Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Celeron N4120 vs Intel Processor N200

Intel Celeron N4120

► remove from comparison Intel Celeron N4120

The Intel Celeron N4120 is a quad-core SoC primarily for inexpensive notebooks and was announced late 2019. It runs at 1.1-2.6 GHz (Single Core Burst) and is based on the Gemini Lake platform. Compared to the predecessor, the Celeron N4100, the refresh offers a 200 MHz higher Boost clock. Similar to the Apollo Lake predecessors, the chip is manufactured in a 14 nm process with FinFETs but offers slightly improved processor cores, double the amount of L2 cache, a smaller package, a new generation of monitor outputs (Gen 10) and a partly integrated WiFi chip. Besides four CPU cores, the chip also includes a DirectX 12 capable GPU as well as a DDR4/LPDDR4 memory controller (dual-channel, up to 2400 MHz). The SoC is not replaceable as it is directly soldered to the mainboard.

Architecture

The processor architecture ist still called Goldmont Plus. Compared to the older Goldmont cores in Apollo Lake, they feature an increased level 2 cache (to 4 MB). That means the per-clock-performance should be a bit better, but not near the Core CPUs like Kaby Lake Y.

Performance

The average N4120 in our database is not much faster than AMD's Zen-based, affordable Athlon Silver 3050e, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned, with the Intel Celeron 6305 and the Core i5-7Y54 found close nearby as well. It's a very basic CPU that we're talking about here. While it does have four cores, these are some seriously slow cores, dashing hopes of anybody looking to get a Core i3-like performance for cheap.

GPU Performance

The UHD Graphics 600 (Gemini Lake) is based on Intel's Gen9 architecture, which supports DirectX 12 and is also used for the Kaby Lake / Skylake / Apollo Lake graphics adapters (like HD Graphics 520). Equipped with 12 EUs and a clock of up to 700 MHz, the performance should be roughly on par with the older HD Graphics 500 (Apollo Lake).

The chip also includes an advanced video engine with hardware support for the playback of VP9 and H.265 material (8-bit color-depth).

Power Consumption

Just like most other N-class Intel processors, Celeron N4120 has a default TDP of 6 W (also known as PL1), making it a good option for passively cooled laptops, tablets, mini-PCs. It's manufactured on a very old (as of late 2022) 14 nm process, though, making for poor energy efficiency.

Intel Processor N200

► remove from comparison Intel N200

The Intel Processor N200 is an entry-level mobile CPU for thin and light laptops from the Alder Lake-N series. It was announced in early 2023 and offers no performance cores and 4 of the 8 efficient cores (E-cores, Gracemont architecture). The chip does not support HyperThreading and clocks with up to 3.7 GHz. The performance of the E-cores should be similar to old Skylake cores (compare to the Core i7-6700HQ). All cores can use up to 6 MB L3-cache. 

Performance

The performance is clearly lower than the Core i3-N300 and N305 due to the reduced core count. Compared to older processors, the N200 should be similar to a Core i5-8250U (4 cores with HyperThreading, 3.4 GHz, 15W) when the power limit is not restricting performance.

Features

The Alder Lake-N chips only support single channel memory with up to DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 or LPDDR5-4800. The chip also supports Quick Sync and AV1 decoding (most likely same engine as in Alder Lake). Furthermore, Wi-Fi 6E and Bluetooth 5.2 are partly integrated (but no Thunderbolt). External chips can be connected via PCIe Gen3 x9 (via the PCH).

The integrated graphics adapter is based on the Xe-architecture and offersall 32 EUs (Execution Units) operating at only 450 - 750 MHz. Due to the single channel memory, low clock speeds and low shader count, the gaming performance of the iGPU is very limited.

Power consumption

The N200 has a base power consumption of only 6 W and is therefore suited for fanless cooling. The CPU is built with a further improved 10nm SuperFin process at Intel (called Intel 7).

ModelIntel Celeron N4120Intel Processor N200
CodenameGemini Lake RefreshAlder Lake-N
SeriesIntel Gemini LakeIntel Alder Lake-N
Series: Alder Lake-N Alder Lake-N
Intel Pentium Silver J5040 compare2 - 3.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Pentium Silver N5030 compare1.1 - 3.1 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron J4125 compare2 - 2.7 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N4120 « 1.1 - 2.6 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron J4025 compare2 - 2.9 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N4020 compare1.1 - 2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core i3-N305 compare1.8 - 3.8 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i3-N300 compare - 3.8 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N200 « 1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N97 compare - 3.6 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N95 compare - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N100 compare1 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N50 compare1 - 3.4 GHz2 / 2 cores6 MB L3
Clock1100 - 2600 MHz1000 - 3700 MHz
L2 Cache4 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 44 / 4
4 x 3.7 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core
TDP6 Watt6 Watt
Technology14 nm10 nm
max. Temp.105 °C105 °C
SocketBGA1090
FeaturesDDR4-2400/LPDDR4-2400 RAM, PCIe 2, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, MPX, EIST, TM1, TM2, Turbo, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SGX
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 600 (200 - 700 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) (450 - 750 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com
L3 Cache6 MB

