Notebookcheck
, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

Motorola Moto G60s review: Budget mid-range smartphone with 50-watt fast charging and a 120 Hz display

120 fps gaming... Or close to this, at least. With a 120 Hz refresh rate, a "gaming SoC", IP rating, and a 5,000 mAh battery including fast 50-watt TurboPower charging, the Moto G60s appears to be an interesting budget mid-range phone on paper. Read on to find out how the Moto smartphone performs in the test and whether it's worth a buy.
Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Florian Schmitt (translated by Stephanie Chamberlain), 🇩🇪 🇳🇱 ...
Motorola Moto G60s review

With the Moto G60s, Motorola introduces fast charging at over 30 watts in the affordable mid-range. The 5,000 mAh battery is equipped with the in-house TurboPower50 charging technology, which is meant to make long charging times a thing of the past. In this regard, Motorola advertises a runtime of 12 hours after only 12 minutes of charging.

Besides the fast charging standard, the 270-Euro (~$316) smartphone (MSRP) features a 6.8-inch Max Vision Full HD+ display with a high refresh rate of 120 Hz and a quad-camera setup. In addition, the Moto G60s is powered by a MediaTek Helio G95 processor that's supported by 4 GB of RAM and 128 GB of internal UFS storage.

, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 
Motorola Moto G60s (Moto G60 Series)
Processor
Mediatek Helio G95 8 x 2 - 2.1 GHz, Cortex-A76 / A55
Graphics adapter
Memory
4096 MB 
Display
6.80 inch, 2480 x 1080 pixel 398 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, IPS, HDR, 120 Hz
Storage
128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 128 GB 
, 107 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: 3.5 mm audio jack, Card Reader: microSD slot (shared, up to 1 TB), 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: acceleration sensor, gyroscope, proximity sensor, compass, OTG, Miracast, IP52-certified
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.0, 2G - 850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz; 3G - 850, 900, 1700, 1900, 2100 MHz; 4G - FDD LTE: 2600, 2100, 1900, 1800, 1700, 900, 850, 700 MHz; TDD LTE: 2300, 2600/2600 MHz, Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 9.6 x 169.6 x 75.9 ( = 0.38 x 6.68 x 2.99 in)
Battery
5000 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 11
Camera
Primary Camera: 64 MP (f/​1.7, phase-comparison AF); 8 MP (f/​2.2, wide angle lens); 5 MP (f/​2.4, macro lens); 2 MP (f/​2.4, depth of field)
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix 16 MP (f/​2.25)
Additional features
Speakers: mono, Keyboard: on-screen, USB cable, charger, My UX, 24 Months Warranty, Widevine L1, fanless
Weight
212 g ( = 7.48 oz / 0.47 pounds), Power Supply: 97 g ( = 3.42 oz / 0.21 pounds)
Price
270 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Possible contenders in comparison

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
80.9 %
09/2021
Motorola Moto G60s
Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4
212 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.80"2480x1080
77.7 %
08/2021
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2
186 g128 GB eMMC Flash6.40"1600x720
80.9 %
06/2021
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4
178.8 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.43"2400x1080
81.4 %
05/2021
realme 8
Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4
177 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.40"2400x1080
78.6 %
06/2021
Oppo A74
SD 662, Adreno 610
175 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.43"2400x1080

Case - Motorola smartphone with punch hole

The Motorola Moto G60s in Iced Mint
The Motorola Moto G60s in Iced Mint

The sturdiness and build quality of the Moto G60s are very solid - there's nothing to criticize here considering the MRP. The Motorola phone's case is mostly made of plastic, and it doesn't radiate any premium quality feel, but it doesn't feel cheap anyway thanks to its textured back. However, due to the very large IPS screen, the Moto G60s isn't really comfortable to hold.

The case of the Motorola phone has an official IP certification, but only according to the IP52 standard. Consequently, Motorola only advertises the G60s as having a water-repellent design, which is intended to be a barrier to protect against moderate contact with water. The case of the Moto G60s is not water-resistant, and therefore, it's not intended for diving, among other activities.

The screen-to-body ratio is a good 86% for this price range thanks to the punch-hole cutout, which is quite small, and the relatively narrow display bezels.

The Motorola Moto G60s in Ink Blue
The Motorola Moto G60s in Ink Blue
Motorola Moto G60s review
Motorola Moto G60s review
Motorola Moto G60s review
Motorola Moto G60s review
Motorola Moto G60s review
Motorola Moto G60s review
Motorola Moto G60s review
, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

Size comparison

169.6 mm / 6.68 inch 75.9 mm / 2.99 inch 9.6 mm / 0.378 inch 212 g0.4674 lbs160.46 mm / 6.32 inch 74.5 mm / 2.93 inch 8.29 mm / 0.3264 inch 178.8 g0.3942 lbs160.6 mm / 6.32 inch 73.9 mm / 2.91 inch 8 mm / 0.315 inch 177 g0.3902 lbs160.3 mm / 6.31 inch 73.8 mm / 2.91 inch 7.95 mm / 0.313 inch 175 g0.3858 lbs159.3 mm / 6.27 inch 73.6 mm / 2.9 inch 8.4 mm / 0.3307 inch 186 g0.4101 lbs

Connectivity - The Moto G60s with UFS storage

The Moto smartphone's connectivity features include an FM radio, a dual-SIM function, a 3.5 mm jack, and Miracast. The G60s has a USB Type-C port at the bottom of the case that supports the USB 2.0 standard, and peripherals can be connected using an OTG adapter. Our review sample's internal UFS storage has a capacity of 128 GB, but 21 GB is already occupied by the system out of the box.

The G-series Moto phone doesn't have a status LED or a true always-on function for incoming notifications. However, Motorola provides its inexpensive mid-range smartphone with the familiar display preview function, which shows notifications when the phone is lifted.

Right side of the case (buttons)
Right side of the case (buttons)
Bottom side of the case (speaker, USB port, microphone)
Bottom side of the case (speaker, USB port, microphone)
Left side of the case (card slot)
Left side of the case (card slot)
Top side of the case (3.5 mm jack, microphone)
Top side of the case (3.5 mm jack, microphone)

microSD card reader

The internal storage of the Moto G60s can be expanded by up to 1 TB with a microSD card. With our reference memory card, the Angelbird V60, we take a closer look at the memory slot's speed. While the results in the CPDT benchmark, especially for sequential reading, are at a really good level, the data rates in our JPEG copy test are below average at 23 MB/s.

