Notebookcheck Logo

Samsung Exynos 850 vs MediaTek Dimensity 6020 vs MediaTek Dimensity 800

Samsung Exynos 850

► remove from comparison Samsung Exynos 850

The Samsung Exynos 850 is a System on a Chip (SoC) for entry level smartphones (Android based). It was announced in May 2020 and the first device with it is the Samsung Galaxy A21s. The chip integrates a processor with 8 small ARM Cortex-A55 cores that clock with up to 2 GHz (octa core).

The multi threaded performance is quite good thanks to 8 cores, the single threaded performance suffers a bit from the small A55 cores, although the clock rate of up to 2 GHz can help a bit.

Furthermore, the SoC integrates a LTE modem (Cat.7 2CA up to 300 MBit/s download, Cat.13 2CA 150 MBit/s upload), a Wi-fi 5 modem (802.11ac), LPPDDR4x memory controller, eMMC 5.1 flash memory controller and a video engine for FHD 60fps encoding and decoding (H.265, H.264, VP9).

It is manufactured in the modern 8nm LPP process at Samsung and should offer a good power efficiency and therefore it is also suited for small smartphones.

MediaTek Dimensity 6020

► remove from comparison Mediatek Dimensity 6020

The Mediatek Dimensity 6020 is a lower mid-range SoC with an integrated 5G modem. It includes two fast ARM Cortex-A76 cores at up to 2.2 GHz and six power efficient Cortex-A55 cores at up to 2 GHz (Octa-Core with Heterogeneous Multi-Processing). The specifications are similar to the old Dimensity 700 SoC.

Furthermore, the chip integrates a 2 core ARM Mali-G57 MC2 GPU, a Wi-fi 5 modem, a LPDDR4x-2133 memory controller, a AI processing unit (APU 3.0) and video de- and encoding.

The Dimensity 6020 is manufactured in the older 7nm process like the Dimensity 700.

MediaTek Dimensity 800

► remove from comparison Mediatek Dimensity 800

The Mediatek Dimensity 800 is a fast mid-range SoC with an integrated 5G modem. It includes four fast ARM Cortex-A76 cores at up to 2 GHz and four power efficient Cortex-A55 cores at up to 2 GHz (Octa-Core with Heterogeneous Multi-Processing). Furthermore, the chip integrates a 4 core ARM Mali-G57 MC4 GPU, a Wi-fi 5 modem, a LPDDR4x memory controller(up to 16 GB with 2133 MHz), a AI processing unit (APU 3.0) and video de- and encoding.

Compared to the similar named Dimensity 800U, the 800 offers two more big A76 cores but clocked 400 MHz lower. This means the single core performance is lower, but the multi-core performance can be better.

The Dimensity 800 is manufactured in the modern 7nm process and should be very power efficient.

