Notebookcheck

Notebookcheck's Top 10 Phablets (>90cm²)

Daniel Schmidt (translated by Andreas Osthoff), 07/09/2017

December 2018 Update. Here is a list of the best XL-sized smartphones - with screen surface areas above 90 cm² - we have reviewed in the last few months. Our list of top models is regularly updated, maintained and commented on and should assist in purchase decisions.

It seems the trend towards bigger smartphone panels is unstoppable right now, which makes it harder to draw the line between smartphones and phablets. We decided to classify them based on their panel surface area. This Top 10 rating only includes smartphones with a panel surface area above 90 cm².

The diagonal sizes can differ due to different aspect ratios. We decided to use 5.7 inches (14.48 cm, 89.57 cm²) for 16:9 smartphones, and 5.9 inches (14.99 cm, 89.93 cm²) for 2:1 or 18:9 smartphones, respectively. 19:9 displays are counted from 6.0 inches upwards (15.24 cm, 89.86 cm²) and more exotic aspect ratios are classified individually.

The following rankings might be interesting for you smartphone purchase decision as well:

The following table shows the Top 10 phablets reviewed in the last 12 months, which  are still relevant and available at this time. In case of identical scores, the more recently tested smartphone is listed first. The table can be sorted by clicking on the header; in addition, the search results can be filtered (e.g. "Kirin").

Best Phablets as of December 2018

Pos.DateRatingImageModelHeightWeightSizeResolutionOSBest Price
104/201892%Huawei P20 ProHuawei P20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 970
ARM Mali-G72 MP12
6 GB Memory, 128 GB UFS 2.1
7.65 mm174 g6.1"2240x1080Android 8.1 Oreo
210/2018
New!
92%Huawei Mate 20 ProHuawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980
ARM Mali-G76 MP10
6 GB Memory, 128 GB UFS 2.1
8.6 mm189 g6.3"3120x1440Android 9.0 Pie
303/201891%Samsung Galaxy S9 PlusSamsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9810
ARM Mali-G72 MP18
6 GB Memory, 64 GB UFS 2.1
8.5 mm189 g6.2"2960x1440Android 8.0 Oreo
411/2018
New!
90%Google Pixel 3 XLGoogle Pixel 3 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
Qualcomm Adreno 630
4 GB Memory, 64 GB UFS 2.1
7.9 mm184 g6.3"2960x1440Android 9.0 Pie
509/201890%Apple iPhone Xs MaxApple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic
Apple A12 Bionic GPU
4 GB Memory, 64 GB eMMC
7.7 mm208 g6.5"2688x1242Apple iOS 12
606/201890%LG G7 ThinQLG G7 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
Qualcomm Adreno 630
4 GB Memory, 64 GB UFS 2.1
7.9 mm162 g6.1"3120x1440Android 8.0 Oreo
710/2018
New!
89%OnePlus 6TOnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
Qualcomm Adreno 630
6 GB Memory, 128 GB UFS 2.1
8.2 mm185 g6.41"2340x1080Android 9.0 Pie
809/201789%LG V30LG V30
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998)
Qualcomm Adreno 540
4 GB Memory, 64 GB UFS 2.1
7.3 mm158 g6"2880x1440Android 7.1 Nougat
908/201889%Samsung Galaxy Note 9Samsung Galaxy Note 9
Samsung Exynos 9810
ARM Mali-G72 MP18
6 GB Memory, 128 GB UFS 2.1
8.8 mm201 g6.4"2960x1440Android 8.1 Oreo
1006/201889%HTC U12 PlusHTC U12 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
Qualcomm Adreno 630
6 GB Memory, 64 GB UFS 2.1
9.7 mm188 g6"2880x1440Android 8.0 Oreo

Working For Notebookcheck

Are you a techie who knows how to write? Then join our Team!

Currently wanted: 
News Editor - Details here

Top 10 smartphones from the last 12 months; current reviews are listed first.

Editors' Comments

The increasing number of smartphones with narrower bezels and higher display (aspect ratios 2:1, 19:9, etc.) also result in larger display sizes. We completely reworked the Top 10 phablet ranking to give you better overview. It is not based on the diagonal size anymore, but the surface area of the panel.