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 128 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird V60)
44.2 MB/s ∼100% +93%
Oppo A74
Adreno 610, SD 662, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
36.62 MB/s ∼83% +60%
Motorola Moto G60s
Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash (Angelbird V60)
22.9 MB/s ∼52%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
18.76 MB/s ∼42% -18%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

05101520253035404550556065707532.635.23836.535.13224.421.724.326.323.926.324.229.824.921.914.221.819.830.118.627.61524.829.818.316.717.328.611.226.322.927.516.118.822.928.226.119.427.616.630.9202723.910.122.821.828.117.215.716.822.418.827.517.723.921.627.11829.420.824.822.325.928.719.824.42026.520.332.53016.624.817.927.119.429.320.725.617.527.730.619.826.725.13331.918.119.72523.927.128.625.425.226.91215.618.824.916.216.316.624.824.52425.126.117.820.716.11927.717.418.925.72221.721.522.318.726.217.41724.418.239.137.137.239.737.236.537.23230.931.733.731.933.529.931.930.634.830.530.631.635.727.133.232.624.331.633.431.135.829.332.234.130.232.530.832.931.636.23132.1323431.131.631.433.531.227.831.832.728.83132.131.932.131.533.332.633.530.83330.731.131.931.23035.831.331.13133.629.631.626.931.536.830.731.532.239.230.632.631.232.929.73229.536.831.333.330.53328.630.533.430.634.231.42830.434.328.331.23034.33131.330.335.532.232.128.533.13030.332.23231.230.333.332.83132.236.429.136.63333.432.635.23836.535.13224.421.724.326.323.926.324.229.824.921.914.221.819.830.118.627.61524.829.818.316.717.328.611.226.322.927.516.118.822.928.226.119.427.616.630.9202723.910.122.821.828.117.215.716.822.418.827.517.723.921.627.11829.420.824.822.325.928.719.824.42026.520.332.53016.624.817.927.119.429.320.725.617.527.730.619.826.725.13331.918.119.72523.927.128.625.425.226.91215.618.824.916.216.316.624.824.52425.126.117.820.716.11927.717.418.925.72221.721.522.318.726.217.41724.418.239.137.137.239.737.236.537.23230.931.733.731.933.529.931.930.634.830.530.631.635.727.133.232.624.331.633.431.135.829.332.234.130.232.530.832.931.636.23132.1323431.131.631.433.531.227.831.832.728.83132.131.932.131.533.332.633.530.83330.731.131.931.23035.831.331.13133.629.631.626.931.536.830.731.532.239.230.632.631.232.929.73229.536.831.333.330.53328.630.533.430.634.231.42830.434.328.331.23034.33131.330.335.532.232.128.533.13030.332.23231.230.333.332.83132.236.429.136.63333.460.176.276.876.776.275.677.376.577.477.276.67677.377.476.176.676.776.477.175.577.476.977.275.976.277.57775.177.276.776.977.277.375.877.476.977.175.577.477.576.976.976.576.476.677.776.976.277.676.576.575.977.176.276.776.576.576.575.777.975.977.776.17776.576.674.578.378.176.276.676.875.678.57676.277.876.276.676.277.676.876.376.277.676.476.675.377.476.876.376.876.176.277.276.776.776.275.777.577.376787676.276.377.876.676.777.776.276.676.476.776.576.677.67776.376.277.376.876.675.976.174.572.376.9849.549.154.554.661.454.956.162.262.361.561.86258.35962.462.258.961.761.155.357.846.445.948.346.449.758.457.855.656.858.657.758.458.558.556.7585655.356.158.458.457.359.359.458.757.859.359.15958.759.558.857.358.359.659.358.8595957.258.158.958.358.857.758.958.95958.752.358.958.5595958.758.658.958.359.254.35959.158.959.358.958.95959.15958.959.158.958.159.156.958.858.457.959.458.757.758.959.25958.759.259.159.458.858.657.134.634.634.93535.118.337.135.335.235.435.435.135.635.637.2Tooltip
Motorola Moto G60s Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Sequential write: Ø23.2 (10.1-38)
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Sequential write: Ø32.2 (24.3-39.7)
Motorola Moto G60s Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Sequential read: Ø76.5 (60.1-78.5)
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Sequential read: Ø54.7 (8-62.4)

Software - Motorola phone with Android 11

Motorola has installed an "unmodified version" of Android 11 on the Moto G60s that comes with security patches at the level of July 2021. On top of that, the manufacturer enhances the user interface with My UX, making the familiar Moto Experiences available, including gestures for activating the flashlight or options to customize the design. Third-party apps are also largely absent, and with the exception of Facebook, only Google applications and the manufacturer's in-house apps are installed.

Apart from the minimalistic user interface, Motorola equips its Moto phone with hardware and software security features called "ThinkShield for Mobile". This is a platform based on Lenovo's ThinkShield brand, and it's intended to provide special protection against malware, phishing, and network attacks.

The Camera2 API in the Moto G60s is available with Level 3, and thanks to DRM Widevine L1, you can watch streaming content in HD quality.

Motorola Moto G60s review
Motorola Moto G60s review
Motorola Moto G60s review
Motorola Moto G60s review

Communication and GNSS - Moto G60s with Wi-Fi 5

In terms of WLAN, the mid-range phone offers a solid configuration with Wi-Fi 5. Although this doesn't provide high transfer rates within domestic networks, the G60s performs consistently and on par with other smartphones in this price range in combination with our reference router, the Netgear Nighthawk AX12. As for additional communication modules, Motorola has also implemented an NFC chip for near-field communication as well as Bluetooth 5.0.

Since the built-in MediaTek SoC doesn't support the 5G standard, the chipset in the Moto G60s only integrates an LTE modem for mobile Internet access. This covers a total of 12 LTE bands and all LTE frequencies that are relevant for Germany, including the LTE bands 20 and 28. However, a trip to foreign countries like the USA, among others, could be a problem in this regard (without bands 13 and 25 being supported).

