Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Iris Pro Graphics P580 vs NVIDIA Quadro 4000M vs NVIDIA Quadro 3000M

Intel Iris Pro Graphics P580

► remove from comparison

The Intel Iris Pro Graphics P580 (GT4e) is an integrated professional graphics unit of the Skylake generation (top version). As successors of the Iris Graphics 6200 (Broadwell), the Iris P580 can be found in some high-end Xeon quad core CPUs and offers 128 MB of dedicated eDRAM memory. Furthermore, the so-called GT4e-version features 72 Execution Units (EUs). Besides the eDRAM cache, the Iris 580 is able to access the main memory (2x 64bit DDR3L-1600 / DDR4-2133).

Compared to the consumer Iris Pro Graphics 580, the P580 is only included in the Xeon processors and intended for professional applications (certified drivers?) similar to the Quadro and Fire Pro lines. 

Compared to the Iris Graphics 550 (28 W GT3e), the Iris Pro Graphics P580 offers more EUs (72 vs. 48) and a larger eDRAM Cache (128 vs. 64 MB).

Performance

The exact performance of the Iris Graphics P580 depends on memory configuration and CPU model (different clock speeds). However, it should be clearly faster than the old Broadwell Iris Pro 6200 and may compete with a dedicated GeForce 945M. Modern games of 2015/2016 should be playable in medium settings.

Features

The revised video engine now decodes H.265/HEVC completely in hardware and thereby much more efficiently than before. Displays can be connected via DP 1.2 / eDP 1.3 (max. 3840 x 2160 @ 60 Hz), whereas HDMI is limited to the older version 1.4 (max. 3840 x 2160 @ 30 Hz). However, HDMI 2.0 can be added using a DisplayPort converter. Up to three displays can be controlled simultaneously.

Power Consumption

The Iris Graphics P580 can be found in some mobile high-end quad core processors (45 W). Therefore, they are most likely not used in thin and light laptops.

NVIDIA Quadro 4000M

► remove from comparison NVIDIA Quadro 4000M

The NVIDIA Quadro 4000M is a professional workstation graphics card based on the Fermi architecture (or more specifically, probably the GF104). Unlike the 5010M, the 4000M does not support ECC memory and dual-precision (DP) floating point calculations.

The Quadro series offers certified drivers that are optimized for stability and performance in professional applications such as CAD or DCC. As a result, multiple scientific or business disciplines can make use of the workstation GPU. The OpenGL performance, for example, should be significantly better than consumer-oriented GeForce graphics cards of similar specifications.

The shader / CUDA cores can be accessed using DirectX 11 or OpenGL 4.1 for graphics rendering or DirectCompute, OpenCL, AXE, and CUDA for general purpose calculations. Due to the new Fermi core, the 4000M should offer higher performance in general purpose calculations compared to its predecessors.

Furthermore, the Nvidia Quadro 4000M is compatible with 3D Vision Pro, a new software solution by Nvidia for stereoscopic output.

The 4000M supports Nvidia Optimus in order to automatically switch between the integrated graphics card and the Quadro for power-saving purposes. Whether or not this feature is supported on a laptop, however, is dependent on the laptop manufacturer.

Similar to the GeForce GTX 480M, the Quadro 4000M is specified at 100 Watt TDP and is therefore only found in large laptops such as the Clevo D901F.

NVIDIA Quadro 3000M

► remove from comparison

The NVIDIA Quadro 3000M is a professional workstation graphics card based on the Fermi architecture (probably GF104 like the GeForce GTX 470M). Compared to the 5010M, the 3000M does not support ECC memory and DP floating point calculations.

The Quadro series offers certified drivers that are optimized for stability and performance in professional applications like CAD, DCC, medicine, or visualisation areas. The OpenGL performance for example should be significantly better than similar specified GeForce graphics cards.

The shader / CUDA cores can be accessed using DirectX 11, OpenGL 4.1 for graphic rendering and DirectCompute, OpenCL, AXE, and CUDA for general purpose calculations. Due to the new Fermi core, the 3000M should offer a high performance in general purpose calculations.

Furthermore, the Nvidia Quadro 3000M is compatible with the new stereoscopic solution by Nvidia called: NVIDIA 3D Vision Pro.

To automatically switch between the processor graphics card and the Quadro, the 3000M supports Nvidia Optimus (if the laptop vendor chooses to integrate it).

