Notebookcheck Logo

ARM Mali-G68 MP4 vs Samsung Xclipse 940 vs ARM Mali-G68 MP2

ARM Mali-G68 MP4

► remove from comparison ARM Mali-G68 MP4

The ARM Mali-G68 MP4 (or G68MC4) is an integrated mid-range graphics card for ARM based SoCs (mostly Android based). The MP4 version uses four of the six possible clusters / cores.

It was introduced mid 2021 in the Mediatek Dimensity 900. It is based on the Valhall architecture and is advertised by ARM as a "sub-premium GPU". It offers all features of the Mali-G78 series including improvements for battery runtime and machine learning.

Samsung Xclipse 940

► remove from comparison Samsung Xclipse 940

The Samsung Xclipse 940 is a graphics chip for smartphones and tablets, integrated in the Samsung Exynos 2400 SoC (iGPU). It is based on the AMD RDNA 3 architecture and includes hardware ray tracing support. #

The performance is similar or slightly better than the older Adreno 740 in the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2.

The Exynos 2400 is the first Exynos processor to use a Fan-out Wafer Level Package (FOWLP) to boost thermal management.

The SoC is manufactured in the 4nm process at Samsung.

ARM Mali-G68 MP2

► remove from comparison ARM Mali-G68 MP2

The ARM Mali-G68 MP2 (or G68MC2) is an integrated mid-range graphics card for ARM based SoCs (mostly Android based). The MP2 version uses two of the six possible clusters / cores.

It was introduced mid 2021 in the Samsung Exynos W920 for smartwatches. It is based on the Valhall architecture and is advertised by ARM as a "sub-premium GPU". It offers all features of the Mali-G78 series including improvements for battery runtime and machine learning.