Networking
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.59 - 1599, n=286, last 2 years)
472 MBit/s ∼100% +36%
Motorola Moto G60s
Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
347 (334min - 351max) MBit/s ∼74%
realme 8
Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
346 (317min - 353max) MBit/s ∼73% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 128 GB eMMC Flash
346 (267min - 353max) MBit/s ∼73% 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
283 (145min - 322max) MBit/s ∼60% -18%
Oppo A74
Adreno 610, SD 662, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
249 (155min - 290max) MBit/s ∼53% -28%
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Average of class Smartphone
  (15.5 - 1414, n=286, last 2 years)
465 MBit/s ∼100% +42%
realme 8
Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
335 (281min - 350max) MBit/s ∼72% +2%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 128 GB eMMC Flash
328 (255min - 340max) MBit/s ∼71% 0%
Motorola Moto G60s
Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
327 (260min - 333max) MBit/s ∼70%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
320 (299min - 340max) MBit/s ∼69% -2%
Oppo A74
Adreno 610, SD 662, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
276 (170min - 314max) MBit/s ∼59% -16%
020406080100120140160180200220240260280300320340260325328332331325329323332330327333326330330326327329332328329324324332324328331329330331260325328332331325329323332330327333326330330326327329332328329324324332324328331329330331334349347351345350345349347347348347349347349343349344350344347348347350345350346350346347Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø326 (260-333)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø347 (334-351)
Positioning indoors
Positioning indoors
Positioning outdoors
Positioning outdoors

The position is determined using the GPS (L1), GLONASS, and Galileo satellite systems along with SBAS. The satellite signal is obtained quickly outdoors and with an accuracy of about two meters. Even indoors, the Moto G60s manages to determine its position very fast.

In order to be able to assess the positioning accuracy of our test device in practice, we track a route in parallel with the Garmin Edge 520 GPS bike computer for comparison purposes.

The deviations are relatively small, resulting in a difference of only about 30 meters between the mid-range phone and the navigation device at the end of the almost 15-kilometer test route. The detailed GPS log is also impressive with a similar positioning accuracy as the Garmin device.

Positioning - Garmin Edge 520
Positioning - Garmin Edge 520
Positioning - Garmin Edge 520
Positioning - Garmin Edge 520
Positioning - Garmin Edge 520
Positioning - Garmin Edge 520
Positioning - Moto G60s
Positioning - Moto G60s
Positioning - Moto G60s
Positioning - Moto G60s
Positioning - Moto G60s
Positioning - Moto G60s

Telephone and call quality - Motorola smartphone with VoLTE

Motorola Moto G60s review

There's not much to complain about in terms of call quality with the Moto G60s. Speech is reproduced intelligibly, and the person on the other end of the line also described us as sounding clear. Skype video calls using the built-in front-facing camera and the speaker worked smoothly in the test.

Thanks to Wi-Fi calling, the Moto phone can be used to make calls over the WLAN network when mobile reception is limited. Furthermore, calls can be made via LTE networks thanks to the VoLTE feature.

Cameras - Moto G60s with quad-camera setup

Photo taken with the front-facing camera of the Moto G60s
Photo taken with the front-facing camera of the Moto G60s

Motorola has equipped its mid-range model with a quad-camera setup on the back, where the main sensor has a resolution of 64 MP. Motorola hasn't disclosed the selected sensor. Most likely, the GW1 sensor from Samsung is used here as in other Motorola phones.

The high-resolution 64 MP main sensor takes photos with decent quality, but details are somewhat limited - and not only at the edges - due to the relatively low sharpness level. Exposure isn't 100% accurate, either, under incident sunlight. The quad-pixel technology ensures a solid illumination when there's less light, which leads to good image sharpness for subjects in the dark, considering we're talking about a mid-range phone.

In addition to the main camera, the G60s sports a macro vision lens as well as a depth sensor and an ultra wide-angle camera. The 118° wide-angle lens, which roughly resembles the field of view of the human eye, is clearly inferior in terms of quality - blurriness is pronounced at the edges, and low-light quality is very poor. Especially the dynamic range in the photos drops noticeably when compared to the main camera. Overall, pictures also look rather cool with this lens.

Although structures are somewhat softened with the 16 MP front-facing camera, the Moto G60s still manages nice selfies in daylight. Bokeh effects in portrait mode are also achieved quite well. As is usual in this price range, videos can only be recorded in Full HD with the selfie camera.

Motorola intends to set itself apart from the mid-range competition in terms of video with features like the dual-capture mode, where the main camera and the front-facing camera can record video at the same time. Apart from software, however, only a UHD option (3840x2160) at 30 fps is available for the 64 MP lens; 60 fps isn't supported even at 1080p. Switching between the wide-angle and ultra wide-angle lenses isn't possible while recording, either.

Ultra wide-angle
Ultra wide-angle
Main camera
8x zoom (max)
Motorola Moto G60s review
Motorola Moto G60s review
Motorola Moto G60s review
Motorola Moto G60s review

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main cameraMain cameraWide-angle cameraLow-light

We subject the 64 MP rear-facing camera to further tests under controlled lighting conditions. We use the ColorChecker Passport to analyze the color representation in comparison to the actual reference colors. We measure once at full studio lighting and once at a light intensity of 1 lux.

The analysis with the ColorChecker Passport reveals average deviations for an affordable mid-range phone compared to the actual reference colors. Dark colors in particular are displayed significantly brighter. The white balance could be better as well. The image sharpness in our test chart isn't very pronounced in the peripheral areas in particular.

ColorChecker
11.8 ∆E
10.6 ∆E
10.4 ∆E
14.5 ∆E
11.3 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
9.9 ∆E
11 ∆E
13.6 ∆E
10.1 ∆E
7 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
5.7 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
11 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
11 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
3.6 ∆E
5 ∆E
7.6 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
2.8 ∆E
ColorChecker Motorola Moto G60s: 8.47 ∆E min: 2.77 - max: 14.46 ∆E
ColorChecker
29.1 ∆E
52.4 ∆E
39.1 ∆E
35.9 ∆E
44.7 ∆E
61.1 ∆E
51.5 ∆E
34.7 ∆E
39.6 ∆E
27.4 ∆E
63.2 ∆E
62.6 ∆E
30.3 ∆E
46.7 ∆E
35 ∆E
74.8 ∆E
42.2 ∆E
41.4 ∆E
85.7 ∆E
69.5 ∆E
51.5 ∆E
36.4 ∆E
23.9 ∆E
13.5 ∆E
ColorChecker Motorola Moto G60s: 45.51 ∆E min: 13.46 - max: 85.68 ∆E

Accessories and warranty - Motorola phone with 50-watt charger

50-watt charger included with the Motorola Moto G60s
50-watt charger included with the Motorola Moto G60s

Besides the Moto smartphone itself, a modular 50-watt power adapter with an extra USB-A port and a USB cable are included in the box. A protective case is not included with the G60s.

