Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Celeron J4115 vs Intel Processor N97

Intel Celeron J4115

► remove from comparison Intel Celeron J4115

The Intel Celeron J4115 is a quad-core SoC primarily for inexpensive mini PCs and was announced late 2017. It runs at 1.8 GHz to 2.5 GHz (Single Core Burst) and is based on the Gemini Lake platform. Similar to the Apollo Lake predecessors, the chip is manufactured on a 14 nm process with FinFETs but offers slightly improved processor cores, double the amount of L2 cache, all in a smaller package. Partial Wi-Fi 5 support is baked into the chip. Besides four CPU cores, the chip also includes a DirectX 12 capable GPU as well as a DDR4/LPDDR4 memory controller (dual-channel, up to 2400 MHz). The processor is not replaceable as it is directly soldered to the mainboard.

Architecture

The processor architecture ist still called Goldmont Plus. Compared to the older Goldmont cores in Apollo Lake, they feature a larger L2 cache (now 4 MB). That means the per-clock-performance should be a bit better, but not anywhere near the Core CPUs like Kaby Lake Y.

Performance

The average J4115 in our database only just matches the Core i5-4260U, a somewhat more power-hungry SoC that saw the light of day in 2014, in multi-thread performance. This means the Celeron is a very basic CPU that isn't really ready to handle anything beyond the most basic tasks such as writing e-mails and listening to Spotify.

Graphics

The UHD Graphics 600 (Gemini Lake) is based on Intel's Generation 9 architecture, which supports DirectX 12 and is also used for the Kaby Lake / Skylake / Apollo Lake graphics adapters (like HD Graphics 520). Equipped with 12 EUs and a clock of up to 750 MHz, the performance should be roughly on par with the older HD Graphics 500 (Apollo Lake).

The chip also includes an advanced video engine with hardware support for the playback of VP9 and H.265 (8-bit color-depth).

Power consumption

Like most other J-class Intel processors, the Celeron has a default TDP (also known as the long-term power limit) of 10 W. This is low enough to allow laptop makers to build passively cooled laptops, mini-PCs, tablets and other gadgetry around the chip.

The Intel Celeron J4115 is built with one of the old 14 nm Intel processes for poor, as of early 2023, energy efficiency.

Intel Processor N97

► remove from comparison Intel N97

The Intel Processor N97 is an entry-level mobile CPU for thin and light laptops from the Alder Lake-N series. It was announced in early 2023 and offers no performance cores and 4 of the 8 efficient cores (E-cores, Gracemont architecture). The chip does not support HyperThreading and clocks with up to 3.7 GHz. The performance of the E-cores should be similar to old Skylake cores (compare to the Core i7-6700HQ). All cores can use up to 6 MB L3-cache. 

Performance

The performance should be between the Intel Processor N100 and Intel Processor N200 and clearly below the Core i3-N300 and N305 due to the reduced core count. 

Features

The Alder Lake-N chips only support single channel memory with up to DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 or LPDDR5-4800. The chip also supports Quick Sync and AV1 decoding (most likely same engine as in Alder Lake). Furthermore, Wi-Fi 6E and Bluetooth 5.2 are partly integrated (but no Thunderbolt). External chips can be connected via PCIe Gen3 x9 (via the PCH).

The integrated graphics adapter is based on the Xe-architecture and offers only 24 of the 32 EUs (Execution Units) operating at 1200 MHz. Due to the single channel memory, low clock speeds, and low shader count, the gaming performance of the iGPU is very limited.

Power consumption

The N97 has a base power consumption of 12 W and therefore double the amount of the N100. The CPU is built with a further improved 10nm SuperFin process at Intel (called Intel 7).

ModelIntel Celeron J4115Intel Processor N97
CodenameGemini LakeAlder Lake-N
SeriesIntel Gemini LakeIntel Alder Lake-N
Series: Alder Lake-N Alder Lake-N
Intel Celeron J4105 compare1.5 - 2.5 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Pentium Silver N5000 compare1.1 - 2.7 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron J4005 compare2 - 2.7 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron J4115 « 1.8 - 2.5 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N4100 compare1.1 - 2.4 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N4000 compare1.1 - 2.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core i3-N305 compare1.8 - 3.8 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i3-N300 compare - 3.8 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N200 compare1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N97 « - 3.6 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N95 compare - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N100 compare1 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N50 compare1 - 3.4 GHz2 / 2 cores6 MB L3
Clock1800 - 2500 MHz <=3600 MHz
L2 Cache4 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 44 / 4
4 x 3.6 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core
TDP10 Watt12 Watt
Technology14 nm10 nm
max. Temp.105 °C105 °C
SocketBGA1090
FeaturesDDR4-2400/LPDDR4-2400 RAM, PCIe 2, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, MPX, EIST, TM1, TM2, Turbo, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SGX
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 600 (250 - 750 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) ( - 1200 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com
L3 Cache6 MB

