Notebookcheck Logo

HiSilicon Kirin 980 vs Samsung Exynos 9825 vs Samsung Exynos 9810

HiSilicon Kirin 980

► remove from comparison HiSilicon Kirin 980

The HiSilicon Kirin 980 is an ARM based high-end octa-core SoC for smartphones and tablets, which was introduced with the Huawei Mate 20 Pro in late 2018. It integrates eight CPU cores in three clusters. The performance cluster contains two Cortex-A76 cores with up to 2.6 GHz, the balanced cluster contains also two Cortex-A76 cores but with only up to 1.92 GHz and finally the power saving cluster contains four small ARM Cortex-A53 cores with up to 1.8 GHz. Furthermore, the SoC integrates a modern LTE radio with Cat 21/18 (max. 1400 Mbps download, 200 Mbps upload), 2x faster dual ISP (versus 970), a LPDDR4X 2133 MHz memory controller (34.1 GB/s versus 29.9 GB/s of the Kirin 970) and a 2160p30 H.265 video encoder (2160p60 decoding). The Kirin 980 is produced in the modern 7nm process at TSMC as the first Android SoC (after the Apple A12).

Samsung Exynos 9825

► remove from comparison Samsung Exynos 9825

The Samsung Exynos 9 9825 is a mobile SoC for smartphones and tablets. It was announced in the Samsung Note 10 line in August 2019. The processor integrates three clusters of processor cores with different architectures. Two big Samsung custom M4 cores clock up to 2.73 GHz and deliver peak performance. Two additional ARM Cortex-A75 are also for performance tasks and clock at up to 2.4 GHz (up from 2.3 GHz in the 9820). Finally, four small and power efficient ARM-Cortex A55 cores clock at up to 1.9 GHz are in the third cluster. The different clusters can run simultaneously thanks to DinamIQ.

The integrated LTE modem supports LTE-Advanced Pro Cat.20 (8CA 2 Gbps download, 3CA 316 Mbps upload). The integrated graphics card is a ARM Mali G76MP12 with 12 cores. Thanks to higher clock rates, the G76 is now a bit faster compared to the Exynos 9820.

The performance of the CPU part is positioned in the high end segment for smartphone processors. Due to the slight changes in clock rates, it is very comparable to the older Eynos 9 9820. Maybe in longer load phases, the improved 7nm process helps to maintain clock speeds a bit better. The direct competitor Snapdragon 855 can be left behind in single-core benchmarks like Geekbench and operates on par in multi-core benchmarks.

The SoC is produced at Samsung in the new 7nm LPP (with EUV) process that should improve power efficiency compared to the Exynos 9820.

Samsung Exynos 9810

► remove from comparison Samsung Exynos 9810

The Samsung Exynos 9 9810 is a mobile SoC for smartphones and tablets. It was announced early 2018 and should be integrated in the upcoming Samsung Galaxy S9 series (at least partly). It integrates eight CPU cores (octa core) in two clusters. The performance cluster integrates four Samsung M3 at 2.9 GHz and the power efficiency cluster four small ARM Cortex-A55 cores at 1.9 GHz. The Samsung M3 cores are based on Samsungs own design and now offer a wider pipeline, improved cache memory and bigger caches. This leads to a twice as fast single-core performance and a 40 percent improved multi-core performance according to Samsung (most likely compared to the previous Exynos 8898).

The integrated LTE modem also got a siginifcant upgrade and now supports Cat.18/13 LTE for up to 1.2 Gbps download and 200 Mbps upload. This is achieved with 6x20 MHz CA, 256-QAM in download and 2x20 MHz in upload.

As a GPU, Samsung integrates a ARM Mali G72MP18 (only 18 clusters, compared to the 20 clusters of the predecessor G71MP20). Most likely Samsung increases performance due to a higher core clock of the graphics card.

The memory controller looks similar to the 8898 and supports LPDDR4x 1800 MHz. The video engine now also supports 10 bit videos (as before 4k120 H.265/HEVC, H.264 and VP9 de- and encoding). 

The SoC is produced at Samsung in the new 10nm LPP process (the Exynos 8898 still used the 10nm LPE process) that should also help with some of the performance gains.

