Notebookcheck

The Best Smartphones with Large Display

November 2020 Update. The current trend in smartphone displays is a complete reversal of the last trend in cell phone displays before the smartphone entered: displays are getting increasingly larger. One reason are our changed habits and the ways in which we use modern smartphones. Telephony became texting and posting, social media and media consumption applications are now more important than ever and benefit immensely from large content display allotments. The following table contains the best smartphones with large displays reviewed by us.
Daniel Schmidt (translated by Finn D. Boerne),

Smartphones with a display larger than 6.5-inches are no longer the exception. If you are looking for the largest displays available this list may be very helpful as it contains the best smartphones with displays that measure at least 6.8-inches diagonally.

The following rankings might be interesting for you smartphone purchase decision as well:

The Best Smartphones with Large Display (> 6.8-inches)

Pos.
Datum
Bew.
Bild
Modell
Dicke
Gewicht
SBR
Bildwiederholrate
Größe
Auflösung
OS
Preis ab
1
09/2020
89 %Samsung Galaxy Note20 UltraSamsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990
ARM Mali-G77 MP11
12 GB Memory, 256 GB 
8.1 mm208 g92 %120 Hz6.90"3088x1440Android 10
2
03/2020
89 %Samsung Galaxy S20 UltraSamsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990
ARM Mali-G77 MP11
12 GB Memory, 128 GB 
8.8 mm219 g90 %120 Hz6.90"3200x1440Android 10
3
10/2020
Neu
87 %Samsung Galaxy Z Fold2 5GSamsung Galaxy Z Fold2 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus)
Qualcomm Adreno 650
12 GB Memory, 256 GB 
6.9 mm279 g90 %120 Hz7.60"2208x1768Android 10
4
06/2020
Neu
85 %Xiaomi Black Shark 3 ProXiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
Qualcomm Adreno 650
12 GB Memory, 256 GB 
10.1 mm253 g83.6 %90 Hz7.10"3120x1440Android 10
5
07/2020
Neu
85 %LG VelvetLG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
Qualcomm Adreno 620
6 GB Memory, 128 GB UFS 2.1
7.85 mm180 g88 %60 Hz6.80"2460x1080Android 10
6
04/2020
Neu
82 %Huawei Mate XsHuawei Mate Xs
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
ARM Mali-G76 MP16
8 GB Memory, 512 GB 
11 mm300 g87 %60 Hz8.00"2480x2200Android 10
7
10/2020
Neu
81 %Nokia 8.3 5GNokia 8.3 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
Qualcomm Adreno 620
8 GB Memory, 128 GB UFS 2.1
9 mm227 g83 %60 Hz6.81"2400x1080Android 10
8
10/2020
Neu
80 %Motorola Moto G9 PlusMotorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
Qualcomm Adreno 618
4 GB Memory, 128 GB UFS 2.1
9.7 mm223 g83.4 %60 Hz6.81"2400x1080Android 10

The table above contains an overview over the best phablets reviewed by Notebookcheck over the course of the past 12 months as well as still relevant and available older products. In cases of identical score the more recent device is listed first. All prices in above table and price comparisons are updated daily and can thus differ.

Editors' Comments

Due to the reorganization and restructuring of this list the number of contenders was reduced significantly. In return, it also brought us six new entries.

1st – Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra

Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra

The Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra features a 6.9-inch dynamic OLED display with an adaptive refresh rate of up to 120 Hz. Not only does the panel support HDR10 and HDR10+, it is also the brightest smartphone display we have ever seen. The Note 20 Ultra is powered by an Exynos 990 with 12 GB of RAM and features a whopping 256 GB of microSD expandable UFS 3.1 storage. Its fast USB 3.2 port supports connecting external displays as well as DeX, among other things. The latter is now also supported wirelessly. Like before the Note includes Samsung’s S pen whose slot has been relocated from the right to the left-hand side.

The tripe-camera setup performed very well and includes a depth-of-field sensor. Samsung’s Note 20 is furthermore IP68-certified against ingress of dust and water and supports 5G and Wi-Fi 6. Too bad the display will only run at 120 Hz in FHD+ resolution.

2nd – Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra

Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra

With its 6.9-inch Dynamic AMOLED display the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra is one of the largest smartphones currently available. Its high resolution of 3200 x 1440 pixels makes for an ultra-sharp picture. That is as long as you decide not to run the phone in 120 Hz mode, because that will lower resolution to 2400 x 1080.

An array of five cameras ensure great photo quality, a 100x zoom, and support for 8k video. However, photo quality when zoomed-in or in low-light situations is in need of improvement.

