A lot has been said over the past few days via various leaks about the kind of performance improvements both Intel and AMD are expected to bring with their latest mobile CPU offerings. Today is the day the review embargoes lift, so we can finally offer you a glimpse into the kind of benefits that can be expected from 35 W SKUs from Intel and AMD.
In this article, we will take a quick look at the comparative benchmark scores achieved by Intel Tiger Lake-H35 Core i7-11370H, AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS, and the Ryzen 9 5980HS.
Both Intel and AMD claimed significant improvements to single-core performance this generation, so let's check out the scores to see if that's really the case.
Are you a techie who knows how to translate? Then join our Team!
Details here
Tiger Lake 35 W vs Cezanne 35 W CPU benchmarks
Starting off with our suite of Cinebench tests, we find the Ryzen 9 5980HS and the Core i7-11370H just within 4% of each other in the single-core test. The Core i7-11370H manages to pull off a not-so-shabby 9% lead over the Ryzen 9 5900HS. Tiger Lake-H35, however, seems to be only about 5% faster than the average Tiger Lake-UP4 Core i7-1185G7 in this test.
As expected, the Core i7-11370H, with just four cores and eight threads, does not stand a chance against AMD's offerings or even Intel Comet Lake-H in Cinebench R15 multi-core. That being said, we do see a significant 23% higher performance compared to Tiger Lake-UP4.
Cinebench R20 shows the gap further narrowing down between Intel and AMD 35 W parts and the differences seem to be mostly within the margin of error in the single-core test. AMD's offerings are way ahead in multi-core; interestingly, the Ryzen 9 5900HS leads the slightly higher-clocked Ryzen 9 5980HS by a perceivable 14%.
Cinebench R23 single is where the Core i7-11370H finally leads the chart albeit by a minuscule 1%, which essentially ties it with the Ryzen 8 5980HS.
In Blender, we see the Ryzen 9 5900HS not too far from the average Core i9-10980HK, but the Core i7-11370H is not able to keep pace with the new Cezanne APU.
Geekbench 5.3 sees the Core i7-11370H on par with the Ryzen 9 5900HS, but Intel's latest chip trails by 10% when compared with the Ryzen 9 5980HS. The Core i7-11370H also has a slight lead in the R Benchmark over both Cezanne 35 W parts.
HWBOT x265 4K preset favors multi-core CPUs a lot, so it is not surprising to see Cezanne 35 W scoring a home run in this test. The Core i7-11370H is about 25% faster than Tiger Lake-UP4 but trails behind significantly behind all the other CPUs in comparison.
Cinebench R15 | |
CPU Single 64Bit | |
AMD Ryzen 9 5980HS | |
Intel Core i7-11370H | |
Intel Core i7-1185G7 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1185G7 (168 - 230, n=27) | |
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS | |
Average Intel Core i9-10980HK (198 - 219, n=15) | |
Intel Core i9-10980HK | |
AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS | |
AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS | |
CPU Multi 64Bit | |
AMD Ryzen 9 5980HS | |
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS | |
AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS | |
Intel Core i9-10980HK | |
Average Intel Core i9-10980HK (1606 - 1862, n=15) | |
AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS | |
Intel Core i7-11370H | |
Intel Core i7-1185G7 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1185G7 (617 - 1066, n=32) |
Cinebench R20 | |
CPU (Single Core) | |
AMD Ryzen 9 5980HS | |
Intel Core i7-1185G7 | |
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS | |
Average Intel Core i7-1185G7 (489 - 593, n=28) | |
Intel Core i7-11370H | |
AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS | |
Intel Core i9-10980HK | |
Average Intel Core i9-10980HK (465 - 507, n=13) | |
AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS | |
CPU (Multi Core) | |
AMD Ryzen 9 5980HS | |
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS | |
AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS | |
Average Intel Core i9-10980HK (3526 - 4487, n=13) | |
AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS | |
Intel Core i9-10980HK | |
Intel Core i7-1185G7 | |
Intel Core i7-11370H | |
Average Intel Core i7-1185G7 (1425 - 2493, n=28) |
