Notebookcheck

Notebookcheck's Top 10 Phablets (>90cm²)

Daniel Schmidt (translated by Andreas Osthoff), 07/09/2017

Update July 2018. Here is a list of the best XL-sized smartphones - with screen surface areas above 90 cm² - we have reviewed in the last few months. Our list of top models is regularly updated, maintained and commented on and should assist in purchase decisions.

It seems the trend towards bigger smartphone panels is unstoppable right now, which makes it harder to draw the line between smartphones and phablets. We decided to classify them based on their panel surface area. This Top 10 rating only includes smartphones with a panel surface area above 90 cm².

The diagonal sizes can differ due to different aspect ratios. We decided to use 5.7 inches (14.48 cm, 89.57 cm²) for 16:9 smartphones, and 5.9 inches (14.99 cm, 89.93 cm²) for 2:1 or 18:9 smartphones, respectively. 19:9 displays are counted from 6.0 inches upwards (15.24 cm, 89.86 cm²) and more exotic aspect ratios are classified individually.

The following rankings might be interesting for you smartphone purchase decision as well:

The following table shows the Top 10 phablets reviewed in the last 12 months, which  are still relevant and available at this time. In case of identical scores, the more recently tested smartphone is listed first. The table can be sorted by clicking on the header; in addition, the search results can be filtered (e.g. "Kirin").

Best Phablets as of July 2018

Pos.DateRatingImageModelHeightWeightSizeResolutionOSBest Price
104/201892%Huawei P20 ProHuawei P20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 970
ARM Mali-G72 MP12
6 GB Memory, 128 GB UFS 2.1
7.65 mm174 g6.1"2240x1080Android 8.1 Oreo
211/201792%Huawei Mate 10 ProHuawei Mate 10 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 970
ARM Mali-G72 MP12
6 GB Memory, 128 GB UFS 2.1
7.9 mm178 g6"2160x1080Android 8.0 Oreo
303/201891%Samsung Galaxy S9 PlusSamsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9810
ARM Mali-G72 MP18
6 GB Memory, 64 GB UFS 2.1
8.5 mm189 g6.2"2960x1440Android 8.0 Oreo
409/201790%Samsung Galaxy Note 8Samsung Galaxy Note 8
Samsung Exynos 8895 Octa
ARM Mali-G71 MP20
6 GB Memory, 64 GB UFS 2.1
8.6 mm195 g6.3"2960x1440Android 7.1 Nougat
505/201890%OnePlus 6OnePlus 6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
Qualcomm Adreno 630
8 GB Memory, 128 GB UFS 2.1
7.75 mm177 g6.28"2280x1080Android 8.1 Oreo
606/2018
Neu
90%LG G7 ThinQLG G7 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
Qualcomm Adreno 630
4 GB Memory, 64 GB UFS 2.1
7.9 mm162 g6.1"3120x1440Android 8.0 Oreo
709/201789%LG V30LG V30
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998)
Qualcomm Adreno 540
4 GB Memory, 64 GB UFS 2.1
7.3 mm158 g6"2880x1440Android 7.1 Nougat
806/201889%HTC U12 PlusHTC U12 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
Qualcomm Adreno 630
6 GB Memory, 64 GB UFS 2.1
9.7 mm188 g6"2880x1440Android 8.0 Oreo
902/201889%Honor View 10Honor View 10
HiSilicon Kirin 970
ARM Mali-G72 MP12
6 GB Memory, 128 GB UFS 2.1
7 mm172 g5.99"2160x1080Android 8.0 Oreo
1003/201888%Razer Phone 2017Razer Phone 2017
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998)
Qualcomm Adreno 540
8 GB Memory, 64 GB UFS 2.1
8 mm197 g5.72"1440x2560Android 7.1 Nougat

Working For Notebookcheck

Are you a techie who knows how to write? Then join our Team!

Currently wanted: 
News Editor - Details here

Top 10 smartphones from the last 12 months; current reviews are listed first.

