Notebookcheck Logo

ARM Mali-G78 MP22 vs Qualcomm Adreno 750

ARM Mali-G78 MP22

► remove from comparison ARM Mali-G78 MP22

The ARM Mali-G78MP22 is an integrated high-end graphics card for ARM based SoCs (mostly Android based). It was introduced late 2020 in the HiSilicon Kirin 9000E (e.g. Huawei MatePad Pro 12.6). It integrates 22 of the 24 possible cores and is based on the second generation of the Valhal architecture. According to ARM it offers two new features: asynchronous top level and fragment dependency tracking.

The graphics card is one of the fastest in Android devices of 2020 and therefore able to run all games fluently.

The GPU supports all modern graphics APIs like OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan 1.1 and OpenCL 2.0.

Qualcomm Adreno 750

► remove from comparison

The Qualcomm Adreno 750 is an integrated graphics unit that is used in the Snapdragon 8 Gen. 3 and is designed for smartphones and tablets. The associated SoC (System-on-a-Chip) was introduced in October 2023 and can be found in many Android-based high-end products of the year 2024. 

Qualcomm promises a performance increase of up to 25% over its predecessor, the Adreno 740, as well as a 25 % improvement in efficiency. The Adreno 750 can now additionally adjust frame rates to within 1 Hz (QSnyc), which should improve power consumption once again. 

With Snapdragon Elite Gaming, games are now possible at up to 240 FPS and the Adreno Frame Motion Engine 2.0 is now said to be able to accelerate games that are limited to 60 FPS to 120 FPS. Upscaling for games in 8k should also be possible. 

The Adreno 750 supports all common Android APIs and is already prepared for use with the Unreal 5 Lumens. 

The Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 is manufactured in the current 4nm process at TSMC.

show full text
ARM Mali-G78 MP22Qualcomm Adreno 750
Adreno 700 Series
Mali-G78 MP24 compare 24
Mali-G78 MP22 24
Mali-G78 MP20 compare 24
Mali-G78 MP14 compare 14
Mali-G77 MP11 compare 11
Mali-G77 MP9 compare 9
Mali-G76 MP16 compare 16
Mali-G76 MP12 compare 10
Mali-G76 MP10 compare 10 @ 0.72 GHz
Mali-G68 MP5 compare 5
Mali-G57 MP6 compare 6
Mali-G57 MP5 compare 5
Mali-G72 MP18 compare 18 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G71 MP20 compare 8 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-G72 MP12 compare 12 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G71 MP8 compare 8 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-G76 MP4 compare 4 @ 0.8 GHz
Mali-G71 MP2 compare 2 @ 0.77 GHz
Mali-G72 MP3 compare 3 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G68 MP4 compare 4
Mali-G52 MP6 compare 6
Mali-G68 MP2 compare 2
Mali-G52 MP2 compare 2 @ 0.95 GHz
Mali-G52 MP1 compare 1 @ 0.8 GHz
Mali-G57 MP4 compare 4
Mali-G57 MP3 compare 3
Mali-G57 MP2 compare 2
Mali-G57 MP1 compare 1
Mali-G51 MP4 compare 4 @ 0.65 GHz
Adreno 750
Adreno 740 compare
Adreno 725 compare @ 0.8 GHz
Adreno 722 compare
Adreno 735 compare @ 0.8 GHz
Adreno 732 compare
Adreno 730 compare @ 0.8 GHz
Adreno 720 compare @ 0.8 GHz
Adreno 710 compare @ 0.8 GHz
CodenameValhall
ArchitectureValhall
Pipelines24 - unified
Shared Memorynoyes
APIOpenGL ES 3.2OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan 1.3
technology5 nm4 nm
Date of Announcement26.05.2020 25.10.2023
Link to Manufacturer Pagewww.arm.com
FeaturesOpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1
CPU in Adreno 750GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy8 x 2300 MHz? MHz1000 MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 38 x 2300 MHz? MHz903 MHz
min. - max.? MHz903 - 1000 MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
11598 Points (50%)
min: 13910     avg: 20925     median: 22040 (96%)     max: 23024 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
16653 Points (37%)
min: 38076     avg: 43953     median: 44758 (98%)     max: 45492 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
9630 Points (41%)
min: 9984     avg: 16072     median: 17279 (73%)     max: 20131 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
12079 Points (30%)
min: 22388     avg: 29111     median: 29081 (72%)     max: 33376 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0)
0 Points (0%)
0 Points (0%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Graphics
0 Points (0%)
0 Points (0%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
0 Points (0%)
17553 Points (86%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
0 Points (0%)
29890 Points (100%)
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
6399 Points (3%)
min: 15108     avg: 18708     median: 19022 (10%)     max: 20321 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
1805 Points (2%)
min: 3991     avg: 4757     median: 4739 (5%)     max: 5190 Points
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 27     avg: 36.1     median: 37 (14%)     max: 42 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
31 fps (6%)
min: 43     avg: 75.4     median: 76.5 (14%)     max: 96 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
76 fps (6%)
min: 92     avg: 186.9     median: 189 (14%)     max: 241 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
64 fps (6%)
min: 64     avg: 141.3     median: 149 (14%)     max: 167 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
112 fps (2%)
min: 90     avg: 239.3     median: 248 (5%)     max: 292 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
154 fps (6%)
min: 143     avg: 314.8     median: 325 (14%)     max: 388 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + ARM Mali-G78 MP22
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
232 fps (2%)
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 750
min: 189     avg: 479.3     median: 498 (4%)     max: 549 fps
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
min: 676800     avg: 747103     median: 754580 (75%)     max: 784286 Points
Antutu v10 - AnTuTu v10 GPU
min: 415471     avg: 760748     median: 772494 (62%)     max: 927463 Points
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
74.4 fps (2%)
min: 212.26     avg: 248.6     median: 248.6 (6%)     max: 285 fps
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 GPU OpenCL
min: 10798     avg: 14134     median: 14192 (4%)     max: 16784 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 GPU Vulkan
min: 13579     avg: 15810     median: 16202 (4%)     max: 17531 Points
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
11.8 Watt (5%)
min: 3.24     avg: 9.2     median: 8.9 (3%)     max: 15.2 Watt

