Qualcomm Adreno 512 vs Qualcomm Adreno 680 vs Qualcomm Adreno 644
Qualcomm Adreno 512 ► remove from comparison
The Qualcomm Adreno 512 is a mobile graphics card for mid-range smartphones and tablets (mostly Android based). It is included in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SoCs and based on the Adreno 500 architecture (like the Adreno 520 in the S820, which should be fully compatible in software).
According to Qualcomm up to 30% faster than the previous generation (Adreno 510?).
The GPU supports modern standards like Vulkan 1.0 (according to Wikipedia), OpenGL ES 3.1 + AE (3.2 in other sources), OpenCL 2.0 and DirectX 12 (FL 12.1 according to Wikipedia, 11.1 according to Qualcomm). Furthermore, the GPU supports Universal Bandwidth Compression (UBWC) to save memory bandwidth.
Qualcomm Adreno 680 ► remove from comparison
The Qualcomm Adreno 680 is an integrated graphics card in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx SoC for Windows laptops. According to Qualcomm it is 2x faster than the previous Adreno 630 in the Snapdragon 850 for Windows PCs with a 60% improved efficiency (thanks to the 7nm process). The performance should be similar to a Intel UHD Graphics 620 (e.g. in a 8th gen Core i5) when running native ARM64 compiled Windows apps and games. Running emulated 32 bit games (64 bit games compiled for AMD/Intel are not supported), the performance is notably slower.
Qualcomm Adreno 644 ► remove from comparison
The Qualcomm Adreno 644 is a smartphone and tablet GPU that is integrated within the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 SoC. The chip was announced mid 2022 and was available in early 2023 in upper mid-range Android smartphones.
According to Qualcomm, the Adreno 644 GPU offers a 20% improved performance over the Adreno 642 , its predecessor, which is integrated in the Snapdragon 780G SoC. This is also thanks to the fast LPDDR5 with 3200 MHz. In our benchmarks with the Mi 13 Lite however, the performance was only on par with the old Adreno 642.
The Adreno 644 supports OpenCL 2.0 FP, OpenGL ES 3.2 and Vulkan 1.1.
The Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 is manufactured in the modern 4nm process with EUV at Samsung that should provide a good power efficiency.
Qualcomm Adreno 512 Qualcomm Adreno 680 Qualcomm Adreno 644 Adreno 600 Series Architecture Adreno 500 Shared Memory yes yes yes API DirectX 12.1, OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan DirectX 12 OpenGL ES 3.2 technology 14 nm 7 nm 4 nm Features OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, Direct3D 12 (FL 12_1) OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1 Date of Announcement 15.12.2015 06.12.2018 07.05.2021 Power Consumption 7 Watt Predecessor Adreno 642
Benchmarks 3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 25561 avg: 28454 median: 29060 (3%) max: 29496 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 1887 avg: 2062 median: 2120 (9%) max: 2161 Points
min: 6303 avg: 6921 median: 6953.5 (30%) max: 7472 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 1734 avg: 1942 median: 2001 (4%) max: 2033 Points
min: 8656 avg: 8893 median: 8751 (19%) max: 9414 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 1270 avg: 1400 median: 1432 (7%) max: 1442 Points
min: 5501 avg: 6158 median: 6262 (31%) max: 6466 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 1134 avg: 1237 median: 1257 (4%) max: 1268 Points
min: 6767 avg: 7037 median: 7012.5 (21%) max: 7388 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
min: 3035 avg: 3133 median: 3140 (2%) max: 3184 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 825 avg: 833 median: 829 (1%) max: 854 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 1650 avg: 1847 median: 1847 (3%) max: 2044 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 1593 avg: 1936 median: 1935.5 (2%) max: 2278 Points
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + Qualcomm Adreno 680 Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
353 Points (0%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 7 avg: 7.5 median: 7.5 (3%) max: 7.9 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 3 avg: 3.2 median: 3.2 (1%) max: 3.3 fps
min: 15 avg: 16.7 median: 17 (3%) max: 18 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 7.9 avg: 8.6 median: 8.6 (1%) max: 8.8 fps
min: 41 avg: 46 median: 46.5 (3%) max: 49 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 8 avg: 8.8 median: 9 (1%) max: 9.1 fps
min: 37 avg: 38.2 median: 38 (4%) max: 40 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 8.2 avg: 13.6 median: 15 (0%) max: 15 fps
min: 52 avg: 62.4 median: 65 (1%) max: 67 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 20 avg: 22.1 median: 22.5 (1%) max: 23 fps
min: 86 avg: 89.2 median: 88 (5%) max: 94 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 512 GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 43 avg: 48.4 median: 50 (0%) max: 51 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 680
140.2 fps (1%)
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 644
min: 147 avg: 150.2 median: 148 (1%) max: 158 fps
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
min: 174679 avg: 177977 median: 175343 (22%) max: 187645 Points
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
12.8 fps (0%)
min: 50.74 avg: 51.7 median: 51.7 (0%) max: 52.63 fps
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 GPU OpenCL
min: 2448 avg: 2513 median: 2497 (1%) max: 2610 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 GPU Vulkan
min: 2650 avg: 2776 median: 2729.5 (1%) max: 2993 Points
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
1890 Points (2%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
min: 6741 avg: 13532 median: 6900 (7%) max: 26954 Points
30029 Points (30%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
min: 2286 avg: 6896 median: 2290 (4%) max: 16113 Points
42541 Points (74%)
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
12.6 Watt (2%)
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 4.19 avg: 4.8 median: 4.6 (2%) max: 5.9 Watt
Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 512 → 100% n=1 Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 680 → 280% n=1 Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 644 → 296% n=1
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
Game Benchmarks The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.
