Notebookcheck Logo

Qualcomm Adreno 619L vs Qualcomm Adreno 530

Qualcomm Adreno 619L

► remove from comparison

The Qualcomm Adreno 619L is a mobile graphics card for mid-range smartphones and tablets (mostly Android based). It is included in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SoCs and based on the Adreno 600 architecture (like the Adreno 630, which should be fully compatible in software).

The performance is 60% better compared to the Adreno 612 graphics card and in our benchmarks on par with the 700 series cards.

The GPU supports modern standards like Vulkan 1.0 (according to Wikipedia), OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0 and DirectX 11 (FL 11_1).

Qualcomm Adreno 530

► remove from comparison Qualcomm Adreno 530

The Qualcomm Adreno 530 is an integrated graphics card for (mostly Android based) smartphones and tablets. It was introduced in the last quarter of 2015 and is integrated in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 SoC. It supports OpenGL ES 3.1 and DirectX 11.1.

The GPU uses a still unknown amount of unified shaders clocked at up to 624 MHz. In 2015 it belongs to the fastest GPU for smartphones. Compared to the predecessor Adreno 430, the 530 is especially faster in demanding benchmarks.

show full text
Qualcomm Adreno 619LQualcomm Adreno 530
Adreno 500 Series
Adreno 660 compare
Adreno 650 compare @ 0.25 - 0.67 GHz
Adreno 690 compare
Adreno 685 compare
Adreno 680 compare
Adreno 644 compare
Adreno 643 compare @ 0.81 GHz
Adreno 642 compare
Adreno 642L compare
Adreno 640 compare
Adreno 630 compare
Adreno 620 compare
Adreno 619 compare
Adreno 619L
Adreno 618 compare
Adreno 616 compare
Adreno 612 compare
Adreno 610 compare
Adreno 540 compare @ 0.71 GHz
Adreno 530 @ 0.62 GHz
Adreno 512 compare
Adreno 510 compare
Adreno 509 compare
Adreno 508 compare @ 0.65 GHz
Adreno 506 compare @ 0.65 GHz
Adreno 505 compare @ 0.45 GHz
Adreno 504 compare @ 0.45 GHz
ArchitectureAdreno 600
Shared Memoryyesyes
APIDirectX 12.1, OpenGL ES 3.2, VulkanDirectX 11.1, OpenGL ES 3.1 AEP
technology8 nm14 nm
FeaturesOpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, Direct3D 12 (FL 12_1)OpenGL ES 3.1 AEP, OpenCL 2.0, Direct3D 11.1 (FL 11_1)
Date of Announcement15.12.2015 15.12.2015
Core Speed624 MHz
CPU in Adreno 619LGPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G8 x 1700 MHz? MHz? MHz
CPU in Adreno 530GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro4 x 2400 MHz? MHz653 MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM89964 x 2200 MHz? MHz624 MHz
min. - max.? MHz624 - ? MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
44899 Points (5%)
min: 24310     avg: 32869     median: 32997 (4%)     max: 40761 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
0 Points (0%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
0 Points (0%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 3122     avg: 3225     median: 3224.5 (14%)     max: 3327 Points
min: 2649     avg: 3348     median: 3425 (15%)     max: 3806 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 3307     avg: 3311     median: 3311 (7%)     max: 3315 Points
min: 3401     avg: 4503     median: 4661.5 (10%)     max: 5006 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 2308     avg: 2328     median: 2328 (12%)     max: 2348 Points
min: 2252     avg: 2605     median: 2594.5 (13%)     max: 2893 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 2120     avg: 2154     median: 2153.5 (6%)     max: 2187 Points
min: 2488     avg: 2996     median: 3108 (9%)     max: 3253 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
min: 809     avg: 818     median: 817.5 (0%)     max: 826 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
247 Points (0%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
5.8 fps (1%)
min: 7.1     avg: 8.4     median: 7.2 (1%)     max: 11 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 15     avg: 15.5     median: 15.5 (1%)     max: 16 fps
min: 15     avg: 17.7     median: 19 (1%)     max: 19 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 14     avg: 14.5     median: 14.5 (2%)     max: 15 fps
min: 14     avg: 18.3     median: 19 (2%)     max: 20 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
26 fps (1%)
min: 12     avg: 28.6     median: 31 (1%)     max: 34.02 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 36     avg: 36.5     median: 36.5 (2%)     max: 37 fps
min: 26     avg: 43     median: 44.5 (3%)     max: 49 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 619L
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 72     avg: 72.5     median: 72.5 (1%)     max: 73 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 530
min: 47.19     avg: 83.3     median: 88 (1%)     max: 96 fps
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
76440 Points (10%)
Basemark X 1.1 - Basemark X 1.1 High Quality
min: 21420     avg: 30602     median: 33028 (75%)     max: 35449 Points
Basemark X 1.1 - Basemark X 1.1 Medium Quality
min: 28538     avg: 37215     median: 38353 (85%)     max: 41500 Points
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 22.78     avg: 22.8     median: 22.8 (0%)     max: 22.85 fps
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
13095 Points (13%)
min: 4781     avg: 5512     median: 5612.5 (6%)     max: 6042 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
1751 Points (3%)
min: 1913     avg: 2183     median: 2178.5 (4%)     max: 2461 Points
Smartbench 2012 - Smartbench 2012 Gaming Index
4410 Points (96%)
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
2.4 Watt (1%)

