Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Celeron N4000 vs Intel Core i3-N300

Intel Celeron N4000

► remove from comparison Intel Celeron N4000

The Intel Celeron N4000 is a dual-core SoC designed for affordable laptops and mini-PCs and was announced late 2017. It runs at 1.1 GHz to 2.6 GHz (Single Core Burst, Multi Core Burst maxes out at 2.5 GHz) and is based on the Gemini Lake platform. Similar to the Apollo Lake predecessor, the chip is manufactured on a 14 nm process with FinFETs but offers slightly improved processor cores, double the amount of L2 cache, all in a smaller package. Partial Wi-Fi 5 support is baked into the chip. Besides two CPU cores, the chip also includes a DirectX 12 capable GPU as well as a DDR4/LPDDR4 memory controller (dual-channel, up to 2400 MHz). The SoC is not replaceable as it is directly soldered to the mainboard.

Architecture

The processor architecture was slightly reworked and is now called Goldmont Plus. It features a larger L2 cache (4 MB). That means the per-clock-performance should be a bit better, but not anywhere near the Core CPUs like Kaby Lake Y.

Performance

The average N4000 in our database only just matches the Core i5-4300Y, a fairly old dual-core processor of nearly the same energy efficiency, in multi-thread performance. In other words, the Celeron is a very slow processor that's good enough for the most basic of tasks only. Expect long load times no matter the app.

Graphics

The UHD Graphics 600 (Gemini Lake) is based on Intel's Generation 9 architecture, which supports DirectX 12 and is also used for the Kaby Lake / Skylake / Apollo Lake graphics adapters (like HD Graphics 520). Equipped with 12 EUs and a clock of up to 650 MHz, the performance should be roughly on par with the older HD Graphics 500 (Apollo Lake).

The chip also includes an advanced video engine with hardware support for the playback of VP9 and H.265 (8-bit color-depth).

Power consumption

Like most other N-class Intel chips, the Celeron N4000 has a 6 W TDP (also known as the long-term power limit). This is not much at all, allowing laptop makers to build passively cooled laptops, tablets, mini-PCs around the chip. The SoC can briefly consume up to 15 W, though, depending on how a system is configured.

Last but not the least, this Celeron is manufactured on one of the old 14 nm Intel processes leading to poor, as of early 2023, energy efficiency.

Intel Core i3-N300

► remove from comparison Intel i3-N300

The Intel Core i3-N305 is an entry-level mobile CPU for thin and light laptops from the Alder Lake-N series. It was announced in early 2023 and offers no performance cores and 8 efficient cores (E-cores, Gracemont architecture). The chip does not support HyperThreading and clocks with up to 3.8 GHz (single core, 3 GHz all core Turbo). The performance of the E-cores should be similar to old Skylake cores (compare to the Core i7-6700HQ). All cores can use up to 6 MB L3-cache. 

Performance

The performance depends on the cooling and TDP settings and should be somewhere similar to the old  Alder Lake Pentium 8500 (1 performance core, 4 efficiency cores, max. 4.4 GHz and 8 MB L3-cache). The multi-threaded performance should be quite good with the 8 cores but will suffer due to the low TDP. Single thread performance will suffer due to the missing P-cores and relatively low boost clock speeds.

Features

The Alder Lake-N chips only support single channel memory with up to DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 or LPDDR5-4800. The chip also supports Quick Sync and AV1 decoding (most likely same engine as in Alder Lake). Furthermore, Wi-Fi 6E and Bluetooth 5.2 are partly integrated (but no Thunderbolt). External chips can be connected via PCIe Gen3 x9 (via the PCH).

The integrated graphics adapter is based on the Xe-architecture and offersall 32 EUs (Execution Units) operating at up to 1.25 GHz. In addition to the single channel memory, the gaming performance is very limited of the iGPU.

Power consumption

The i3 has a base power consumption of 7 W and is therefore even suited for fanless cooling. The CPU is built with a further improved 10nm SuperFin process at Intel (called Intel 7).

ModelIntel Celeron N4000Intel Core i3-N300
CodenameGemini LakeAlder Lake-N
SeriesIntel Gemini LakeIntel Alder Lake-N
Series: Alder Lake-N Alder Lake-N
Intel Pentium Silver J5005 compare1.5 - 2.8 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron J4105 compare1.5 - 2.5 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Pentium Silver N5000 compare1.1 - 2.7 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron J4005 compare2 - 2.7 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron J4115 compare1.8 - 2.5 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N4100 compare1.1 - 2.4 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N4000 « 1.1 - 2.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core i3-N305 compare1.8 - 3.8 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i3-N300 « - 3.8 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N200 compare1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N97 compare - 3.6 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N95 compare - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N100 compare1 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N50 compare1 - 3.4 GHz2 / 2 cores6 MB L3
Clock1100 - 2600 MHz <=3800 MHz
L2 Cache4 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 28 / 8
8 x 3.8 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core
TDP6 Watt7 Watt
Technology14 nm10 nm
max. Temp.105 °C105 °C
SocketBGA1090
FeaturesDDR4-2400/LPDDR4-2400 RAM, PCIe 2, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SMEP, SMAP, MPX, EIST, TM1, TM2, Turbo, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SGX
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 600 (200 - 650 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) ( - 1250 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
$107 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com
L3 Cache6 MB

