Notebookcheck Logo

Mediatek Helio G99 vs Mediatek Helio G35

Mediatek Helio G99

► remove from comparison Mediatek Helio G99

The Mediatek Helio G99 is a mainstream ARM SoC for smartphones (mainly Android based) that was introduced in 2022. It is manufactured in a 6 nm FinFET process and is equipped with 2x big ARM Cortex-A76 cores with up to 2.2 GHz and 6x small and power efficient ARM Cortex-A55 cores (max. 2 GHz) in two clusters (bigLITTLE). The chip integrates an ARM Mali-G57 MC2 (two cores). Compared to the older Helio G96, the G99 is manufactured in the more recent 6nm process and clocks higher.

Furthermore, the integrated LTE / 4G modem supports Cat-13 download speeds. Wi-Fi 5 is also integrated (a/b/g/n/ac). The memory controller supportsLPDDR4x with up to 4,266 Mbps.

Mediatek Helio G35

► remove from comparison Mediatek Helio G35

The Mediatek Helio G35 is an entry level ARM SoC for smartphones (mainly Android based) that was introduced in late 2020. It is manufactured in a 12 nm FinFET process and is equipped with 8 ARM Cortex-A53 CPU cores clocked at up to 2.3 GHz. Compared to the similar Helio G25, the G35 offers higher CPU clock speeds (+ 300 MHz), GPU clock speeds (+30 MHz) and supports higher display resolutions of up to 2400 x 1800.

Furthermore, the SoC integrates a LTE Cat.4 modem, a Wi-Fi 5 / Bluetooth 5.0 modem, a LPDDR3-933 / LPDDR4-1200 / LPDDR4x-1600 memory controller, a IMG PowerVR GE8320 graphics card, and a 1080p30 video de- and encoder (H.265 decoding, H.264 encoding).

