Lenovo ThinkPad E550 (Core i7, Radeon R7 M265) Notebook Review
![](fileadmin/_processed_/csm_intro_59222f6373.jpg)
A true ThinkPad for less than 600 Euro (~$660) - is that even possible? We tried to find the answer to this very question during our first review of the ThinkPad E550 and came to the conclusion that the entry-level business machine had more than decent office capabilities.
In addition to the entry-level configuration we examined, Lenovo offers many other versions of the E550 equipped with different hardware. Today we are taking a look at the top-of-the-line model, which sells for 950 Euro (~$1030). For this comparatively high price, the user gets a fast Core i7-5500U, 8 GB RAM and a 1 TB hard drive. In addition, Lenovo also integrated a dedicated Radeon R7 M265 GPU, which should allow for fluid gameplay with current 3D titles at least a low resolution and quality settings. Let's find out if the notebook is as good of an allrounder as it appears to be on paper.
Since neither the chassis, the input devices, nor the connectivity differ in any way from our last review notebook, we are not going spend any time reviewing these sections. Please check out our previous review for details. Our review overvideo is below.
Are you a techie who knows how to write? Then join our Team! Wanted:
- News Writer (Romania based)
Details here
Display
Depending on the configuration, the E550 ships either with a simple WXGA (1366 x 768 Pixel, 100 ppi, 200 cd/m²) or - as in our case - with a FullHD-Display (1920 x 1080 Pixel, 141 ppi, 220 cd/m²). Aside from an increase in sharpness, it's the effective doubling of the workspace which makes the higher-resolution display a much more compelling choice in our opinion. Users who need to work with large Excel spreadsheets or who want to be able to view programs side-by-side should definitely consider the high-res model.
Even though the display specs have remained the same since our last review, our test candidate features a different panel (Innolux N156HGE-EAB vs. AUO B156HTN03.6) - obviously Lenovo has more than one supplier. From a quality standpoint, our verdict unfortunately remains negative: the maximum brightness of only 188 cd/m² is simply not enough for bright offices or working near windows; the just average black value of 0.46 cd/m² results in a rather modest contrast ratio of 424:1 as well. The display is consequently quite anemic-looking, which won't matter much for office-type tasks, though games and movies would look much better on a higher-quality IPS display. At least the brightness distribution is quite decent and there's absolutely no flickering, since the backlight doesn't use PWM.
|
Brightness Distribution: 90 %
Center on Battery: 195 cd/m²
Contrast: 424:1 (Black: 0.46 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 9.92 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.9
ΔE Greyscale 10.06 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
59.3% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
38% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
41.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
59.3% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
39.84% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.37
Lenovo ThinkPad E550-20DF00CNGE 1.920 x 1.080 TN-Panel | Lenovo ThinkPad E550-20DGS00300 1.920 x 1.080 TN-Panel | Dell Latitude 15 3550-0123 1.920 x 1.080 IPS-Panel | HP Pavilion 15-ab022ng 1.920 x 1.080 TN-Panel | Acer Aspire V3-574G-59MA 1.920 x 1.080 IPS-Panel | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 2% | 50% | 11% | 0% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 39.84 | 40.69 2% | 64.3 61% | 44.11 11% | 39.83 0% |
sRGB Coverage | 59.3 | 61.1 3% | 83.3 40% | 66.4 12% | 59.5 0% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 41.2 | 42.06 2% | 60.9 48% | 45.57 11% | 41.21 0% |
Screen | -6% | 62% | -4% | 16% | |
Brightness middle | 195 | 228 17% | 353 81% | 223 14% | 257 32% |
Brightness | 188 | 210 12% | 335 78% | 215 14% | 247 31% |
Brightness Distribution | 90 | 89 -1% | 88 -2% | 83 -8% | 84 -7% |
Black Level * | 0.46 | 0.688 -50% | 0.31 33% | 0.76 -65% | 0.45 2% |
Contrast | 424 | 331 -22% | 1139 169% | 293 -31% | 571 35% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 9.92 | 10.04 -1% | 4.59 54% | 8.5 14% | 7.36 26% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 10.06 | 10.65 -6% | 3.73 63% | 9.35 7% | 7.82 22% |
Gamma | 2.37 93% | 2.53 87% | 2.42 91% | 2.46 89% | 2.4 92% |
CCT | 11552 56% | 12807 51% | 6268 104% | 10402 62% | 6939 94% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 38 | 38.8 2% | 55 45% | 42 11% | 38 0% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 59.3 | 83 40% | 66 11% | 59.2 0% | |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -2% /
-4% | 56% /
59% | 4% /
0% | 8% /
12% |
* ... smaller is better
Also not a strength is the panel's color accuracy. As shipped, the display exhibits a noticeable blueish cast and the color space coverage is fairly restricted at 38 % and and 59 % for AdobeRGB and sRGB, respectively. The former is rectified fairly easily with a calibration, but the latter is a deal-stopper for professional photo and graphics editing. Even with our optimized ICC profile enabled, some colors - which are obviously outside the reproducible color space - show DeltaE deviations of far more than 5. The graylevels are pretty decent, however.