All things considered the Galaxy S20 Ultra is a smartphone that leaves almost nothing to be desired and is an eye-catcher due to its sheer size alone.

Pricecompare

3rd – Samsung Galaxy Z Fold2

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold2

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold2’s foldable OLED display measures 7.6-inches. It is a bit smaller than on its predecessor but in return is not only significantly brighter but also supports a refresh rate of 120 Hz. The foldable is powered by Qualcomm’s current top-of-the-line SoC supported by 12 GB of RAM, 256 GB of non-expandable storage space, and the latest in communication equipment and connectivity. Only the triple-camera had to take a step back and lacks Samsung’s latest and greatest sensor.

In our test, the Fold2 offered a great concept with useful optimizations, in particularly the massively improved outside display. Nevertheless, the Fold2 remains a comparatively sensitive piece of technology.

Pricecompare

4th – Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro

Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro

The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro offers everything a typical gaming smartphone should. In addition to a playful design, it comes with a fast SoC, 12 GB of RAM, and 256 GB of UFS storage. Its most important feature, however, is without a doubt its ginormous 7.1-inch AMOLED display running at 90 Hz flanked by a set of stereo speakers.

In addition to its large display, the Black Shark also offers fast 5G, Wi-Fi 6, Dual SIM, and last but not least a headphone jack. In return, it lacks support for wireless charging, NFC, and microSD expandability.

Pricecompare

5th – LG Velvet

LG Velvet

The LG Velvet features a 6.8-inch POLED display that can be complemented by an equally large secondary display. The mid-range SoC makes for decent system performance and supports 5G. Gaming, on the other hand, requires a few compromises. In return, its triple-camera performed very well, it supports USB 3.2 and wireless charging, and is both IP68 and MIL-STD-certified.

Unfortunately, its wide-angle camera was a bit of a letdown, and the Velvet’s LTE support of LTE bands turned out to be fairly limited. Battery life on the other hand was decent.

Pricecompare

6th – Huawei Mate Xs

Huawei Mate Xs

The Huawei Mate Xs features an 8.0-inch OLED display curved around the exterior of the foldable smartphone. It is powered by a fast SoC with 5G support, which as access to 8 GB of RAM and 512 GB of fast UFS storage that can be further expanded via NM card. Its USB 3.2 port supports wired display output and can not only mirror the smartphone display but extend it to offer a full desktop mode.

All in all we liked the concept, particularly from a visual perspective, even though it lacked some quality assurance in the end. The quad-camera was decent, unfortunately it does not support Google services and lacks a DRM certification.

Pricecompare

7th – Nokia 8.3 5G

Nokia 8.3 5G

The Nokia 8.3 5G is a premium mid-range smartphone with a 6.81-inch IPS display powered by a Snapdragon 765G with 8 GB of RAM and support for 5G networks. Its quad camera’s most important feature is the 64 MP sensor that managed to take decent photo as well as its ultra-wide angle lens that turned out pretty decent as well. The other two lenses are used for macro photography and depth-of-fiend analysis.

Benefits include long battery life, good design, and Android One. Downsides include a hefty price tag considering the lack of other features expected of a premium smartphone.

Pricecompare

8th – Motorola Moto G9 Plus

Moto G9 Plus

The Motorola Moto G9 Plus is living proof that smartphones with large displays don’t necessarily have to be expensive. Its 6.81-inch LTPS panel suffered from minor screen halations, and the device is powered by a fast mid-range SoC with access to 4 GB of RAM.

Thanks to its large battery, the Moto G9 Plus can last for a very long time. Unfortunately, its camera did not perform particularly well and the display turned out to be fairly dim overall.

Pricecompare

The Best Smartphones with Large Display in Comparison

Size Comparison

177.8 mm / 7 inch 83.3 mm / 3.28 inch 10.1 mm / 0.3976 inch 253 g0.558 lbs171.9 mm / 6.77 inch 78.6 mm / 3.09 inch 9 mm / 0.3543 inch 227 g0.5 lbs170 mm / 6.69 inch 78.1 mm / 3.07 inch 9.7 mm / 0.3819 inch 223 g0.4916 lbs166.9 mm / 6.57 inch 76 mm / 2.99 inch 8.8 mm / 0.3465 inch 219 g0.4828 lbs167.08 mm / 6.58 inch 74 mm / 2.91 inch 7.85 mm / 0.3091 inch 180 g0.3968 lbs164.8 mm / 6.49 inch 77.2 mm / 3.04 inch 8.1 mm / 0.3189 inch 208 g0.4586 lbs161.3 mm / 6.35 inch 146.2 mm / 5.76 inch 11 mm / 0.4331 inch 300 g0.661 lbs159.2 mm / 6.27 inch 128.2 mm / 5.05 inch 6.9 mm / 0.2717 inch 279 g0.615 lbs