Motorola grants a 24-month warranty for the Moto G smartphone in Germany.

Input devices and handling - Motorola smartphone with FaceUnlock

As with other Moto phones, the Google Assistant can be launched on the Moto G60s for voice control via a special button at the side of the device. The other built-in buttons are also easy to use, they sit firmly in the frame, and their pressure points are pleasantly firm. The capacitive multi-touchscreen accurately responds to inputs.

A classic fingerprint scanner is available on the back for biometric security. Although the display takes a second to unlock, there's no room for criticism in terms of reliability. A FaceUnlock function is also available. The 2D face recognition is less secure, and it's often not particularly faster.

Motorola Moto G60s review
Motorola Moto G60s review
Motorola Moto G60s review

Display - Moto G60s with 120 Hz

Subpixel grid
Subpixel grid
Shadows on the display of the Moto G60s
Shadows on the display of the Moto G60s

The 6.8-inch 120 Hz LC display has a resolution of 2480x1080 pixels, which results in a pixel density of just under 400 PPI. The IPS panel of the Moto G60s has a relatively uneven brightness distribution. Especially at the upper display edge and in the area of the punch hole, a significant shadow formation is visible.

Motorola specifies an HDR-10 certification for the G60s, but the higher dynamic range of HDR content is unlikely to be noticeable with the relatively dim IPS panel, even for trained eyes - the brightness is too low for this, although it's at a good level compared to the mid-range competition. The maximum brightness that we measured with a pure white display background is 602 cd/m².

In addition, we examine the panel's luminosity with an evenly distributed proportion of dark to bright areas (APL50) in the test. We determined a similar maximum brightness of 610 cd/m² here.

592
cd/m²
598
cd/m²
531
cd/m²
597
cd/m²
602
cd/m²
558
cd/m²
600
cd/m²
500
cd/m²
502
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 602 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 564.4 cd/m² Minimum: 1.75 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 83 %
Center on Battery: 600 cd/m²
Contrast: 1075:1 (Black: 0.56 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.23 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.5
ΔE Greyscale 2.6 | 0.64-98 Ø5.7
99.4% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.32
Motorola Moto G60s
IPS, 2480x1080, 6.80
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
Super AMOLED, 1600x720, 6.40
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.43
realme 8
Super AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.40
Oppo A74
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.43
Screen
-88%
14%
-11%
-20%
Brightness middle
602
349
-42%
706
17%
590
-2%
606
1%
Brightness
564
352
-38%
701
24%
607
8%
606
7%
Brightness Distribution
83
92
11%
98
18%
92
11%
98
18%
Black Level *
0.56
Contrast
1075
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
2.23
5.87
-163%
2.1
6%
2.64
-18%
3.6
-61%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
3.99
15.51
-289%
4.9
-23%
6.85
-72%
6.2
-55%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.6
2.7
-4%
1.5
42%
2.4
8%
3.3
-27%
Gamma
2.32 95%
2.07 106%
2.29 96%
2.265 97%
2.31 95%
CCT
7127 91%
6970 93%
6447 101%
6913 94%
6704 97%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 21103 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Compared with our chosen competition with OLED displays, the LC display of the Moto G60s has a clear contrast disadvantage. The ratio of the black level to the maximum brightness of about 1:1000 is average at best, even for an LC panel.

On the other hand, the analysis performed with the spectrophotometer and the CalMAN software shows low average deltaE deviations from the sRGB color space of 2.2 (colors) and 2.3 (grayscales), respectively, using the default color profile. Furthermore, the color temperature that we measured in this "Natural" mode is about 7,100 K, which is cooler than the ideal value of 6,500 K.

Color accuracy (target color space: sRGB, color profile: Saturated)
Color accuracy (target color space: sRGB, color profile: Saturated)
Color accuracy (target color space: sRGB, color profile: Natural)
Color accuracy (target color space: sRGB, color profile: Natural)
Color space (target color space: AdobeRGB, color profile: Saturated)
Color space (target color space: AdobeRGB, color profile: Saturated)
Color space (target color space: P3, color profile: Saturated)
Color space (target color space: P3, color profile: Saturated)
Color space (target color space: sRGB, color profile: Saturated)
Color space (target color space: sRGB, color profile: Saturated)
Grayscales (target color space: sRGB, color profile: Saturated)
Grayscales (target color space: sRGB, color profile: Saturated)
Grayscales (target color space: sRGB, color profile: Natural)
Grayscales (target color space: sRGB, color profile: Natural)
Color saturation (target color space: sRGB, color profile: Saturated)
Color saturation (target color space: sRGB, color profile: Saturated)

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
22 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 11 ms rise
↘ 11 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 32 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (23.8 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
38 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 19 ms rise
↘ 19 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 40 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (37.6 ms).

Despite the low contrast, the Moto G60s impresses with a solid readability even in sunny weather thanks to its relatively good brightness level. As soon as reflections appear on the display, however, content can only be read with difficulties.

Moto G60s review
Moto G60s review
Moto G60s review

Viewing angles are good, and even at very flat viewing angles, screen content is displayed relatively color accurately. There are no color shifts, but the panel darkens noticeably when viewed from the side.

Moto G60s review

Performance - Moto G60s with MediaTek SoC

The MediaTek Helio G95 is an SoC manufactured in a 12 nm process, which is especially aimed at gamers due to the low latency between the GPU and the display. The chipset integrates two Cortex-A76 cores running at up to 2.05 GHz as well as six small Cortex-A55 cores with clock speeds of 2 GHz. The Mali-G76 MP4 is integrated as the graphics unit.

In everyday use, the system speed is pleasing, and it provides a mostly smooth experience in combination with only 4 GB of RAM but a 120 Hz display - minor micro stuttering is still visible from time to time when multitasking.

The Moto phone delivers a decent performance in our benchmark package, but a large performance gap is noticeable compared to the Poco F3 (prices start at around $395 on newegg). The Helio G95 in the realme 8 delivers slightly better results as well; the G60s is outperformed in the graphics benchmarks in particular, but the Moto smartphone still performs on par with the mid-range competition. On the other hand, the browser benchmark scores are remarkably good. The UFS 2.1 storage also performs on par with our comparison devices using the same 2.1 standard.

