Notebookcheck Logo

Apple M2 Pro 10-Core vs Intel Xeon W-10885M

Apple M2 Pro 10-Core

► remove from comparison Apple M2 Pro 10-Core

The Apple M2 Pro 10-Core is a System on a Chip (SoC) from Apple that is found in the early 2023 MacBook Pro 14 and Mac Mini entry level models. It offers 10 of the 12 cores available in the chip divided in six performance cores (P-cores) and four power-efficiency cores (E-cores). The E-cores clock with up to 3.4 GHz, the P-Cores up to 3.7 GHz (mostly 3.3 GHz in multi-threaded workloads and 3.4 GHz in single threaded).

The big cores (codename Avalanche) offer 192 KB instruction cache, 128 KB data cache, and 36 MB shared L2 cache (up from 24 MB in the M1 Pro). The four efficiency cores (codename Blizzard) are a lot smaller and offer only 128 KB instruction cache, 64 KB data cache, and 4 MB shared cache. CPU and GPU can both use the 24 MB SLC (System Level Cache). 

The unified memory (16 or 32 GB LPDDR5-6400) next to the chip is connected by a 256 Bit memory controller (200 GB/s bandwidth) and can be used by the GPU and CPU.

The performance of the M2 Pro 10-Core should be similar to the old M1 Pro with all 10 cores. The multi-threaded performance should be slower, as the M2 10-core has two p-cores less (and 2 e-cores more) but the single-threaded performance should be better due to the faster clock speed and architectural improvements. The old M1 Pro 8-core should be noticeably slower.

The integrated graphics card in the M1 Pro 10-core offers all 16 of the 19 cores.

Furthermore, the SoC integrates a fast 16 core neural engine (faster than M1 Pro), a secure enclave (e.g., for encryption), a unified memory architecture, Thunderbolt 4 controller, an ISP, and media de- and encoders (including ProRes).

The M2 Pro is manufactured in 5 nm at TSMC (second generation) and integrates 40 billion transistors. 

Intel Xeon W-10885M

► remove from comparison Intel W-10885M

The Intel Xeon W-10885M is a high-end processor for workstation laptops with eight cores based on the Comet Lake architecture (CML-H, 4th generation of Skylake). The processor clocks at between 2.4 and 5.3 GHz and can execute up to sixteen threads simultaneously thanks to Hyper-Threading. The processor is still manufactured in the old 14nm (14nm++) process.

The Comet Lake architecture is similar to Coffee Lake and offers the same features and is produced in the same 14nm process. Other than the improved clock rates, the memory controller now also supports faster DDR4-2933 RAM. More information on Comet Lake and all the models and articles on it can be found here.

The Intel Xeon W-10885M supports the management features vPro, TXT and SIPP and is the professional version of the Intel Core i9-10885H

Performance

The performance of the W-10885M should be slightly above the older Core i9-9980HK top model, thanks to the potential higher single core turbo. Thanks to the 8 cores and high Turbo speeds, even demanding applications should run very good on the CPU. However, long term performance is always depending on the laptop cooling system and system configuration. At the time of announcement, the Intel Xeon W-10885M is the second fastest Comet Lake-H CPU behind the Core i9-10980HK.

Graphics

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics P630 iGPU is supposed to offer a similar performance as the UHD630 in the Core i7-9880H. As a  low-end solution it will only run current games smoothly at reduced details - if at all. The P-variant uses professional drivers.

Power Consumption

Intel specifies the TDP with 45 watts and therefore the i9 is only suited for big laptops with good cooling solutions. Using cTDP-down, the CPU can also be configured to 35 Watt resulting in a reduced performance.