This month, the Huawei Mate 20 Pro and the OnePlus 6T replace their predecessors. We also have a new entry with the Google Pixel 3 XL.

1st - Huawei P20 Pro

Huawei P20 Pro
Huawei P20 Pro

The Huawei P20 Pro mainly creates a wow-effect with its powerful triple camera, but we also like the colors with some extraordinary choices. Huawei completely changed them for the current P-series and now uses large display and big batteries. It is also the first P-series smartphone where the cameras are not sitting flush with the rest of the chassis. The technical specs are very similar to the Mate 10 Pro, but Huawei uses a Natural-Tone display for the first time, which will automatically adjust the picture based on the environment. The MIMO antenna technology for the Wi-Fi is now also available on a Huawei smartphone and enables high transfer rates, but the Wi-Fi performance was not very consistent. We also have some expectations for a smartphone that retails for more than 800 Euros, like modern Bluetooth and at least a 1440p screen. The latter is not really an advantage in day-to-day usage, but important for VR applications.

Pricecompare

2nd - Huawei Mate 20 Pro

Huawei Mate 20 Pro
Huawei Mate 20 Pro

The Mate series is the technological pinnacle from the Chinese manufacturer. The Huawei Mate 20 Pro definitely meets this claim. It features a fast SoC with 6 GB RAM, a powerful Leica triple camera, a brilliant and bright 1440p OLED screen, a rapid quick-charge mode as well as wireless charging, it is dust- and waterproof, is equipped with an IR blaster, has rapid MIMO WLAN with HT160 and the fastest modem you can currently find in a smartphone. The Mate is slim, despite its big 4200 mAh battery. 128 GB internal storage is adequate for this price range.

It is, however, unfortunate that Huawei does not offer other storage versions in all regions. Huawei's new Nano memory card does not really compensate for that since it occupies the second SIM slot. Implementing one of the speakers in the USB port is a smart idea, but not always ideal.

Pricecompare

3rd - Samsung Galaxy S9+

Samsung Galaxy S9+
Samsung Galaxy S9+

No doubt: both, the Galaxy S9 and the Galaxy S9+, are amazing smartphones. However, the differences to their respective predecessors are fairly small. Equipped with a new and quite fast Exynos SoC, 6 GB of RAM (S9: 4 GB), and 64/256 GB of UFS 2.1 storage the S9+ has quite a bit to offer. The display has been fine-tuned even further by Samsung and the phone’s already narrow bezels have shrunk once more. The rest of the specs are not any less impressive: LTE Cat. 18, Bluetooth 5.0, microSD slot, IP67-certified, wireless charging, USB 3.1 with support for DisplayPort, fingerprint reader and iris scanner, and much more. Like the new brilliant dual-lens camera capable of adjusting its aperture between f/1.5 and f/2.4.

Our major gripe was once again Bixby. The new phone is also slightly bigger and heavier than its predecessor. The battery has remained identical yet battery life has dropped compared to its predecessor.

Pricecompare

Independent journalism is made possible by advertising. We show the least amount of ads whenever possible but we intentionally show more ads when an adblocker is used. Please, switch off ad blockers and support us!

4th - Google Pixel 3 XL

Google Pixel 3 XL
Google Pixel 3 XL

The Google Pixel 3 XL features a 6.3-inch (18.5:9, 16 cm, 100.73 cm²) OLED display with the 1440p resolution. It is powered by the current high-end SoC from Qualcomm supported by 4 GB RAM as well as 64 or 128 GB internal storage, which cannot be expanded. The highlight of the internet giant is definitely the single camera, which was further improved thanks to new algorithms.

Otherwise, however, we miss innovations and many modern features are missing. The Pixel 3 XL still offers a strong overall package including good speakers, a better display compared to the predecessor, fast LTE, wireless charging, long update cycle, and infinite storage for pictures in the Google cloud.

