∼11%
ZTE Blade A510
24338 Points ∼11%
Leagoo M5
24238 Points ∼11%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Coolpad Porto S
599 Points ∼35%
Lenovo C2
9 Points ∼1%
Lenovo Moto E4
617 Points ∼36%
LG K4 2017
9 Points ∼1%
Lenovo Moto C Plus
632 Points ∼37%
Huawei Y5 II
10 Points ∼1%
TP-Link Neffos C5
638 Points ∼38%
Wiko Lenny 3
632 Points ∼37%
ZTE Blade A510
10 Points ∼1%
Leagoo M5
9 Points ∼1%
Graphics (sort by value)
Coolpad Porto S
173 Points ∼2%
Lenovo C2
177 Points ∼2%
Lenovo Moto E4
208 Points ∼2%
LG K4 2017
144 Points ∼2%
Lenovo Moto C Plus
209 Points ∼2%
Huawei Y5 II
283 Points ∼3%
TP-Link Neffos C5
281 Points ∼3%
Wiko Lenny 3
138 Points ∼2%
ZTE Blade A510
174 Points ∼2%
Leagoo M5
139 Points ∼2%
Memory (sort by value)
Coolpad Porto S
467 Points ∼11%
Lenovo C2
332 Points ∼8%
Lenovo Moto E4
576 Points ∼13%
LG K4 2017
257 Points ∼6%
Lenovo Moto C Plus
501 Points ∼11%
Huawei Y5 II
375 Points ∼8%
TP-Link Neffos C5
991 Points ∼22%
Wiko Lenny 3
293 Points ∼7%
ZTE Blade A510
285 Points ∼6%
Leagoo M5
331 Points ∼7%
System (sort by value)
Coolpad Porto S
905 Points ∼14%
Lenovo C2
826 Points ∼13%
Lenovo Moto E4
1077 Points ∼16%
LG K4 2017
586 Points ∼9%
Lenovo Moto C Plus
1048 Points ∼16%
Huawei Y5 II
1094 Points ∼17%
TP-Link Neffos C5
1199 Points ∼18%
Wiko Lenny 3
988 Points ∼15%
ZTE Blade A510
829 Points ∼13%
Leagoo M5
990 Points ∼15%
Overall (sort by value)
Coolpad Porto S
458 Points ∼12%
Lenovo C2
147 Points ∼4%
Lenovo Moto E4
531 Points ∼14%
LG K4 2017
119 Points ∼3%
Lenovo Moto C Plus
513 Points ∼14%
Huawei Y5 II
183 Points ∼5%
TP-Link Neffos C5
683 Points ∼18%
Wiko Lenny 3
399 Points ∼11%
ZTE Blade A510
141 Points ∼4%
Leagoo M5
144 Points ∼4%
3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Coolpad Porto S
7413 Points ∼10%
Lenovo Moto E4
8266 Points ∼11%
LG K4 2017
4143 Points ∼6%
Lenovo Moto C Plus
7825 Points ∼11%
Huawei Y5 II
Points ∼0%
TP-Link Neffos C5
9291 Points ∼13%
Wiko Lenny 3
7849 Points ∼11%
ZTE Blade A510
7025 Points ∼10%
Leagoo M5
7886 Points ∼11%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Coolpad Porto S
2590 Points ∼1%
Lenovo Moto E4
3168 Points ∼1%
LG K4 2017
2359 Points ∼1%
Lenovo Moto C Plus
3226 Points ∼1%
Huawei Y5 II
Points ∼0%
TP-Link Neffos C5
4223 Points ∼1%
Wiko Lenny 3
2476 Points ∼1%
ZTE Blade A510
2682 Points ∼1%
Leagoo M5
2478 Points ∼1%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Coolpad Porto S
3028 Points ∼2%
Lenovo C2
Points ∼0%
Lenovo Moto E4
3671 Points ∼2%
LG K4 2017
2609 Points ∼1%
Lenovo Moto C Plus
3711 Points ∼2%
Huawei Y5 II