As the GeForce GTX 470M, the Quadro 3000M is specified at 75 Watt TDP and therefore only suited for large laptops with 17 inch displays.

show full text
Intel Iris Pro Graphics P580NVIDIA Quadro 4000MNVIDIA Quadro 3000M
Quadro M Series
Iris Pro Graphics P580 72 @ 0.35 - 1.1 GHzeDRAM + 64/128 Bit
Iris Pro Graphics 580 72 @ 0.35 - 1.05 GHzeDRAM + 64/128 Bit
Iris Graphics 550 48 @ 0.3 - 1.1 GHzeDRAM + 64/128 Bit
Iris Graphics 540 48 @ 0.3 - 1.05 GHzeDRAM + 64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 530 24 @ 0.35 - 1.15 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 520 24 @ 0.3 - 1.05 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 515 24 @ 0.3 - 1 GHz64/128 Bit
UHD Graphics 610 12 @ 0.3 - 0.95 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 610 12 @ 0.3 - 0.95 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 510 12 @ 0.3 - 0.95 GHz64/128 Bit
UHD Graphics 605 18 @ 0.3 - 0.75 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 505 18 @ 0.3 - 0.75 GHz64/128 Bit
UHD Graphics 600 12 @ 0.3 - 0.7 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 500 12 @ 0.3 - 0.7 GHz64/128 Bit
Quadro M5500 2048 @ 1.14 - 1.14 GHz256 Bit @ 6606 MHz
Quadro M5000M 1536 @ 0.96 - 1.05 GHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M4000M 1280 @ 0.98 - 1.01 GHz256 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M3000M 1024 @ 1.05 GHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2200 1024 @ 0.69 - 1.04 GHz128 Bit @ 5508 MHz
Quadro M1200 640 @ 0.99 - 1.15 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2000M 640 @ 1.04 - 1.2 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M1000M 512 @ 0.99 - 1.07 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M620 512 @ 1.02 GHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro 5010M 384 @ 0.45 GHz256 Bit @ 1300 MHz
Quadro 4000M 336 @ 0.48 GHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro M520 384 @ 0.76 - 1.02 GHz64 Bit
Quadro M600M 384 @ 0.84 - 0.88 GHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M500M 384 @ 1.03 - 1.12 GHz64 Bit @ 4004 MHz
Quadro 5000M 320 @ 0.41 GHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro 3000M 240 @ 0.45 GHz256 Bit @ 625 MHz
Quadro 2000M 192 @ 0.55 GHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
Quadro 1000M 96 @ 0.7 GHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
Quadro M5500 2048 @ 1.14 - 1.14 GHz256 Bit @ 6606 MHz
Quadro M5000M 1536 @ 0.96 - 1.05 GHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M4000M 1280 @ 0.98 - 1.01 GHz256 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M3000M 1024 @ 1.05 GHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2200 1024 @ 0.69 - 1.04 GHz128 Bit @ 5508 MHz
Quadro M1200 640 @ 0.99 - 1.15 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2000M 640 @ 1.04 - 1.2 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M1000M 512 @ 0.99 - 1.07 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M620 512 @ 1.02 GHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro 5010M 384 @ 0.45 GHz256 Bit @ 1300 MHz
Quadro 4000M 336 @ 0.48 GHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro M520 384 @ 0.76 - 1.02 GHz64 Bit
Quadro M600M 384 @ 0.84 - 0.88 GHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M500M 384 @ 1.03 - 1.12 GHz64 Bit @ 4004 MHz
Quadro 5000M 320 @ 0.41 GHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro 3000M 240 @ 0.45 GHz256 Bit @ 625 MHz
Quadro 2000M 192 @ 0.55 GHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
Quadro 1000M 96 @ 0.7 GHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
CodenameSkylake GT4eFermiFermi
ArchitectureGen. 9 SkylakeFermiFermi
Pipelines72 - unified336 - unified240 - unified
Core Speed350 - 1100 (Boost) MHz475 MHz450 MHz
Memory Bus WidtheDRAM + 64/128 Bit256 Bit256 Bit
Memory TypeeDRAMGDDR5GDDR5
Max. Amount of Memory128 MB2048 MB2048 MB
Shared Memoryyesnono
APIDirectX 12_1, OpenGL 4.4DirectX 11, Shader 5.0DirectX 11, Shader 5.0
technology14 nm40 nm40 nm
FeaturesQuickSyncOpenGl 4.1, FP32OpenGl 4.1, FP32
Date of Announcement24.01.2016 22.02.2011 22.02.2011
Shader Speed950 MHz900 MHz
Memory Speed1200 MHz625 MHz
Power Consumption100 Watt75 Watt
Notebook Sizelargelarge
Link to Manufacturer Pagewww.nvidia.com
CPU in Iris Pro Graphics P580GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Intel Xeon E3-1575M v54 x 3000 MHz, 45 W350 MHz1100 MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 2229     avg: 2335     median: 2334.5 (3%)     max: 2440 Points
1742 Points (2%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 2025     avg: 2092     median: 2092 (2%)     max: 2159 Points
1539 Points (1%)
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total + NVIDIA Quadro 4000M
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
10722 Points (3%)
3DM Vant. Perf. total + NVIDIA Quadro 3000M
7941 Points (2%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA Quadro 4000M
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
9184 Points (5%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA Quadro 3000M
min: 6604     avg: 6661     median: 6660.5 (4%)     max: 6717 Points
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro 4000M
3DMark 06
17727 Points (23%)
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro 3000M
min: 14054     avg: 14221     median: 14220.5 (19%)     max: 14387 Points
Unigine Heaven 2.1 - Heaven 2.1 high
31.4 fps (6%)
SPECviewperf 11
specvp11 snx-01 + NVIDIA Quadro 4000M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 snx-01
26.4 fps (16%)
specvp11 snx-01 + NVIDIA Quadro 3000M
20.4 fps (12%)
specvp11 tcvis-02 + NVIDIA Quadro 4000M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 tcvis-02
29.2 fps (17%)
specvp11 tcvis-02 + NVIDIA Quadro 3000M
22.9 fps (13%)
specvp11 sw-02 + NVIDIA Quadro 4000M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 sw-02
39.1 fps (30%)
specvp11 sw-02 + NVIDIA Quadro 3000M
30.1 fps (23%)
specvp11 proe-05 + NVIDIA Quadro 4000M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 proe-05
10.6 fps (12%)
specvp11 proe-05 + NVIDIA Quadro 3000M
7.6 fps (9%)
specvp11 maya-03 + NVIDIA Quadro 4000M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 maya-03
51.4 fps (39%)
specvp11 maya-03 + NVIDIA Quadro 3000M
42.5 fps (32%)
specvp11 lightwave-01 + NVIDIA Quadro 4000M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 lightwave-01
42.1 fps (45%)
specvp11 lightwave-01 + NVIDIA Quadro 3000M
34.7 fps (37%)
specvp11 ensight-04 + NVIDIA Quadro 4000M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 ensight-04
24.9 fps (12%)
specvp11 ensight-04 + NVIDIA Quadro 3000M
18.3 fps (9%)
specvp11 catia-03 + NVIDIA Quadro 4000M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 catia-03
36.5 fps (19%)
specvp11 catia-03 + NVIDIA Quadro 3000M
24.6 fps (13%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 Gaming graphics
7.1 Points (90%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 Graphics
7.1 Points (90%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA Quadro 4000M
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
6638 Points (5%)
Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA Quadro 3000M
6519 Points (5%)
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro 4000M
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
46 fps (16%)
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro 3000M
min: 45.4     avg: 45.5     median: 45.5 (16%)     max: 45.65 fps