Test Results

Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold2 5G
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro
LG Velvet
Huawei Mate Xs
Nokia 8.3 5G
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Response Times
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
8.8 (4.4, 4.4)
9.6 (4.8, 4.8)
10 (5, 5)
10 (5, 5)
9.2 (4.8, 4.4)
5.2 (2.8, 2.4)
40 (19, 21)
39 (20, 19)
Response Time Black / White *
3.2 (2, 1.2)
2.8 (1.2, 1.6)
6 (3, 3)
8 (5, 3)
3.2 (2, 1.2)
3.2 (2, 1.2)
16 (7, 9)
23 (11, 12)
PWM Frequency
245.1 (99)
240.4 (99)
219
362
245.1 (99)
242.7 (99)
Screen
Brightness middle
860
734
637
570
586
417
669
390
Brightness
878
748
635
589
587
418
604
377
Brightness Distribution
96
95
96
90
97
99
82
93
Black Level *
0.55
0.66
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4.5
3.2
2.25
4.65
2.8
2.6
4.3
3.39
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
10.4
6.8
4.12
7.61
6.3
7.7
8.4
5.22
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
2.4
2.7
2.2
4.9
2.3
2
5.5
4.3
Gamma
2 110%
2.11 104%
2.17 101%
2.205 100%
2.01 109%
2.31 95%
2.22 99%
2.506 88%
CCT
6466 101%
6299 103%
6689 97%
7500 87%
6827 95%
6276 104%
7959 82%
6033 108%
Contrast
1216
591
Heat
Maximum Upper Side *
33.8
35
41.8
40.2
34.5
33.8
38.2
42.2
Maximum Bottom *
31.1
34.1
36.5
39.9
32.2
34
37.6
41.4
Idle Upper Side *
27.1
32.1
26.7
27.9
29
33.8
27.6
28.8
Idle Bottom *
24.9
27.9
26.9
28.8
27.5
32
27
27.3
Battery Runtime
Reader / Idle
1223
1858
1853
1589
1071
1489
2732
H.264
993
1131
832
972
762
1087
1352
WiFi v1.3
644
720
736
767
741
481
921
968
Load
338
221
302
247
357
216
267
Power Consumption
Idle Minimum *
0.65
0.76
1
1.5
0.66
2.22
0.8
0.8
Idle Average *
1.06
1.91
2.1
2.3
1.58
3.94
1.4
1.7
Idle Maximum *
1.49
1.96
2.8
3.1
1.6
4.01
1.9
2.2
Load Average *
4.91
4.72
6.8
7.4
3.3
4.34
4.4
5.3
Load Maximum *
10.29
10.15
10.5
12.3
5.46
8.46
7
7.4