Geekbench 5.3
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G60s
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096
522 Points ∼52%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
364 Points ∼36% -30%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
507 Points ∼51% -3%
realme 8
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096
532 Points ∼53% +2%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
305 Points ∼31% -42%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
998 Points ∼100% +91%
Average Mediatek Helio G95
  (506 - 532, n=5)
515 Points ∼52% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (58 - 1755, n=257, last 2 years)
610 Points ∼61% +17%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G60s
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096
1653 Points ∼49%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1370 Points ∼41% -17%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
1685 Points ∼50% +2%
realme 8
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096
1689 Points ∼50% +2%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
1234 Points ∼37% -25%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
3368 Points ∼100% +104%
Average Mediatek Helio G95
  (1622 - 1689, n=5)
1665 Points ∼49% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (248 - 4914, n=257, last 2 years)
2063 Points ∼61% +25%
Vulkan Score 5.3 (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G60s
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096
2055 Points ∼57%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1145 Points ∼32% -44%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
2258 Points ∼63% +10%
realme 8
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096
2400 Points ∼67% +17%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
Points ∼0% -100%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
3587 Points ∼100% +75%
Average Mediatek Helio G95
  (2055 - 2400, n=4)
2209 Points ∼62% +7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (72 - 7701, n=157, last 2 years)
2289 Points ∼64% +11%
OpenCL Score 5.3 (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G60s
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096
1943 Points ∼54%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1132 Points ∼31% -42%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
2248 Points ∼62% +16%
realme 8
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096
2314 Points ∼64% +19%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
374 Points ∼10% -81%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
3606 Points ∼100% +86%
Average Mediatek Helio G95
  (1943 - 2314, n=5)
2194 Points ∼61% +13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (255 - 7514, n=158, last 2 years)
2325 Points ∼64% +20%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0 (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G60s
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096
8732 Points ∼64%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
6570 Points ∼48% -25%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
8236 Points ∼61% -6%
realme 8
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096
10373 Points ∼76% +19%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
7554 Points ∼56% -13%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
13610 Points ∼100% +56%
Average Mediatek Helio G95
  (8236 - 10373, n=3)
9114 Points ∼67% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4436 - 17085, n=78, last 2 years)
10268 Points ∼75% +18%
3DMark
Wild Life Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G60s
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096
1373 Points ∼32%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
679 Points ∼16% -51%
realme 8
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096
1493 Points ∼35% +9%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
383 Points ∼9% -72%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
4288 Points ∼100% +212%
Average Mediatek Helio G95
  (1373 - 1493, n=2)
1433 Points ∼33% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (153 - 9680, n=124, last 2 years)
3065 Points ∼71% +123%
Wild Life Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G60s
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096
1352 Points ∼32%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
174 Points ∼4% -87%
realme 8
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096
1502 Points ∼35% +11%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
Points ∼0% -100%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
4271 Points ∼100% +216%
Average Mediatek Helio G95
  (1352 - 1502, n=2)
1427 Points ∼33% +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (174 - 11700, n=121, last 2 years)
3181 Points ∼74% +135%
Wild Life Extreme (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G60s
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096
387 Points ∼32%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
686 Points ∼56% +77%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
108 Points ∼9% -72%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
1223 Points ∼100% +216%
Average Mediatek Helio G95
 
387 Points ∼32% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (102 - 3080, n=72, last 2 years)
985 Points ∼81% +155%
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G60s
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096
381 Points ∼31%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
173 Points ∼14% -55%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
Points ∼0% -100%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
1222 Points ∼100% +221%
Average Mediatek Helio G95
 