Pricecompare

5th - Apple iPhone XS Max

Apple iPhone XS Max
Apple iPhone XS Max

The Apple iPhone XS Max is the bigger sibling of the iPhone XS and equipped with a slim-bezel 6.5-inch OLED screen including notch. The two Apple smartphones are identical except for the size, but the iPhone XS Max offers more pixels due to the larger screen and a bigger battery. The new SoC is very fast and the camera was optimized as well. Thanks to new software algorithms, you get higher dynamic range and the low-light performance was improved. The protection against fluids was upgraded and is not only limited to fresh water anymore. There is a new 512 GB storage option.

Pricecompare

6th – LG G7 ThinQ

LG G7 ThinQ
LG G7 ThinQ

At 6.1 inches (15.49 cm, 13:6, 91.34 cm2, 14.16 sq in) the LG G7 ThinQ’s display is very large. It is based on MLCD+ technology including HDR, and can get incredibly bright. Pixel density is high thanks to its 3120 x 1440 resolution. The remaining hardware matches the device’s high-end ambitions perfectly: a very fast Snapdragon 845, LTE Cat. 18, ac-Wi-Fi with MIMO, a Hi-Fi DAC, and last but not least wireless charging. Storage size is nothing to write home about but rather average for its class, and it can be expanded via microSD.

At just 3,000 mAh the battery is comparatively small, and the cameras were not the best either. In addition, the USB-C port is only connected to a USB 2.0 bus.

Pricecompare

7th - OnePlus 6T

OnePlus 6T
OnePlus 6T

Compared to its predecessor, the OnePlus 6T is not much different, but that is not surprising considering the half-year release cycle. The notch is much smaller, the fingerprint scanner is now sitting underneath the glass and the stereo jack was removed. The fingerprint scanner was not 100 % convincing in our review, though.

Otherwise, the 6T is a fast smartphone with a very responsive UI, great battery runtimes, a good camera as well as great communication features. You have to make a compromise in terms of the speakers. There is also no storage expansion via microSD and there is no special protection against dust or water.

Pricecompare

8th – LG V30

LG V30
LG V30

Many people believe the LG V30 is what the LG G6 should have been. Contrary to the small sibling, LG equips this smartphone with the latest components including a high-end SoC, quad-DAC audio chip as well as wireless charging. LG does not drop the stereo jack, either. The display of the LG V30 is also very good, but is pretty dark in practice. 4GB RAM as well as 64 GB internal storage is just average, but you can expand the storage via microSD. The V30 is also certified according to IP68 and passed 14 MIL-STD-810 tests.

The USB port only supports the 2.0 standard, which is unfortunate. The price at launch is also rather ambitious.

Pricecompare

9th - Samsung Galaxy Note 9

Samsung Galaxy Note 9
Samsung Galaxy Note 9

The Samsung Galaxy Note 9 is once again a really good business phablet. The Korean manufacturer upgraded the battery to 4000 mAh on the new Note model, so the runtimes are much longer compared to the previous model. The S Pen now supports Bluetooth and offers some new features. Samsung's new smartphone also turns out to be a serious storage device at up to 512 GB internal storage, which can be doubled via microSD card. All in all, the Note 9 can store up to 1 TB of data.

The smartphone is powered by the latest high-end SoC from Samsung in combination with up to 8 GB RAM, fast LTE with many bands, fast WLAN, a huge number of sensors, good stereo speakers, a great camera, as well as a brilliant Super AMOLED screen.

Pricecompare

10th - HTC U12+

HTC U12+
HTC U12+

The design of the HTC U12 Plus hardly changed and features a 6.0-inch SLCD6 display (2:1, 15.24 cm, 92.90 cm²) with 2880 x 1440 pixels. HTC's smartphone is powered by Qualcomm's current high-end SoC supported by 6 GB RAM and 64 GB fast UFS 2.1 storage. The latter can be expanded via microSD card. The case is protected against dust and water, and also accommodates two speakers that sound decent. The main lens of the new dual-cam is really good, but we were not convinced by the second lens during the review. The battery runtime is also just average, but this is also a result of the comparatively small battery. The display is also pretty dark compared to the other high-end competitors

