Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Processor N200 vs AMD Ryzen 5 3580U vs Intel Processor N97

Intel Processor N200

► remove from comparison Intel N200

The Intel Processor N200 is an entry-level mobile CPU for thin and light laptops from the Alder Lake-N series. It was announced in early 2023 and offers no performance cores and 4 of the 8 efficient cores (E-cores, Gracemont architecture). The chip does not support HyperThreading and clocks with up to 3.7 GHz. The performance of the E-cores should be similar to old Skylake cores (compare to the Core i7-6700HQ). All cores can use up to 6 MB L3-cache. 

Performance

The performance is clearly lower than the Core i3-N300 and N305 due to the reduced core count. Compared to older processors, the N200 should be similar to a Core i5-8250U (4 cores with HyperThreading, 3.4 GHz, 15W) when the power limit is not restricting performance.

Features

The Alder Lake-N chips only support single channel memory with up to DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 or LPDDR5-4800. The chip also supports Quick Sync and AV1 decoding (most likely same engine as in Alder Lake). Furthermore, Wi-Fi 6E and Bluetooth 5.2 are partly integrated (but no Thunderbolt). External chips can be connected via PCIe Gen3 x9 (via the PCH).

The integrated graphics adapter is based on the Xe-architecture and offersall 32 EUs (Execution Units) operating at only 450 - 750 MHz. Due to the single channel memory, low clock speeds and low shader count, the gaming performance of the iGPU is very limited.

Power consumption

The N200 has a base power consumption of only 6 W and is therefore suited for fanless cooling. The CPU is built with a further improved 10nm SuperFin process at Intel (called Intel 7).

AMD Ryzen 5 3580U

► remove from comparison AMD R5 3580U

The AMD Ryzen 5 3580U, a Microsoft Surface Edition chip, is a mobile SoC that was announced in October 2019 as part of the Surface Book 15. It combines four Zen+ cores (8 threads) clocked at 2.2 - 3.8 GHz with a Radeon RX Vega 9 graphics adapter with 9 CUs (576 Shaders) clocked at up to 1300 MHz. Compared to the similar Ryzen 5 3500U, the 3580 integrates a faster GPU with 9 instead of 8 CUs.

The Picasso SoCs use the Zen+ microarchitecture with slight improvements that should lead to a 3% IPS (performance per clock) improvements. Furthermore, the 12nm process allows higher clock rates at similar power consumptions.

The integrated dual-channel memory controller supports up to DDR4-2400 memory. As the features of the Picasso APUs are the same compared to the Raven Ridge predecessors, we point to our Raven Ridge launch article.

Performance

The average 3580U in our extensive database is in the same league as the Core i5-1035G7 and also the Core i7-10510U, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. This is a fairly decent result, as of mid 2021.

Power consumption

This Ryzen 5 has a default TDP (also known as the long-term power limit) of 15 W, a value that laptop manufacturers - or should we say, Microsoft - are allowed to change to anything between 12 W and 35 W with clock speeds and performance changing correspondingly. Those values are not low enough to allow for fan-free designs, for better or worse.

The CPU is built with a fairly old, as of late 2022, 12 nm process for lower-than-average energy efficiency.

Intel Processor N97

► remove from comparison Intel N97

The Intel Processor N97 is an entry-level mobile CPU for thin and light laptops from the Alder Lake-N series. It was announced in early 2023 and offers no performance cores and 4 of the 8 efficient cores (E-cores, Gracemont architecture). The chip does not support HyperThreading and clocks with up to 3.7 GHz. The performance of the E-cores should be similar to old Skylake cores (compare to the Core i7-6700HQ). All cores can use up to 6 MB L3-cache. 

Performance

The performance should be between the Intel Processor N100 and Intel Processor N200 and clearly below the Core i3-N300 and N305 due to the reduced core count. 

Features

The Alder Lake-N chips only support single channel memory with up to DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 or LPDDR5-4800. The chip also supports Quick Sync and AV1 decoding (most likely same engine as in Alder Lake). Furthermore, Wi-Fi 6E and Bluetooth 5.2 are partly integrated (but no Thunderbolt). External chips can be connected via PCIe Gen3 x9 (via the PCH).

The integrated graphics adapter is based on the Xe-architecture and offers only 24 of the 32 EUs (Execution Units) operating at 1200 MHz. Due to the single channel memory, low clock speeds, and low shader count, the gaming performance of the iGPU is very limited.