Points ∼0%
TP-Link Neffos C5
4906 Points ∼2%
Wiko Lenny 3
2920 Points ∼1%
ZTE Blade A510
3109 Points ∼2%
Leagoo M5
2921 Points ∼1%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Coolpad Porto S
8.6 fps ∼1%
Lenovo C2
5 fps ∼0%
Lenovo Moto E4
6 fps ∼0%
LG K4 2017
3.4 fps ∼0%
Lenovo Moto C Plus
10 fps ∼1%
Huawei Y5 II
8.4 fps ∼1%
TP-Link Neffos C5
14 fps ∼1%
Wiko Lenny 3
4.4 fps ∼0%
ZTE Blade A510
4.9 fps ∼0%
Leagoo M5
4.4 fps ∼0%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Coolpad Porto S
4.8 fps ∼1%
Lenovo C2
8.5 fps ∼2%
Lenovo Moto E4
11 fps ∼2%
LG K4 2017
10 fps ∼2%
Lenovo Moto C Plus
6 fps ∼1%
Huawei Y5 II
15 fps ∼3%
TP-Link Neffos C5
8.3 fps ∼2%
Wiko Lenny 3
8 fps ∼2%
ZTE Blade A510
8.5 fps ∼2%
Leagoo M5
8 fps ∼2%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Coolpad Porto S
3.6 fps ∼1%
Lenovo C2
fps ∼0%
Lenovo Moto E4
2.2 fps ∼0%
LG K4 2017
1 fps ∼0%
Lenovo Moto C Plus
4.5 fps ∼1%
Huawei Y5 II
fps ∼0%
TP-Link Neffos C5
6.1 fps ∼1%
Wiko Lenny 3
fps ∼0%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Coolpad Porto S
1.6 fps ∼0%
Lenovo C2
3.7 fps ∼1%
Lenovo Moto E4
4.8 fps ∼1%
LG K4 2017
5.4 fps ∼1%
Lenovo Moto C Plus
2.2 fps ∼1%
Huawei Y5 II
6.1 fps ∼2%
TP-Link Neffos C5
2.8 fps ∼1%
Wiko Lenny 3
fps ∼0%
ZTE Blade A510
3.5 fps ∼1%
Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
Coolpad Porto S
2088 Points ∼4%
Lenovo C2
2159 Points ∼4%
Lenovo Moto E4
2270 Points ∼5%
LG K4 2017
1506 Points ∼3%
Lenovo Moto C Plus
2247 Points ∼5%
Huawei Y5 II
2707 Points ∼5%
TP-Link Neffos C5
2738 Points ∼6%
Wiko Lenny 3
2133 Points ∼4%
ZTE Blade A510
2102 Points ∼4%
Leagoo M5
2144 Points ∼4%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
Coolpad Porto S
32901.1 ms * ∼55%
Lenovo C2
16585 ms * ∼28%
Lenovo Moto E4
17184.6 ms * ∼29%
LG K4 2017
19723.2 ms * ∼33%
Lenovo Moto C Plus
16237.6 ms * ∼27%
Huawei Y5 II
12505 ms * ∼21%
TP-Link Neffos C5
12783.4 ms * ∼21%
Wiko Lenny 3
14862.9 ms * ∼25%
ZTE Blade A510
17364.1 ms * ∼29%
Leagoo M5
14766.5 ms * ∼25%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto E4
48 Points ∼6%
AndroBench 3-5
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
Lenovo C2
16.1 MB/s ∼18%
Lenovo Moto E4
44.9 MB/s ∼52%
LG K4 2017
44.41 MB/s ∼51%
Lenovo Moto C Plus
10.7 MB/s ∼12%
Huawei Y5 II
18.03 MB/s ∼21%
TP-Link Neffos C5
18.89 MB/s ∼22%
Wiko Lenny 3
19.59 MB/s ∼22%
ZTE Blade A510
16.5 MB/s ∼19%
Leagoo M5
18.48 MB/s ∼21%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
Lenovo C2
24.2 MB/s ∼25%
Lenovo Moto E4
65.4 MB/s ∼68%
LG K4 2017
75.28 MB/s ∼78%