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Celeron N4000
14.7 pt (24%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i3-N300
19 pt (32%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
100%
1 i3-N300 +
34 Points (17%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
100%
1 i3-N300 +
165 Points (3%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
100%
1 i3-N300 +
2546 Points (2%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
100%
1 i3-N300 +
513 Points (21%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
160 Points (17%)
195 Points (21%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
273 Points (1%)
968 Points (2%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 121     avg: 132.7     median: 138 (1%)     max: 139 Points
416 Points (3%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 65     avg: 70.3     median: 70.9 (20%)     max: 75 Points
85 Points (24%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
1.7 Points (2%)
5.3 Points (7%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
0.9 Points (21%)
1 Points (24%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
2152 Points (13%)
2884 Points (17%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
4030 Points (3%)
12014 Points (9%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
100%
1 i3-N300 +
18450 Points (12%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
100%
1 i3-N300 +
4497 Points (5%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
1007 s (12%)
531 s (6%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
31.9 s (6%)
17.5 s (4%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
760 Points (1%)
1915 Points (3%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
4114 MIPS (2%)
11976 MIPS (7%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
2298 MIPS (27%)
2403 MIPS (28%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
9.5 fps (0%)
28.9 fps (1%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
47.3 fps (1%)
106.6 fps (3%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
0.8 fps (1%)
3.2 fps (6%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.1 GB/s (3%)
0.2 GB/s (7%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.1 GB/s (2%)
0.5 GB/s (8%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
0.9 GB/s (2%)
2.6 GB/s (7%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
100%
1 i3-N300 +
2147 Seconds (27%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
4736 Seconds (33%)
1095 Seconds (8%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
1.7 sec (36%)
1.3 sec (29%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
2259 Points (5%)
4261 Points (9%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
25.3 s (5%)
33.2 s (7%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
57.5 s (2%)
69.1 s (3%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
1295 s (6%)
1381 s (6%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 i3-N300 +
15263 Points (12%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 1638     avg: 1713     median: 1712.5 (4%)     max: 1787 Points
4983 Points (12%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
100%
1 i3-N300 +
28114 Points (23%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
100%
1 i3-N300 +
28073 Points (23%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
100%
1 i3-N300 +
28903 Points (23%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
100%
1 i3-N300 +
4049 Points (10%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
1974 Points (4%)
5528 Points (10%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
1389 Points (16%)
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Single-Core
100%
1 i3-N300 +
762 Points (18%)
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Multi-Core
100%
1 i3-N300 +
2803 Points (11%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
100%
1 i3-N300 +
734 Points (23%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
100%
1 i3-N300 +
2641 Points (11%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 431     avg: 433.5     median: 433.5 (15%)     max: 436 Points
626 Points (21%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 797     avg: 802     median: 801.5 (1%)     max: 806 Points
2674 Points (5%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
434 Points (2%)
616 Points (3%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
791 Points (2%)
2642 Points (8%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
1862 Points (19%)
2913 Points (29%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
3219 Points (3%)
9894 Points (10%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 2306     avg: 2382     median: 2381.5 (3%)     max: 2457 ms
1638 ms (2%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
446.5 ms (5%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
15679 Points (10%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 71.2     avg: 78.6     median: 78.6 (14%)     max: 86 Points
104.3 Points (19%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
6152 Points (32%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
22786 Points (49%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
7604 Points (50%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
10205 Points (51%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
100%
1 i3-N300 +
529 Points (19%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 i3-N300 +
24.4 Watt (4%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 i3-N300 +
22.2 Watt (4%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 i3-N300 +
14.7 Watt (10%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron N4000 → 100% n=35

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i3-N300 → 227% n=35

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.35
log 11. 15:31:13

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 9426 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 14928 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1768141873s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 10 Jan 2026 05:18:44 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.004s ... 0.004s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.004s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 9426 +0.001s ... 0.005s

#8 got single benchmarks 9426 +0.002s ... 0.008s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 14928 +0.004s ... 0.011s

#10 got single benchmarks 14928 +0.005s ... 0.016s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.016s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.035s ... 0.052s

#13 return log +0s ... 0.052s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
Google Logo Add as a preferred
source on Google
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)