Because of the relatively low maximum brightness, we can't whole-heartedly recommend the E550 for outdoor use despite its non-glare display. The screen content might still be visible on overcast fall days like in our photo, but bright sunlight overwhelms the 200 cd/m²-display. ThinkPad loyalists who need to work outside a lot should consider the T550, which has a much stronger LED backlight, but is unfortunately much more expensive as well.
Outdoor use
What is true for most lower-priced TN panels applies here as well and the screen content only appears unaltered if the user is located directly in front of the display. Even small deviations from the ideal vertical to either above and below change the brightness significantly and decrease the already pretty low contrast. It's also advisable to refrain from shallow angles in the horizontal plane, although the margin is quite a bit larger here.
Performance
Although the soon-to-be-released successor likely will incorporate CPUs based on the current Skylake-generation, the E550 still uses Broadwell chips introduced early 2015. Our review notebook is equipped with a Core i7-5500U CPU, which is one of the fastest dual-core ULV model with a 15 watt TDP. Thanks two two cores plus Hyper Threading, clocked from 2.4 to 3.0 GHz (2.9 GHz for both cores), the 5500U promises to have more than enough performance for typical office and multimedia tasks. For additional details, please check our CPU database.
In addition to the processor-integrated HD Graphics 5500, Lenovo equips some of the models with a dedicated Radeon R7 M265 (384 shader @ 825 MHz, 2 GB DDR3 @ 1000 MHz / 128 Bit) from AMD as well. Interestingly enough, this configuration contradicts what the manufacturer mentions in the offical spec sheets, which list a Radeon R7 M260 (384 Shader @ 980 MHz, 2 GB DDR3 @ 1000 MHz / 64 Bit) instead. That's good for potential customers though, since the R7 M265's doubled memory bandwidth makes more than up for the loss of MHz.
Given the price of the E550, 8 GB of RAM (1x 8 GB DDR3L-1600, single channel) and a 1000 GB hard drive can be considered decent, but far from outstanding. As far as expansion is concerned, only the RAM is upgradeable thanks to an open DDR3 slot; M.2 or mSATA slots are noteably absent.
Processor
The Core i7-5500U takes full advantage of its maximum clock speed during the Cinebench R15 test and remains more or less at a constant 3.0 GHz. Both cores sustain the maximum of 2.9 GHz only for about 30 seconds, however - after that time, the processor drops to around 2.6 to 2.7 GHz (both with the notebook plugged in and running on battery). It seems like we've received a rather inefficient review notebook with a high leakage current, which already hits the 15-watt limit at a lower frequency. The Broadwell CPU managed slightly higher benchmark scores during earlier tests - see for example the review of the Dell Latitude 3550. Overall we can't complain too much about the performance: compared to the Core i3-5005U, the Core i7 is between 30 and 50 % faster; the performance plus compared to the Core i5-5200U is about 10 to 15 %.
Storage Device
Obviously the budget wasn't quite large enough for Lenovo to outfit the E550 with an SSD or at least an SSHD, so the notebook comes with a standard hard drive instead. The particular model is a member of Western Digital's "Blue Mobile"-series with a capacity of 1 TB and a rotational speed of 5400 RPM. With access times of 19.2 ms and a sequential transfer rate of 91 MB/s, the performance is - just like expected - fairly average, which in turn impacts the response characteristics of the whole system. At least it should be fairly easy to swap out the hard drive for a faster model.