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro 4000M → 0% n=

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro 3000M → 0% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Fifa 11

Fifa 11

2010
high 1360x768
Quadro 3000M:
206.2  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro 3000M:
127.3  fps
StarCraft 2

StarCraft 2

2010
low 1024x768
Quadro 4000M:
180  fps
med. 1360x768
Quadro 4000M:
112  fps
high 1360x768
Quadro 4000M:
79  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro 4000M:
71  fps
Metro 2033

Metro 2033

2010
med. 1360x768
Quadro 3000M:
53.8  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro 3000M:
11.5  fps
Risen

Risen

2009
med. 1024x768
Quadro 3000M:
66.7  fps
high 1366x768
Quadro 3000M:
39.6  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro 3000M:
30.4  fps
Need for Speed Shift

Need for Speed Shift

2009
med. 1024x768
Quadro 3000M:
104.8  fps
high 1366x768
Quadro 3000M:
70.9  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro 3000M:
43.3  fps
Colin McRae: DIRT 2

Colin McRae: DIRT 2

2009
med. 1024x768
Quadro 3000M:
113.5  fps
high 1360x768
Quadro 3000M:
71.4  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro 3000M:
40  fps
Anno 1404

Anno 1404

2009
low 1024x768
Quadro 4000M:
173  fps
Quadro 3000M:
187.6  fps
ultra 1280x1024
Quadro 4000M:
62  fps
Quadro 3000M:
52.4  fps
Sims 3

Sims 3

2009
low 800x600
Quadro 4000M:
279  fps
med. 1024x768
Quadro 4000M:
165  fps
high 1280x1024
Quadro 4000M:
79  fps
Racedriver: GRID

Racedriver: GRID

2008
low 800x600
Quadro 4000M:
188  fps
med. 1024x768
Quadro 4000M:
148  fps
high 1280x1024
Quadro 4000M:
117  fps
NVIDIA Quadro 3000Mlowmed.highultraQHD4K
Fifa 11206.2127.3
Metro 203353.811.5
Risen66.739.630.4
Need for Speed Shift104.870.943.3
Colin McRae: DIRT 2113.571.440
Anno 1404187.652.4
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps


1
1
3

1
2
1		1
4

1





NVIDIA Quadro 4000Mlowmed.highultraQHD4K
StarCraft 21801127971
Anno 140417362
Sims 327916579
Racedriver: GRID188148117
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps


4

1
2

3


2






For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.27
log 16. 08:58:20

#0 checking url part for id 7172 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 2431 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 2433 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 05:38:48 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.123s ... 0.124s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.124s

#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.124s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 7172 +0.042s ... 0.166s

#9 got single benchmarks 7172 +0.007s ... 0.173s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 2431 +0.002s ... 0.175s

#11 got single benchmarks 2431 +0.011s ... 0.186s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 2433 +0.002s ... 0.188s

#13 got single benchmarks 2433 +0.007s ... 0.195s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.195s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.2s ... 0.395s

#16 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.395s

#17 Got 27 rows for game benchmarks. +0.005s ... 0.4s

#18 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.4s

#19 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.006s ... 0.406s

#20 benchmarks composed for output. +0.022s ... 0.428s

#21 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.428s

#22 return log +0.002s ... 0.43s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)