Pricecompare

Top 10 Phablets in Comparison

Size Comparison

Measurement Results

Huawei P20 Pro
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Google Pixel 3 XL
Apple iPhone Xs Max
LG G7 ThinQ
OnePlus 6T
LG V30
Samsung Galaxy Note 9
HTC U12 Plus
Response Times
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
4 (2, 2)
4 (2, 2)
8 (3, 5)
8 (3, 5)
16.4
46 (24.8, 21.2)
12 (6, 6)
10 (5, 5)
10 (5, 5)
42.4 (19.6, 22.8)
Response Time Black / White *
4 (2, 2)
4 (2, 2)
6 (3, 3)
22 (18, 4)
6
18.8 (7.2, 11.6)
6 (3, 3)
25 (19, 6)
6 (3, 3)
29.6 (15.6, 14)
PWM Frequency
238.1
245.1 (99)
215.5
250 (99)
240 (99)
1174 (42)
240 (99)
227 (80)
227
9709 (50)
Screen
Brightness middle
569
576
565
410
656
974
437
432
499
395
Brightness
578
582
571
413
659
975
442
428
506
402
Brightness Distribution
95
90
96
97
88
96
95
87
96
90
Black Level *
0.49
0.37
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
1.3
1.3
2.3
3.16
1.7
5.4
2.21
4.18
4.62
1.6
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
2.1
3.5
4.8
5.5
2.8
13.1
4.27
8.53
10.91
3.4
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
1.6
1.6
1.9
1.7
1.7
5
2.1
5.3
2.2
1.1
Gamma
2.31 95%
2.18 101%
2.16 102%
2.219 99%
1.998 110%
2.31 95%
2.307 95%
2.33 94%
2.103 105%
2.14 103%
CCT
6401 102%
6561 99%
6332 103%
6653 98%
6487 100%
7480 87%
6353 102%
7487 87%
6115 106%
6536 99%
Contrast
1988
1068
Heat
Maximum Upper Side *
35.6
43.3
35.8
42
38.9
34.8
48.6
30.3
45.9
38.1
Maximum Bottom *
34.3
44.5
37.9
39.9
42.8
35.8
42
30.3
47
38.8
Idle Upper Side *
30.7
34
23.1
26.4
30.7
32.3
30.3
29.9
34.2
32.6
Idle Bottom *
29.3
32.2
22
26
31.2
29.3
29.7
27.7
33.8
26.8
Battery Runtime
Reader / Idle
1727
1747
1343
1725
1305
1662
1936
1914
1687
1452
H.264
784
854
674
724
801
908
903
822
896
464
WiFi v1.3
744
767
521
691
742
591
865
774
794
507
Load
345
282
237
299
223
260
261
267
354
230
Power Consumption
Idle Minimum *
0.84
0.95
0.68
0.7
1
1.16
0.7
0.72
0.9
0.77
Idle Average *
1.54
2.17
0.95
1.4
1.4
1.98
1.1
1.37
1.9
2.18
Idle Maximum *
1.57
2.25
1.09
2
1.7
2.07
2.1
1.41
3.7
2.21
Load Average *
2.47
4.47
4.58
4.8
4.6
4.51
4.2
3.46
5.3
6.25
Load Maximum *
2.49
6.15
5.16
9.5
6.7
8.3
8.3
7.83
7.6
10.16

