Notebookcheck Logo

AMD E2-9000 vs Intel Core m3-7Y30

AMD E2-9000

► remove from comparison AMD E2-9000

The AMD E2-9000 is the least powerful chip from the Stoney-Ridge APU series for notebooks (7th APU generation) at the time of announcement in 2017. The SoC integrates two CPU cores (one Excavator module with 2 integer and on FP unit) clocked between 1.8-2.2 GHz. It also includes a Radeon R2 GPU clocked at 600 MHz as well as a single-channel DDR4-1866 memory controller, H.265 video engine and chipset with all I/O ports. Compared to the older E2-9010, the E2-9000 offers a lower base speed (1.8 versus 2 GHz).

Architecture

Stoney Ridge is the successor of the Carrizo architecture and the design is almost identical. Thanks to optimized manufacturing processes and more aggressive Boost behavior, however, the clocks are a bit higher at the same power consumption. The memory controller now also supports DDR4-RAM, in this case up to 1866 MHz. Stoney Ridge is the designation for the smaller dual-core and single-core chip, while Bristol Ridge is the bigger quad-core chip with dual-channel memory controller. More technical details are available in the following articles:

Power Consumption

AMD specifies the TDP of the E2-9000 with 10 Watts (compared to the 9010 at 15W). This means the APU is intended for thin and light notebooks.

Intel Core m3-7Y30

► remove from comparison Intel m3-7Y30

The Intel Core m3-7Y30 is a very efficient dual-core SoC for tablets and passively cooled notebooks based on the Kaby Lake architecture and was announced in the end of August 2016. The CPU consists of two processor cores clocked at 1.0-2.6 GHz (2-core Turbo not specified yet). Thanks to Hyper Threading, the processor can execute up to four threads simultaneously. The chips also includes the Intel HD Graphics 615 GPU, a dual-channel memory controller (DDR3L/LPDDR3) as well as VP9 and H.265 video de- and encoder. It is still produced in a 14 nm process with FinFET transistors. 

Architecture

Intel basically used the familiar micro architecture from the Skylake generation, so the per-MHz performance is identical. Only the Speed-Shift technology for faster dynamic adjustments of the voltages and clocks was improved, and the matured 14 nm process now also enables much higher frequencies and better efficiency than before. 

Performance

Since Intel basically removed the Core m5 and Core m7 series or included them into the higher i5 and i7 series, respectively, the m3-7Y30 is officially the last Core-m chip. Thanks to its high Turbo clock, the 7Y30 can sometimes keep up with the 15 Watt models for short peak load and single-thread scenarios, but the clocks will drop significantly under sustained workloads. The CPU is still suitable for many more demanding applications as well as multitasking. Thanks to the improved efficiency, the CPU can often even beat the Core m5 and m7 siblings from the previous Skylake generation.

Graphics

The integrated Intel HD Graphics 615 GPU has 24 Execution Units (EUs) like the old HD Graphics 515 and runs with clocks between 300 and 900 MHz in combination with this processor. The performance heavily depends on the TDP limit as well as the memory configuration; with fast LPDDR3-1866 RAM in dual-channel mode, the GPU should sometimes be able to compete with the HD Graphics 520, but can also be much slower in other scenarios. Modern games from 2016 will, if at all, only run smoothly in the lowest settings.

Contrary to Skylake, Kaby Lake now also supports hardware decoding for H.265/HEVC Main10 with a 10-bit color depth as well as Google's VP9 codec.

Power Consumption

The chip is manufactured in an improved 14 nm process with FinFET transistors, so the power efficiency was once again improved significantly. The typical TDP for the Y-series is specified at 4.5 Watts, and can be adjusted in both directions depending on the usage scenario.

ModelAMD E2-9000Intel Core m3-7Y30
SeriesAMD Bristol RidgeIntel Kaby Lake
CodenameStoney RidgeKaby Lake
Series: Kaby Lake Kaby Lake
AMD A9-9425 compare3.1 - 3.7 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A9-9420e compare - 2.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A9-9420 compare3 - 3.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A9-9410 compare2.9 - 3.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A6-9225 compare2.6 - 3.1 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A6-9220 compare2.5 - 2.9 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A6-9220C compare1.8 - 2.7 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A6-9210 compare2.4 - 2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A4-9120 compare2.2 - 2.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A4-9120C compare1.6 - 2.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E2-9010 compare2 - 2.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E2-9000 « 1.8 - 2.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A6-9220e compare1.6 - 2.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core i7-7700K compare4.2 - 4.5 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7700 compare3.6 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6 compare3.1 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7920HQ compare3.1 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7700T compare2.9 - 3.8 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7600K compare3.8 - 4.2 GHz4 / 4 cores8 MB L3
Intel Xeon E3-1505M v6 compare3 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7820HQ compare2.9 - 3.9 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7820HK compare2.9 - 3.9 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7700HQ compare2.8 - 3.8 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7500 compare3.4 - 3.8 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7440HQ compare2.8 - 3.8 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7567U compare3.5 - 4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7660U compare2.5 - 4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7600U compare2.8 - 3.9 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7300HQ compare2.5 - 3.5 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7500T compare2.7 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7287U compare3.3 - 3.7 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7560U compare2.4 - 3.8 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7267U compare3.1 - 3.5 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7360U compare2.3 - 3.6 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7500U compare2.7 - 3.5 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7300U compare2.6 - 3.5 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7260U compare2.2 - 3.4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7200U compare2.5 - 3.1 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i3-7100H compare3 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i3-7167U compare2.8 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7Y75 compare1.3 - 3.6 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7Y57 compare1.2 - 3.3 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7Y54 compare1.2 - 3.2 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i3-7100U compare2.4 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core m3-7Y32 compare1 - 3 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 4415U compare2.3 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Core m3-7Y30 « 1 - 2.6 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron 3965U compare2.2 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Core i3-7020U compare2.3 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Celeron 3867U compare1.8 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 3865U compare1.8 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 4425Y compare1.7 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 4415Y compare1.6 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 4410Y compare1.5 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 3965Y compare1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Clock1800 - 2200 MHz1000 - 2600 MHz
L2 Cache1 MB512 KB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 4
TDP10 Watt4.5 Watt
Transistors1200 Million
Technology28 nm14 nm
Die Size124.5 mm2
max. Temp.90 °C100 °C
SocketBGABGA
FeaturesSingle-Channel DDR4-1866, Virtualization,Dual-Channel DDR3L-1600/LPDDR3-1866 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NI, TXT
iGPUAMD Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge) ( - 600 MHz)Intel HD Graphics 615 (300 - 900 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comark.intel.com
L1 Cache128 KB
L3 Cache4 MB
$281 U.S.