* ... smaller is better

Benchmarks

Geekbench 5.1 - 5.3
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Mali-G77 MP11, Exynos 990, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2787 Points ∼16%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Mali-G77 MP11, Exynos 990, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
2815 Points ∼17%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold2 5G
Adreno 650, SD 865+ (Plus), 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3012 Points ∼18%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 865, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
3361 Points ∼20%
LG Velvet
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
1797 Points ∼11%
Huawei Mate Xs
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990 5G, 512 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
2972 Points ∼18%
Nokia 8.3 5G
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
1527 Points ∼9%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
1786 Points ∼11%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Mali-G77 MP11, Exynos 990, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
940 Points ∼54%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Mali-G77 MP11, Exynos 990, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
940 Points ∼54%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold2 5G
Adreno 650, SD 865+ (Plus), 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
983 Points ∼56%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 865, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
903 Points ∼52%
LG Velvet
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
554 Points ∼32%
Huawei Mate Xs
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990 5G, 512 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
766 Points ∼44%
Nokia 8.3 5G
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
558 Points ∼32%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
551 Points ∼32%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Mali-G77 MP11, Exynos 990, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4273 Points ∼54%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Mali-G77 MP11, Exynos 990, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
4447 Points ∼56%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold2 5G
Adreno 650, SD 865+ (Plus), 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4536 Points ∼57%
LG Velvet
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
1898 Points ∼24%
Huawei Mate Xs
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990 5G, 512 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
2497 Points ∼31%
Nokia 8.3 5G
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2963 Points ∼37%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3391 Points ∼43%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Mali-G77 MP11, Exynos 990, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8239 Points ∼68%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Mali-G77 MP11, Exynos 990, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
9157 Points ∼75%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold2 5G
Adreno 650, SD 865+ (Plus), 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
10043 Points ∼83%
LG Velvet
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3547 Points ∼29%
Huawei Mate Xs
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990 5G, 512 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
5672 Points ∼47%
Nokia 8.3 5G
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3592 Points ∼30%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2471 Points ∼20%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Mali-G77 MP11, Exynos 990, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
6830 Points ∼71%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Mali-G77 MP11, Exynos 990, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
7412 Points ∼77%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold2 5G
Adreno 650, SD 865+ (Plus), 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
7909 Points ∼82%
LG Velvet
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2934 Points ∼30%
Huawei Mate Xs
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990 5G, 512 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
4422 Points ∼46%
Nokia 8.3 5G
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3430 Points ∼36%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2701 Points ∼28%
GFXBench
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Mali-G77 MP11, Exynos 990, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
34 fps ∼22%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Mali-G77 MP11, Exynos 990, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
33 fps ∼21%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold2 5G
Adreno 650, SD 865+ (Plus), 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
23 fps ∼15%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 865, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
27 fps ∼17%
LG Velvet
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
12 fps ∼8%
Huawei Mate Xs
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990 5G, 512 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
46 fps ∼29%
Nokia 8.3 5G
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
13 fps ∼8%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
10 fps ∼6%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Mali-G77 MP11, Exynos 990, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
22 fps ∼9%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Mali-G77 MP11, Exynos 990, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
22 fps ∼9%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold2 5G
Adreno 650, SD 865+ (Plus), 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
22 fps ∼9%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 865, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
20 fps ∼8%
LG Velvet
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
8.5 fps ∼4%
Huawei Mate Xs
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990 5G, 512 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
68 fps ∼28%
Nokia 8.3 5G
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
8.6 fps ∼4%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
6.3 fps ∼3%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Mali-G77 MP11, Exynos 990, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
49 fps ∼24%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Mali-G77 MP11, Exynos 990, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
51 fps ∼25%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold2 5G
Adreno 650, SD 865+ (Plus), 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
34 fps ∼17%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 865, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
53 fps ∼26%
LG Velvet
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
20 fps ∼10%
Huawei Mate Xs
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990 5G, 512 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
60 fps ∼29%
Nokia 8.3 5G
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
21 fps ∼10%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
16 fps ∼8%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Mali-G77 MP11, Exynos 990, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
43 fps ∼7%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Mali-G77 MP11, Exynos 990, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
56 fps ∼10%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold2 5G
Adreno 650, SD 865+ (Plus), 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
46 fps ∼8%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 865, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
27 fps ∼5%
LG Velvet
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
23 fps ∼4%
Huawei Mate Xs
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990 5G, 512 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
165 fps ∼28%
Nokia 8.3 5G
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
24 fps ∼4%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
18 fps ∼3%
PCMark for Android - Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Mali-G77 MP11, Exynos 990, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
11784 Points ∼77%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Mali-G77 MP11, Exynos 990, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
10255 Points ∼67%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold2 5G
Adreno 650, SD 865+ (Plus), 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
12457 Points ∼81%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 865, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
10945 Points ∼72%
LG Velvet
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
7808 Points ∼51%
Huawei Mate Xs
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990 5G, 512 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
8512 Points ∼56%
Nokia 8.3 5G
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
7245 Points ∼47%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
7737 Points ∼51%