ModelSamsung Exynos 850MediaTek Dimensity 6020MediaTek Dimensity 800
SeriesSamsung Mediatek Mediatek
CodenameCortex-A55Cortex-A76 / A55Cortex-A76 / A55
Series: Cortex-A76 / A55
Samsung Exynos 850 « - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A55
Allwinner A5230.48 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A55
UNISOC SC9863A1.2 - 1.6 GHz8 / 8 cores512 KB L3 Cortex-A55
MediaTek Dimensity 8202 - 2.6 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A76 / A55
MediaTek Dimensity 8102 - 2.4 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A76 / A55
MediaTek Dimensity 8002 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A76 / A55
MediaTek Dimensity 800U2 - 2.4 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A76 / A55
MediaTek Dimensity 6100+2 - 2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A76 / A55
MediaTek Dimensity 60802 - 2.4 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A76 / A55
MediaTek Dimensity 6020 « 2 - 2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A76 / A55
UNISOC T8202.1 - 2.7 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A76 / A55
UNISOC Tangula T7702 - 2.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A76 / A55
UNISOC Tangula T7602 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores3 MB L3 Cortex-A76 / A55
MediaTek Dimensity 7002 - 2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A76 / A55
UNISOC T7652.1 - 2.3 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A76 / A55
MediaTek Dimensity 7202 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A76 / A55
UNISOC T7501.8 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores3 MB L3 Cortex-A76 / A55
MediaTek Dimensity 8202 - 2.6 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A76 / A55
MediaTek Dimensity 8102 - 2.4 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A76 / A55
MediaTek Dimensity 800 « 2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A76 / A55
MediaTek Dimensity 800U2 - 2.4 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A76 / A55
MediaTek Dimensity 6100+2 - 2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A76 / A55
MediaTek Dimensity 60802 - 2.4 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A76 / A55
MediaTek Dimensity 60202 - 2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A76 / A55
UNISOC T8202.1 - 2.7 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A76 / A55
UNISOC Tangula T7702 - 2.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A76 / A55
UNISOC Tangula T7602 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores3 MB L3 Cortex-A76 / A55
MediaTek Dimensity 7002 - 2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A76 / A55
UNISOC T7652.1 - 2.3 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A76 / A55
MediaTek Dimensity 7202 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A76 / A55
UNISOC T7501.8 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores3 MB L3 Cortex-A76 / A55
Clock <=2000 MHz2000 - 2200 MHz2000 MHz
Cores / Threads8 / 88 / 8
2 x 2.2 GHz ARM Cortex-A76
6 x 2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55
8 / 8
Technology8 nm7 nm7 nm
FeaturesLTE Cat.7 / Cat.13, LPDDR4x RAM, Bluetooth 5.0, Wi-Fi 802.11ac (Wi-Fi 5), 48 MP Camera, eMMC 5.1, GPS, GLONASS, BeiDou, Galileo2x ARM Cortex-A76 (2.2 GHz), 6x ARM Cortex-A55 (2 GHz), ARM Mali-G75 MC2, APU 3.0, 5G Modem (2CC), MiraVision (4K HDR Video, 80MP Photo), Wi-Fi 5, Bluetooth 5.1, UFS 2.2, 16GB LPDDR4x Support4x ARM Cortex-A76 (2 GHz), 4x ARM Cortex-A55 (2 GHz), ARM Mali-G75 MC5, APU 3.0, 5G Modem (2CC), MiraVision (4K HDR Video, 80MP Photo), Wi-Fi 5, Bluetooth 5.1, UFS 2.2, 16GB LPDDR4x Support
iGPUARM Mali-G52 MP1ARM Mali-G57 MP2ARM Mali-G57 MP4
ArchitectureARMARMARM
Announced
Manufacturerwww.samsung.comwww.mediatek.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.5, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - Exynos 850
0.4 pt (29%)
Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.5, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - Dimensity 800
0.8 pt (59%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
18816 Points (16%)
21499 Points (18%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
min: 2042     avg: 2108     median: 2109 (25%)     max: 2168 Points
3647 Points (43%)
min: 3626     avg: 4027     median: 4026.5 (47%)     max: 4427 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
min: 2015     avg: 2091     median: 2079 (24%)     max: 2190 Points
3671 Points (42%)
min: 3593     avg: 4024     median: 4024 (46%)     max: 4455 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
709 Points (19%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
1781 Points (7%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 119     avg: 167.3     median: 178 (8%)     max: 183 Points
539 Points (23%)
523 Points (22%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 519     avg: 900     median: 1042 (2%)     max: 1087 Points
1813 Points (3%)
2143 Points (4%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
987 Points (10%)
2524 Points (25%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
4986 Points (5%)
8649 Points (9%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 8326.9     avg: 8842     median: 8823 (10%)     max: 9397 ms
2468 ms (3%)
3490 ms (4%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 4875     avg: 5426     median: 5454.5 (5%)     max: 5904 Points
16765 Points (15%)
14751 Points (13%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
25 Points (7%)
52 Points (15%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 35     avg: 36.8     median: 36.5 (8%)     max: 39 Points
66 Points (14%)
56 Points (12%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 UX
min: 25484     avg: 29469     median: 28792.5 (24%)     max: 34806 Points
59479 Points (50%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 MEM
min: 20787     avg: 28847     median: 28119.5 (23%)     max: 38363 Points
49330 Points (40%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 GPU
min: 20716     avg: 21830     median: 22122.5 (4%)     max: 22360 Points
89187 Points (16%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 CPU
min: 45047     avg: 46029     median: 46132 (17%)     max: 46804 Points
99879 Points (36%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 Total Score
min: 119981     avg: 126175     median: 125664 (12%)     max: 133391 Points
297875 Points (29%)
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 Total Score
min: 121238     avg: 133665     median: 133304 (8%)     max: 146815 Points
313046 Points (19%)
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 CPU
min: 36486     avg: 40832     median: 41451.5 (11%)     max: 43937 Points
100142 Points (27%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
10533 Points (1%)
4668 Points (1%)
23814 Points (3%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
8331 Points (13%)
26340 Points (42%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
min: 4894     avg: 5492     median: 5739 (27%)     max: 6065 Points
9850 Points (46%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
min: 5433     avg: 5445     median: 5445 (36%)     max: 5457 Points
min: 7511     avg: 7913     median: 7913 (52%)     max: 8315 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
min: 6929     avg: 7021     median: 7021 (35%)     max: 7113 Points
min: 9674     avg: 9817     median: 9816.5 (49%)     max: 9959 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 254     avg: 264     median: 264 (10%)     max: 274 Points
544 Points (21%)
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 0     avg: 1.9     median: 2.8 (1%)     max: 3.02 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 0     avg: 1     median: 1.2 (1%)     max: 1.894 Watt

Average Benchmarks Samsung Exynos 850 → 100% n=8

Average Benchmarks MediaTek Dimensity 6020 → 183% n=8

Average Benchmarks MediaTek Dimensity 800 → 205% n=8

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.26
log 02. 05:02:47

#0 checking url part for id 12728 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 15078 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 13001 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 01 Jun 2024 05:37:57 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.18s ... 0.181s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.181s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 12728 +0.019s ... 0.2s

#8 got single benchmarks 12728 +0.022s ... 0.222s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 15078 +0.003s ... 0.225s

#10 got single benchmarks 15078 +0.018s ... 0.243s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 13001 +0.016s ... 0.26s

#12 got single benchmarks 13001 +0.013s ... 0.272s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.272s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.207s ... 0.479s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.479s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)