381 Points ∼31% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (101 - 4236, n=71, last 2 years)
1008 Points ∼82% +165%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G60s
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096
68 fps ∼96%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
59 fps ∼83% -13%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
60 fps ∼85% -12%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
35 fps ∼49% -49%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
71 fps ∼100% +4%
Average Mediatek Helio G95
  (45 - 68, n=3)
57.7 fps ∼81% -15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (8.2 - 143, n=202, last 2 years)
63.4 fps ∼89% -7%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G60s
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096
78 fps ∼39%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
44 fps ∼22% -44%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
85 fps ∼43% +9%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
35 fps ∼18% -55%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
200 fps ∼100% +156%
Average Mediatek Helio G95
  (78 - 85, n=3)
81.3 fps ∼41% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4.3 - 417, n=202, last 2 years)
120 fps ∼60% +54%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G60s
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096
42 fps ∼70%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
42 fps ∼70% 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
49 fps ∼82% +17%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
19 fps ∼32% -55%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
60 fps ∼100% +43%
Average Mediatek Helio G95
  (42 - 49, n=3)
44.3 fps ∼74% +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4.5 - 120, n=201, last 2 years)
50.7 fps ∼85% +21%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G60s
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096
43 fps ∼36%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
24 fps ∼20% -44%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
52 fps ∼44% +21%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
19 fps ∼16% -56%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
119 fps ∼100% +177%
Average Mediatek Helio G95
  (43 - 52, n=3)
49 fps ∼41% +14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 229, n=202, last 2 years)
69.9 fps ∼59% +63%
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G60s
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096
26 fps ∼44%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
30 fps ∼51% +15%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
31 fps ∼53% +19%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
13 fps ∼22% -50%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
59 fps ∼100% +127%
Average Mediatek Helio G95
  (26 - 31, n=3)
28.7 fps ∼49% +10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.1 - 106, n=200, last 2 years)
39.5 fps ∼67% +52%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G60s
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096
29 fps ∼36%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
15 fps ∼19% -48%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
32 fps ∼40% +10%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
13 fps ∼16% -55%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
81 fps ∼100% +179%
Average Mediatek Helio G95
  (29 - 33, n=3)
31.3 fps ∼39% +8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 151, n=200, last 2 years)
48 fps ∼59% +66%
GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G60s
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096
15 fps ∼34%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
16 fps ∼36% +7%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
18 fps ∼41% +20%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
7 fps ∼16% -53%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
44 fps ∼100% +193%
Average Mediatek Helio G95
  (15 - 18, n=3)
16.7 fps ∼38% +11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.3 - 61, n=199, last 2 years)
24.8 fps ∼56% +65%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G60s
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096
18 fps ∼38%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
9.3 fps ∼19% -48%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
19 fps ∼40% +6%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
7.1 fps ∼15% -61%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
48 fps ∼100% +167%
Average Mediatek Helio G95
  (18 - 19, n=3)
18.7 fps ∼39% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.8 - 96.6, n=199, last 2 years)
28.9 fps ∼60% +61%
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G60s
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096
16 fps ∼33%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
17 fps ∼35% +6%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
19 fps ∼39% +19%
realme 8
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096
19 fps ∼39% +19%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
8.3 fps ∼17% -48%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
49 fps ∼100% +206%
Average Mediatek Helio G95
  (16 - 19, n=5)
18.2 fps ∼37% +14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.5 - 73, n=268, last 2 years)
25 fps ∼51% +56%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G60s
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096
19 fps ∼33%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
9.2 fps ∼16% -52%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
20 fps ∼35% +5%
realme 8
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096
21 fps ∼37% +11%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
8.2 fps ∼14% -57%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
57 fps ∼100% +200%
Average Mediatek Helio G95
  (19 - 21, n=5)
20.4 fps ∼36% +7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.95 - 257, n=268, last 2 years)
29.4 fps ∼52% +55%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G60s
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096
10 fps ∼30%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
9.5 fps ∼29% -5%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
12 fps ∼36% +20%
realme 8
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096
12 fps ∼36% +20%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
4.9 fps ∼15% -51%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
33 fps ∼100% +230%
Average Mediatek Helio G95
  (10 - 12, n=5)
11.4 fps ∼35% +14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 60, n=269, last 2 years)
16.8 fps ∼51% +68%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G60s
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096
6.8 fps ∼31%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
3.3 fps ∼15% -51%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
7.4 fps ∼34% +9%
realme 8
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096
7.7 fps ∼35% +13%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
2.8 fps ∼13% -59%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
22 fps ∼100% +224%
Average Mediatek Helio G95
  (6.8 - 7.8, n=5)
7.48 fps ∼34% +10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.35 - 101, n=269, last 2 years)
11.4 fps ∼52% +68%
AImark - Score v2.x (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G60s
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096
12983 Points ∼12%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
7242 Points ∼6% -44%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
6118 Points ∼5% -53%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
15832 Points ∼14% +22%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
111838 Points ∼100% +761%
Average Mediatek Helio G95
  (6118 - 12983, n=3)
10500 Points ∼9% -19%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4293 - 273221, n=84, last 2 years)
68835 Points ∼62% +430%
BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G60s
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096
3052 Points ∼48%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2346 Points ∼37% -23%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
1566 Points ∼25% -49%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
2247 Points ∼35% -26%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
6356 Points ∼100% +108%
Average Mediatek Helio G95
  (1566 - 3182, n=3)
2600 Points ∼41% -15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (615 - 8124, n=188, last 2 years)
3889 Points ∼61% +27%
System (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G60s
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096
4932 Points ∼49%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
5353 Points ∼54% +9%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
2083 Points ∼21% -58%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
4921 Points ∼49% 0%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
9997 Points ∼100% +103%
Average Mediatek Helio G95
  (2083 - 5564, n=3)
4193 Points ∼42% -15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1160 - 19657, n=188, last 2 years)
7051 Points ∼71% +43%
Memory (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G60s
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096
4108 Points ∼53%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2843 Points ∼37% -31%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
1012 Points ∼13% -75%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
2618 Points ∼34% -36%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
7692 Points ∼100% +87%
Average Mediatek Helio G95
  (1012 - 4108, n=3)
2959 Points ∼38% -28%
Average of class Smartphone
  (522 - 9044, n=188, last 2 years)
4581 Points ∼60% +12%
Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G60s
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096
3603 Points ∼28%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1811 Points ∼14% -50%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
3178 Points ∼25% -12%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
1832 Points ∼14% -49%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
12801 Points ∼100% +255%
Average Mediatek Helio G95
  (3178 - 3807, n=3)
3529 Points ∼28% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (349 - 25642, n=188, last 2 years)
6188 Points ∼48% +72%
Web (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G60s
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096
1188 Points ∼72%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1099 Points ∼66% -7%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144
898 Points ∼54% -24%
Oppo A74
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
1081 Points ∼65% -9%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
1658 Points ∼100% +40%
Average Mediatek Helio G95
  (898 - 1288, n=3)
1125 Points ∼68% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (10 - 2392, n=188, last 2 years)
1321 Points ∼80% +11%
UL Procyon AI Inference - Overall Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G60s
Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096
5923 Points ∼46%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
3400 Points ∼26% -43%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
12855 Points ∼100% +117%
Average Mediatek Helio G95
 
5923 Points ∼46% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1555 - 28727, n=40, last 2 years)
10488 Points ∼82% +77%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (12.4 - 182, n=177, last 2 years)
54.9 Points ∼100% +49%
Motorola Moto G60s (Chrome93)
36.789 Points ∼67%
Average Mediatek Helio G95 (16.9 - 40.4, n=4)
32.8 Points ∼60% -11%
Oppo A74 (Chrome 91.0.4472.77)
32.187 Points ∼59% -13%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G (Chrome 92)
31.568 Points ∼58% -14%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S (Chrome 91)
16.922 Points ∼31% -54%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (10.8 - 414, n=187, last 2 years)
99.8 Points ∼100% +38%
Motorola Moto G60s (Chrome93)
72.362 Points ∼73%
Average Mediatek Helio G95 (26.7 - 72.4, n=3)
56.6 Points ∼57% -22%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G (Chrome 92)
55.877 Points ∼56% -23%
Oppo A74 (Chrome 91.0.4472.77)
47.837 Points ∼48% -34%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S (Chrome 91)
26.662 Points ∼27% -63%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (9 - 244, n=163, last 2 years)
54.7 runs/min ∼100% +62%
Motorola Moto G60s (Chrome93)
33.8 runs/min ∼62%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G (Chome 92)
29.1 runs/min ∼53% -14%
Average Mediatek Helio G95 (14.7 - 34.2, n=3)
27.6 runs/min ∼50% -18%
Oppo A74 (Chrome 91.0.4472.77)
26.5 runs/min ∼48% -22%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S (Chrome 91)
14.7 runs/min ∼27% -57%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Average of class Smartphone (20 - 252, n=193, last 2 years)
83.1 Points ∼100% +46%
Oppo A74 (Chrome 91.0.4472.77)
59 Points ∼71% +4%
Motorola Moto G60s (Chrome93)
57 Points ∼69%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G (Chrome 92)
51 Points ∼61% -11%
Average Mediatek Helio G95 (28 - 57, n=4)
46.8 Points ∼56% -18%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S (Chrome 91)
28 Points ∼34% -51%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (1986 - 64222, n=200, last 2 years)
19512 Points ∼100% +20%
Motorola Moto G60s (Chrome93)
16289 Points ∼83%
Average Mediatek Helio G95 (4808 - 16289, n=3)
12304 Points ∼63% -24%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G (Chrome 92)
11313 Points ∼58% -31%
Oppo A74 (Chrome 91.0.4472.77)
8958 Points ∼46% -45%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S (Chrome 91)
4808 Points ∼25% -70%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S (Chrome 91)
10797.4 ms * ∼100% -304%
Average Mediatek Helio G95 (2673 - 10797, n=4)
5037 ms * ∼47% -88%
Oppo A74 (Chrome 91.0.4472.77)
4321.8 ms * ∼40% -62%
Average of class Smartphone (414 - 29635, n=202, last 2 years)
3648 ms * ∼34% -36%
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G (Chrome 92)
3349.4 ms * ∼31% -25%
Motorola Moto G60s (Chrome93)
2673.4 ms * ∼25%