System Performance
Once the OS is booted up and and the required programs are up and running, the ThinkPad is a competent performer thankst to the Core i7 CPU and the 8 GB of RAM. Even heavier multitasking doesn't pose too much of a problem, provided the hard drive isn't being accessed heavily.
How much a conventional hard drive limits the performance comes to light when running tests like the PCMark 7 benchmark. While the E550, Latitude 3550 and Pavilion 15 managed about 2800 points, the SSD-equipped Aspire V3-574G pulled clearly ahead with 4800 points - despite the slower CPU. Even though the results have to be taken with a grain of salt because of the synthetic nature of the PCMark tests, notebooks with Core i5 CPU and SSD generally feel faster as well when compared to models with i7 CPU and conventional hard drives.
PCMark 7 - Score (sort by value) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E550-20DF00CNGE | |
Dell Latitude 15 3550-0123 | |
HP Pavilion 15-ab022ng | |
Acer Aspire V3-574G-59MA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad Edge E550-20DGS00300 |
PCMark 7 Score | 2819 points | |
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3960 points | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4020 points | |
Help |
GPU Performance
The AMD Radeon R7 M265 is a lower middle-class GPU with performance similar to a Nvidia GeForce 830M or GeForce 930M. The Radeon outperforms the integrated HD Graphics 5500 by about 100 - 150 percent, since the frugal Intel CPU is best suited for simple 2D tasks. AMDs Enduro-technology automatically switches over to the dedicated GPU to execute 3D applications and games, although this behavior can be adjusted individually for each program.
Unfortunately it's not possible to modify the behavior of the Radeon R7 M265 on battery power: while we recorded 825/1000 MHz (core/memory speed) for the GPU when the E550 was plugged in, we saw a drop down to 400/600 MHz away from the outlet. This results in a performance reduction of about 50 % and a 3DMark 11 GPU score of 1068 points.
3DMark 06 Standard Score | 10622 points | |
3DMark 11 Performance | 2241 points | |
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 35932 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 6547 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 1302 points | |
Help |
Gaming Performance
The various gaming benchmarks confirm our prediction that the Radeon R7 M265 performs much like a GeForce 830M. Depending on the age of a game and its graphics requirments, the performance allows for fluent gameplay at a resolution of 1366 x 768 pixels and medium quality settings. Simple titles like Fifa 16 run stutter-free even at the native FullHD resolution, whereas games like The Witcher 3 or Assassin's Creed Unity push the E550 to its limits even at the minimum preset.
Mad Max | |
1920x1080 Very High Preset AF:12x (sort by value) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E550-20DF00CNGE | |
Dell Latitude 15 3550-0123 | |
Intel NUC Kit NUC5i3RYH | |
1920x1080 High Preset AF:6x (sort by value) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E550-20DF00CNGE | |
Dell Latitude 15 3550-0123 | |
Intel NUC Kit NUC5i3RYH | |
1366x768 Normal Preset AF:2x (sort by value) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E550-20DF00CNGE | |
Dell Latitude 15 3550-0123 | |
Intel NUC Kit NUC5i3RYH |
Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare | |
1920x1080 Extra / On (Cache Shadow Maps Off), 2x Supersampling AA:2x SM (sort by value) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E550-20DF00CNGE | |
1920x1080 High / On (Cache Shadow Maps Off) AA:FX (sort by value) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E550-20DF00CNGE | |
HP EliteBook 850 G2 J8R68EA | |
1366x768 Normal / On (Cache Shadow Maps Off) (sort by value) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E550-20DF00CNGE | |
Asus Asuspro Essential P751JF-T2007G | |
