The Best Smartphones with Large Display

November 2020 Update. The current trend in smartphone displays is a complete reversal of the last trend in cell phone displays before the smartphone entered: displays are getting increasingly larger. One reason are our changed habits and the ways in which we use modern smartphones. Telephony became texting and posting, social media and media consumption applications are now more important than ever and benefit immensely from large content display allotments. The following table contains the best smartphones with large displays reviewed by us.

Daniel Schmidt (translated by Finn D. Boerne), 07/09/2017

Smartphones with a display larger than 6.5-inches are no longer the exception. If you are looking for the largest displays available this list may be very helpful as it contains the best smartphones with displays that measure at least 6.8-inches diagonally.

The following rankings might be interesting for you smartphone purchase decision as well:

The Best Smartphones with Large Display (> 6.8-inches)

Pos.	Datum	Bew.	Modell	Dicke	Gewicht	SBR	Bildwiederholrate	Größe	Auflösung	OS
1	09/2020	89 %	Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra Samsung Exynos 990 ARM Mali-G77 MP11 12 GB Memory, 256 GB	8.1 mm	208 g	92 %	120 Hz	6.90"	3088x1440	Android 10
2	03/2020	89 %	Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra Samsung Exynos 990 ARM Mali-G77 MP11 12 GB Memory, 128 GB	8.8 mm	219 g	90 %	120 Hz	6.90"	3200x1440	Android 10
3	10/2020 Neu	87 %	Samsung Galaxy Z Fold2 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) Qualcomm Adreno 650 12 GB Memory, 256 GB	6.9 mm	279 g	90 %	120 Hz	7.60"	2208x1768	Android 10
4	06/2020 Neu	85 %	Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Qualcomm Adreno 650 12 GB Memory, 256 GB	10.1 mm	253 g	83.6 %	90 Hz	7.10"	3120x1440	Android 10
5	07/2020 Neu	85 %	LG Velvet Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G Qualcomm Adreno 620 6 GB Memory, 128 GB UFS 2.1	7.85 mm	180 g	88 %	60 Hz	6.80"	2460x1080	Android 10
6	04/2020 Neu	82 %	Huawei Mate Xs HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G ARM Mali-G76 MP16 8 GB Memory, 512 GB	11 mm	300 g	87 %	60 Hz	8.00"	2480x2200	Android 10
7	10/2020 Neu	81 %	Nokia 8.3 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G Qualcomm Adreno 620 8 GB Memory, 128 GB UFS 2.1	9 mm	227 g	83 %	60 Hz	6.81"	2400x1080	Android 10
8	10/2020 Neu	80 %	Motorola Moto G9 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G Qualcomm Adreno 618 4 GB Memory, 128 GB UFS 2.1	9.7 mm	223 g	83.4 %	60 Hz	6.81"	2400x1080	Android 10

Editors' Comments

Due to the reorganization and restructuring of this list the number of contenders was reduced significantly. In return, it also brought us six new entries.

1st – Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra

The Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra features a 6.9-inch dynamic OLED display with an adaptive refresh rate of up to 120 Hz. Not only does the panel support HDR10 and HDR10+, it is also the brightest smartphone display we have ever seen. The Note 20 Ultra is powered by an Exynos 990 with 12 GB of RAM and features a whopping 256 GB of microSD expandable UFS 3.1 storage. Its fast USB 3.2 port supports connecting external displays as well as DeX, among other things. The latter is now also supported wirelessly. Like before the Note includes Samsung’s S pen whose slot has been relocated from the right to the left-hand side.

The tripe-camera setup performed very well and includes a depth-of-field sensor. Samsung’s Note 20 is furthermore IP68-certified against ingress of dust and water and supports 5G and Wi-Fi 6. Too bad the display will only run at 120 Hz in FHD+ resolution.

Top 10 Laptops
Multimedia, Budget Multimedia, Gaming, Budget Gaming, Lightweight Gaming, Business, Budget Office, Workstation, Subnotebooks, Ultrabooks, Chromebooks

under 300 USD/Euros, under 500 USD/Euros, 1.000 USD/Euros

Best Displays, for University Students

Top 10 Smartphones
Smartphones, Phablets, ≤5-inch, Camera Smartphones The Best Smartphones for Less Than 160 Euros

Pricecompare

2nd – Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra

With its 6.9-inch Dynamic AMOLED display the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra is one of the largest smartphones currently available. Its high resolution of 3200 x 1440 pixels makes for an ultra-sharp picture. That is as long as you decide not to run the phone in 120 Hz mode, because that will lower resolution to 2400 x 1080.