ModelHiSilicon Kirin 980Samsung Exynos 9825Samsung Exynos 9810
SeriesHiSilicon Samsung ExynosSamsung Exynos
CodenameCortex-A76/-A55Exynos M3 / Cortex-A55Exynos M3 / Cortex-A55
Series: Exynos Exynos M3 / Cortex-A55
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G - 2.86 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A76/-A55
HiSilicon Kirin 990 - 2.86 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A76/-A55
HiSilicon Kirin 8201.84 - 2.36 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A76/-A55
HiSilicon Kirin 820e1.84 - 2.22 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A76/-A55
HiSilicon Kirin 8101.88 - 2.27 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A76/-A55
HiSilicon Kirin 980 « - 2.6 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A76/-A55
Samsung Exynos 9825 « 1.9 - 2.73 GHz8 / 8 cores Exynos M3 / Cortex-A55
Samsung Exynos 98201.9 - 2.7 GHz8 / 8 cores Exynos M3 / Cortex-A55
Samsung Exynos 9810 - 2.9 GHz8 / 8 cores Exynos M3 / Cortex-A55
Samsung Exynos 98251.9 - 2.73 GHz8 / 8 cores Exynos M3 / Cortex-A55
Samsung Exynos 98201.9 - 2.7 GHz8 / 8 cores Exynos M3 / Cortex-A55
Samsung Exynos 9810 « - 2.9 GHz8 / 8 cores Exynos M3 / Cortex-A55
Clock <=2600 MHz1900 - 2730 MHz <=2900 MHz
Cores / Threads8 / 88 / 88 / 8
Transistors6900 Million
Technology7 nm7 nm10 nm
FeaturesARM Mali-G76 GPU, 2x Cortex-A76 (2.6 GHz) + 2x Cortex-A76 (1.92) + 4x Cortex-A53 (1.8 GHz, big.LITTLE), 2x LTE Dual-SIM (1.4 Gbps down Cat21)ARM Mali-G76MP12 GPU , 2x Samsung Mongoose Custom CPU, 2x Cortex-A75, 4x Cortex-A55 big.LITTLE, LPDDR4x Memory ControllerARM Mali-G72MP18 GPU , 4x Exynos M3 (max 2.9 GHz), 4x Cortex-A55 (max 1.9 GHz) big.LITTLE, LPDDR4x Memory Controller
iGPUARM Mali-G76 MP10 ( - 720 MHz)ARM Mali-G76 MP12ARM Mali-G72 MP18
ArchitectureARMARMARM
Announced
Manufacturerwww.samsung.comnews.samsung.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.5, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - Kirin 980
0.9 pt (71%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 19993     avg: 27047     median: 23103.5 (19%)     max: 37164 Points
min: 31908     avg: 32588     median: 32588 (27%)     max: 33268 Points
min: 18756     avg: 23944     median: 26226 (22%)     max: 26851 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
min: 2227     avg: 3461     median: 3426.5 (40%)     max: 4917 Points
min: 3389     avg: 3519     median: 3519 (41%)     max: 3649 Points
min: 2546     avg: 2717     median: 2601.5 (31%)     max: 3120 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
min: 2421     avg: 3580     median: 3726 (43%)     max: 4997 Points
min: 3498     avg: 3622     median: 3622 (41%)     max: 3746 Points
min: 2561     avg: 2752     median: 2649.5 (30%)     max: 3148 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 706     avg: 707     median: 707 (30%)     max: 708 Points
834 Points (35%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 2553     avg: 2558     median: 2558 (5%)     max: 2563 Points
2331 Points (4%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 685     avg: 696     median: 695.5 (3%)     max: 707 Points
min: 805     avg: 814     median: 813.5 (4%)     max: 822 Points
679 Points (3%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 2347     avg: 2474     median: 2500 (8%)     max: 2549 Points
min: 2177     avg: 2184     median: 2184 (7%)     max: 2191 Points
2033 Points (6%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 3207     avg: 3303     median: 3314 (33%)     max: 3378 Points
min: 4549     avg: 4550     median: 4550 (45%)     max: 4551 Points
min: 3688     avg: 3721     median: 3698 (37%)     max: 3776 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 9547     avg: 9838     median: 9854 (11%)     max: 10024 Points
min: 10367     avg: 10426     median: 10425.5 (12%)     max: 10484 Points
min: 8786     avg: 8874     median: 8874 (10%)     max: 8963 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 3563     avg: 3601     median: 3601 (49%)     max: 3639 Points
5109 Points (70%)
3786 Points (52%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 9577     avg: 9735     median: 9734.5 (24%)     max: 9892 Points
10487 Points (26%)
8491 Points (21%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 8473     avg: 8680     median: 8679.5 (14%)     max: 8886 Points
7453 Points (12%)
min: 5895     avg: 5915     median: 5915 (9%)     max: 5935 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 2922     avg: 2994     median: 2994 (45%)     max: 3066 Points
2169 Points (32%)
min: 1961     avg: 1965     median: 1965 (29%)     max: 1969 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
min: 1576     avg: 2232     median: 2231.5 (18%)     max: 2887 Points
3566 Points (29%)
min: 895     avg: 1039     median: 1039 (8%)     max: 1183 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
min: 2969     avg: 5181     median: 5180.5 (47%)     max: 7392 Points
5534 Points (50%)
min: 1898     avg: 2002     median: 2001.5 (18%)     max: 2105 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
min: 15206     avg: 16273     median: 16273 (32%)     max: 17340 Points
13991 Points (27%)
min: 10213     avg: 10328     median: 10328 (20%)     max: 10443 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
min: 7157     avg: 7523     median: 7523 (15%)     max: 7889 Points
7083 Points (14%)
min: 5651     avg: 5656     median: 5656 (11%)     max: 5661 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