ModelApple M2 Pro 10-CoreIntel Xeon W-10885M
SeriesApple M2Intel Comet Lake
Series: Comet Lake Comet Lake-H
Apple M2 Max compare2.42 - 3.7 GHz12 / 12 cores48 MB L3
Apple M2 Pro compare2.42 - 3.5 GHz12 / 12 cores24 MB L3
Apple M2 Pro 10-Core « 2.42 - 3.7 GHz10 / 10 cores24 MB L3
Apple M2 compare2.42 - 3.48 GHz8 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10980HK compare2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Xeon W-10885M « 2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10885H compare2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10880H compare2.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10875H compare2.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10870H compare2.2 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10850H compare2.7 - 5.1 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Xeon W-10855M compare2.8 - 5.1 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10750H compare2.6 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10500H compare2.5 - 4.5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10400H compare2.6 - 4.6 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10300H compare2.5 - 4.5 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10200H compare2.4 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Clock2424 - 3696 MHz2400 - 5300 MHz
L1 Cache7.3 MB512 KB
L2 Cache36 MB2 MB
L3 Cache24 MB16 MB
Cores / Threads10 / 108 / 16
Transistors40000 Million
Technology5 nm14 nm
FeaturesARMv8 Instruction SetDual-Channel DDR4 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NI
iGPUApple M2 Pro 16-Core GPUIntel UHD Graphics P630 (350 - 1200 MHz)
Chip AI15.8 TOPS INT8
ArchitectureARMx86
Announced
CodenameComet Lake-H
TDP45 Watt
SocketFCBGA1440

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - W-10885M
33 pt (55%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
11811 Points (11%)
6893 Points (6%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
1643 Points (69%)
1300 Points (55%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
449 Points (49%)
min: 488     avg: 495.3     median: 495.5 (54%)     max: 502 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
3235 Points (8%)
min: 2727     avg: 3639     median: 3882.5 (9%)     max: 4065 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
1664 Points (11%)
min: 1089     avg: 1509     median: 1640 (10%)     max: 1666 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
231 Points (64%)
min: 208     avg: 209.8     median: 210 (58%)     max: 211 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
18.3 Points (24%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
2.4 Points (56%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
7865 Points (48%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
44583 Points (32%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
105.8 s (1%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
3.6 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
7180 Points (11%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 36204     avg: 43315     median: 45696 (26%)     max: 48044 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 5495     avg: 5568     median: 5507 (65%)     max: 5703 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
100.1 fps (3%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
236.9 fps (6%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 8.89     avg: 11.9     median: 13.1 (23%)     max: 13.6 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1 GB/s (29%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
1.8 GB/s (31%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
10.3 GB/s (27%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
435 Seconds (6%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
415 Seconds (3%)
min: 281     avg: 326.3     median: 286 (2%)     max: 412 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.551     avg: 0.6     median: 0.6 (12%)     max: 0.57 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
13490 Points (29%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
7.7 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
17.1 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
429.3 s (2%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 13072     avg: 16593     median: 18302 (45%)     max: 18404 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 10772     avg: 13951     median: 14922 (38%)     max: 16159 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 15118     avg: 19215     median: 20247 (36%)     max: 22279 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 6457     avg: 8161     median: 8812 (37%)     max: 9214 Points
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Single-Core
2668 Points (65%)
1756 Points (42%)
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Multi-Core
12943 Points (50%)
8148 Points (32%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
2653 Points (84%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
12168 Points (50%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1926     avg: 1937     median: 1936.5 (73%)     max: 1947 Points
min: 1331     avg: 1339     median: 1340 (51%)     max: 1347 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 12074     avg: 12132     median: 12131.5 (22%)     max: 12189 Points
min: 6948     avg: 7939     median: 8378 (15%)     max: 8491 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1310     avg: 1332     median: 1323 (6%)     max: 1362 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 7542     avg: 8126     median: 8295 (26%)     max: 8541 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 5880     avg: 5899     median: 5892 (59%)     max: 5924 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 30737     avg: 32163     median: 32814 (32%)     max: 32939 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
447.4 ms (1%)
min: 728     avg: 736     median: 733 (1%)     max: 746 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
75471 Points (55%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
250 Points (69%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
391 Points (70%)
min: 228     avg: 229.3     median: 229 (41%)     max: 231 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
1772 Points (66%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
150 Watt (26%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
152.9 Watt (28%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
2.2 Watt (1%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
5.2 Watt (6%)
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
10.8 Points per Watt (8%)

Average Benchmarks Apple M2 Pro 10-Core → 100% n=13

Average Benchmarks Intel Xeon W-10885M → 84% n=13

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.34
log 07. 22:17:09

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14977 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 12205 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1759868229s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 07 Oct 2025 05:18:31 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.005s ... 0.005s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.005s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 14977 +0.001s ... 0.005s

#8 got single benchmarks 14977 +0.004s ... 0.01s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 12205 +0.004s ... 0.013s

#10 got single benchmarks 12205 +0.006s ... 0.019s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.019s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.028s ... 0.048s

#13 return log +0s ... 0.048s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)