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 619L → 100% n=13

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 530 → 114% n=13

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

League of Legends: Wild Rift

League of Legends: Wild Rift

2020
ultra
100%
Adreno 619L:
60  fps
PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
100%
Adreno 619L:
39 40 ~ 40 fps
med.
100%
Adreno 619L:
40 40 ~ 40 fps
high
100%
Adreno 619L:
30 30 ~ 30 fps
Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
100%
Adreno 619L:
60  fps
72%
Adreno 530:
0 (!) 30 30 30 30 56 58 59 59 60 60 ~ 43 fps
Asphalt 8: Airborne

Asphalt 8: Airborne

2013
low
Adreno 530:
29 29 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 ~ 30 fps
high
Adreno 530:
0 (!) 29 29 29 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 48 ~ 29 fps
Asphalt 9: Legends

Asphalt 9: Legends

2013
high
100%
Adreno 619L:
29  fps
Real Racing 3

Real Racing 3

2013
low
Adreno 530:
60  fps
high
100%
Adreno 619L:
60  fps
72%
Adreno 530:
35 51 ~ 43 fps

Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 619L → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 530 → 72%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 72%

Qualcomm Adreno 619Llowmed.highultraQHD4K
League of Legends: Wild Rift60
PUBG Mobile404030
Dead Trigger 260
Asphalt 9: Legends29
Real Racing 360
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
1


1

1
1
2


1






Qualcomm Adreno 530lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Dead Trigger 243
Asphalt 8: Airborne3029
Real Racing 36043
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
1
1



1
2










For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 08. 10:45:46

#0 checking url part for id 10573 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 7062 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 07 May 2024 05:40:33 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.141s ... 0.142s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.142s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.142s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 10573 +0.033s ... 0.176s

#8 got single benchmarks 10573 +0.015s ... 0.19s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 7062 +0.002s ... 0.193s

#10 got single benchmarks 7062 +0.065s ... 0.258s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.258s

#12 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.024s ... 0.282s

#13 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.008s ... 0.29s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.097s ... 0.387s

#15 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.387s

#16 Got 51 rows for game benchmarks. +0.041s ... 0.428s

#17 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.428s

#18 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.003s ... 0.43s

#19 benchmarks composed for output. +0.015s ... 0.446s

#20 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.446s

#21 return log +0.054s ... 0.5s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)