Average Benchmarks ARM Mali-G78 MP22 → 100% n=13

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 750 → 242% n=13

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Diablo Immortal

Diablo Immortal

2022
low Medium
Adreno 750:
59.3 59.6 59.8 ~ 60 fps
Genshin Impact

Genshin Impact

2020
low
Adreno 750:
40 52 60 60.1 ~ 53 fps
med.
Adreno 750:
59.8  fps
ultra
Adreno 750:
51 52 54 55 59.8 60 60 60 60 ~ 57 fps
Armajet

Armajet

2020
high
100%
Mali-G78 MP22:
61  fps
PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
Adreno 750:
49 58 59.3 59.4 60 89 90 90 115.3 116.2 118 119 120 ~ 88 fps
med.
Adreno 750:
60  fps
high
100%
Mali-G78 MP22:
30  fps
193%
Adreno 750:
40 58.1 59 59.3 59.5 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 ~ 58 fps
ultra
Adreno 750:
39.4 39.6 39.9 39.9 39.9 40 40 40 40 40 40 ~ 40 fps
Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
Adreno 750:
60 60 98 103 ~ 80 fps
Asphalt 9: Legends

Asphalt 9: Legends

2013
high
Adreno 750:
59.4  fps
Subway Surfers

Subway Surfers

2012
high
100%
Mali-G78 MP22:
61  fps

Average Gaming ARM Mali-G78 MP22 → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 750 → 193%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 193%

ARM Mali-G78 MP22Qualcomm Adreno 750
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
Diablo Immortal60
Genshin Impact5359.857
PUBG Mobile3088605840
Dead Trigger 280
Asphalt 9: Legends59.4
ARM Mali-G78 MP22Qualcomm Adreno 750
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps






1










< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
1
2

1
1

2
1

2







For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.33
log 10. 01:32:51

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 10957 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 11624 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1757460771s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 07 Sep 2025 05:18:44 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.032s ... 0.033s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.033s

#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.033s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 10957 +0.015s ... 0.047s

#9 got single benchmarks 10957 +0.004s ... 0.051s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 11624 +0s ... 0.052s

#11 got single benchmarks 11624 +0.031s ... 0.083s

#12 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.083s

#13 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.005s ... 0.088s

#14 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.088s

#15 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.089s

#16 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.089s

#17 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.09s

#18 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.091s

#19 min, max, avg, median took s +0.012s ... 0.103s

#20 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.103s

#21 Got 67 rows for game benchmarks. +0.014s ... 0.117s

#22 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.117s

#23 got data and put it in $dataArray +0s ... 0.117s

#24 benchmarks composed for output. +0.003s ... 0.12s

#25 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.12s

#26 return log +0.001s ... 0.12s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)