Notebookcheck Logo

Mediatek MT8183 vs HiSilicon Kirin 659

Mediatek MT8183

► remove from comparison  MT8183

The Mediatek MT8183 is a mainstream ARM SoC (System on a Chip) that was introduced in Late 2019 and is primarily used for Android based tablets. It is manufactured in a 12 nm process (unverified) and has a total of eight CPU cores with four powerful Cortex-A73 and four small Cortex-A53 cores in a big.LITTLE configuration. The integrated graphics card is a ARM Mali-G72 with three clusters (MP3).

Features

Besides CPU and GPU, the chip is also equipped with an LPDDR3/LPDDR4x memory controller, a Wi-Fi 5 (a/b/g/n/ac) modem (but no cellular modem). Furthermore, Mediatek states that it integrated an AI accelerator with a performance of 0.5 TOPS.

The maximum display resolution is only 2,400 x 1,080 pixels.

HiSilicon Kirin 659

► remove from comparison  Kirin 659

The HiSilicon Kirin 659 is an ARM-based octa-core SoC for mid-range smartphones and tablets. It was announced mid 2017 and features eight ARM Cortex-A53 cores. Four cores can be clocked with up to 1.7 GHz (power saving cores) and four with up to 2.36 GHz (performance cores). The difference to the older Kirin 650 and Kirin 655 SoCs is the higher clock speed of the performance cores (2.35 versus 2.1 and 2.0 GHz). The slightly older Kirin 658 is very similar. The 659 is in our benchmarks around 4% faster than the 658 and offers a better LTE radio (Cat. 13).

Furthermore, a ARM Mali-T830 MP2 graphics card (at >=900 MHz), a 64-Bit LPDDR3 memory controller and a dual-sim capable LTE Cat. 6 (max. 300 MBit/s and GSM, WCDMA, UMTS, HSPA+) radio are integrated in the SoC. The processor performance can be compared with the older Kirin 930 and therefore sufficient for daily usage as browsing and non demanding apps. High-end SoCs with Cortex-A57 or A72 cores however should be noticeably faster. The SoC is produced in a modern 16nm FinFET process and is therefore very power efficient.