HP Envy 15-w000ng x360 | |
HP EliteBook 850 G2 J8R68EA | |
1024x768 Low / Off (Shader Preload On) (sort by value) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E550-20DF00CNGE | |
Asus Asuspro Essential P751JF-T2007G | |
HP Envy 15-w000ng x360 | |
HP EliteBook 850 G2 J8R68EA |
Assassin's Creed Unity | |
1920x1080 Ultra High Graphics Quality AA:4x MS (sort by value) | |
Dell Latitude 15 3550-0123 | |
1920x1080 High Graphics Quality AA:2x MS (sort by value) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E550-20DF00CNGE | |
Dell Latitude 15 3550-0123 | |
1366x768 Medium Graphics Quality AA:FX (sort by value) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E550-20DF00CNGE | |
Dell Latitude 15 3550-0123 | |
HP EliteBook 850 G2 J8R68EA | |
1024x768 Low Graphics Quality (sort by value) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E550-20DF00CNGE | |
Dell Latitude 15 3550-0123 | |
Asus Asuspro Essential P751JF-T2007G | |
HP Envy 15-w000ng x360 | |
HP EliteBook 850 G2 J8R68EA |
Far Cry 4 | |
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics Quality AA:SM (sort by value) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E550-20DF00CNGE | |
HP EliteBook 850 G2 J8R68EA | |
1920x1080 High Graphics Quality AA:SM (sort by value) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E550-20DF00CNGE | |
HP EliteBook 850 G2 J8R68EA | |
1366x768 Medium Graphics Quality (sort by value) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E550-20DF00CNGE | |
Asus Asuspro Essential P751JF-T2007G | |
HP Envy 15-w000ng x360 | |
HP EliteBook 850 G2 J8R68EA | |
1024x768 Low Graphics Quality (sort by value) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E550-20DF00CNGE | |
Asus Asuspro Essential P751JF-T2007G | |
HP Envy 15-w000ng x360 | |
HP EliteBook 850 G2 J8R68EA |
Dragon Age: Inquisition | |
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics Quality AA:2x MS (sort by value) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E550-20DF00CNGE | |
Dell Latitude 15 3550-0123 | |
HP EliteBook 850 G2 J8R68EA | |
1920x1080 High Graphics Quality (sort by value) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E550-20DF00CNGE | |
Dell Latitude 15 3550-0123 | |
Intel NUC Kit NUC5i3RYH | |
HP Envy 15-w000ng x360 | |
HP EliteBook 850 G2 J8R68EA | |
1366x768 Medium Graphics Quality (sort by value) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E550-20DF00CNGE | |
Dell Latitude 15 3550-0123 | |
Intel NUC Kit NUC5i3RYH | |
Asus Asuspro Essential P751JF-T2007G | |
HP Envy 15-w000ng x360 | |
HP EliteBook 850 G2 J8R68EA | |
1024x768 Low Graphics Quality (sort by value) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E550-20DF00CNGE | |
Dell Latitude 15 3550-0123 | |
Intel NUC Kit NUC5i3RYH | |
Asus Asuspro Essential P751JF-T2007G | |
HP Envy 15-w000ng x360 | |
HP EliteBook 850 G2 J8R68EA |
Evolve | |
1920x1080 Very High Graphics Quality AA:1TX SM (sort by value) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E550-20DF00CNGE | |
HP EliteBook 850 G2 J8R68EA | |
1920x1080 High Graphics Quality AA:FX (sort by value) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E550-20DF00CNGE | |
HP EliteBook 850 G2 J8R68EA | |
1366x768 Medium Graphics Quality (sort by value) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E550-20DF00CNGE | |
Asus Asuspro Essential P751JF-T2007G | |
HP Envy 15-w000ng x360 | |
HP EliteBook 850 G2 J8R68EA | |
1024x768 Low Graphics Quality (sort by value) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E550-20DF00CNGE | |
Asus Asuspro Essential P751JF-T2007G | |
HP Envy 15-w000ng x360 | |
HP EliteBook 850 G2 J8R68EA |
Battlefield Hardline | |
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics Quality (DX11) AA:4x MS (sort by value) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E550-20DF00CNGE | |
Dell Latitude 15 3550-0123 | |
HP EliteBook 850 G2 J8R68EA | |