Editors' Comments

The increasing number of smartphones with narrower bezels and higher display (aspect ratios 2:1, 19:9, etc.) also result in larger display sizes. We completely reworked the Top 10 phablet ranking to give you better overview. It is not based on the diagonal size anymore, but the surface area of the panel.

This change changes our ranking and devices like the LG G6iPhone X, and Moto Z2 Force drop out of the rating because they do not meet the new requirements. The HTC U11 Plus and das OnePlus 5T are replaced by their successors, and the we have new entries with the Huawei P20 Pro, Razer Phone, and the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s.

1st - Huawei P20 Pro

Huawei P20 Pro
Huawei P20 Pro

The Huawei P20 Pro mainly creates a wow-effect with its powerful triple camera, but we also like the colors with some extraordinary choices. Huawei completely changed them for the current P-series and now uses large display and big batteries. It is also the first P-series smartphone where the cameras are not sitting flush with the rest of the chassis. The technical specs are very similar to the Mate 10 Pro, but Huawei uses a Natural-Tone display for the first time, which will automatically adjust the picture based on the environment. The MIMO antenna technology for the Wi-Fi is now also available on a Huawei smartphone and enables high transfer rates, but the Wi-Fi performance was not very consistent. We also have some expectations for a smartphone that retails for more than 800 Euros, like modern Bluetooth and at least a 1440p screen. The latter is not really an advantage in day-to-day usage, but important for VR applications.

Pricecompare

2nd – Huawei Mate 10 Pro

Huawei Mate 10 Pro
Huawei Mate 10 Pro

Bigger is better for the Huawei Mate 10 Pro: The 6-inch phablet comes with Huawei's most powerful high-end SoC, 6 GB RAM as well as 128 GB internal storage. It is also the first device of its kind with dual-VoLTE and LTE Cat. 18. It is already shipped with the current Android 8.0 Oreo and offers a full list of features worthy of a high-end smartphone, including a 4000 mAh battery as well as IP67 certification. The panel resolution falls a bit short and you cannot expand the storage via microSD. There is no stereo jack, either, and Bluetooth 4.2 is not the latest version, but you can stream high-res audio files via aptX HD.

Pricecompare

3rd - Samsung Galaxy S9+

Samsung Galaxy S9+
Samsung Galaxy S9+

No doubt: both, the Galaxy S9 and the Galaxy S9+, are amazing smartphones. However, the differences to their respective predecessors are fairly small. Equipped with a new and quite fast Exynos SoC, 6 GB of RAM (S9: 4 GB), and 64/256 GB of UFS 2.1 storage the S9+ has quite a bit to offer. The display has been fine-tuned even further by Samsung and the phone’s already narrow bezels have shrunk once more. The rest of the specs are not any less impressive: LTE Cat. 18, Bluetooth 5.0, microSD slot, IP67-certified, wireless charging, USB 3.1 with support for DisplayPort, fingerprint reader and iris scanner, and much more. Like the new brilliant dual-lens camera capable of adjusting its aperture between f/1.5 and f/2.4.

Our major gripe was once again Bixby. The new phone is also slightly bigger and heavier than its predecessor. The battery has remained identical yet battery life has dropped compared to its predecessor.

Pricecompare

4th – Samsung Galaxy Note 8

Samsung Galaxy Note 8
Samsung Galaxy Note 8

After last year's fiasco, Samsung's Galaxy Note 8 is once again an exceptional phablet with pen support. Similar to the current Galaxy S models, it features an aspect ratio of 2.06:1 with a diagonal size of 6.3 inches. It is well equipped with 6 GB RAM as well as 64 GB internal storage, especially since the latter can be expanded via microSD. The dual-camera of the Note 8 is a new feature, and the second lens can be used as 2x optical zoom, but it captures less light than the wide-angle lens. The Note 8 does not reveal many drawbacks. The fingerprint scanner is now at the back, and the position is not perfect. The speaker could be better and we are not fully convinced by the location features, either.