* ... smaller is better

Motorola Moto G60sSamsung Galaxy A22 4GXiaomi Redmi Note 10Srealme 8Oppo A74Average 128 GB UFS 2.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-30%
16%
4%
9%
25%
43%
Sequential Read 256KB
498.53
297.7
-40%
498.76
0%
526.2
6%
514.5
3%
769 ?(427 - 1011, n=92)
54%
831 ?(45.6 - 2037, n=273, last 2 years)
67%
Sequential Write 256KB
200.54
183
-9%
371.98
85%
187.8
-6%
255.34
27%
270 ?(13.6 - 707, n=92)
35%
377 ?(11.9 - 1321, n=273, last 2 years)
88%
Random Read 4KB
123.34
101.2
-18%
110.47
-10%
144
17%
139.45
13%
147 ?(92.6 - 239, n=92)
19%
146 ?(13.5 - 325, n=273, last 2 years)
18%
Random Write 4KB
135.34
66.9
-51%
120.97
-11%
133
-2%
126.39
-7%
124 ?(18.2 - 290, n=92)
-8%
136 ?(5.5 - 330, n=273, last 2 years)
0%

Games - Motorola smartphone with the Mali-G76

With the Moto G60s, Motorola delivers a good overall package for gamers despite the mid-range price. Along with a large 120 Hz panel, the Moto phone has sufficient power for a gaming experience that exceeds 60 fps - at least in simple games. We took a closer look at a few Android titles with our partner GameBench.

The US-based manufacturer sets a 40 fps limit for PUBG Mobile, and only 30 fps is possible when using the HD graphics setting - at the time of conducting our review, the UHD mode is not selectable. In Armajet, which theoretically supports up to 144 fps, we manage a maximum of 116 fps. However, we "only" get 85 frames per second on average.

PUBG Mobile
PUBG Mobile
Armajet
Armajet
01020304050607080901001101081169380899511511110010192967187959083807585798181907673818787768510010094849596107948375979885738077869389919380908478745651648884798278958884918787808684847280747577798910096918794868371575451658376848484859090898588838485869085888990827271849594104888388876861768278689185838474888696104911081169380899511511110010192967187959083807585798181907673818787768510010094849596107948375979885738077869389919380908478745651648884798278958884918787808684847280747577798910096918794868371575451658376848484859090898588838485869085888990827271849594104888388876861768278689185838474888696104914041384040404040404039413940393933413940394040403940404040404038414039404040404039403940404140403940404037413940403940394040404040404040404040404040404040404040404040404039403940404040404040404040404040403941404040404040404040403941383940404010811693808995115111100101929671879590838075857981819076738187877685100100948495961079483759798857380778693899193809084787456516488847982789588849187878086848472807475777989100969187948683715754516583768484848590908985888384858690858889908272718495941048883888768617682786891858384748886961049140413840404040404040394139403939334139403940404039404040404040384140394040404040394039404041404039404040374139404039403940404040404040404040404040404040404040404040404040394039404040404040404040404040404039414040404040404040404039413839404040303030303030303030303030293030303030292930303030292930303029302930303030293028313030303030303029312930303030303030303030313029312930303030303029312930312930302930303030303030293130303030302931292929313030293031293030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030302930303030303030293130303030303030Tooltip
; Armajet: Ø84.9 (51-116)
; PUBG Mobile; Balanced: Ø39.8 (33-41)
; PUBG Mobile; HD: Ø29.9 (28-31)

Emissions - Motorola phone remains cool

Temperature

The GFXBench app's battery test
The GFXBench app's battery test

The rear of the case heats up within a moderate range under prolonged load - the Moto G60s never gets truly hot in the test. We use the GFXBench app's battery test to examine the heat development on the inside. Here, the respective scenarios are run 30 times in a row, and both the battery status as well as the frame rates are registered.

Although performance decreases continuously over time, we still can't detect a significant drop in frame rates with a loss of about 20% The stability of the Moto G60s is also very good in the stress tests of the 3DMark benchmark.

Motorola Moto G60s review
Motorola Moto G60s review
Motorola Moto G60s review
Motorola Moto G60s review
Motorola Moto G60s review
Motorola Moto G60s review
0123456788.098.18.148.168.168.168.168.168.168.168.168.17.657.637.567.527.527.487.337.374.134.144.164.154.164.154.164.174.164.164.164.154.154.144.144.164.154.164.164.148.098.18.148.168.168.168.168.168.168.168.168.17.657.637.567.527.527.487.337.374.134.144.164.154.164.154.164.174.164.164.164.154.154.144.144.164.154.164.164.142.312.322.322.332.332.322.332.332.312.322.322.322.312.332.322.312.312.322.322.321.0461.0371.0411.0551.0431.0541.0521.0571.0561.0581.0591.0551.0581.0421.0471.0541.0541.0561.0561.055Tooltip
Motorola Moto G60s Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø7.89 (7.33-8.16)
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø4.15 (4.13-4.17)
Motorola Moto G60s Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.5.1: Ø2.32 (2.31-2.33)
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.4.2: Ø1.052 (1.037-1.059)
Max. Load
 38.1 °C
101 F
35.1 °C
95 F
33.7 °C
93 F
 
 38.2 °C
101 F
35.2 °C
95 F
34 °C
93 F
 
 37.3 °C
99 F
34.9 °C
95 F
33.7 °C
93 F
 
Maximum: 38.2 °C = 101 F
Average: 35.6 °C = 96 F
32.6 °C
91 F
34.7 °C
94 F
35.1 °C
95 F
32 °C
90 F
35.3 °C
96 F
36.9 °C
98 F
32.9 °C
91 F
36 °C
97 F
36.4 °C
98 F
Maximum: 36.9 °C = 98 F
Average: 34.7 °C = 94 F
Power Supply (max.)  41.6 °C = 107 F | Room Temperature 21.3 °C = 70 F | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 35.6 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38.2 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 22 to 52.9 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 36.9 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24 °C / 75 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
Motorola Moto G60s review
Motorola Moto G60s review

Speaker

The Moto G60s only has one speaker at the bottom. Its sound quality is okay, but the Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 4G, among others, also offers good-sounding stereo speakers in this price range. As expected, there's no bass presence in the sound pattern of the Moto G60s, but super high tones suffer heavily as well.