1920x1080 High Graphics Quality (DX11) (sort by value) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E550-20DF00CNGE | |
Dell Latitude 15 3550-0123 | |
Intel NUC Kit NUC5i3RYH | |
Asus Asuspro Essential P751JF-T2007G | |
HP Envy 15-w000ng x360 | |
HP EliteBook 850 G2 J8R68EA | |
1366x768 Medium Graphics Quality (DX11) (sort by value) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E550-20DF00CNGE | |
Dell Latitude 15 3550-0123 | |
Intel NUC Kit NUC5i3RYH | |
Asus Asuspro Essential P751JF-T2007G | |
HP Envy 15-w000ng x360 | |
HP EliteBook 850 G2 J8R68EA | |
1024x768 Low Graphics Quality (DX11) (sort by value) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E550-20DF00CNGE | |
Dell Latitude 15 3550-0123 | |
Intel NUC Kit NUC5i3RYH | |
Asus Asuspro Essential P751JF-T2007G | |
HP Envy 15-w000ng x360 | |
HP EliteBook 850 G2 J8R68EA |
Dirt Rally | |
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:4x MS (sort by value) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E550-20DF00CNGE | |
Dell Latitude 15 3550-0123 | |
HP Pavilion 15-ab022ng | |
Intel NUC Kit NUC5i3RYH | |
1920x1080 High Preset (sort by value) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E550-20DF00CNGE | |
Dell Latitude 15 3550-0123 | |
HP Pavilion 15-ab022ng | |
Intel NUC Kit NUC5i3RYH | |
Asus Asuspro Essential P751JF-T2007G | |
HP Envy 15-w000ng x360 | |
1366x768 Medium Preset (sort by value) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E550-20DF00CNGE | |
Dell Latitude 15 3550-0123 | |
HP Pavilion 15-ab022ng | |
Intel NUC Kit NUC5i3RYH | |
Asus Asuspro Essential P751JF-T2007G | |
HP Envy 15-w000ng x360 | |
1024x768 Ultra Low Preset (sort by value) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E550-20DF00CNGE | |
Dell Latitude 15 3550-0123 | |
HP Pavilion 15-ab022ng | |
Intel NUC Kit NUC5i3RYH | |
HP Envy 15-w000ng x360 |
The Witcher 3 | |
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) (sort by value) | |
Dell Latitude 15 3550-0123 | |
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off) (sort by value) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E550-20DF00CNGE | |
Dell Latitude 15 3550-0123 | |
1366x768 Medium Graphics & Postprocessing (sort by value) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E550-20DF00CNGE | |
Dell Latitude 15 3550-0123 | |
1024x768 Low Graphics & Postprocessing (sort by value) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E550-20DF00CNGE | |
Dell Latitude 15 3550-0123 | |
Intel NUC Kit NUC5i3RYH | |
HP Envy 15-w000ng x360 |
Batman: Arkham Knight | |
1920x1080 High / On AA:SM AF:16x (sort by value) | |
Dell Latitude 15 3550-0123 | |
HP Pavilion 15-ab022ng | |
1920x1080 High / On (Interactive Smoke & Paper Debris Off) AA:SM AF:8x (sort by value) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E550-20DF00CNGE | |
Dell Latitude 15 3550-0123 | |
HP Pavilion 15-ab022ng | |
1366x768 Normal / Off AF:4x (sort by value) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E550-20DF00CNGE | |
Dell Latitude 15 3550-0123 | |
HP Pavilion 15-ab022ng | |
Intel NUC Kit NUC5i3RYH | |
1280x720 Low / Off AF:Trilinear (sort by value) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E550-20DF00CNGE | |
Dell Latitude 15 3550-0123 | |
HP Pavilion 15-ab022ng | |
Intel NUC Kit NUC5i3RYH |
Metal Gear Solid V | |
1920x1080 Extra High / On (sort by value) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E550-20DF00CNGE | |
Dell Latitude 15 3550-0123 | |
1920x1080 High / On (sort by value) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E550-20DF00CNGE | |
Dell Latitude 15 3550-0123 | |
Intel NUC Kit NUC5i3RYH | |
1366x768 Medium / Off (sort by value) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E550-20DF00CNGE | |
Dell Latitude 15 3550-0123 | |
Intel NUC Kit NUC5i3RYH | |
1024x768 Low / Off (sort by value) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E550-20DF00CNGE | |
Dell Latitude 15 3550-0123 | |
Intel NUC Kit NUC5i3RYH |
World of Warships | |