Pricecompare

5th - OnePlus 6

OnePlus 6
OnePlus 6

The OnePlus 6 is mostly a final polish by the Chinese company. The smartphone is now shipped with the Snapdragon 845 and the display got a notch. The latter is bigger as well at 6.28 inches with a resolution of 2280 x 1080 pixels. The smallest models comes with 6 GB RAM and 64 GB internal storage, but you can also get 128 or 256 GB (both 8 GB RAM) if you need more storage, because there is no microSD reader.The rear cover is now made of glass.

The cameras are really good, but not much improved. The display is also pretty dim compared to other high-end smartphones, even though this is only a problem under direct sunlight. VoLTE and VoWiFi are supported by the OnePlus 6 in theory, but you will need a cooperation with your local providers, which is not possible in every country.

Pricecompare

6th – LG G7 ThinQ

LG G7 ThinQ
LG G7 ThinQ

At 6.1 inches (15.49 cm, 13:6, 91.34 cm2, 14.16 sq in) the LG G7 ThinQ’s display is very large. It is based on MLCD+ technology including HDR, and can get incredibly bright. Pixel density is high thanks to its 3120 x 1440 resolution. The remaining hardware matches the device’s high-end ambitions perfectly: a very fast Snapdragon 845, LTE Cat. 18, ac-Wi-Fi with MIMO, a Hi-Fi DAC, and last but not least wireless charging. Storage size is nothing to write home about but rather average for its class, and it can be expanded via microSD.

At just 3,000 mAh the battery is comparatively small, and the cameras were not the best either. In addition, the USB-C port is only connected to a USB 2.0 bus.

Pricecompare

Quality journalism is made possible by advertising. We show the least amount of ads whenever possible. We intentionally show more ads when an adblocker is used. Please, switch off ad blockers.

7th – LG V30

LG V30
LG V30

Many people believe the LG V30 is what the LG G6 should have been. Contrary to the small sibling, LG equips this smartphone with the latest components including a high-end SoC, quad-DAC audio chip as well as wireless charging. LG does not drop the stereo jack, either. The display of the LG V30 is also very good, but is pretty dark in practice. 4GB RAM as well as 64 GB internal storage is just average, but you can expand the storage via microSD. The V30 is also certified according to IP68 and passed 14 MIL-STD-810 tests.

The USB port only supports the 2.0 standard, which is unfortunate. The price at launch is also rather ambitious.

Pricecompare

8th - HTC U12+

HTC U12+
HTC U12+

The design of the HTC U12 Plus hardly changed and features a 6.0-inch SLCD6 display (2:1, 15.24 cm, 92.90 cm²) with 2880 x 1440 pixels. HTC's smartphone is powered by Qualcomm's current high-end SoC supported by 6 GB RAM and 64 GB fast UFS 2.1 storage. The latter can be expanded via microSD card. The case is protected against dust and water, and also accommodates two speakers that sound decent. The main lens of the new dual-cam is really good, but we were not convinced by the second lens during the review. The battery runtime is also just average, but this is also a result of the comparatively small battery. The display is also pretty dark compared to the other high-end competitors

Pricecompare

9th – Honor View 10

Honor View 10
Honor View 10

The Honor View 10 is an interesting alternative, because it offers many high-end components for a comparatively low price. The display (5.99-inch, 2:1, 2160 x 1080 pixels) manages good test results and the system performance of the View 10 is really good thanks to the fast Kirin SoC as well as one of the fastest LTE modem, which even supports Dual-VoLTE.

The high temperatures under load are not good and the WLAN performance could be better. Honor could also improve the power consumption, although the battery runtimes are still good thanks to the big battery.

Pricecompare

10th - Razer Phone (2017)

Razer Phone
Razer Phone

The Razer Phone is currently one of the few smartphones with a 16:9 aspect ratio despite the high-end specs. The display size is 5.72 inches (14.53 cm, 90.20 cm²) with a resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels. It is powered by a powerful Snapdragon SoC, which is supported by a healthy amount of RAM (8 GB). You can expand the 64 GB internal storage with a microSD card. The Razer Phone was shipped with Android 7.1 Nougat, but already got the update to Android Oreo.