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Mali-G77 MP11, Exynos 990, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
527820 Points ∼70%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Mali-G77 MP11, Exynos 990, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
498708 Points ∼66%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold2 5G
Adreno 650, SD 865+ (Plus), 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
589249 Points ∼78%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 865, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
572807 Points ∼76%
LG Velvet
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
308878 Points ∼41%
Huawei Mate Xs
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990 5G, 512 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
470692 Points ∼63%
Nokia 8.3 5G
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
285731 Points ∼38%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
251673 Points ∼33%
WebXPRT 3 - --- (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Mali-G77 MP11, Exynos 990, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
102 Points ∼34%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Mali-G77 MP11, Exynos 990, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
86 Points ∼29%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold2 5G
Adreno 650, SD 865+ (Plus), 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
114 Points ∼39%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 865, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
101 Points ∼34%
LG Velvet
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
76 Points ∼26%
Huawei Mate Xs
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990 5G, 512 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
98 Points ∼33%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
68 Points ∼23%
AndroBench 3-5
Random Write 4KB (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Mali-G77 MP11, Exynos 990, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
217.74 MB/s ∼68%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Mali-G77 MP11, Exynos 990, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
221.37 MB/s ∼69%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold2 5G
Adreno 650, SD 865+ (Plus), 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
220.6 MB/s ∼69%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 865, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
261.45 MB/s ∼82%
LG Velvet
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
135.87 MB/s ∼43%
Huawei Mate Xs
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990 5G, 512 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
259.08 MB/s ∼81%
Nokia 8.3 5G
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
109.9 MB/s ∼34%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
98.12 MB/s ∼31%
Random Read 4KB (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Mali-G77 MP11, Exynos 990, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
186.67 MB/s ∼51%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Mali-G77 MP11, Exynos 990, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
202.43 MB/s ∼55%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold2 5G
Adreno 650, SD 865+ (Plus), 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
232.1 MB/s ∼63%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 865, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
218.2 MB/s ∼59%
LG Velvet
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
154.28 MB/s ∼42%
Huawei Mate Xs
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990 5G, 512 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
202.85 MB/s ∼55%
Nokia 8.3 5G
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
117.1 MB/s ∼32%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
134.77 MB/s ∼37%
Sequential Write 256KB (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Mali-G77 MP11, Exynos 990, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
802.09 MB/s ∼61%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Mali-G77 MP11, Exynos 990, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
697.08 MB/s ∼53%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold2 5G
Adreno 650, SD 865+ (Plus), 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
756.6 MB/s ∼57%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 865, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
657.92 MB/s ∼50%
LG Velvet
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
409.21 MB/s ∼31%
Huawei Mate Xs
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990 5G, 512 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
402.67 MB/s ∼30%
Nokia 8.3 5G
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
225.6 MB/s ∼17%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
186.23 MB/s ∼14%
Sequential Read 256KB (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Mali-G77 MP11, Exynos 990, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1782.3 MB/s ∼87%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Mali-G77 MP11, Exynos 990, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
1632.02 MB/s ∼80%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold2 5G
Adreno 650, SD 865+ (Plus), 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1681 MB/s ∼83%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 865, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
1398.36 MB/s ∼69%
LG Velvet
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
924.54 MB/s ∼45%
Huawei Mate Xs
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990 5G, 512 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
1766.63 MB/s ∼87%
Nokia 8.3 5G
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
937.3 MB/s ∼46%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
489.37 MB/s ∼24%
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Mali-G77 MP11, Exynos 990, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
870 (841min - 882max) MBit/s ∼51%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Mali-G77 MP11, Exynos 990, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
825 (763min - 855max) MBit/s ∼48%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold2 5G
Adreno 650, SD 865+ (Plus), 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
766 (468min - 808max) MBit/s ∼44%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 865, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
817 (785min - 843max) MBit/s ∼47%
LG Velvet
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
683 (656min - 691max) MBit/s ∼40%
Huawei Mate Xs
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990 5G, 512 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
963 (471min - 1110max) MBit/s ∼56%
Nokia 8.3 5G
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
643 (580min - 670max) MBit/s ∼37%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
309 (140min - 360max) MBit/s ∼18%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Mali-G77 MP11, Exynos 990, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
772 (691min - 832max) MBit/s ∼43%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Mali-G77 MP11, Exynos 990, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
818 (425min - 890max) MBit/s ∼46%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold2 5G
Adreno 650, SD 865+ (Plus), 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
671 (626min - 693max) MBit/s ∼38%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 865, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
876 (785min - 909max) MBit/s ∼49%
LG Velvet
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
618 (310min - 644max) MBit/s ∼35%
Huawei Mate Xs
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990 5G, 512 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
542 (479min - 631max) MBit/s ∼31%
Nokia 8.3 5G
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
651 (612min - 662max) MBit/s ∼37%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
326 (309min - 343max) MBit/s ∼18%
PUBG Mobile - HD (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Mali-G77 MP11, Exynos 990, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
40 (37min - 41max) fps ∼67%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Mali-G77 MP11, Exynos 990, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
40 (34min - 42max) fps ∼67%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold2 5G
Adreno 650, SD 865+ (Plus), 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 (56min - 60max) fps ∼100%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 865, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
60 fps ∼100%
Huawei Mate Xs
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990 5G, 512 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
40 (35min - 41max) fps ∼67%
Nokia 8.3 5G
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
30 (28min - 31max) fps ∼50%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
30 fps ∼50%
static version load dynamic
Loading Comments
Comment on this article
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Reviews > The Best Smartphones with Large Display
Daniel Schmidt (Update: 2020-11-13)