Cinebench R23 | |
Single Core | |
AMD Ryzen 9 5980HS | |
Intel Core i7-11370H | |
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS | |
Average Intel Core i7-1185G7 (1251 - 1532, n=24) | |
Average Intel Core i9-10980HK (1228 - 1305, n=4) | |
Multi Core | |
AMD Ryzen 9 5980HS | |
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS | |
Average Intel Core i9-10980HK (9597 - 11641, n=4) | |
Intel Core i7-11370H | |
Average Intel Core i7-1185G7 (3610 - 6383, n=24) |
Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
Average Intel Core i7-1185G7 (478 - 745, n=28) | |
Intel Core i7-1185G7 | |
Intel Core i7-11370H | |
AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS | |
Intel Core i9-10980HK | |
AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS | |
Average Intel Core i9-10980HK (239 - 299, n=13) | |
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS | |
AMD Ryzen 9 5980HS |
Geekbench 5.4 | |
Single-Core | |
AMD Ryzen 9 5980HS | |
Average Intel Core i7-1185G7 (1398 - 1626, n=21) | |
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS | |
Intel Core i9-10980HK | |
Intel Core i7-1185G7 | |
Intel Core i7-11370H | |
Average Intel Core i9-10980HK (1283 - 1401, n=12) | |
AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS | |
AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS | |
Multi-Core | |
AMD Ryzen 9 5980HS | |
Intel Core i9-10980HK | |
Average Intel Core i9-10980HK (7634 - 8666, n=12) | |
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS | |
AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS | |
AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS | |
Intel Core i7-1185G7 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1185G7 (4620 - 5944, n=21) | |
Intel Core i7-11370H |
LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF | |
AMD Ryzen 9 5980HS | |
AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS | |
Intel Core i7-11370H | |
Intel Core i7-1185G7 | |
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS | |
Intel Core i9-10980HK | |
Average Intel Core i9-10980HK (44 - 89, n=13) | |
Average Intel Core i7-1185G7 (41.3 - 61.7, n=26) |
R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean | |
Intel Core i7-1185G7 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1185G7 (0.55 - 0.615, n=27) | |
Intel Core i9-10980HK | |
AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS | |
Average Intel Core i9-10980HK (0.561 - 0.596, n=13) | |
Intel Core i7-11370H | |
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS | |
AMD Ryzen 9 5980HS |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset | |
AMD Ryzen 9 5980HS | |
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS | |
Average Intel Core i9-10980HK (12 - 14.6, n=13) | |
Intel Core i9-10980HK | |
AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS | |
AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS | |
Intel Core i7-11370H | |
Intel Core i7-1185G7 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1185G7 (5.02 - 8.13, n=27) |
* ... smaller is better
Top 10 Laptops
Multimedia, Budget Multimedia, Gaming, Budget Gaming, Lightweight Gaming, Business, Budget Office, Workstation, Subnotebooks, Ultrabooks, Chromebooks
under 300 USD/Euros, under 500 USD/Euros, 1,000 USD/Euros, for University Students, Best Displays
Top 10 Smartphones
Smartphones, Phablets, ≤6-inch, Camera Smartphones
All in all, these results confirm two things:
1. AMD has been able to finally beat a Comet Lake-H Core i9-10980HK in single-core by a decent margin at just 35 W.
2. Intel can just about close the gap with Cezanne 35 W in single-core, but it really does not have the hegemony like it had till the Comet Lake generation.
Both Tiger Lake-H35 and Cezanne 35 W should be good if your primary use case is mobile gaming and better performance in single-threaded apps. But with many AAA games scaling up to six cores easily these days, those aiming for higher FPS averages may feel the pinch with Tiger Lake-H35.
Our full reviews of the Asus TUF Dash F15 FX516P, the Asus ROG Flow X13, and the Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA503 will follow soon wherein we will also talk about gaming comparisons, power consumption, and noise levels for a more holistic comparison, so watch this space.
Source(s)
Own