The high refresh rate (120 Hz) of the gamer smartphone's IGZO panel is another highlight. We also liked the two speakers during our review, and the 4000 mAh battery provides great battery runtimes.

Pricecompare

Top 10 Phablets in Comparison

Size Comparison

Measurement Results

Huawei P20 Pro
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
OnePlus 6
LG G7 ThinQ
LG V30
HTC U12 Plus
Honor View 10
Razer Phone 2017
Response Times
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
4 (2, 2)
6.4 (3.6, 2.8)
8 (3, 5)
4.8 (2, 2.8)
4
46 (24.8, 21.2)
10 (5, 5)
42.4 (19.6, 22.8)
53.6 (26, 27.6)
30 (17, 13)
Response Time Black / White *
4 (2, 2)
4.4 (2.4, 2)
6 (3, 3)
4 (2, 2)
3.2
18.8 (7.2, 11.6)
25 (19, 6)
29.6 (15.6, 14)
25.6 (8.4, 17.2)
19 (12, 7)
PWM Frequency
238.1
247.5
215.5
257.7
236
1174 (42)
227 (80)
9709 (50)
Screen
Brightness middle
569
629
565
530
430
974
432
395
530
436
Brightness
578
636
571
536
437
975
428
402
523
417
Brightness Distribution
95
94
96
93
87
96
87
90
88
92
Black Level *
0.49
0.37
0.35
0.16
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
1.3
1.7
2.3
2.6
2.3
5.4
4.18
1.6
2.4
3.88
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
2.1
3.6
4.8
5.1
4.6
13.1
8.53
3.4
5.5
7.96
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
1.6
2.4
1.9
2.7
2.4
5
5.3
1.1
2.2
5.8
Gamma
2.31 104%
2.15 112%
2.16 111%
2.04 118%
2.28 105%
2.31 104%
2.33 103%
2.14 112%
2.25 107%
2.45 98%
CCT
6401 102%
6337 103%
6332 103%
6206 105%
6160 106%
7480 87%
7487 87%
6536 99%
6598 99%
7657 85%
Contrast
1988
1068
1514
2725
Heat
Maximum Upper Side *
35.6
36.7
35.8
35.7
45.3
34.8
30.3
38.1
37.4
32.7
Maximum Bottom *
34.3
39.8
37.9
36.4
42.5
35.8
30.3
38.8
35
32.8
Idle Upper Side *
30.7
26.3
23.1
30.4
30.5
32.3
29.9
32.6
28.8
29.7
Idle Bottom *
29.3
25.3
22
29.8
30.1
29.3
27.7
26.8
24.9
28.1
Battery Runtime
Reader / Idle
1727
1744
1343
1134
1806
1662
1914
1452
1671
H.264
784
929
674
662
791
908
822
464
819
WiFi v1.3
744
818
521
474
762
591
774
507
679
762
Load
345
398
237
246
246
260
267
230
305
Power Consumption
Idle Minimum *
0.84
0.85
0.68
0.73
0.6
1.16
0.72
0.77
1.05
0.83
Idle Average *
1.54
1.15
0.95
1.44
1
1.98
1.37
2.18
2.36
2.11
Idle Maximum *
1.57
1.23
1.09
1.53
1.6
2.07
1.41
2.21
2.41
2.24
Load Average *
2.47
4.12
4.58
4.56
4.3
4.51
3.46
6.25
4.93
4.94
Load Maximum *
2.49
8.42
5.16
5.09
8.6
8.3
7.83
10.16
9.04
9.08