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Celeron N4120
16.7 pt (28%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - N200
20.7 pt (34%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
100%
1 N200 +
45 Points (23%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
100%
1 N200 +
91 Points (2%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 965     avg: 1149     median: 1230 (1%)     max: 1253 Points
114%
N200 +
1406 Points (1%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 409     avg: 416.5     median: 416.5 (17%)     max: 424 Points
166%
N200 +
690 Points (28%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 159     avg: 163.3     median: 165 (18%)     max: 166 Points
161%
N200 +
265 Points (29%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 376     avg: 460.7     median: 490 (1%)     max: 516 Points
111%
N200 +
542 Points (1%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 223     avg: 227     median: 224 (1%)     max: 234 Points
219 Points (1%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 73     avg: 73.6     median: 73.2 (20%)     max: 74.5 Points
154%
N200 +
113 Points (31%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
2.7 Points (3%)
102%
N200 +
2.7 Points (4%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
0.9 Points (21%)
155%
N200 +
1.4 Points (32%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
2159 Points (13%)
182%
N200 +
3937 Points (24%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
6432 Points (5%)
117%
N200 +
7549 Points (5%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
100%
1 N200 +
11030 Points (7%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
100%
1 N200 +
5971 Points (7%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
661 s (8%)
875 s (10%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
17.6 s (4%)
26 s (5%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
100%
1 N200 +
2115 Points (3%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 5832     avg: 6817     median: 7184 (4%)     max: 7436 MIPS
7146 MIPS (4%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 2145     avg: 2279     median: 2279 (27%)     max: 2412 MIPS
142%
N200 +
3230 MIPS (38%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
100%
1 N200 +
16.3 fps (0%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
100%
1 N200 +
80 fps (2%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 1.02     avg: 1.2     median: 1.3 (2%)     max: 1.38 fps
116%
N200 +
1.5 fps (3%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.2 GB/s (5%)
163%
N200 +
0.3 GB/s (8%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.3 GB/s (4%)
231%
N200 +
0.6 GB/s (10%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
1.8 GB/s (5%)
178%
N200 +
3.2 GB/s (8%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
100%
1 N200 +
4297 Seconds (55%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 2558     avg: 2571     median: 2570.5 (18%)     max: 2583 Seconds
120%
N200 +
2150 Seconds (15%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 1.642     avg: 1.6     median: 1.6 (36%)     max: 1.649 sec
143%
N200 +
1.1 sec (25%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
3403 Points (7%)
115%
N200 +
3902 Points (8%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
25.6 s (6%)
136%
N200 +
18.8 s (4%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
58.8 s (3%)
138%
N200 +
42.7 s (2%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
1 N200 +
1011 s (4%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 N200 +
9491 Points (7%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 2626     avg: 2669     median: 2668.5 (7%)     max: 2711 Points
104%
N200 +
2765 Points (7%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
100%
1 N200 +
27649 Points (22%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
100%
1 N200 +
28655 Points (23%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
100%
1 N200 +
34749 Points (28%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 2251     avg: 2348     median: 2373 (6%)     max: 2421 Points
120%
N200 +
2848 Points (7%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 3496     avg: 3723     median: 3688 (7%)     max: 3984 Points
112%
N200 +
4135 Points (7%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 909     avg: 939     median: 938.5 (4%)     max: 968 Points
133%
N200 +
1251 Points (5%)
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Single-Core
320 Points (7%)
299%
N200 +
956 Points (22%)
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Multi-Core
1068 Points (4%)
155%
N200 +
1660 Points (6%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
100%
1 N200 +
853 Points (27%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
100%
1 N200 +
1375 Points (6%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 438     avg: 442     median: 439 (15%)     max: 449 Points
211%
N200 +
928 Points (31%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 1505     avg: 1525     median: 1509 (3%)     max: 1561 Points
102%
N200 +
1540 Points (3%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 435     avg: 435.5     median: 435.5 (2%)     max: 436 Points
205%
N200 +
891 Points (4%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 1492     avg: 1503     median: 1503 (5%)     max: 1514 Points
101%
N200 +
1518 Points (5%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1864     avg: 1885     median: 1876 (19%)     max: 1915 Points
243%
N200 +
4552 Points (45%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 5477     avg: 5606     median: 5668 (6%)     max: 5674 Points
176%
N200 +
9989 Points (10%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 2125     avg: 2308     median: 2345.5 (3%)     max: 2415 ms
161%
N200 +
1460 ms (2%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
520 ms (6%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 16865     avg: 17701     median: 17701 (12%)     max: 18537 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 85     avg: 90.9     median: 86.2 (15%)     max: 106 Points
199%
N200 +
171.3 Points (31%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work 3.0 Battery Life
383 min (100%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
28061 Points (12%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
8969 Points (31%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
100%
1 N200 +
614 Points (23%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
14.2 Watt (2%)
101%
1 N200 +
14.1 Watt (2%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
8.3 Watt (2%)
61%
1 N200 +
13.6 Watt (2%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 N200 +
6.1 Watt (4%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
3.6 Watt (3%)
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
28.4 Points per Watt (21%)
57%
1 N200 +
16.1 Points per Watt (12%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron N4120 → 100% n=37

Average Benchmarks Intel Processor N200 → 146% n=37

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.35
log 09. 23:34:47

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11533 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 14930 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1767998087s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 07 Jan 2026 12:03:32 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.005s ... 0.005s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.005s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 11533 +0.001s ... 0.007s

#8 got single benchmarks 11533 +0.001s ... 0.007s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 14930 +0.003s ... 0.011s

#10 got single benchmarks 14930 +0.004s ... 0.015s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.015s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.036s ... 0.051s

#13 return log +0.003s ... 0.054s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
Google Logo Add as a preferred
source on Google
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)