min: 8578     avg: 9588     median: 9587.5 (25%)     max: 10597 Points
8839 Points (23%)
min: 6025     avg: 6099     median: 6098.5 (16%)     max: 6172 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 1948     avg: 2176     median: 2053.5 (2%)     max: 3098 ms
min: 2478     avg: 2503     median: 2503 (3%)     max: 2528 ms
min: 2060     avg: 2509     median: 2394 (3%)     max: 3189 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 20618     avg: 21733     median: 21603.5 (19%)     max: 23285 Points
min: 18908     avg: 19022     median: 19021.5 (17%)     max: 19135 Points
min: 12933     avg: 14397     median: 14711.5 (13%)     max: 15233 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 86     avg: 105.1     median: 99 (21%)     max: 124 Points
min: 97     avg: 107.5     median: 107.5 (22%)     max: 118 Points
min: 63     avg: 67.8     median: 68 (14%)     max: 72 Points
AnTuTu v6 - AnTuTu v6 Total Score
min: 245662     avg: 250407     median: 250848 (85%)     max: 254229 Points
min: 291772     avg: 292608     median: 292608 (100%)     max: 293444 Points
min: 214090     avg: 218110     median: 217950 (74%)     max: 222290 Points
min: 18280     avg: 18321     median: 18320.5 (56%)     max: 18361 Points
min: 7800     avg: 8235     median: 8294 (25%)     max: 8612 Points
min: 70640     avg: 70670     median: 70669.5 (87%)     max: 70699 Points
min: 53528     avg: 55588     median: 55698 (68%)     max: 57538 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 GPU
min: 95964     avg: 110298     median: 111697 (35%)     max: 122632 Points
min: 155432     avg: 155907     median: 155906 (48%)     max: 156381 Points
min: 91292     avg: 92956     median: 92887 (29%)     max: 94690 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 CPU
min: 101537     avg: 108108     median: 106863 (65%)     max: 117617 Points
min: 101869     avg: 102259     median: 102259 (63%)     max: 102649 Points
min: 80534     avg: 86884     median: 88577 (54%)     max: 91540 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 Total Score
min: 268359     avg: 295586     median: 295634 (52%)     max: 322616 Points
min: 347082     avg: 347156     median: 347156 (61%)     max: 347229 Points
min: 236552     avg: 243663     median: 243861 (43%)     max: 250577 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 UX
min: 66660     avg: 67111     median: 67110.5 (56%)     max: 67561 Points
58288 Points (49%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 MEM
min: 71845     avg: 71918     median: 71917.5 (58%)     max: 71990 Points
51005 Points (41%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 GPU
min: 135337     avg: 137666     median: 137666 (25%)     max: 139995 Points
117851 Points (22%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 CPU
min: 136978     avg: 137360     median: 137360 (50%)     max: 137741 Points
102716 Points (37%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 Total Score
min: 410820     avg: 414054     median: 414054 (40%)     max: 417287 Points
329860 Points (32%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
min: 246439     avg: 246733     median: 246733 (32%)     max: 247027 Points
215665 Points (28%)
min: 121702     avg: 154312     median: 154312 (20%)     max: 186922 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
min: 4919     avg: 7101     median: 7789 (41%)     max: 7905 Points
5864 Points (31%)
min: 2385     avg: 2407     median: 2407 (13%)     max: 2429 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
0 Points (0%)
22707 Points (49%)
min: 5088     avg: 5342     median: 5341.5 (11%)     max: 5595 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
min: 7567     avg: 8433     median: 8147.5 (53%)     max: 9326 Points
min: 8801     avg: 8914     median: 8914 (58%)     max: 9027 Points
min: 5184     avg: 5411     median: 5305 (35%)     max: 5851 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
min: 9728     avg: 11164     median: 10243.5 (51%)     max: 13531 Points
min: 11011     avg: 11412     median: 11412 (57%)     max: 11813 Points
min: 5736     avg: 6022     median: 5891 (29%)     max: 6571 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
676 Points (26%)

Average Benchmarks HiSilicon Kirin 980 → 100% n=29

Average Benchmarks Samsung Exynos 9825 → 108% n=29

Average Benchmarks Samsung Exynos 9810 → 76% n=29

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.26
log 27. 03:21:01

#0 checking url part for id 10436 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11485 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 9632 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 25 Apr 2024 05:38:32 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.081s ... 0.082s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.082s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 10436 +0.017s ... 0.099s

#8 got single benchmarks 10436 +0.036s ... 0.135s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 11485 +0.003s ... 0.138s

#10 got single benchmarks 11485 +0.015s ... 0.153s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 9632 +0.003s ... 0.156s

#12 got single benchmarks 9632 +0.017s ... 0.173s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.173s

#14 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.286s ... 0.459s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.021s ... 0.48s

#16 return log +0s ... 0.48s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)