* ... smaller is better

Benchmarks

Geekbench 4.1/4.2
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Huawei P20 Pro
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
6756 Points ∼19%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
10024 Points ∼28%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Mali-G72 MP18, 9810, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
8963 Points ∼25%
Google Pixel 3 XL
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
8292 Points ∼23%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
A12 Bionic GPU, A12 Bionic, 64 GB eMMC Flash
11244 Points ∼31%
LG G7 ThinQ
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
9029 Points ∼25%
OnePlus 6T
Adreno 630, 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
8995 Points ∼25%
LG V30
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
6078 Points ∼17%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9
Mali-G72 MP18, 9810, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
8874 Points ∼25%
HTC U12 Plus
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
8812 Points ∼24%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Huawei P20 Pro
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
1922 Points ∼30%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3378 Points ∼53%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Mali-G72 MP18, 9810, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3776 Points ∼60%
Google Pixel 3 XL
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2325 Points ∼37%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
A12 Bionic GPU, A12 Bionic, 64 GB eMMC Flash
4774 Points ∼75%
LG G7 ThinQ
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2448 Points ∼39%
OnePlus 6T
Adreno 630, 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2384 Points ∼38%
LG V30
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
1900 Points ∼30%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9
Mali-G72 MP18, 9810, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
1698 Points ∼27%
HTC U12 Plus
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2429 Points ∼38%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Huawei P20 Pro
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2942 Points ∼66%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
4364 Points ∼98%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Mali-G72 MP18, 9810, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2546 Points ∼57%
Google Pixel 3 XL
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3676 Points ∼83%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
A12 Bionic GPU, A12 Bionic, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2723 Points ∼61%
LG G7 ThinQ
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3416 Points ∼77%
OnePlus 6T
Adreno 630, 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3681 Points ∼83%
LG V30
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2893 Points ∼65%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9
Mali-G72 MP18, 9810, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2613 Points ∼59%
HTC U12 Plus
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2947 Points ∼66%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei P20 Pro
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3109 Points ∼38%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
4250 Points ∼52%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Mali-G72 MP18, 9810, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3792 Points ∼46%
Google Pixel 3 XL
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
5789 Points ∼71%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
A12 Bionic GPU, A12 Bionic, 64 GB eMMC Flash
4828 Points ∼59%
LG G7 ThinQ
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
5322 Points ∼65%
OnePlus 6T
Adreno 630, 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
5877 Points ∼72%
LG V30
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3809 Points ∼46%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9
Mali-G72 MP18, 9810, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3797 Points ∼46%
HTC U12 Plus
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
4450 Points ∼54%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Huawei P20 Pro
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3070 Points ∼59%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
4275 Points ∼82%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Mali-G72 MP18, 9810, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3420 Points ∼66%
Google Pixel 3 XL
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
5133 Points ∼99%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
A12 Bionic GPU, A12 Bionic, 64 GB eMMC Flash
4121 Points ∼79%
LG G7 ThinQ
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
4735 Points ∼91%
OnePlus 6T
Adreno 630, 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
5189 Points ∼100%
LG V30
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3559 Points ∼69%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9
Mali-G72 MP18, 9810, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3450 Points ∼66%
HTC U12 Plus
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3997 Points ∼77%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Huawei P20 Pro
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2940 Points ∼63%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
4407 Points ∼94%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Mali-G72 MP18, 9810, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2561 Points ∼54%
Google Pixel 3 XL
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3280 Points ∼70%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
A12 Bionic GPU, A12 Bionic, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2961 Points ∼63%
LG G7 ThinQ
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3109 Points ∼66%
OnePlus 6T
Adreno 630, 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3374 Points ∼72%
LG V30
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2855 Points ∼61%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9
Mali-G72 MP18, 9810, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2649 Points ∼56%
HTC U12 Plus
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2656 Points ∼57%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei P20 Pro
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3503 Points ∼12%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
5854 Points ∼20%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Mali-G72 MP18, 9810, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