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Celeron J4115
16.5 pt (27%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - N97
25.8 pt (43%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
100%
1 N97 +
63 Points (35%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
100%
1 N97 +
192 Points (4%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
100%
1 N97 +
2913 Points (3%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
100%
1 N97 +
973 Points (41%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 156     avg: 156.5     median: 156.5 (17%)     max: 157 Points
237%
N97 +
371 Points (40%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 503     avg: 547     median: 546.5 (1%)     max: 590 Points
204%
N97 +
1115 Points (3%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 225     avg: 244     median: 244 (2%)     max: 263 Points
196%
N97 +
479 Points (3%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 70.1     avg: 70.6     median: 70.6 (20%)     max: 71.1 Points
228%
N97 +
161 Points (45%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
3.2 Points (4%)
187%
N97 +
6 Points (8%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
0.8 Points (20%)
234%
N97 +
1.9 Points (46%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
2087 Points (13%)
261%
N97 +
5445 Points (33%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
7426 Points (5%)
206%
N97 +
15323 Points (11%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
100%
1 N97 +
24158 Points (15%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
100%
1 N97 +
8567 Points (10%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
564 s (7%)
108%
N97 +
523 s (6%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
19.1 s (4%)
114%
N97 +
16.8 s (3%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
1203 Points (2%)
193%
N97 +
2321 Points (4%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 7129     avg: 7614     median: 7613.5 (4%)     max: 8098 MIPS
173%
N97 +
13174 MIPS (8%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 2184     avg: 2200     median: 2199.5 (26%)     max: 2215 MIPS
183%
N97 +
4019 MIPS (47%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
17.5 fps (0%)
199%
N97 +
34.9 fps (1%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
76.3 fps (2%)
229%
N97 +
174.8 fps (4%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 1.34     avg: 1.4     median: 1.4 (2%)     max: 1.49 fps
247%
N97 +
3.5 fps (6%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.2 GB/s (5%)
152%
N97 +
0.3 GB/s (8%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.2 GB/s (4%)
215%
N97 +
0.5 GB/s (9%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
1.7 GB/s (4%)
171%
N97 +
2.9 GB/s (8%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
100%
1 N97 +
2014 Seconds (26%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 2380     avg: 2515     median: 2515 (18%)     max: 2650 Seconds
247%
N97 +
1020 Seconds (7%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
1.7 sec (37%)
219%
N97 +
0.8 sec (17%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
3683 Points (8%)
175%
N97 +
6461 Points (14%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
27.4 s (6%)
149%
N97 +
18.4 s (4%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
63.3 s (3%)
165%
N97 +
38.3 s (2%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
1472 s (7%)
187%
N97 +
786 s (3%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 N97 +
15578 Points (12%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 2688     avg: 2793     median: 2792.5 (7%)     max: 2897 Points
219%
N97 +
6118 Points (15%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
27642 Points (22%)
181%
N97 +
50003 Points (41%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 26282     avg: 28448     median: 28448 (23%)     max: 30614 Points
178%
N97 +
50545 Points (41%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
100%
1 N97 +
52858 Points (42%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 2318     avg: 2482     median: 2481.5 (6%)     max: 2645 Points
184%
N97 +
4565 Points (12%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 3560     avg: 3758     median: 3758 (7%)     max: 3956 Points
172%
N97 +
6473 Points (12%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
1063 Points (4%)
235%
N97 +
2493 Points (11%)
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Single-Core
100%
1 N97 +
1300 Points (32%)
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Multi-Core
100%
1 N97 +
3181 Points (12%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
100%
1 N97 +
1247 Points (40%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
100%
1 N97 +
3029 Points (12%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 388     avg: 399     median: 399 (15%)     max: 410 Points
266%
N97 +
1060 Points (40%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 1410     avg: 1421     median: 1420.5 (3%)     max: 1431 Points
194%
N97 +
2757 Points (5%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 N97 +
1052 Points (5%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 N97 +
2738 Points (9%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 N97 +
4703 Points (47%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 N97 +
10893 Points (11%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 2457     avg: 2482     median: 2482 (3%)     max: 2507 ms
255%
N97 +
975 ms (1%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
100%
1 N97 +
145.3 Points (40%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 80.1     avg: 81.7     median: 81.7 (15%)     max: 83.2 Points
234%
N97 +
191.4 Points (34%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
100%
1 N97 +
844 Points (32%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
14.1 Watt (2%)
38%
1 N97 +
37.1 Watt (6%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
12.2 Watt (2%)
43%
1 N97 +
28.4 Watt (5%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 N97 +
13.5 Watt (9%)
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
21.6 Points per Watt (16%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron J4115 → 100% n=35

Average Benchmarks Intel Processor N97 → 200% n=35

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.33
log 29. 11:25:40

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 12643 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 14969 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1759137940s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 28 Sep 2025 05:17:48 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.006s ... 0.006s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.006s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 12643 +0.004s ... 0.01s

#8 got single benchmarks 12643 +0.005s ... 0.015s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 14969 +0.004s ... 0.018s

#10 got single benchmarks 14969 +0.004s ... 0.023s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.023s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.043s ... 0.065s

#13 return log +0.003s ... 0.068s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)