Notebookcheck Logo

Mediatek MT8768 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 665

Mediatek MT8768

► remove from comparison Mediatek Helio MT8768

The MediatekMT8768 is an entry level ARM SoC for smartphones (mainly Android based) and tablets that was introduced in early 2020. It is most likely manufactured in a 12 nm FinFET process (like the similar Helio A25) and is equipped with 8 ARM Cortex-A53 CPU cores divided in two clusters. A performance cluster with four cores clocked at up to 2 GHz and a efficiency cluster clocked at up to 1.5 GHz.

Furthermore, the SoC integrates a LTE modem, a LPDDR3 / LPDDR4x-1600 memory controller, a IMG PowerVR GE8320 graphics card and a 1080p30 video de- and encoder (H.265 decoding, H.264 encoding).

Qualcomm Snapdragon 662

► remove from comparison Qualcomm SD 662

The Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 is a lower mid-range ARM-based SoC largely found in Android tablets and smartphones. It features 8 Kryo 260 cores (custom design, 64-Bit capable) that are divided in two clusters. A fast cluster of four cores with up to 2 GHz (Kryo 260 Gold - Cortex-A73 derivate) and a power saving efficiency cluster with up to 1.8 GHz (Kryo 260 Silver - Cortex A53 derivate). Both clusters can also be used together.

In addition to the 8 CPU cores, the SoC integrates a mid range Adreno 610 GPU with a LPDDR4 memory controller (dual-channel)  and supports Wi-Fi (802.11ac + MIMO, max. 867 Mbps), Bluetooth 5, and LTE (X12 LTE modem with up to 600 Mbps download and 150 Mbps upload).

Power Consumption

Thanks to the new 11 nm LPP process, the energy efficiency should be quite good.

Qualcomm Snapdragon 665

► remove from comparison Qualcomm SD 665

The Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (SM6125) is a fast mid-range ARM-based SoC largely found on Android tablets and smartphones. It features 8 Kryo 260 cores (custom design, 64-Bit capable) that are divided in two clusters. A fast cluster of four cores with up to 2 GHz (Kryo 260 Gold - Cortex-A73 derivate) and a power saving efficiency cluster with up to 1.8 GHz (Kryo 260 Silver - Cortex A53 derivate). Both clusters can also be used together.

In addition to the 8 CPU cores, the SoC integrates a mid range Adreno 610 GPU with a LPDDR4 memory controller (dual-channel)  and supports Wi-Fi (802.11ac + MIMO, max. 867 Mbps), Bluetooth 5, and LTE (X12 LTE modem with up to 600 Mbps download and 150 Mbps upload).

Power Consumption

Thanks to the new 11 nm LPP process, the energy efficiency should be quite good.

ModelMediatek MT8768Qualcomm Snapdragon 662Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
SeriesMediatek Mediatek MT8Qualcomm SnapdragonQualcomm Snapdragon
CodenameCortex-A53Kryo 260Kryo 260
Series: Snapdragon Kryo 260
Mediatek MT8768 « 1.5 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
MediaTek MT81682 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8766B2 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6652.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 260
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 « 1.8 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 260
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6602.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 260
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6361.8 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 260
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 « 2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 260
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6621.8 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 260
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6602.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 260
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6361.8 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 260
Clock1500 - 2000 MHz1800 - 2000 MHz2200 MHz
Cores / Threads8 / 88 / 88 / 8
FeaturesLTE Cat-7 DL / Cat-13 UL, LPDDR3 / LPDDR4x Memory Controller, 1080p30 H.264 Video Encoder, H.264 / H.265 1080p30 DecoderAdreno 610 GPU, X11 LTE Modem, Hexagon 683 DSP, Specra 340T ISPAdreno 610 GPU, X12 LTE Modem, Hexagon 686 DSP, Specra 165 ISP
iGPUPowerVR GE8320 ( - 650 MHz)Qualcomm Adreno 610Qualcomm Adreno 610
ArchitectureARMARMARM
Announced
Manufacturerwww.mediatek.comwww.qualcomm.comwww.qualcomm.com
Technology11 nm11 nm