4797 Points ∼17%
Google Pixel 3 XL
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
8380 Points ∼29%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
A12 Bionic GPU, A12 Bionic, 64 GB eMMC Flash
10374 Points ∼36%
LG G7 ThinQ
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
7882 Points ∼27%
OnePlus 6T
Adreno 630, 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
8397 Points ∼29%
LG V30
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
5819 Points ∼20%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9
Mali-G72 MP18, 9810, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
4904 Points ∼17%
HTC U12 Plus
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
6419 Points ∼22%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Huawei P20 Pro
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3360 Points ∼25%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
5456 Points ∼41%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Mali-G72 MP18, 9810, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
4018 Points ∼30%
Google Pixel 3 XL
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
6228 Points ∼46%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
A12 Bionic GPU, A12 Bionic, 64 GB eMMC Flash
6667 Points ∼50%
LG G7 ThinQ
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
5877 Points ∼44%
OnePlus 6T
Adreno 630, 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
6310 Points ∼47%
LG V30
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
4728 Points ∼35%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9
Mali-G72 MP18, 9810, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
4124 Points ∼31%
HTC U12 Plus
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
4882 Points ∼36%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Huawei P20 Pro
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
121 fps ∼1%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
120 fps ∼1%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Mali-G72 MP18, 9810, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
147 fps ∼1%
Google Pixel 3 XL
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
140 fps ∼1%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
A12 Bionic GPU, A12 Bionic, 64 GB eMMC Flash
226 fps ∼2%
LG G7 ThinQ
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
144 fps ∼1%
OnePlus 6T
Adreno 630, 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
152 fps ∼1%
LG V30
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
113 fps ∼1%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9
Mali-G72 MP18, 9810, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
146 fps ∼1%
HTC U12 Plus
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
98 fps ∼1%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Huawei P20 Pro
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
60 fps ∼2%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
61 fps ∼2%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Mali-G72 MP18, 9810, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
60 fps ∼2%
Google Pixel 3 XL
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
60 fps ∼2%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
A12 Bionic GPU, A12 Bionic, 64 GB eMMC Flash
60 fps ∼2%
LG G7 ThinQ
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
60 fps ∼2%
OnePlus 6T
Adreno 630, 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
60 fps ∼2%
LG V30
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
60 fps ∼2%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9
Mali-G72 MP18, 9810, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
60 fps ∼2%
HTC U12 Plus
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
59 fps ∼2%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Huawei P20 Pro
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
61 fps ∼1%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
73 fps ∼1%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Mali-G72 MP18, 9810, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
74 fps ∼1%
Google Pixel 3 XL
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
56 fps ∼1%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
A12 Bionic GPU, A12 Bionic, 64 GB eMMC Flash
107 fps ∼1%
LG G7 ThinQ
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
63 fps ∼1%
OnePlus 6T
Adreno 630, 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
59 fps ∼1%
LG V30
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
59 fps ∼1%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9
Mali-G72 MP18, 9810, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
76 fps ∼1%
HTC U12 Plus
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
72 fps ∼1%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Huawei P20 Pro
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
54 fps ∼1%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
42 fps ∼1%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Mali-G72 MP18, 9810, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
45 fps ∼1%
Google Pixel 3 XL
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
37 fps ∼1%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
A12 Bionic GPU, A12 Bionic, 64 GB eMMC Flash
59 fps ∼2%
LG G7 ThinQ
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
41 fps ∼1%
OnePlus 6T
Adreno 630, 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
59 fps ∼2%
LG V30
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
35 fps ∼1%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9
Mali-G72 MP18, 9810, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
47 fps ∼1%
HTC U12 Plus
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
35 fps ∼1%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Huawei P20 Pro
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
6982 Points ∼68%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
9225 Points ∼89%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Mali-G72 MP18, 9810, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
5319 Points ∼52%
Google Pixel 3 XL
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
9029 Points ∼88%
LG G7 ThinQ
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
7717 Points ∼75%
OnePlus 6T
Adreno 630, 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
8487 Points ∼82%
LG V30
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
5603 Points ∼54%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9
Mali-G72 MP18, 9810, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
5184 Points ∼50%
HTC U12 Plus
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