Adreno 644:
42 [X] Motorola Razr 40 2.0.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 1.8GHz
Adreno 644
min:
36 fps, max:
45 fps
fps
Adreno 644:
45 [X] Motorola Razr 40 2.0.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 1.8GHz
Adreno 644
min:
40 fps, max:
46 fps
fps
Adreno 644:
45 [X] Motorola Razr 40 1.61.6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 1.8GHz
Adreno 644
min:
44 fps, max:
45 fps
89 [X] Xiaomi 13 Lite 1.61.6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 1.8GHz
Adreno 644
min:
84 fps, max:
90 fps
~ 67 fps
200%
Adreno 644:
60 [X] Motorola Razr 40 2.7.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 1.8GHz
Adreno 644
min:
56 fps, max:
60 fps
60 ~ 60 fps
100%
Adreno 512:
24 30 ~ 27 fps
148%
Adreno 644:
40 [X] Honor 90 5G 2.7.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 1.8GHz
Adreno 644
min:
37 fps, max:
41 fps
fps
100%
Adreno 512:
30 30 30 ~ 30 fps
133%
Adreno 644:
40 [X] Xiaomi 13 Lite 2.5.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 1.8GHz
Adreno 644
min:
34 fps, max:
41 fps
40 [X] Xiaomi 13 Lite 2.5.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 1.8GHz
Adreno 644
min:
22 fps, max:
41 fps
40 [X] Motorola Razr 40 2.7.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 1.8GHz
Adreno 644
min:
38 fps, max:
41 fps
40 [X] Honor 90 5G 2.7.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 1.8GHz
Adreno 644
min:
37 fps, max:
41 fps
40 ~ 40 fps
100%
Adreno 512:
30 [X] Nokia 7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 2.2GHz
Adreno 512
min:
28 fps, max:
31 fps
60 [X] Xiaomi Mi 6X Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 2.2GHz
Adreno 512
min:
45 fps, max:
60 fps
~ 45 fps
100%
Adreno 512:
30 60 [X] BlackBerry Key2 1.23.1.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 2.2GHz
Adreno 512
min:
47 fps, max:
60 fps
60 ~ 50 fps
100%
Adreno 512:
60 [X] BlackBerry Key2 1.11.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 2.2GHz
Adreno 512
min:
25 fps, max:
60 fps
fps
100%
Adreno 512:
30 [X] Nokia 7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 2.2GHz
Adreno 512
min:
29 fps, max:
31 fps
30 [X] Xiaomi Mi 6X Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 2.2GHz
Adreno 512
min:
27 fps, max:
31 fps
~ 30 fps
200%
Adreno 644:
60 [X] Honor 90 5G 1.9.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 1.8GHz
Adreno 644
min:
59 fps, max:
61 fps
fps
100%
Adreno 512:
28 [X] Xiaomi Mi 6X Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 2.2GHz
Adreno 512
min:
27 fps, max:
30 fps
29 [X] Nokia 7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 2.2GHz
Adreno 512
min:
26 fps, max:
30 fps
30 ~ 29 fps
100%
Adreno 512:
28 28 ~ 28 fps
102%
Adreno 644:
60 61 [X] Xiaomi 13 Lite 3.9.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 1.8GHz
Adreno 644
min:
50 fps, max:
61 fps
~ 61 fps
Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 512 → 100% Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%
Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 644 → 157% Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 157%
Qualcomm Adreno 644 low med. high ultra QHD 4K Diablo Immortal 42 45 Armajet 67 PUBG Mobile 60 40 40 Dead Trigger 2 60 Subway Surfers 61 < 30 fps < 60 fps < 120 fps ≥ 120 fps 1 1 1 1 3 1
For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List
v1.26
log 01. 06:28:00
#0 checking url part for id 8778 +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 9846 +0s ... 0s
#2 checking url part for id 11580 +0s ... 0s
#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s
#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 01 Jun 2024 05:39:27 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s
#5 composed specs +0.155s ... 0.156s
#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.156s
#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.156s
#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 8778 +0.045s ... 0.201s
#9 got single benchmarks 8778 +0.043s ... 0.244s
#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 9846 +0.002s ... 0.246s
#11 got single benchmarks 9846 +0.014s ... 0.26s
#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 11580 +0.002s ... 0.262s
#13 got single benchmarks 11580 +0.018s ... 0.28s
#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.28s
#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.137s ... 0.417s
#16 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.417s
#17 Got 41 rows for game benchmarks. +0.052s ... 0.469s
#18 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.469s
#19 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.005s ... 0.474s
#20 benchmarks composed for output. +0.023s ... 0.497s
#21 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.497s
#22 return log +0.002s ... 0.5s
Please share our article, every link counts!
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)