Power consumption

The N97 has a base power consumption of 12 W and therefore double the amount of the N100. The CPU is built with a further improved 10nm SuperFin process at Intel (called Intel 7).

ModelIntel Processor N200AMD Ryzen 5 3580UIntel Processor N97
CodenameAlder Lake-NPicasso-U (Zen+)Alder Lake-N
SeriesIntel Alder Lake-NAMD Picasso (Ryzen 3000 APU)Intel Alder Lake-N
Series: Alder Lake-N Alder Lake-N
Intel Core i3-N3051.8 - 3.8 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i3-N300 - 3.8 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N200 « 1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N97 - 3.6 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N95 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N1001 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N501 - 3.4 GHz2 / 2 cores6 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 3780U2.3 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 3700U2.3 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H2.1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U2.1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 3450U2.1 - 3.5 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 3580U « 2.1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i3-N3051.8 - 3.8 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i3-N300 - 3.8 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N2001 - 3.7 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N97 « - 3.6 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N95 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N1001 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N501 - 3.4 GHz2 / 2 cores6 MB L3
Clock1000 - 3700 MHz2100 - 3700 MHz <=3600 MHz
L3 Cache6 MB4 MB6 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 4
4 x 3.7 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core
4 / 84 / 4
4 x 3.6 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core
TDP6 Watt15 Watt12 Watt
Technology10 nm12 nm10 nm
max. Temp.105 °C105 °C105 °C
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) (450 - 750 MHz)AMD Radeon RX Vega 9 ( - 1300 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) ( - 1200 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comwww.amd.comark.intel.com
L1 Cache384 KB
L2 Cache2 MB
Transistors4500 Million
SocketFP5
FeaturesDDR4-2400 RAM, PCIe 3, MMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHA

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - N200
20.8 pt (35%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R5 3580U
24.9 pt (41%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - N97
25.9 pt (43%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
100%
1 N200 +
45 Points (25%)
140%
1 N97 +
63 Points (35%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
100%
1 N200 +
91 Points (2%)
211%
1 N97 +
192 Points (4%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
100%
1 N200 +
1406 Points (1%)
207%
1 N97 +
2913 Points (3%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
100%
1 N200 +
690 Points (29%)
141%
1 N97 +
973 Points (41%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
100%
N200 +
265 Points (29%)
352 Points (38%)
140%
N97 +
371 Points (41%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
100%
N200 +
542 Points (1%)
1549 Points (4%)
206%
N97 +
1115 Points (3%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
N200 +
219 Points (1%)
693 Points (4%)
219%
N97 +
479 Points (3%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
N200 +
113 Points (31%)
139 Points (39%)
142%
N97 +
161 Points (45%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
N200 +
2.7 Points (4%)
7.8 Points (10%)
219%
N97 +
6 Points (8%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
N200 +
1.4 Points (32%)
1.7 Points (39%)
143%
N97 +
1.9 Points (46%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
N200 +
3937 Points (24%)
4525 Points (27%)
138%
N97 +
5445 Points (33%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
N200 +
7549 Points (5%)
18307 Points (13%)
203%
N97 +
15323 Points (11%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
100%
1 N200 +
11030 Points (7%)
219%
1 N97 +
24158 Points (15%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
100%
1 N200 +
5971 Points (7%)
143%
1 N97 +
8567 Points (10%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
N200 +
875 s (10%)
274.7 s (3%)
167%
N97 +
523 s (6%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
N200 +
26 s (5%)
7.2 s (1%)
155%
N97 +
16.8 s (3%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
100%
N200 +
2115 Points (3%)
2924 Points (5%)
110%
N97 +
2321 Points (4%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
100%
N200 +
7146 MIPS (4%)
15209 MIPS (9%)
184%
N97 +
13174 MIPS (8%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
100%
N200 +
3230 MIPS (38%)
3572 MIPS (42%)
124%
N97 +
4019 MIPS (47%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
100%
N200 +
16.3 fps (5%)
40.1 fps (13%)
214%
N97 +
34.9 fps (12%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
100%
N200 +
80 fps (18%)
135.3 fps (31%)
219%
N97 +
174.8 fps (40%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
100%
N200 +
1.5 fps (3%)
4.1 fps (7%)
230%
N97 +
3.5 fps (6%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
100%
N200 +
0.3 GB/s (8%)
0.4 GB/s (12%)
90%
N97 +
0.3 GB/s (8%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
100%
N200 +
0.6 GB/s (10%)
0.6 GB/s (10%)
91%
N97 +
0.5 GB/s (9%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
100%
N200 +
3.2 GB/s (8%)
3.5 GB/s (9%)
91%
N97 +
2.9 GB/s (8%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
100%
1 N200 +
4297 Seconds (55%)
213%
1 N97 +
2014 Seconds (26%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
100%
N200 +
2150 Seconds (15%)
710 Seconds (5%)
211%
N97 +
1020 Seconds (7%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
100%
1 N200 +
1.1 sec (25%)
146%
1 N97 +
0.8 sec (17%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
N200 +
3902 Points (8%)
5545 Points (12%)
166%
N97 +
6461 Points (14%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
N200 +
18.8 s (4%)
12 s (3%)
102%
N97 +
18.4 s (4%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
N200 +
42.7 s (2%)
27.2 s (1%)
112%
N97 +
38.3 s (2%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
N200 +
1011 s (4%)
694 s (3%)
129%
N97 +
786 s (3%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
N200 +
9491 Points (7%)
21501 Points (17%)
164%
N97 +
15578 Points (12%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
100%
N200 +
2765 Points (7%)
6856 Points (17%)
221%
N97 +
6118 Points (15%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
100%
N200 +
27649 Points (22%)
47473 Points (39%)
181%
N97 +
50003 Points (41%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
100%
N200 +
28655 Points (23%)
48287 Points (39%)
176%
N97 +
50545 Points (41%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
100%
N200 +
34749 Points (29%)
52082 Points (43%)
152%
N97 +
52858 Points (44%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
100%
N200 +
2848 Points (7%)
6687 Points (17%)
160%
N97 +
4565 Points (12%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
100%
N200 +
4135 Points (7%)
9805 Points (17%)
157%
N97 +
6473 Points (12%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
100%
N200 +
1251 Points (5%)
2898 Points (12%)
199%
N97 +
2493 Points (11%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core
100%
1 N200 +
956 Points (24%)
136%
1 N97 +
1300 Points (32%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core
100%
1 N200 +
1660 Points (6%)
192%
1 N97 +
3181 Points (12%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
100%
1 N200 +
853 Points (27%)
146%
1 N97 +
1247 Points (40%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
100%
1 N200 +
1375 Points (6%)
220%
1 N97 +
3029 Points (12%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
N200 +
928 Points (36%)
900 Points (35%)
114%
N97 +
1060 Points (41%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
N200 +
1540 Points (3%)
2990 Points (5%)
179%
N97 +
2757 Points (5%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 N200 +
891 Points (4%)
118%
1 N97 +
1052 Points (5%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 N200 +
1518 Points (5%)
180%
1 N97 +
2738 Points (9%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 N200 +
4552 Points (45%)
103%
1 N97 +
4703 Points (47%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 N200 +
9989 Points (10%)
109%
1 N97 +
10893 Points (11%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
3908 Points (43%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
11829 Points (17%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
100%
N200 +
1460 ms (2%)
1243 ms (1%)
150%
N97 +
975 ms (1%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
28517 Points (22%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
100%
1 N97 +
145.3 Points (40%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
100%
1 N200 +
171.3 Points (31%)
112%
1 N97 +
191.4 Points (34%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
100%
1 N200 +
614 Points (23%)
137%
1 N97 +
844 Points (32%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 N200 +
14.1 Watt (2%)
41.1 Watt (7%)
38%
1 N97 +
37.1 Watt (6%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 N200 +
13.6 Watt (2%)
40 Watt (7%)
48%
1 N97 +
28.4 Watt (5%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 N200 +
6.1 Watt (4%)
45%
1 N97 +
13.5 Watt (9%)
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
100%
1 N200 +
16.1 Points per Watt (12%)
17.3 Points per Watt (13%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Processor N200 → 100% n=35

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 5 3580U → 194% n=35

Average Benchmarks Intel Processor N97 → 162% n=35

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.33
log 28. 09:44:14

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14930 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 11514 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 14969 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1751096654s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 28 Jun 2025 05:20:10 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.006s ... 0.006s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.006s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 14930 +0.003s ... 0.009s

#9 got single benchmarks 14930 +0.005s ... 0.014s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 11514 +0.003s ... 0.018s

#11 got single benchmarks 11514 +0.004s ... 0.022s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 14969 +0.001s ... 0.023s

#13 got single benchmarks 14969 +0s ... 0.023s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.023s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.055s ... 0.079s

#16 return log +0s ... 0.079s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)