1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:High FX AF:16x (sort by value) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E550-20DF00CNGE | |
Dell Latitude 15 3550-0123 | |
1920x1080 High Preset AF:8x (sort by value) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E550-20DF00CNGE | |
Dell Latitude 15 3550-0123 | |
1366x768 Medium Preset AF:Trilinear (sort by value) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E550-20DF00CNGE | |
Dell Latitude 15 3550-0123 | |
1366x768 Low Preset AF:Trilinear (sort by value) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E550-20DF00CNGE | |
Dell Latitude 15 3550-0123 |
FIFA 16 | |
1920x1080 High Preset AA:4x MS (sort by value) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E550-20DF00CNGE | |
Dell Latitude 15 3550-0123 | |
Intel NUC Kit NUC5i3RYH | |
1366x768 High Preset AA:2x MS (sort by value) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E550-20DF00CNGE | |
Dell Latitude 15 3550-0123 | |
Intel NUC Kit NUC5i3RYH | |
1280x720 Low Preset (sort by value) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E550-20DF00CNGE | |
Dell Latitude 15 3550-0123 | |
Intel NUC Kit NUC5i3RYH |
low | med. | high | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Tomb Raider (2013) | 104.5 | 51.5 | 34.6 | 16.1 |
Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare (2014) | 45.8 | 28.7 | 14.7 | 7.9 |
Assassin's Creed Unity (2014) | 17.3 | 12.9 | 8 | |
Far Cry 4 (2014) | 39 | 28 | 13.5 | 10 |
Dragon Age: Inquisition (2014) | 42 | 28.7 | 10.7 | 7 |
Evolve (2015) | 34.8 | 26.2 | 14.8 | 13 |
Battlefield Hardline (2015) | 53.3 | 42 | 17.3 | 10.8 |
Dirt Rally (2015) | 136.6 | 40.6 | 21.3 | 12.6 |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 22.9 | 15.9 | 8.8 | |
Batman: Arkham Knight (2015) | 25 | 17 | 7 | |
Metal Gear Solid V (2015) | 60 | 48.7 | 18.3 | 11.4 |
Mad Max (2015) | 32.4 | 16 | 13.9 | |
World of Warships (2015) | 83.2 | 56.4 | 28.1 | 20.8 |
FIFA 16 (2015) | 69 | 49.1 | 27.5 |
Emissions
System Noise
The fan doesn't run at all during idle or low CPU utilization - a behavior we already observed when evaluating the first model - which results in an extremely low noise level of only 30 dB. The E550 is never completely silent though, since the whirring sound of the hard drive remains audible.
Despite the faster processor and the additional Radeon GPU, the noise only increases marginally under full load and tops out at either 33.1 (3Dmark 06) or 35.6 dB (stress test). The competitors from Dell and HP surpass 40 dB easily and can't compete against the E550 here. The fan system runs smoothly and uniformly and doesn't emit any high-pitched frequencies.
Lenovo ThinkPad E550-20DF00CNGE Intel Core i7-5500U, AMD Radeon R7 M265 | Lenovo ThinkPad Edge E550-20DGS00300 Intel Core i3-5005U, Intel HD Graphics 5500 | Dell Latitude 15 3550-0123 Intel Core i7-5500U, NVIDIA GeForce 830M | HP ProBook 450 G2 L3Q27EA Intel Core i5-5200U, Intel HD Graphics 5500 | HP Pavilion 15-ab022ng Intel Core i7-5500U, NVIDIA GeForce 940M | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -1% | -16% | 4% | -25% | |
Idle Minimum * | 29.8 | 31.3 -5% | 32.5 -9% | 28.9 3% | 34.5 -16% |
Idle Average * | 29.8 | 31.3 -5% | 32.5 -9% | 28.9 3% | 34.5 -16% |
Idle Maximum * | 31.1 | 31.3 -1% | 32.5 -5% | 28.9 7% | 34.5 -11% |
Load Average * | 33.1 | 32.8 1% | 43.5 -31% | 32.9 1% | 44.1 -33% |
Load Maximum * | 35.6 | 33.8 5% | 45.3 -27% | 34.3 4% | 52.5 -47% |
* ... smaller is better
Noise Level
Idle |
| 29.8 / 29.8 / 31.1 dB(A) |
HDD |
| 30.4 dB(A) |
DVD |
| 36.4 / dB(A) |
Load |
| 33.1 / 35.6 dB(A) |
![]() | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Temperature
Despite the mostly passive cooling, the ThinkPad doesn't get hot during idle and only reaches about 30 to 32 degrees C in most areas. Users who work with office programs and similar programs or browse the web can operate the E550 on the lap without any problems.