show full text
ModelMediatek Helio G99Mediatek Helio G35
CodenameCortex-A76 / A55Cortex-A53
SeriesMediatek Mediatek Helio GMediatek Mediatek Helio G
Series: Mediatek Helio G Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio G100 compare2 - 2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A76 / A55
Mediatek Helio G99 « 2 - 2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A76 / A55
Mediatek Helio G96 compare2 - 2.05 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A76 / A55
Mediatek Helio G95 compare2 - 2.05 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A76 / A55
Mediatek Helio G90T compare2.05 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A76 / A55
Mediatek Helio G37 compare1.8 - 2.3 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio G35 « 2.3 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio G36 compare2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio G25 compare2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Clock2000 - 2200 MHz2300 MHz
Cores / Threads8 / 8
2 x 2.2 GHz ARM Cortex-A76
6 x 2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55		8 / 8
Technology6 nm12 nm
Features2x Cortex-A76, 6x Cortex-A55, 4G LTE Cat-12/13, 64MP AI-Camera support, LPDDR3/LPDDR4x-2133, eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.1, Beidou, Galileo, Glonass, GPS, Wi-Fi 5 (a/b/g/n/ac), AI Accelerator up to 1 TMACs, H.264 / H.265 / HEVC video encoding (4k30)UMTS/HSPA+, LTE Cat. 4, Cat-7 DL / Cat-13 UL, LPDDR3-933 / LPDDR4-1200 / LPDDR4x-1600 Memory Controller, 1080p30 H.264 Video Encoder, H.264 / H.265 1080p30 Decoder
iGPUARM Mali-G57 MP2PowerVR GE8320 ( - 680 MHz)
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
Manufacturerwww.mediatek.comwww.mediatek.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.5, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - Helio G35
0.3 pt (24%)
Mediatek MT8766B
0.1631 -48%
...
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450
0.1785 -43%
MediaTek MT8168
0.1792 -43%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 429
0.2028 -36%
Samsung Exynos 7904
0.2136 -32%
Mediatek Helio G25
0.2329 -26%
Mediatek MT8768
0.2861 -9%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
0.2949 -7%
Mediatek Helio A25
0.3082 -2%
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V
0.3136 -1%
Mediatek Helio G35
0.3157
Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T
0.3354 6%
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
0.3465 10%
Samsung Exynos 850
0.3734 18%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 460
0.4139 31%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632
0.4418 40%
Mediatek Helio P65
0.4442 41%
Mediatek Helio G88
0.4616 46%
Mediatek MT8183
0.4633 47%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
0.4641 47%
...
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G
1.3 312%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
min: 3102     avg: 3563     median: 3606 (34%)     max: 3798 Points
min: 839     avg: 1086     median: 1073 (10%)     max: 1304 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
min: 3438     avg: 3596     median: 3630.5 (41%)     max: 3685 Points
min: 954     avg: 1156     median: 1173 (13%)     max: 1343 Points
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Single-Core
min: 704     avg: 724     median: 728 (18%)     max: 738 Points
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Multi-Core
min: 1784     avg: 1955     median: 1984 (8%)     max: 2065 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
min: 714     avg: 717     median: 717 (23%)     max: 720 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
min: 1916     avg: 1941     median: 1940.5 (8%)     max: 1965 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 490     avg: 546     median: 548 (21%)     max: 576 Points
min: 149     avg: 167.2     median: 170 (6%)     max: 178 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 1649     avg: 1824     median: 1817 (3%)     max: 1981 Points
min: 538     avg: 780     median: 881 (2%)     max: 965 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
555 Points (2%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
1921 Points (6%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 2512     avg: 2620     median: 2672 (27%)     max: 2675 Points
783 Points (8%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 7018     avg: 7608     median: 7896 (8%)     max: 7911 Points
3585 Points (4%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
2625 Points (29%)
753 Points (8%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 7492     avg: 7532     median: 7531.5 (10%)     max: 7571 Points
3421 Points (4%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 7124     avg: 7934     median: 7933.5 (12%)     max: 8743 Points
3535 Points (6%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 2334     avg: 2555     median: 2555 (38%)     max: 2776 Points
797 Points (12%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 1628.6     avg: 2004     median: 1971 (2%)     max: 2443.7 ms
10031 ms (12%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 17228     avg: 21975     median: 22187 (16%)     max: 26476 Points
min: 5007     avg: 5370     median: 5369.5 (4%)     max: 5732 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 39     avg: 73.1     median: 81 (22%)     max: 89 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 80     avg: 95.4     median: 93.5 (17%)     max: 112 Points
34 Points (6%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 UX
25846 Points (22%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 MEM
24983 Points (20%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 GPU
14363 Points (3%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 CPU
41824 Points (15%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 Total Score
107016 Points (10%)
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 Total Score
min: 229468     avg: 317183     median: 319204 (16%)     max: 375956 Points
0 Points (0%)
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 CPU
min: 83150     avg: 98532     median: 100624 (25%)     max: 106860 Points
0 Points (0%)
Antutu v10 - AnTuTu v10 Total Score
min: 383511     avg: 405846     median: 403256 (13%)     max: 422936 Points
Antutu v10 - AnTuTu v10 CPU
min: 120432     avg: 130531     median: 129105 (4%)     max: 139789 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
1727 Points (0%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random write internal
min: 30.8     avg: 56     median: 63.7 (43%)     max: 71.8 MB/s
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq write internal
min: 184.1     avg: 571     median: 681 (19%)     max: 830 MB/s
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random read internal
min: 17.6     avg: 33.8     median: 40.4 (20%)     max: 45.4 MB/s
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq read internal
min: 719.36     avg: 789     median: 796 (20%)     max: 858 MB/s
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
min: 14042     avg: 22881     median: 26431 (12%)     max: 28259 Points
4665 Points (2%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
min: 8885     avg: 9880     median: 9586 (35%)     max: 11379 Points
min: 5208     avg: 5333     median: 5297 (19%)     max: 5581 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
min: 5279     avg: 5437     median: 5436.5 (36%)     max: 5594 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 526     avg: 567     median: 569 (21%)     max: 602 Points
226 Points (8%)
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 2.52     avg: 4.8     median: 3.8 (2%)     max: 10.2 Watt
min: 2.16     avg: 2.2     median: 2.2 (1%)     max: 2.23 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 0.84     avg: 1.9     median: 1.3 (2%)     max: 6.02 Watt
min: 0.801     avg: 0.8     median: 0.8 (1%)     max: 0.886 Watt

Average Benchmarks Mediatek Helio G99 → 100% n=18

Average Benchmarks Mediatek Helio G35 → 31% n=18

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.33
log 30. 12:25:24

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14649 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 13249 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1759227924s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 29 Sep 2025 12:06:34 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.004s ... 0.004s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.004s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 14649 +0.001s ... 0.005s

#8 got single benchmarks 14649 +0.026s ... 0.031s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 13249 +0.003s ... 0.034s

#10 got single benchmarks 13249 +0.009s ... 0.043s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.043s

#12 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.017s ... 0.06s

#13 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.061s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.007s ... 0.067s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.068s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)