An array of five cameras ensure great photo quality, a 100x zoom, and support for 8k video. However, photo quality when zoomed-in or in low-light situations is in need of improvement.

All things considered the Galaxy S20 Ultra is a smartphone that leaves almost nothing to be desired and is an eye-catcher due to its sheer size alone.

3rd – Samsung Galaxy Z Fold2

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold2’s foldable OLED display measures 7.6-inches. It is a bit smaller than on its predecessor but in return is not only significantly brighter but also supports a refresh rate of 120 Hz. The foldable is powered by Qualcomm’s current top-of-the-line SoC supported by 12 GB of RAM, 256 GB of non-expandable storage space, and the latest in communication equipment and connectivity. Only the triple-camera had to take a step back and lacks Samsung’s latest and greatest sensor.

In our test, the Fold2 offered a great concept with useful optimizations, in particularly the massively improved outside display. Nevertheless, the Fold2 remains a comparatively sensitive piece of technology.

Pricecompare

4th – Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro

The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro offers everything a typical gaming smartphone should. In addition to a playful design, it comes with a fast SoC, 12 GB of RAM, and 256 GB of UFS storage. Its most important feature, however, is without a doubt its ginormous 7.1-inch AMOLED display running at 90 Hz flanked by a set of stereo speakers.

In addition to its large display, the Black Shark also offers fast 5G, Wi-Fi 6, Dual SIM, and last but not least a headphone jack. In return, it lacks support for wireless charging, NFC, and microSD expandability.

Pricecompare

5th – LG Velvet

The LG Velvet features a 6.8-inch POLED display that can be complemented by an equally large secondary display. The mid-range SoC makes for decent system performance and supports 5G. Gaming, on the other hand, requires a few compromises. In return, its triple-camera performed very well, it supports USB 3.2 and wireless charging, and is both IP68 and MIL-STD-certified.

Unfortunately, its wide-angle camera was a bit of a letdown, and the Velvet’s LTE support of LTE bands turned out to be fairly limited. Battery life on the other hand was decent.

Pricecompare

6th – Huawei Mate Xs

The Huawei Mate Xs features an 8.0-inch OLED display curved around the exterior of the foldable smartphone. It is powered by a fast SoC with 5G support, which as access to 8 GB of RAM and 512 GB of fast UFS storage that can be further expanded via NM card. Its USB 3.2 port supports wired display output and can not only mirror the smartphone display but extend it to offer a full desktop mode.

All in all we liked the concept, particularly from a visual perspective, even though it lacked some quality assurance in the end. The quad-camera was decent, unfortunately it does not support Google services and lacks a DRM certification.

Pricecompare

7th – Nokia 8.3 5G

The Nokia 8.3 5G is a premium mid-range smartphone with a 6.81-inch IPS display powered by a Snapdragon 765G with 8 GB of RAM and support for 5G networks. Its quad camera’s most important feature is the 64 MP sensor that managed to take decent photo as well as its ultra-wide angle lens that turned out pretty decent as well. The other two lenses are used for macro photography and depth-of-fiend analysis.

Benefits include long battery life, good design, and Android One. Downsides include a hefty price tag considering the lack of other features expected of a premium smartphone.

Pricecompare

8th – Motorola Moto G9 Plus

The Motorola Moto G9 Plus is living proof that smartphones with large displays don’t necessarily have to be expensive. Its 6.81-inch LTPS panel suffered from minor screen halations, and the device is powered by a fast mid-range SoC with access to 4 GB of RAM.

Thanks to its large battery, the Moto G9 Plus can last for a very long time. Unfortunately, its camera did not perform particularly well and the display turned out to be fairly dim overall.

Pricecompare

The Best Smartphones with Large Display in Comparison

Size Comparison

Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro Nokia 8.3 5G Motorola Moto G9 Plus Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra LG Velvet Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra Huawei Mate Xs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold2 5G ❌