8601 Points ∼83%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Huawei P20 Pro
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
8115 Points ∼60%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
12535 Points ∼93%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Mali-G72 MP18, 9810, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
5822 Points ∼43%
Google Pixel 3 XL
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
11180 Points ∼83%
LG G7 ThinQ
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
9503 Points ∼70%
OnePlus 6T
Adreno 630, 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
10590 Points ∼78%
LG V30
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
6854 Points ∼51%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9
Mali-G72 MP18, 9810, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
5960 Points ∼44%
HTC U12 Plus
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
10264 Points ∼76%
Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value)
Huawei P20 Pro
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
887 Points ∼17%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
1571 Points ∼30%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Mali-G72 MP18, 9810, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
1481 Points ∼28%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
A12 Bionic GPU, A12 Bionic, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2407 Points ∼45%
LG G7 ThinQ
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
1176 Points ∼22%
OnePlus 6T
Adreno 630, 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
1201 Points ∼23%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9
Mali-G72 MP18, 9810, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
1481 Points ∼28%
Basemark GPU
1920x1080 OpenGL Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P20 Pro
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
24.45 (min: 9.63, max: 65.63) fps ∼4%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
29.12 (min: 9.74, max: 74.17) fps ∼4%
LG G7 ThinQ
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
30.49 (min: 9.86, max: 49.99) fps ∼5%
OnePlus 6T
Adreno 630, 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
35.34 fps ∼5%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9
Mali-G72 MP18, 9810, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
29.4 fps ∼5%
Vulkan Medium Native (sort by value)
Huawei P20 Pro
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
10.52 (min: 5, max: 27.66) fps ∼2%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
16.92 (min: 6.06, max: 28.78) fps ∼3%
LG G7 ThinQ
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
17.42 (min: 10.81, max: 36.84) fps ∼3%
OnePlus 6T
Adreno 630, 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
29.68 fps ∼5%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9
Mali-G72 MP18, 9810, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
15.51 fps ∼3%
1920x1080 Vulkan Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P20 Pro
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
11.8 (min: 5.55, max: 28.23) fps ∼2%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
25.57 (min: 7.38, max: 46.96) fps ∼3%
LG G7 ThinQ
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
28.33 (min: 16.3, max: 60.18) fps ∼4%
OnePlus 6T
Adreno 630, 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
32.86 fps ∼4%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9
Mali-G72 MP18, 9810, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
22.84 fps ∼3%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
Huawei P20 Pro
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
207959 Points ∼37%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
300617 Points ∼53%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Mali-G72 MP18, 9810, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
250577 Points ∼44%
Google Pixel 3 XL
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
285269 Points ∼50%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
A12 Bionic GPU, A12 Bionic, 64 GB eMMC Flash
302955 Points ∼53%
LG G7 ThinQ
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
256276 Points ∼45%
OnePlus 6T
Adreno 630, 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
294488 Points ∼52%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9
Mali-G72 MP18, 9810, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
236552 Points ∼42%
HTC U12 Plus
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
255739 Points ∼45%
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Huawei P20 Pro
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
179709 Points ∼71%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
250848 Points ∼99%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Mali-G72 MP18, 9810, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
222290 Points ∼87%
Google Pixel 3 XL
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
215632 Points ∼85%
LG G7 ThinQ
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
223464 Points ∼88%
OnePlus 6T
Adreno 630, 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
228939 Points ∼90%
LG V30
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
173749 Points ∼68%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9
Mali-G72 MP18, 9810, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
214090 Points ∼84%
HTC U12 Plus
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
221971 Points ∼87%
Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
Huawei P20 Pro
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
11584 Points ∼23%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
23285 Points ∼47%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Mali-G72 MP18, 9810, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
14760 Points ∼30%
Google Pixel 3 XL
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
16228 Points ∼33%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
A12 Bionic GPU, A12 Bionic, 64 GB eMMC Flash
43114 Points ∼87%
LG G7 ThinQ
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
16720 Points ∼34%
OnePlus 6T
Adreno 630, 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
16824 Points ∼34%
LG V30
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
10506 Points ∼21%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9
Mali-G72 MP18, 9810, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
14663 Points ∼30%
HTC U12 Plus
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
16285 Points ∼33%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
Huawei P20 Pro