ModelMediatek MT8183HiSilicon Kirin 659
Series Mediatek MT8
CodenameCortex-A73/-A53Cortex-A53
Clock2000 MHz2360 MHz
Cores / Threads8 / 88 / 8
Technology12 nm16 nm
Features32 MP Camera ISP, 1080p H.264 Video Encoder, H.265 DecoderARMv8-ISA, Mali-T830 MP2, Dual SIM LTE (Cat. 6), LPDDR3 Memory Controller
iGPUARM Mali-G72 MP3ARM Mali-T830 MP2
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
Series: Cortex-A53
JLQ JR510 compare1.5 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 935 compare2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 659 « 2.36 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 658 compare2.35 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 655 compare2.1 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 650 compare2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 930 compare2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 620 compare1.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
MediaTek MT8163 V/A 1.5 GHz compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
MediaTek MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz compare1.3 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
MediaTek MT8161 compare1.3 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Marvell Armada PXA1908 compare1.2 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.5, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - MT8183
0.5 pt (36%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
12599 Points (10%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 15776     avg: 18163     median: 18829 (16%)     max: 19883 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
min: 2085     avg: 2543     median: 2560.5 (30%)     max: 2966 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
min: 2322     avg: 2590     median: 2543 (29%)     max: 2963 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
100%
1 MT8183 +
323 Points (10%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
100%
1 MT8183 +
1214 Points (5%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 MT8183 +
min: 260     avg: 292.8     median: 300 (13%)     max: 305 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 MT8183 +
min: 909     avg: 1208     median: 1293 (2%)     max: 1430 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
0 Points (0%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
0 Points (0%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1397     avg: 1431     median: 1430.5 (14%)     max: 1464 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 5308     avg: 5377     median: 5376.5 (6%)     max: 5445 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1395 Points (19%)
min: 887     avg: 888     median: 888 (12%)     max: 889 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
4968 Points (12%)
min: 3438     avg: 3473     median: 3473 (8%)     max: 3508 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 5754     avg: 6212     median: 6212 (10%)     max: 6670 Points
3508 Points (5%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1410     avg: 1469     median: 1468.5 (22%)     max: 1527 Points
876 Points (13%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
805 Points (6%)
968 Points (8%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
1718 Points (16%)
2829 Points (26%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
10758 Points (21%)
5944 Points (12%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
5381 Points (11%)
3298 Points (7%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
6072 Points (16%)
3897 Points (10%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 3957     avg: 4403     median: 4337.5 (5%)     max: 4979 ms
min: 8684     avg: 9440     median: 9271 (11%)     max: 10788 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
1173 ms (13%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 8665     avg: 9742     median: 9822 (9%)     max: 10670 Points
min: 4191     avg: 4947     median: 4980 (4%)     max: 5471 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 46     avg: 54.3     median: 55.5 (12%)     max: 60 Points
min: 34     avg: 38.7     median: 40 (8%)     max: 42 Points
AnTuTu v6 - AnTuTu v6 Total Score
min: 62810     avg: 65730     median: 66608 (23%)     max: 68232 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 MEM
0 Points (0%)
min: 7947     avg: 8633     median: 8430.5 (26%)     max: 9656 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 UX
0 Points (0%)
min: 21484     avg: 23751     median: 24193.5 (30%)     max: 24268 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 GPU
0 Points (0%)
min: 12982     avg: 13331     median: 13167.5 (4%)     max: 14340 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 CPU
0 Points (0%)
min: 39451     avg: 41305     median: 41643.5 (25%)     max: 41874 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 Total Score
0 Points (0%)
min: 81992     avg: 87019     median: 87511.5 (15%)     max: 89639 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 UX
100%
1 MT8183 +
32912 Points (28%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 MEM
100%
1 MT8183 +
32293 Points (26%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 GPU
100%
1 MT8183 +
25424 Points (5%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 CPU
100%
1 MT8183 +
67925 Points (25%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 Total Score
100%
1 MT8183 +
158554 Points (15%)
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 Total Score
100%
1 MT8183 +
160693 Points (10%)
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 CPU
100%
1 MT8183 +
69184 Points (19%)
AndEBench - AndEBench Java
1694 Iter./s (52%)
AndEBench - AndEBench Native
20418 Iter./s (67%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
175006 Points (23%)
min: 122441     avg: 127602     median: 127602 (17%)     max: 132762 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
100%
1 MT8183 +
min: 6087     avg: 13047     median: 13046.5 (21%)     max: 20006 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
100%
1 MT8183 +
min: 5224     avg: 5900     median: 5830.5 (27%)     max: 6716 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
min: 2714     avg: 3143     median: 3143 (17%)     max: 3572 Points
min: 2413     avg: 2626     median: 2635 (14%)     max: 2819 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
min: 6470     avg: 11152     median: 11152 (24%)     max: 15834 Points
min: 5970     avg: 7032     median: 6957 (15%)     max: 8244 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
min: 5056     avg: 5633     median: 5264 (34%)     max: 6735 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
min: 6284     avg: 7442     median: 7441.5 (37%)     max: 8599 Points
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
100%
1 MT8183 +
min: 3.4     avg: 3.4     median: 3.4 (1%)     max: 3.44 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
100%
1 MT8183 +
min: 1.871     avg: 1.9     median: 1.9 (2%)     max: 1.889 Watt

Average Benchmarks Mediatek MT8183 → 100% n=22

Average Benchmarks HiSilicon Kirin 659 → 75% n=22

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 05. 17:29:34

#0 checking url part for id 11547 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 9252 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 04 May 2024 05:40:37 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.053s ... 0.054s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.054s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 11547 +0.013s ... 0.067s

#7 got single benchmarks 11547 +0.021s ... 0.088s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 9252 +0.003s ... 0.091s

#9 got single benchmarks 9252 +0.022s ... 0.113s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.113s

#11 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.051s ... 0.164s

#12 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.166s

#13 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.068s ... 0.234s

#14 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.003s ... 0.236s

#15 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.003s ... 0.239s

#16 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.003s ... 0.242s

#17 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.003s ... 0.245s

#18 min, max, avg, median took s +0.04s ... 0.285s

#19 return log +0.022s ... 0.306s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)