Test Results

	Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra	Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra	Samsung Galaxy Z Fold2 5G	Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro	LG Velvet	Huawei Mate Xs	Nokia 8.3 5G	Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Response Times
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	8.8 (4.4, 4.4)	9.6 (4.8, 4.8)	10 (5, 5)	10 (5, 5)	9.2 (4.8, 4.4)	5.2 (2.8, 2.4)	40 (19, 21)	39 (20, 19)
Response Time Black / White *	3.2 (2, 1.2)	2.8 (1.2, 1.6)	6 (3, 3)	8 (5, 3)	3.2 (2, 1.2)	3.2 (2, 1.2)	16 (7, 9)	23 (11, 12)
PWM Frequency	245.1 (99)	240.4 (99)	219	362	245.1 (99)	242.7 (99)
Screen
Brightness middle	860	734	637	570	586	417	669	390
Brightness	878	748	635	589	587	418	604	377
Brightness Distribution	96	95	96	90	97	99	82	93
Black Level *							0.55	0.66
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *	4.5	3.2	2.25	4.65	2.8	2.6	4.3	3.39
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *	10.4	6.8	4.12	7.61	6.3	7.7	8.4	5.22
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *	2.4	2.7	2.2	4.9	2.3	2	5.5	4.3
Gamma	2 ^110%	2.11 ^104%	2.17 ^101%	2.205 ^100%	2.01 ^109%	2.31 ^95%	2.22 ^99%	2.506 ^88%
CCT	6466 ^101%	6299 ^103%	6689 ^97%	7500 ^87%	6827 ^95%	6276 ^104%	7959 ^82%	6033 ^108%
Contrast							1216	591
Heat
Maximum Upper Side *	33.8	35	41.8	40.2	34.5	33.8	38.2	42.2
Maximum Bottom *	31.1	34.1	36.5	39.9	32.2	34	37.6	41.4
Idle Upper Side *	27.1	32.1	26.7	27.9	29	33.8	27.6	28.8
Idle Bottom *	24.9	27.9	26.9	28.8	27.5	32	27	27.3
Battery Runtime
Reader / Idle	1223	1858	1853	1589		1071	1489	2732
H.264	993	1131	832	972		762	1087	1352
WiFi v1.3	644	720	736	767	741	481	921	968
Load	338	221	302	247		357	216	267
Power Consumption
Idle Minimum *	0.65	0.76	1	1.5	0.66	2.22	0.8	0.8
Idle Average *	1.06	1.91	2.1	2.3	1.58	3.94	1.4	1.7
Idle Maximum *	1.49	1.96	2.8	3.1	1.6	4.01	1.9	2.2
Load Average *	4.91	4.72	6.8	7.4	3.3	4.34	4.4	5.3
Load Maximum *	10.29	10.15	10.5	12.3	5.46	8.46	7	7.4

* ... smaller is better

Benchmarks

Geekbench 5.1 - 5.3
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra Mali-G77 MP11, Exynos 990, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2787 Points ∼16%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra Mali-G77 MP11, Exynos 990, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	2815 Points ∼17%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold2 5G Adreno 650, SD 865+ (Plus), 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	3012 Points ∼18%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro Adreno 650, SD 865, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	3361 Points ∼20%
LG Velvet Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	1797 Points ∼11%
Huawei Mate Xs Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990 5G, 512 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	2972 Points ∼18%
Nokia 8.3 5G Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	1527 Points ∼9%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	1786 Points ∼11%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra Mali-G77 MP11, Exynos 990, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	940 Points ∼54%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra Mali-G77 MP11, Exynos 990, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	940 Points ∼54%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold2 5G Adreno 650, SD 865+ (Plus), 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	983 Points ∼56%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro Adreno 650, SD 865, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	903 Points ∼52%
LG Velvet Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	554 Points ∼32%
Huawei Mate Xs Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990 5G, 512 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	766 Points ∼44%
Nokia 8.3 5G Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	558 Points ∼32%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	551 Points ∼32%

3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra Mali-G77 MP11, Exynos 990, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	4273 Points ∼54%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra Mali-G77 MP11, Exynos 990, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	4447 Points ∼56%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold2 5G Adreno 650, SD 865+ (Plus), 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	4536 Points ∼57%
LG Velvet Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	1898 Points ∼24%
Huawei Mate Xs Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990 5G, 512 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	2497 Points ∼31%
Nokia 8.3 5G Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	2963 Points ∼37%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	3391 Points ∼43%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra Mali-G77 MP11, Exynos 990, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	8239 Points ∼68%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra Mali-G77 MP11, Exynos 990, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	9157 Points ∼75%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold2 5G Adreno 650, SD 865+ (Plus), 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	10043 Points ∼83%
LG Velvet Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	3547 Points ∼29%
Huawei Mate Xs Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990 5G, 512 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	5672 Points ∼47%
Nokia 8.3 5G Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	3592 Points ∼30%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	2471 Points ∼20%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra Mali-G77 MP11, Exynos 990, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6830 Points ∼71%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra Mali-G77 MP11, Exynos 990, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	7412 Points ∼77%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold2 5G Adreno 650, SD 865+ (Plus), 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	7909 Points ∼82%
LG Velvet Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	2934 Points ∼30%
Huawei Mate Xs Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990 5G, 512 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	4422 Points ∼46%
Nokia 8.3 5G Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	3430 Points ∼36%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	2701 Points ∼28%