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3852.2 ms * ∼6%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
1951.9 ms * ∼3%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Mali-G72 MP18, 9810, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2059.7 ms * ∼3%
Google Pixel 3 XL
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2785 ms * ∼5%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
A12 Bionic GPU, A12 Bionic, 64 GB eMMC Flash
603.1 ms * ∼1%
LG G7 ThinQ
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2484.1 ms * ∼4%
OnePlus 6T
Adreno 630, 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2281.6 ms * ∼4%
LG V30
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3630 ms * ∼6%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9
Mali-G72 MP18, 9810, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2710 ms * ∼5%
HTC U12 Plus
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2409.6 ms * ∼4%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score (sort by value)
Huawei P20 Pro
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
182 Points ∼23%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
334 Points ∼41%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Mali-G72 MP18, 9810, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
164 Points ∼20%
Google Pixel 3 XL
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
287 Points ∼36%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
A12 Bionic GPU, A12 Bionic, 64 GB eMMC Flash
347 Points ∼43%
LG G7 ThinQ
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
252 Points ∼31%
OnePlus 6T
Adreno 630, 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
260 Points ∼32%
LG V30
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
138 Points ∼17%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9
Mali-G72 MP18, 9810, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
202 Points ∼25%
HTC U12 Plus
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
257 Points ∼32%
WebXPRT 3 - --- (sort by value)
Huawei P20 Pro
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
69 Points ∼38%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
124 Points ∼68%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Mali-G72 MP18, 9810, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
64 Points ∼35%
Google Pixel 3 XL
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
100 Points ∼55%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
A12 Bionic GPU, A12 Bionic, 64 GB eMMC Flash
155 Points ∼85%
LG G7 ThinQ
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
97 Points ∼53%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9
Mali-G72 MP18, 9810, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
72 Points ∼40%
HTC U12 Plus
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
101 Points ∼55%
AndroBench 3-5
Random Write 4KB (sort by value)
Huawei P20 Pro
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
160.49 MB/s ∼98%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
157.84 MB/s ∼96%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Mali-G72 MP18, 9810, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
22.74 MB/s ∼14%
Google Pixel 3 XL
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
132.7 MB/s ∼81%
LG G7 ThinQ
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
23.26 MB/s ∼14%
OnePlus 6T
Adreno 630, 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
22 MB/s ∼13%
LG V30
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
10.21 MB/s ∼6%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9
Mali-G72 MP18, 9810, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
21 MB/s ∼13%
HTC U12 Plus
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
104.24 MB/s ∼63%
Random Read 4KB (sort by value)
Huawei P20 Pro
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
144.33 MB/s ∼83%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
157.42 MB/s ∼91%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Mali-G72 MP18, 9810, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
129.68 MB/s ∼75%
Google Pixel 3 XL
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
120.8 MB/s ∼70%
LG G7 ThinQ
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
110.46 MB/s ∼64%
OnePlus 6T
Adreno 630, 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
138.5 MB/s ∼80%
LG V30
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
78.17 MB/s ∼45%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9
Mali-G72 MP18, 9810, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
134 MB/s ∼77%
HTC U12 Plus
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
118.14 MB/s ∼68%
Sequential Write 256KB (sort by value)
Huawei P20 Pro
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
196.69 MB/s ∼80%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
196.39 MB/s ∼80%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Mali-G72 MP18, 9810, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
204.94 MB/s ∼83%
Google Pixel 3 XL
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
228.6 MB/s ∼93%
LG G7 ThinQ
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
176.45 MB/s ∼72%
OnePlus 6T
Adreno 630, 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
204.4 MB/s ∼83%
LG V30
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
193.22 MB/s ∼79%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9
Mali-G72 MP18, 9810, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
196 MB/s ∼80%
HTC U12 Plus
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
195.82 MB/s ∼80%
Sequential Read 256KB (sort by value)
Huawei P20 Pro
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
831.82 MB/s ∼93%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
853.28 MB/s ∼95%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Mali-G72 MP18, 9810, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
818.69 MB/s ∼92%
Google Pixel 3 XL
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
632.6 MB/s ∼71%
LG G7 ThinQ
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
695.15 MB/s ∼78%
OnePlus 6T
Adreno 630, 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
735.3 MB/s ∼82%
LG V30
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
669.48 MB/s ∼75%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9
Mali-G72 MP18, 9810, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
805 MB/s ∼90%
HTC U12 Plus
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
709.11 MB/s ∼79%

* ... smaller is better

static version load dynamic
Loading Comments
Comment on this article
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Reviews > Notebookcheck's Top 10 Phablets (>90cm²)
Daniel Schmidt (Update: 2018-12- 2)