* ... smaller is better

Benchmarks

AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Huawei P20 Pro
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
179709 Points ∼78%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
177341 Points ∼77%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Mali-G72 MP18, 9810, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
222290 Points ∼96%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
Mali-G71 MP20, 8895 Octa, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
173997 Points ∼75%
OnePlus 6
Adreno 630, 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
230421 Points ∼100%
LG G7 ThinQ
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
223464 Points ∼97%
LG V30
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
173749 Points ∼75%
HTC U12 Plus
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
221971 Points ∼96%
Honor View 10
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
173653 Points ∼75%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
Huawei P20 Pro
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
207959 Points ∼72%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
212278 Points ∼73%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Mali-G72 MP18, 9810, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
250577 Points ∼86%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
Mali-G71 MP20, 8895 Octa, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
201210 Points ∼69%
OnePlus 6
Adreno 630, 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
266686 Points ∼92%
LG G7 ThinQ
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
256276 Points ∼88%
HTC U12 Plus
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
255739 Points ∼88%
Razer Phone 2017
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
208972 Points ∼72%
Geekbench 4.1/4.2
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Huawei P20 Pro
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
6756 Points ∼23%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
6792 Points ∼24%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Mali-G72 MP18, 9810, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
8963 Points ∼31%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
Mali-G71 MP20, 8895 Octa, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
6744 Points ∼23%
LG V30
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
6078 Points ∼21%
HTC U12 Plus
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
8812 Points ∼31%
Honor View 10
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
6785 Points ∼23%
Razer Phone 2017
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
6742 Points ∼23%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Huawei P20 Pro
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
1922 Points ∼32%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
1898 Points ∼32%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Mali-G72 MP18, 9810, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3776 Points ∼64%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
Mali-G71 MP20, 8895 Octa, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2028 Points ∼34%
LG V30
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
1900 Points ∼32%
HTC U12 Plus
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2429 Points ∼41%
Honor View 10
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
1918 Points ∼32%
Razer Phone 2017
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
1942 Points ∼33%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Huawei P20 Pro
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
121 fps ∼7%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
112 fps ∼7%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Mali-G72 MP18, 9810, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
147 fps ∼9%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
Mali-G71 MP20, 8895 Octa, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
105 fps ∼6%
OnePlus 6
Adreno 630, 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
150 fps ∼9%
LG V30
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
113 fps ∼7%
HTC U12 Plus
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
98 fps ∼6%
Honor View 10
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
125 fps ∼7%
Razer Phone 2017
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
117 fps ∼7%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Huawei P20 Pro
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
60 fps ∼13%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
60 fps ∼13%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Mali-G72 MP18, 9810, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
60 fps ∼13%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
Mali-G71 MP20, 8895 Octa, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
59 fps ∼13%
OnePlus 6
Adreno 630, 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
60 fps ∼13%
LG V30
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
60 fps ∼13%
HTC U12 Plus
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
59 fps ∼13%
Honor View 10
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
59 fps ∼13%
Razer Phone 2017
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
79 fps ∼17%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Huawei P20 Pro
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
61 fps ∼11%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
54 fps ∼10%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Mali-G72 MP18, 9810, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
74 fps ∼13%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
Mali-G71 MP20, 8895 Octa, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
51 fps ∼9%
OnePlus 6
Adreno 630, 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
66 fps ∼12%
LG V30
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
59 fps ∼11%
HTC U12 Plus
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
72 fps ∼13%
Honor View 10
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
66 fps ∼12%
Razer Phone 2017
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
43 fps ∼8%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Huawei P20 Pro
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
54 fps ∼15%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
56 fps ∼15%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Mali-G72 MP18, 9810, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
45 fps ∼12%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
Mali-G71 MP20, 8895 Octa, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
38 fps ∼10%
OnePlus 6
Adreno 630, 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
58 fps ∼16%
LG V30
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