GFXBench
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra Mali-G77 MP11, Exynos 990, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	34 fps ∼22%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra Mali-G77 MP11, Exynos 990, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	33 fps ∼21%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold2 5G Adreno 650, SD 865+ (Plus), 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	23 fps ∼15%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro Adreno 650, SD 865, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	27 fps ∼17%
LG Velvet Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	12 fps ∼8%
Huawei Mate Xs Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990 5G, 512 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	46 fps ∼29%
Nokia 8.3 5G Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	13 fps ∼8%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	10 fps ∼6%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra Mali-G77 MP11, Exynos 990, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	22 fps ∼9%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra Mali-G77 MP11, Exynos 990, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	22 fps ∼9%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold2 5G Adreno 650, SD 865+ (Plus), 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	22 fps ∼9%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro Adreno 650, SD 865, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	20 fps ∼8%
LG Velvet Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	8.5 fps ∼4%
Huawei Mate Xs Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990 5G, 512 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	68 fps ∼28%
Nokia 8.3 5G Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	8.6 fps ∼4%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	6.3 fps ∼3%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra Mali-G77 MP11, Exynos 990, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	49 fps ∼24%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra Mali-G77 MP11, Exynos 990, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	51 fps ∼25%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold2 5G Adreno 650, SD 865+ (Plus), 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	34 fps ∼17%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro Adreno 650, SD 865, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	53 fps ∼26%
LG Velvet Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	20 fps ∼10%
Huawei Mate Xs Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990 5G, 512 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	60 fps ∼29%
Nokia 8.3 5G Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	21 fps ∼10%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	16 fps ∼8%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra Mali-G77 MP11, Exynos 990, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	43 fps ∼7%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra Mali-G77 MP11, Exynos 990, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	56 fps ∼10%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold2 5G Adreno 650, SD 865+ (Plus), 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	46 fps ∼8%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro Adreno 650, SD 865, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	27 fps ∼5%
LG Velvet Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	23 fps ∼4%
Huawei Mate Xs Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990 5G, 512 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	165 fps ∼28%
Nokia 8.3 5G Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	24 fps ∼4%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	18 fps ∼3%

PCMark for Android - Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra Mali-G77 MP11, Exynos 990, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	11784 Points ∼77%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra Mali-G77 MP11, Exynos 990, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	10255 Points ∼67%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold2 5G Adreno 650, SD 865+ (Plus), 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	12457 Points ∼81%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro Adreno 650, SD 865, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	10945 Points ∼72%
LG Velvet Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	7808 Points ∼51%
Huawei Mate Xs Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990 5G, 512 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	8512 Points ∼56%
Nokia 8.3 5G Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	7245 Points ∼47%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	7737 Points ∼51%

AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra Mali-G77 MP11, Exynos 990, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	527820 Points ∼70%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra Mali-G77 MP11, Exynos 990, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	498708 Points ∼66%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold2 5G Adreno 650, SD 865+ (Plus), 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	589249 Points ∼78%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro Adreno 650, SD 865, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	572807 Points ∼76%
LG Velvet Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	308878 Points ∼41%
Huawei Mate Xs Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990 5G, 512 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	470692 Points ∼63%
Nokia 8.3 5G Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	285731 Points ∼38%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	251673 Points ∼33%

WebXPRT 3 - --- (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra Mali-G77 MP11, Exynos 990, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	102 Points ∼34%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra Mali-G77 MP11, Exynos 990, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	86 Points ∼29%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold2 5G Adreno 650, SD 865+ (Plus), 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	114 Points ∼39%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro Adreno 650, SD 865, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	101 Points ∼34%
LG Velvet Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	76 Points ∼26%
Huawei Mate Xs Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990 5G, 512 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	98 Points ∼33%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	68 Points ∼23%