You don't have to do without an audio jack with the Motorola phone. The audio output is pleasingly loud and subtle. Wireless headphones can be connected via Bluetooth 5.0. The mid-range phone supports the following BT codecs: AAC, aptX, aptX HD, and aptX adaptive as well as LDAC.

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2050.739.22541.335.3313128.44035.635.4503836.56330.128.28030.831.410023.523.312520.322.216020.334.220016.243.525015.951.531513.958.640013.661.750013.563.463019.364.580016.567.6100013.97412501474.4160013.270.3200013.271.2250014.270.331501672.5400017.271.6500017.972.1630018.564.7800019.168.51000019.869.41250019.371.11600020.156.3SPL28.882.9N1.154.9median 16.5median 67.6Delta2.99.545.642.240.236.233.427.231.2303533.727.525.220.12019.619.217.220.915.931.712.440.11247.410.251.510.155.18.758.215.260.716.362.515.667.913.169.211.17011.57111.769.814.171.414.464.517.764.216.567.416.769.218.165.517.554.118.852.227.180.10.845.2median 15.2median 62.52.610.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseMotorola Moto G60sSamsung Galaxy A22 4G
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Motorola Moto G60s audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 25% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 64% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 51% of all tested devices were better, 9% similar, 40% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

Samsung Galaxy A22 4G audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.2% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 53% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 35% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 71% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 22% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

Battery life - Moto G60s with 5,000 mAh

Energy consumption

A 5,000 mAh lithium-polymer battery provides energy. It can be recharged in almost exactly 57 minutes with the included 50-watt power adapter when it's completely drained. In terms of power consumption, the Moto G60s proves to be exemplary for a 120 Hz smartphone with a 6.8-inch IPS panel.

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.1 / 0.2 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.7 / 0.9 / 1.2 Watt
Load midlight 4.3 / 6.4 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Motorola Moto G60s
5000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A22 4G
5000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
5000 mAh
realme 8
5000 mAh
Oppo A74
5000 mAh
Average Mediatek Helio G95
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-60%
-12%
-15%
-58%
-43%
Idle Minimum *
0.7
1.5
-114%
0.69
1%
0.62
11%
1.297 ?(0.69 - 2.5, n=3)
-85%
0.933 ?(0.12 - 2.5, n=217, last 2 years)
-33%
Idle Average *
0.9
2.1
-133%
1.46
-62%
1.59
-77%
1.987 ?(0.9 - 3.6, n=3)
-121%
1.794 ?(0.65 - 3.94, n=217, last 2 years)
-99%
Idle Maximum *
1.2
2.5
-108%
1.5
-25%
1.63
-36%
2.13 ?(1.2 - 3.7, n=3)
-78%
2.02 ?(0.69 - 4.01, n=217, last 2 years)
-68%
Load Average *
4.3
2.9
33%
3.67
15%
4.05
6%
4.32 ?(3.67 - 5, n=3)
-0%
4.45 ?(2.1 - 8.4, n=217, last 2 years)
-3%
Load Maximum *
6.4
4.9
23%
5.58
13%
5.2
19%
6.79 ?(5.58 - 8.4, n=3)
-6%
7.32 ?(3.56 - 12.3, n=217, last 2 years)
-14%

* ... smaller is better

Energy consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

0123456782.192.162.052.052.161.982.212.082.241.5260.8022.262.250.7790.7121.8461.8731.8251.7781.7432.441.1912.852.450.9861.1182.430.7222.340.7061.6632.21.7360.8891.1160.6812.222.322.181.0662.592.220.7322.122.092.312.12.132.122.282.12.172.222.090.7282.072.340.890.7553.653.873.83.723.753.731.1823.630.8270.8532.340.7782.292.322.250.8140.7452.431.0482.412.522.522.422.440.8222.320.9972.283.122.292.692.272.312.12.452.482.281.0151.0752.092.272.372.522.492.560.7060.7574.980.9624.564.564.324.654.494.414.294.624.624.464.234.674.554.484.114.834.54.594.071.0683.035.14.824.14.843.930.7272.382.224.835.264.654.744.724.944.694.924.781.31823.964.620.7993.353.382.652.792.812.862.892.712.992.740.7285.375.046.1766.120.8564.740.8675.055.024.255.054.674.864.640.7064.345.66.420.8744.484.84.670.7911.9144.594.744.512.780.7697.027.013.740.7584.684.354.970.9781.7285.335.633.874.756.114.074.660.8324.625.194.874.835.411.0682.626.464.087.165.657.145.795.966.195.6150.7934.756.270.776.917.356.846.115.055.757.167.046.245.355.345.886.485.194.853.648.136.645.857.034.26.556.456.796.775.52.810.7531.21.11.6871.6872.122.22.224.554.644.724.744.694.584.094.64.64.434.884.642.162.16.152.950.7650.840.7841.0912.593.033.013.093.063.083.113.193.023.023.7932.922.932.313.063.423.332.872.172.842.822.822.982.842.942.783.583.213.333.23.342.252.562.62.63.263.242.233.153.212.33.022.282.473.273.093.442.482.713.463.232.163.093.143.123.123.313.043.082.31.9872.0222.131.9812.072.312.030.9673.483.614.322.841.7723.263.253.713.374.053.313.353.343.323.333.423.223.453.31.563.042.431.7212.632.652.692.571.5852.442.742.421.8062.872.712.642.452.733.321.5061.7252.571.5562.632.862.852.672.883.2432.762.842.572.772.982.622.712.991.6092.642.332.62.522.242.422.542.212.341.5462.181.5671.5284.384.34.24.124.614.524.564.34.143.674.74.444.294.113.294.434.634.593.943.214.394.774.264.243.132.064.83