The rather conservative cooling approach has a much more pronounced effect under load conditions, since the notebook heats up more. In one area in particular - in the back on the left side - the temperatures climbed to above 40 degrees C after a fairly short time. Foruntately the handrests aren't affected much and remain much cooler.
The CPU and the GPU maxed out at 82 and 76 degrees C during the stress test, which is far from critical. We didn't observe any throttling, although the Turbo didn't reach its full potential either with the cores only running at 2.5 GHz. The likely explanation is once again that the TDP limit of 15 watts was reached at that point.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.1 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 37 °C / 98.6 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.6 °C / 81.7 F (-9.4 °C / -16.9 F).
Energy Management
Power Consumption
With an idle power consumption of between 4.1 and 7.7 watts, the E550 ranks about average compared to the competiton; the extremely frugal HP ProBook 450 G2 (2.4 - 5 watts) is the exception. Compared to the entry-level configuration, our higher-end review notebook consumed less than one watt more.
3D applications increase the delta to between 10 and 20 watts, but most of that increase can be attributed to the power requirements of the dedicated Radeon GPU. Considering the performance, the power draw of 37.6 to 54.7 watts seems more than appropriate for this notebook and the 65-watt power adapter has no problems supplying the required watts.
Off / Standby | ![]() ![]() |
Idle | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Load |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Key:
min: ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Battery Life
Lenovo promises a battery life of up to 9 hours for the E550 with its 48 Wh battery. Under optiomal circumstances, two hours more are possible, although that requires minimized display brightness, deactivated wireless modules and idle mode.
Actual runtimes - for example while web surfing or when watching a video stored on the hard drive (display at 150 cd/m²) - are closer to 5 hours. The minimum battery life is under 90 minutes with the charging cycle taking about 2.5 hours.
Overall results are just average, but there are no alternatives: Lenovo doesn't offer higher-capacity batteries for the E550.
Lenovo ThinkPad E550-20DF00CNGE 48 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad Edge E550-20DGS00300 48 Wh | Dell Latitude 15 3550-0123 58 Wh | HP ProBook 450 G2 L3Q27EA 40 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 20% | 39% | ||
Reader / Idle | 663 | 748 13% | 775 17% | |
H.264 | 311 | 328 5% | 474 52% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 293 | 310 6% | 379 29% | |
Load | 82 | 128 56% | 129 57% | |
WiFi | 395 | 456 |
Pros
Cons
Verdict
At a purchase price of 1000 Euro (~$1100), the top-model in the E550-series can't be considered entry-level any longer and accordingly, expectations run pretty high. Unfortunately, the ThinkPad can't quite measure up.
The most significant drawbacks are the TN panel, which is average at best, the slow hard drive and the very short warranty of only 12 months. The other models in the series are affected by the same shortcomings, but they usually also sell for a few hundred Euro less. Our configuration as such isn't the most convincing, since part of the budget was obviously allotted to pay for the more prestigious Core i7 CPU - which doesn't really offer any significant performance benefits over the much more cost-effective Core i5 processor.
Our recommendation is to consider a pared-down, less expensive model instead.
All things considered, the E550 is a solid workhorse with superb input devices and a very low noise level. Of course there are some differences in quality in some areas compared to the higher-end L and T-series models, but considering the much lower price, those differences seem acceptable. Patient users might want to wait until the Skylake-equipped E560 hits the market, since the E550 might turn into a real bargain in the upcoming months: discontinued ThinkPad models are often sold at very attractive prices.
Lenovo ThinkPad E550-20DF00CNGE
- 04/12/2016 v5 (old)
Till Schönborn