35 fps ∼10%
HTC U12 Plus
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
35 fps ∼10%
Honor View 10
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
55 fps ∼15%
Razer Phone 2017
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
40 fps ∼11%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Huawei P20 Pro
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
6982 Points ∼68%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
6932 Points ∼67%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Mali-G72 MP18, 9810, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
5319 Points ∼52%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
Mali-G71 MP20, 8895 Octa, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
5096 Points ∼49%
OnePlus 6
Adreno 630, 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
8282 Points ∼80%
LG G7 ThinQ
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
7717 Points ∼75%
LG V30
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
5603 Points ∼54%
HTC U12 Plus
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
8601 Points ∼83%
Honor View 10
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
6724 Points ∼65%
Razer Phone 2017
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
7046 Points ∼68%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Huawei P20 Pro
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
8115 Points ∼79%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
8439 Points ∼82%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Mali-G72 MP18, 9810, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
5822 Points ∼57%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
Mali-G71 MP20, 8895 Octa, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
6084 Points ∼59%
OnePlus 6
Adreno 630, 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
9630 Points ∼94%
LG G7 ThinQ
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
9503 Points ∼93%
LG V30
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
6854 Points ∼67%
HTC U12 Plus
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
10264 Points ∼100%
Honor View 10
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
8306 Points ∼81%
Razer Phone 2017
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
7968 Points ∼78%
Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value)
Huawei P20 Pro
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
887 Points ∼47%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
788 Points ∼42%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Mali-G72 MP18, 9810, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
1481 Points ∼79%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
Mali-G71 MP20, 8895 Octa, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
1295 Points ∼69%
OnePlus 6
Adreno 630, 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
1169 Points ∼62%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Huawei P20 Pro
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2942 Points ∼82%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3002 Points ∼84%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Mali-G72 MP18, 9810, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2546 Points ∼71%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
Mali-G71 MP20, 8895 Octa, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2417 Points ∼68%
OnePlus 6
Adreno 630, 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3566 Points ∼100%
LG G7 ThinQ
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3416 Points ∼95%
LG V30
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2893 Points ∼81%
HTC U12 Plus
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2947 Points ∼82%
Honor View 10
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
1897 Points ∼53%
Razer Phone 2017
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3148 Points ∼88%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei P20 Pro
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3109 Points ∼38%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3034 Points ∼37%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Mali-G72 MP18, 9810, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3792 Points ∼46%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
Mali-G71 MP20, 8895 Octa, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2723 Points ∼33%
OnePlus 6
Adreno 630, 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
5547 Points ∼68%
LG G7 ThinQ
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
5322 Points ∼65%
LG V30
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3809 Points ∼46%
HTC U12 Plus
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
4450 Points ∼54%
Honor View 10
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2730 Points ∼33%
Razer Phone 2017
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
4490 Points ∼55%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Huawei P20 Pro
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3070 Points ∼60%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3027 Points ∼59%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Mali-G72 MP18, 9810, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3420 Points ∼67%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
Mali-G71 MP20, 8895 Octa, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2648 Points ∼52%
OnePlus 6
Adreno 630, 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
4937 Points ∼96%
LG G7 ThinQ
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
4735 Points ∼92%
LG V30
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3559 Points ∼69%
HTC U12 Plus
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3997 Points ∼78%
Honor View 10
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2487 Points ∼48%
Razer Phone 2017
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
4101 Points ∼80%
Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
Huawei P20 Pro
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
11584 Points ∼23%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
10406 Points ∼21%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Mali-G72 MP18, 9810, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
14760 Points ∼30%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
Mali-G71 MP20, 8895 Octa, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
13265 Points ∼27%
OnePlus 6
Adreno 630, 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
17026 Points ∼34%
LG G7 ThinQ
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
16720 Points ∼34%
LG V30
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
10506 Points ∼21%
HTC U12 Plus
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
16285 Points ∼33%
Honor View 10