show full text
ARM Mali-G68 MP4Samsung Xclipse 940ARM Mali-G68 MP2
Mali-G Series
Mali-G78 MP24 24
Mali-G78 MP22 24
Mali-G78 MP20 24
Mali-G78 MP14 14
Mali-G77 MP11 11
Mali-G77 MP9 9
Mali-G76 MP16 16
Mali-G76 MP12 10
Mali-G76 MP10 10 @ 0.72 GHz
Mali-G68 MP5 5
Mali-G57 MP6 6
Mali-G57 MP5 5
Mali-G72 MP18 18 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G71 MP20 8 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-G72 MP12 12 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G71 MP8 8 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-G76 MP4 4 @ 0.8 GHz
Mali-G71 MP2 2 @ 0.77 GHz
Mali-G72 MP3 3 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G68 MP4 4
Mali-G52 MP6 6
Mali-G68 MP2 2
Mali-G52 MP2 2 @ 0.95 GHz
Mali-G52 MP1 1 @ 0.8 GHz
Mali-G57 MP4 4
Mali-G57 MP3 3
Mali-G57 MP2 2
Mali-G57 MP1 1
Mali-G51 MP4 4 @ 0.65 GHz
Xclipse 950 8
Xclipse 940
Xclipse 920 192 @ 0.56 GHz
Mali-G78 MP24 24
Mali-G78 MP22 24
Mali-G78 MP20 24
Mali-G78 MP14 14
Mali-G77 MP11 11
Mali-G77 MP9 9
Mali-G76 MP16 16
Mali-G76 MP12 10
Mali-G76 MP10 10 @ 0.72 GHz
Mali-G68 MP5 5
Mali-G57 MP6 6
Mali-G57 MP5 5
Mali-G72 MP18 18 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G71 MP20 8 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-G72 MP12 12 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G71 MP8 8 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-G76 MP4 4 @ 0.8 GHz
Mali-G71 MP2 2 @ 0.77 GHz
Mali-G72 MP3 3 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G68 MP4 4
Mali-G52 MP6 6
Mali-G68 MP2 2
Mali-G52 MP2 2 @ 0.95 GHz
Mali-G52 MP1 1 @ 0.8 GHz
Mali-G57 MP4 4
Mali-G57 MP3 3
Mali-G57 MP2 2
Mali-G57 MP1 1
Mali-G51 MP4 4 @ 0.65 GHz
CodenameValhallValhall
ArchitectureValhallValhall
Pipelines4 - unified2 - unified
Shared Memorynoyesno
technology5 nm4 nm5 nm
Date of Announcement14.09.2021 09.10.2023 14.09.2021
Link to Manufacturer Pagewww.arm.comwww.arm.com
FeaturesOpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1
CPU in Mali-G68 MP4GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
MediaTek Dimensity 70508 x 2000 MHz? MHz? MHz
MediaTek Dimensity 10808 x 2000 MHz? MHz? MHz
MediaTek Dimensity 9208 x 2000 MHz? MHz? MHz
» show 2 more
min. - max.? - 900 MHz? MHz
CPU in Xclipse 940GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Samsung Exynos 240010 x 2000 MHz? MHz? MHz
Samsung Exynos 2400e10 x 2000 MHz? MHz? MHz
min. - max.? MHz? MHz
CPU in Mali-G68 MP2GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Samsung Exynos 13308 x 2000 MHz? MHz? MHz
Samsung Exynos W10005 x 1500 MHz? MHz? MHz
Samsung Exynos W9302 x 1400 MHz? MHz? MHz
Samsung Exynos W9202 x 1180 MHz? MHz? MHz
min. - max.? MHz? MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Steel Nomad Light
min: 220     avg: 248     median: 250 (1%)     max: 272 Points
min: 1821     avg: 1919     median: 1919 (4%)     max: 2017 Points
0 Points (0%)
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
min: 2001     avg: 2220     median: 2242.5 (1%)     max: 2409 Points
min: 12652     avg: 13765     median: 13472.5 (7%)     max: 15464 Points
min: 1348     avg: 1351     median: 1351 (1%)     max: 1354 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 567     avg: 612     median: 619 (1%)     max: 656 Points
min: 3933     avg: 4172     median: 4188.5 (5%)     max: 4378 Points
351 Points (0%)
3DMark - 3DMark Solar Bay
min: 6649     avg: 8042     median: 8361 (4%)     max: 8797 Points
0 Points (0%)
3DMark - 3DMark Solar Bay Extreme
937 Points (5%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
48592 Points (5%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 4505     avg: 5078     median: 5061 (22%)     max: 5612 Points
min: 15466     avg: 17363     median: 17362.5 (75%)     max: 19259 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 5193     avg: 5883     median: 6021 (13%)     max: 6313 Points
min: 34989     avg: 35721     median: 35720.5 (79%)     max: 36452 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 3514     avg: 4058     median: 4173 (18%)     max: 4362 Points
min: 15675     avg: 16588     median: 16451 (69%)     max: 17638 Points
2494 Points (10%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 3678     avg: 4183     median: 4213 (10%)     max: 4406 Points
min: 23545     avg: 25100     median: 25121 (63%)     max: 26633 Points
2324 Points (6%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0)
min: 4021     avg: 4779     median: 4796 (43%)     max: 5335 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Graphics
min: 4927     avg: 5628     median: 5747 (34%)     max: 6110 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
min: 3378     avg: 3886     median: 3887 (19%)     max: 4225 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
min: 3580     avg: 4104     median: 4085.5 (14%)     max: 4372 Points
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 4.1     avg: 6     median: 4.5 (2%)     max: 32 fps
min: 30     avg: 32.5     median: 33 (12%)     max: 34 fps
min: 2.4     avg: 2.5     median: 2.5 (1%)     max: 2.6 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 9.4     avg: 10.6     median: 11 (2%)     max: 12 fps
min: 69     avg: 79.3     median: 79.5 (14%)     max: 89 fps
min: 5.7     avg: 5.8     median: 5.8 (1%)     max: 5.9 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 24     avg: 27.9     median: 28 (2%)     max: 31 fps
min: 153     avg: 159.8     median: 155 (11%)     max: 176 fps
16 fps (1%)
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 23     avg: 25.2     median: 25 (2%)     max: 27 fps
min: 130     avg: 134.5     median: 134.5 (13%)     max: 139 fps
14 fps (1%)
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 35     avg: 41.9     median: 42 (1%)     max: 46 fps
min: 214     avg: 231     median: 229.5 (5%)     max: 251 fps
24 fps (1%)
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 60     avg: 64.5     median: 64.5 (3%)     max: 69 fps
min: 269     avg: 296.8     median: 299.5 (12%)     max: 319 fps
40 fps (2%)
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + ARM Mali-G68 MP4
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 91     avg: 100.7     median: 101.5 (1%)     max: 108 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Samsung Xclipse 940
min: 378     avg: 388     median: 385.5 (3%)     max: 403 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + ARM Mali-G68 MP2
min: 59     avg: 59.5     median: 59.5 (0%)     max: 60 fps
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
min: 109691     avg: 127408     median: 128282 (13%)     max: 140863 Points
Antutu v10 - AnTuTu v10 GPU
min: 104333     avg: 107286     median: 107208 (7%)     max: 109771 Points
min: 613580     avg: 652246     median: 649947 (45%)     max: 695509 Points
min: 63138     avg: 63179     median: 63178.5 (4%)     max: 63219 Points
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 25.38     avg: 34.4     median: 33.2 (1%)     max: 39.37 fps
min: 239     avg: 245.7     median: 249 (6%)     max: 249 fps
25 fps (1%)
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 GPU OpenCL
min: 2243     avg: 2305     median: 2301 (1%)     max: 2394 Points
min: 13590     avg: 16104     median: 16919 (4%)     max: 16987 Points
1287 Points (0%)
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 GPU Vulkan
min: 2298     avg: 2329     median: 2310.5 (1%)     max: 2376 Points
min: 16011     avg: 16689     median: 16082.5 (4%)     max: 18578 Points
1286 Points (0%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
min: 13104     avg: 21255     median: 21981 (8%)     max: 26121 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
min: 4174     avg: 20359     median: 22932.5 (30%)     max: 27937 Points
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 2.95     avg: 4.3     median: 4.1 (2%)     max: 7.55 Watt
min: 10.2     avg: 11.7     median: 11.8 (5%)     max: 13.2 Watt
min: 2.78     avg: 2.8     median: 2.8 (1%)     max: 2.85 Watt