AndroBench 3-5
Random Write 4KB (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra Mali-G77 MP11, Exynos 990, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	217.74 MB/s ∼68%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra Mali-G77 MP11, Exynos 990, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	221.37 MB/s ∼69%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold2 5G Adreno 650, SD 865+ (Plus), 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	220.6 MB/s ∼69%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro Adreno 650, SD 865, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	261.45 MB/s ∼82%
LG Velvet Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	135.87 MB/s ∼43%
Huawei Mate Xs Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990 5G, 512 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	259.08 MB/s ∼81%
Nokia 8.3 5G Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	109.9 MB/s ∼34%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	98.12 MB/s ∼31%
Random Read 4KB (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra Mali-G77 MP11, Exynos 990, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	186.67 MB/s ∼51%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra Mali-G77 MP11, Exynos 990, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	202.43 MB/s ∼55%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold2 5G Adreno 650, SD 865+ (Plus), 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	232.1 MB/s ∼63%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro Adreno 650, SD 865, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	218.2 MB/s ∼59%
LG Velvet Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	154.28 MB/s ∼42%
Huawei Mate Xs Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990 5G, 512 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	202.85 MB/s ∼55%
Nokia 8.3 5G Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	117.1 MB/s ∼32%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	134.77 MB/s ∼37%
Sequential Write 256KB (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra Mali-G77 MP11, Exynos 990, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	802.09 MB/s ∼61%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra Mali-G77 MP11, Exynos 990, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	697.08 MB/s ∼53%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold2 5G Adreno 650, SD 865+ (Plus), 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	756.6 MB/s ∼57%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro Adreno 650, SD 865, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	657.92 MB/s ∼50%
LG Velvet Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	409.21 MB/s ∼31%
Huawei Mate Xs Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990 5G, 512 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	402.67 MB/s ∼30%
Nokia 8.3 5G Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	225.6 MB/s ∼17%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	186.23 MB/s ∼14%
Sequential Read 256KB (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra Mali-G77 MP11, Exynos 990, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1782.3 MB/s ∼87%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra Mali-G77 MP11, Exynos 990, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	1632.02 MB/s ∼80%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold2 5G Adreno 650, SD 865+ (Plus), 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1681 MB/s ∼83%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro Adreno 650, SD 865, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	1398.36 MB/s ∼69%
LG Velvet Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	924.54 MB/s ∼45%
Huawei Mate Xs Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990 5G, 512 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	1766.63 MB/s ∼87%
Nokia 8.3 5G Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	937.3 MB/s ∼46%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	489.37 MB/s ∼24%

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra Mali-G77 MP11, Exynos 990, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	870 (841^min - 882^max) MBit/s ∼51%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra Mali-G77 MP11, Exynos 990, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	825 (763^min - 855^max) MBit/s ∼48%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold2 5G Adreno 650, SD 865+ (Plus), 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	766 (468^min - 808^max) MBit/s ∼44%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro Adreno 650, SD 865, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	817 (785^min - 843^max) MBit/s ∼47%
LG Velvet Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	683 (656^min - 691^max) MBit/s ∼40%
Huawei Mate Xs Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990 5G, 512 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	963 (471^min - 1110^max) MBit/s ∼56%
Nokia 8.3 5G Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	643 (580^min - 670^max) MBit/s ∼37%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	309 (140^min - 360^max) MBit/s ∼18%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra Mali-G77 MP11, Exynos 990, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	772 (691^min - 832^max) MBit/s ∼43%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra Mali-G77 MP11, Exynos 990, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	818 (425^min - 890^max) MBit/s ∼46%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold2 5G Adreno 650, SD 865+ (Plus), 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	671 (626^min - 693^max) MBit/s ∼38%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro Adreno 650, SD 865, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	876 (785^min - 909^max) MBit/s ∼49%
LG Velvet Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	618 (310^min - 644^max) MBit/s ∼35%
Huawei Mate Xs Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990 5G, 512 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	542 (479^min - 631^max) MBit/s ∼31%
Nokia 8.3 5G Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	651 (612^min - 662^max) MBit/s ∼37%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	326 (309^min - 343^max) MBit/s ∼18%

PUBG Mobile - HD (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra Mali-G77 MP11, Exynos 990, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	40 (37^min - 41^max) fps ∼67%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra Mali-G77 MP11, Exynos 990, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	40 (34^min - 42^max) fps ∼67%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold2 5G Adreno 650, SD 865+ (Plus), 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	60 (56^min - 60^max) fps ∼100%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro Adreno 650, SD 865, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	60 fps ∼100%
Huawei Mate Xs Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990 5G, 512 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	40 (35^min - 41^max) fps ∼67%
Nokia 8.3 5G Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	30 (28^min - 31^max) fps ∼50%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	30 fps ∼50%