Lenovo Moto C Plus
13.5 MB/s ∼14%
Huawei Y5 II
29.47 MB/s ∼31%
TP-Link Neffos C5
39.11 MB/s ∼41%
Wiko Lenny 3
40.59 MB/s ∼42%
ZTE Blade A510
25.55 MB/s ∼26%
Leagoo M5
36.07 MB/s ∼37%
Random Write 4KB (sort by value)
Coolpad Porto S
13.95 MB/s ∼8%
Lenovo C2
4.7 MB/s ∼3%
Lenovo Moto E4
29.2 MB/s ∼18%
Lenovo Moto C Plus
15.4 MB/s ∼9%
Huawei Y5 II
6 MB/s ∼4%
TP-Link Neffos C5
6.85 MB/s ∼4%
Wiko Lenny 3
6.2 MB/s ∼4%
ZTE Blade A510
4.69 MB/s ∼3%
Leagoo M5
5.46 MB/s ∼3%
Random Read 4KB (sort by value)
Coolpad Porto S
22.52 MB/s ∼13%
Lenovo C2
14.5 MB/s ∼8%
Lenovo Moto E4
18.7 MB/s ∼11%
Lenovo Moto C Plus
18.1 MB/s ∼10%
Huawei Y5 II
27.3 MB/s ∼16%
TP-Link Neffos C5
17.16 MB/s ∼10%
Wiko Lenny 3
15.1 MB/s ∼9%
ZTE Blade A510
14.03 MB/s ∼8%
Leagoo M5
14.98 MB/s ∼9%
Sequential Write 256KB (sort by value)
Coolpad Porto S
39.99 MB/s ∼19%
Lenovo C2
8 MB/s ∼4%
Lenovo Moto E4
45.3 MB/s ∼22%
Lenovo Moto C Plus
44.45 MB/s ∼21%
Huawei Y5 II
21.6 MB/s ∼10%
TP-Link Neffos C5
52.43 MB/s ∼25%
Wiko Lenny 3
11.6 MB/s ∼6%
ZTE Blade A510
9.94 MB/s ∼5%
Leagoo M5
12.11 MB/s ∼6%
Sequential Read 256KB (sort by value)
Coolpad Porto S
168.23 MB/s ∼21%
Lenovo C2
120.7 MB/s ∼15%
Lenovo Moto E4
187.6 MB/s ∼24%
Lenovo Moto C Plus
186.69 MB/s ∼23%
Huawei Y5 II
173.3 MB/s ∼22%
TP-Link Neffos C5
145.77 MB/s ∼18%
Wiko Lenny 3
132.5 MB/s ∼17%
ZTE Blade A510
111.91 MB/s ∼14%
Leagoo M5
133.68 MB/s ∼17%

Legend

 
Coolpad Porto S Mediatek MT6735, ARM Mali-T720, 8 GB eMMC Flash
 
Lenovo C2 Mediatek MT6735, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 8 GB eMMC Flash
 
Lenovo Moto E4 Mediatek MT6737, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
LG K4 2017 Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909, Qualcomm Adreno 304, 8 GB eMMC Flash
 
Lenovo Moto C Plus Mediatek MT6737, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Huawei Y5 II Mediatek MT6735, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 8 GB eMMC Flash
 
TP-Link Neffos C5 Mediatek MT6735, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Wiko Lenny 3 Mediatek MT6580M, ARM Mali-400 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
ZTE Blade A510 Mediatek MT6735P, ARM Mali-T720, 8 GB eMMC Flash
 
Leagoo M5 Mediatek MT6580M, ARM Mali-400 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash

* ... smaller is better

Read all 3 comments / answer
static version load dynamic
Loading Comments
Comment this article
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Reviews > Notebookcheck's Top 10 Smartphones under 120 Euros
Staff (Update: 2017-11-12)