Average Benchmarks ARM Mali-G68 MP4 → 100% n=16

Average Benchmarks Samsung Xclipse 940 → 610% n=16

Average Benchmarks ARM Mali-G68 MP2 → 55% n=16

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Diablo Immortal

Diablo Immortal

2022
low Medium
100%
Mali-G68 MP4:
30 30 30 ~ 30 fps
ultra Ultra
100%
Mali-G68 MP4:
29.8 30 30 ~ 30 fps
Genshin Impact

Genshin Impact

2020
low
100%
Mali-G68 MP4:
30.5 32 37 43.5 ~ 36 fps
161%
Xclipse 940:
56.2 58 59 60 ~ 58 fps
86%
Mali-G68 MP2:
30.9  fps
ultra
100%
Mali-G68 MP4:
23 27 34.6 35 ~ 30 fps
180%
Xclipse 940:
47 50.8 58 59 ~ 54 fps
100%
Mali-G68 MP2:
17.9 42.2 ~ 30 fps
Armajet

Armajet

2020
high
100%
Mali-G68 MP4:
30 30 59 60 60 60 79 108 112 115 118 ~ 76 fps
PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
100%
Mali-G68 MP4:
30 30 30 30 40 58.7 59 59 60 60 60 60 ~ 48 fps
167%
Xclipse 940:
59.1 81 90 90 ~ 80 fps
71%
Mali-G68 MP2:
29.2 38.2 ~ 34 fps
med.
100%
Mali-G68 MP4:
40 40 40 60 ~ 45 fps
high
100%
Mali-G68 MP4:
28 30 30 30 30 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 ~ 37 fps
159%
Xclipse 940:
57 58.8 60 60 ~ 59 fps
119%
Mali-G68 MP2:
29.3 59.1 ~ 44 fps
ultra
100%
Mali-G68 MP4:
39.8  fps
101%
Xclipse 940:
39.2 40 40 40 ~ 40 fps
Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
100%
Mali-G68 MP4:
71  fps
161%
Xclipse 940:
105 119 119 ~ 114 fps
Asphalt 9: Legends

Asphalt 9: Legends

2013
low
100%
Mali-G68 MP4:
30 30 30 ~ 30 fps
143%
Mali-G68 MP2:
43  fps
high
100%
Mali-G68 MP4:
30  fps
142%
Mali-G68 MP2:
42.5  fps
Subway Surfers

Subway Surfers

2012
high
100%
Mali-G68 MP4:
60 60 120 ~ 80 fps

Average Gaming ARM Mali-G68 MP4 → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming Samsung Xclipse 940 → 155%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 150%

Average Gaming ARM Mali-G68 MP2 → 110%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 112%

ARM Mali-G68 MP4Samsung Xclipse 940ARM Mali-G68 MP2
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
Diablo Immortal3030
Genshin Impact3630585430.930
Armajet76
PUBG Mobile48453739.88059403444
Dead Trigger 271114
Asphalt 9: Legends30304342.5
Subway Surfers80
ARM Mali-G68 MP4Samsung Xclipse 940ARM Mali-G68 MP2
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
4


1


2
3

3







< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
1
1




1
1

2







< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
3





2


1







For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.35
log 15. 18:48:46

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 10953 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 12422 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 10947 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1765820926s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 14 Dec 2025 14:23:09 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.015s ... 0.015s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.015s

#8 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.015s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 10953 +0.018s ... 0.033s

#10 got single benchmarks 10953 +0.025s ... 0.058s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 12422 +0s ... 0.059s

#12 got single benchmarks 12422 +0.006s ... 0.065s

#13 getting avg benchmarks for device 10947 +0s ... 0.065s

#14 got single benchmarks 10947 +0.006s ... 0.071s

#15 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.071s

#16 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.073s

#17 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.004s ... 0.076s

#18 min, max, avg, median took s +0.019s ... 0.096s

#19 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.096s

#20 Got 97 rows for game benchmarks. +0.013s ... 0.109s

#21 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.109s

#22 got data and put it in $dataArray +0s ... 0.109s

#23 benchmarks composed for output. +0.003s ... 0.112s

#24 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.112s

#25 return log +0s ... 0.112s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
Google Add as a preferred
source on Google
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)