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.5, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - Helio MT8768
0.3 pt (22%)
Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.5, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - SD 662
0.5 pt (36%)
Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.5, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - SD 665
0.5 pt (38%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 11228     avg: 11876     median: 11431 (10%)     max: 12969 Points
min: 18647     avg: 19225     median: 19223.5 (16%)     max: 19804 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
min: 957     avg: 1390     median: 1251.5 (15%)     max: 2101 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
min: 969     avg: 1146     median: 1144 (13%)     max: 1328 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
185 Points (6%)
179%
1 SD 662 +
min: 330     avg: 331.5     median: 331.5 (10%)     max: 333 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
848 Points (3%)
133%
1 SD 662 +
min: 1111     avg: 1129     median: 1129 (4%)     max: 1147 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 135     avg: 156     median: 155 (7%)     max: 179 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 498     avg: 775     median: 798.5 (1%)     max: 1003 Points
min: 1256     avg: 1356     median: 1371.5 (2%)     max: 1421 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 SD 665 +
min: 313     avg: 314     median: 314 (1%)     max: 315 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 SD 665 +
min: 1327     avg: 1366     median: 1379 (4%)     max: 1392 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
789 Points (8%)
1472 Points (15%)
min: 1495     avg: 1509     median: 1495 (15%)     max: 1536 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
3745 Points (4%)
4938 Points (6%)
min: 5134     avg: 5388     median: 5366 (6%)     max: 5663 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
100%
1 SD 665 +
2272 Points (18%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
100%
1 SD 665 +
2767 Points (25%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
100%
1 SD 665 +
10733 Points (21%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
100%
1 SD 665 +
4516 Points (9%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
100%
1 SD 665 +
6117 Points (16%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 10163.3     avg: 11131     median: 11009 (13%)     max: 12342 ms
min: 3779     avg: 4379     median: 4502 (5%)     max: 4650 ms
min: 4434     avg: 4783     median: 4562 (5%)     max: 6719 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 4070     avg: 4855     median: 4215 (4%)     max: 6281 Points
min: 8893     avg: 9495     median: 9485.5 (9%)     max: 10247 Points
min: 6133     avg: 8901     median: 9260 (8%)     max: 9671 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
30 Points (9%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 24     avg: 31.8     median: 32 (7%)     max: 39 Points
min: 51     avg: 53.2     median: 52 (11%)     max: 59 Points
min: 38     avg: 50.9     median: 51 (11%)     max: 58 Points
AnTuTu v6 - AnTuTu v6 Total Score
100%
1 SD 665 +
108166 Points (37%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 MEM
100%
1 SD 665 +
10308 Points (32%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 UX
100%
1 SD 665 +
35460 Points (44%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 GPU
100%
1 SD 665 +
31064 Points (10%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 CPU
100%
1 SD 665 +
63801 Points (39%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 Total Score
100%
1 SD 665 +
140633 Points (25%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 UX
min: 19097     avg: 21572     median: 21571.5 (18%)     max: 24046 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 MEM
min: 15791     avg: 19538     median: 19538 (16%)     max: 23285 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 GPU
min: 11434     avg: 11546     median: 11546 (2%)     max: 11658 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 CPU
min: 35898     avg: 37935     median: 37935 (14%)     max: 39972 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 Total Score
min: 89714     avg: 90591     median: 90590.5 (9%)     max: 91467 Points
min: 167471     avg: 177411     median: 177145 (17%)     max: 185542 Points
min: 167305     avg: 171951     median: 169695 (16%)     max: 181432 Points
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 Total Score
132881 Points (8%)
149%
1 SD 662 +
min: 194505     avg: 200601     median: 198172 (12%)     max: 211557 Points
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 CPU
40100 Points (11%)
165%
1 SD 662 +
min: 64163     avg: 66339     median: 66230 (18%)     max: 68731 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
100%
1 SD 662 +
16222 Points (2%)
1066%
1 SD 665 +
172978 Points (23%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random write internal
6.9 MB/s (5%)
min: 21.7     avg: 22.3     median: 22.3 (16%)     max: 22.9 MB/s
13.4 MB/s (10%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq write internal
171.2 MB/s (5%)
min: 111.1     avg: 112.5     median: 112.5 (3%)     max: 113.8 MB/s
151 MB/s (5%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random read internal
18.7 MB/s (23%)
min: 15.3     avg: 15.5     median: 15.5 (19%)     max: 15.6 MB/s
11.3 MB/s (14%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq read internal
249 MB/s (7%)
min: 403     avg: 414.5     median: 414.5 (12%)     max: 426 MB/s
256 MB/s (7%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
6296 Points (10%)
min: 10366     avg: 11330     median: 10740 (17%)     max: 12884 Points
7618 Points (12%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
min: 4564     avg: 5215     median: 5215 (24%)     max: 5866 Points
min: 3195     avg: 5608     median: 5689.5 (26%)     max: 7554 Points
6505 Points (30%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
2269 Points (12%)
min: 3090     avg: 3167     median: 3201 (17%)     max: 3211 Points
min: 3249     avg: 3328     median: 3328 (18%)     max: 3407 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
5264 Points (11%)
min: 8075     avg: 8811     median: 8076 (17%)     max: 10283 Points
min: 9865     avg: 10707     median: 10707 (23%)     max: 11549 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
min: 4536     avg: 4750     median: 4750 (31%)     max: 4964 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
min: 5647     avg: 6171     median: 6170.5 (31%)     max: 6694 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
232 Points (9%)
141%
1 SD 662 +
328 Points (13%)
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
2.1 Watt (1%)
99%
1 SD 662 +
min: 3.34     avg: 3.6     median: 3.6 (2%)     max: 3.83 Watt
99%
1 SD 665 +
3.5 Watt (2%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
0.8 Watt (1%)
99%
1 SD 662 +
min: 1.32     avg: 1.6     median: 1.6 (2%)     max: 1.953 Watt
100%
1 SD 665 +
1.2 Watt (1%)

Average Benchmarks Mediatek MT8768 → 100% n=25

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 → 169% n=25

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 → 163% n=25

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.26
log 06. 04:49:09

#0 checking url part for id 12755 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 12771 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 11487 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 04 May 2024 05:40:37 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.023s ... 0.024s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.024s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 12755 +0.014s ... 0.039s

#8 got single benchmarks 12755 +0.018s ... 0.057s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 12771 +0.014s ... 0.071s

#10 got single benchmarks 12771 +0.045s ... 0.115s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 11487 +0.013s ... 0.128s

#12 got single benchmarks 11487 +0.039s ... 0.167s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.167s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.236s ... 0.403s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.403s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)