Benchmarks

Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
84 Points (1%)
min: 226     avg: 244.7     median: 250 (2%)     max: 258 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
47 Points (14%)
min: 103     avg: 105.3     median: 105 (32%)     max: 108 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
1 Points (1%)
min: 2.67     avg: 2.8     median: 2.8 (4%)     max: 2.85 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
0.6 Points (15%)
min: 1.23     avg: 1.2     median: 1.2 (31%)     max: 1.24 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
1787 Points (11%)
min: 4071     avg: 4086     median: 4086 (25%)     max: 4101 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
2897 Points (2%)
min: 8431     avg: 8639     median: 8638.5 (6%)     max: 8846 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
100%
1 m3-7Y30 +
min: 9764     avg: 10514     median: 10514 (7%)     max: 11264 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
100%
1 m3-7Y30 +
min: 5253     avg: 5270     median: 5269.5 (6%)     max: 5286 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
1242 s (15%)
692 s (8%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
36.2 s (7%)
20.2 s (4%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
744 Points (1%)
1255 Points (2%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
6.3 fps (2%)
15.6 fps (5%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
35.7 fps (8%)
85.3 fps (20%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.1 GB/s (0%)
0.2 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.1 GB/s (2%)
0.3 GB/s (4%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
0.7 GB/s (2%)
1.5 GB/s (4%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
100%
1 m3-7Y30 +
1809 Seconds (13%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
1556 Points (3%)
min: 3405     avg: 3407     median: 3406.5 (7%)     max: 3408 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
26.9 s (6%)
14.7 s (3%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
59.8 s (3%)
33.4 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
1304 s (6%)
719 s (3%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 E2-9000 +
3146 Points (3%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
1199 Points (3%)
min: 3611     avg: 3616     median: 3615.5 (10%)     max: 3620 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
11949 Points (10%)
31762 Points (26%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
10209 Points (8%)
min: 29788     avg: 30303     median: 30302.5 (25%)     max: 30817 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
11528 Points (10%)
min: 33164     avg: 33771     median: 33229 (28%)     max: 34920 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
914 Points (2%)
min: 2550     avg: 2691     median: 2744 (7%)     max: 2779 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
1255 Points (2%)
min: 3727     avg: 3847     median: 3866 (7%)     max: 3949 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
100%
1 m3-7Y30 +
min: 1138     avg: 1304     median: 1304 (5%)     max: 1470 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 E2-9000 +
1591 Points (16%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 E2-9000 +
2461 Points (3%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 E2-9000 +
1543 Points (21%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 E2-9000 +
2371 Points (6%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
2323 Points (4%)
5006 Points (9%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
1430 Points (28%)
2538 Points (50%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
2439 Points (4%)
5526 Points (9%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
1526 Points (23%)
2538 Points (38%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
100%
1 E2-9000 +
2993 Points (24%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
100%
1 E2-9000 +
2893 Points (26%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
100%
1 E2-9000 +
2847 Points (6%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
100%
1 E2-9000 +
2914 Points (6%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
100%
1 E2-9000 +
2894 Points (8%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
3175 ms (4%)
min: 1414     avg: 1421     median: 1421 (2%)     max: 1428 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
100%
1 E2-9000 +
258.9 ms (3%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
10575 Points (10%)
min: 23605     avg: 24813     median: 24813 (22%)     max: 26021 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 m3-7Y30 +
16.7 Watt (3%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 m3-7Y30 +
15.7 Watt (3%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
100%
1 m3-7Y30 +
15.9 Points per Watt (12%)

Average Benchmarks AMD E2-9000 → 100% n=30

Average Benchmarks Intel Core m3-7Y30 → 212% n=30

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 02. 14:09:50

#0 checking url part for id 9294 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 8163 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 01 Jun 2024 05:37:57 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.035s ... 0.036s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.036s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 9294 +0.003s ... 0.039s

#7 got single benchmarks 9294 +0.011s ... 0.049s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 8163 +0.003s ... 0.052s

#9 got single benchmarks 8163 +0.025s ... 0.077s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.077s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.28s ... 0.357s

#12 return log +0.031s ... 0.387s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)