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
6729 Points ∼14%
Razer Phone 2017
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
12600 Points ∼25%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
Huawei P20 Pro
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3852.2 ms * ∼6%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3590.6 ms * ∼6%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Mali-G72 MP18, 9810, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2059.7 ms * ∼3%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
Mali-G71 MP20, 8895 Octa, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
1876.8 ms * ∼3%
OnePlus 6
Adreno 630, 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2445 ms * ∼4%
LG G7 ThinQ
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2484.1 ms * ∼4%
LG V30
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3630 ms * ∼6%
HTC U12 Plus
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2409.6 ms * ∼4%
Honor View 10
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
6013 ms * ∼10%
Razer Phone 2017
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3476 ms * ∼6%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score (sort by value)
Huawei P20 Pro
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
182 Points ∼23%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
158 Points ∼20%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Mali-G72 MP18, 9810, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
164 Points ∼20%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
Mali-G71 MP20, 8895 Octa, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
159 Points ∼20%
OnePlus 6
Adreno 630, 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
252 Points ∼31%
LG G7 ThinQ
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
252 Points ∼31%
LG V30
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
138 Points ∼17%
HTC U12 Plus
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
257 Points ∼32%
Honor View 10
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
157 Points ∼19%
WebXPRT 3 - --- (sort by value)
Huawei P20 Pro
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
69 Points ∼53%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Mali-G72 MP18, 9810, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
64 Points ∼49%
OnePlus 6
Adreno 630, 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
98 Points ∼75%
LG G7 ThinQ
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
97 Points ∼75%
HTC U12 Plus
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
101 Points ∼78%
AndroBench 3-5
Random Write 4KB (sort by value)
Huawei P20 Pro
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
160.49 MB/s ∼98%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
164.45 MB/s ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Mali-G72 MP18, 9810, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
22.74 MB/s ∼14%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
Mali-G71 MP20, 8895 Octa, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
14.55 MB/s ∼9%
OnePlus 6
Adreno 630, 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
21.8 MB/s ∼13%
LG G7 ThinQ
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
23.26 MB/s ∼14%
LG V30
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
10.21 MB/s ∼6%
HTC U12 Plus
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
104.24 MB/s ∼63%
Honor View 10
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
160 MB/s ∼97%
Razer Phone 2017
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
14.3 MB/s ∼9%
Random Read 4KB (sort by value)
Huawei P20 Pro
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
144.33 MB/s ∼83%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
132.27 MB/s ∼76%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Mali-G72 MP18, 9810, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
129.68 MB/s ∼75%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
Mali-G71 MP20, 8895 Octa, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
122.48 MB/s ∼71%
OnePlus 6
Adreno 630, 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
137 MB/s ∼79%
LG G7 ThinQ
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
110.46 MB/s ∼64%
LG V30
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
78.17 MB/s ∼45%
HTC U12 Plus
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
118.14 MB/s ∼68%
Honor View 10
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
144.3 MB/s ∼83%
Razer Phone 2017
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
142.5 MB/s ∼82%
Sequential Write 256KB (sort by value)
Huawei P20 Pro
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
196.69 MB/s ∼86%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
208.72 MB/s ∼91%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Mali-G72 MP18, 9810, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
204.94 MB/s ∼90%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
Mali-G71 MP20, 8895 Octa, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
205.85 MB/s ∼90%
OnePlus 6
Adreno 630, 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
201.4 MB/s ∼88%
LG G7 ThinQ
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
176.45 MB/s ∼77%
LG V30
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
193.22 MB/s ∼85%
HTC U12 Plus
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
195.82 MB/s ∼86%
Honor View 10
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
194.3 MB/s ∼85%
Razer Phone 2017
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
202.5 MB/s ∼89%
Sequential Read 256KB (sort by value)
Huawei P20 Pro
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
831.82 MB/s ∼100%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
732.46 MB/s ∼88%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Mali-G72 MP18, 9810, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
818.69 MB/s ∼98%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8
Mali-G71 MP20, 8895 Octa, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
796.96 MB/s ∼96%
OnePlus 6
Adreno 630, 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
725.6 MB/s ∼87%
LG G7 ThinQ
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
695.15 MB/s ∼84%
LG V30
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
669.48 MB/s ∼80%
HTC U12 Plus
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
709.11 MB/s ∼85%
Honor View 10
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
810.3 MB/s ∼97%
Razer Phone 2017
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
732.3 MB/s ∼88%

* ... smaller is better

static version load dynamic
Loading Comments
Comment this article
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Reviews > Notebookcheck's Top 10 Phablets (>90cm²)
Daniel Schmidt (Update: 2018-07-20)