Notebookcheck Logo

AMD PRO A8-9600B vs Intel Core i3-7167U

AMD PRO A8-9600B

► remove from comparison AMD A8-9600B

The AMD PRO A8-9600B is a mid-range APU of the Bristol Ridge series (7th generation of APUs) with 4 CPU-cores (two Excavator modules) clocked at 2.4 - 3.3 GHz. It is intended for business laptops and features the same specifications as the consumer AMD A10-9600P SoC.

It was announced in mid 2016 and is based on the same silicon as Carrizo but with more and refined features. It is a ULV-chip with a TDP of 15 Watt and integrates a Radeon R5 graphics card (384 shader cores / 6 compute cores) and a dual-channel DDR4-1866 memory controller. As Carrizo its a full featured SoC that offers all I/O ports on the chip.

The A10-9600P is slightly faster than the old 15-Watt top model of Carrizo, the FX-8800P. Therefore, the CPU performance is similar to a Broadwell 15 Watt Core i3 like The i3-5010U. See our Bristol Ridge article for more information on the architecture and improvements compared to Carrizo.

Intel Core i3-7167U

► remove from comparison

The Intel Core i3-7167U is a dual-core SoC for notebooks based on the Kaby Lake architecture and was announced in January 2017. The CPU has two processor cores clocked at 2.8 GHz (no Turbo Boost). The processor can execute up to four threads simultaneously thanks to Hyper Threading. It is also equipped with an Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 GPU with 64 MB eDRAM, a dual-channel memory controller (DDR4) as well as VP9 and H.265 video decoding as well as encoding. The chip is still manufactured in a 14nm process with FinFET transistors.

The i3-7167U does not have a Turbo, only 3MB L3 cache and the slowest clocked Iris Plus GPU compared to the faster Core i5 and i7 models.

Architecture

Intel basically uses the same micro architecture compared to Skylake, so the per-MHz performance does not differ. The manufacturer only reworked the Speed Shift technology for faster dynamic adjustments of voltages and clocks, and the improved 14nm process allows much higher frequencies combined with better efficiency than before.

Performance

The Core i3-7167U is a bit faster than the Core i5-6200U (up to 2.8 GHz, 15 Watts, no eDRAM) due to the missing Turbo. The CPU performance is therefore sufficient for most scenarios. Some games might still require a real quad-core processor and therefore nit run perfectly on the dual-core processor, despite Hyper Threading.

Graphics

The integrated Intel Iris Plus 650 Graphics is the GT3e model of the Kaby Lake GPU (Intel Gen. 9.5). It has 48 Execution Units running at 300-1000 MHz (slowest Iris 650, fastest is 1100 MHz in the i7-7567U, for example) and the performance is comparable to a GeForce 920MX thanks to fast eDRAM cache. However, there aren't any significant improvements compared to the old Iris Pro 550, so modern games can often not be played smoothly or only at the lowest or medium settings, respectively.

Contrary to Skylake, Kaby lake now also supports H.265/HEVC Main 10 with a 10-bit color depth as well as Google's VP9 codec. The dual-core Kaby Lake processors announced in January should also support HDCP 2.2.

Power Consumption

The chip is manufactured in an improved 14nm process with FinFET transistors, which improves the efficiency even further. Intel specifies the TDP with 28 Watts, which can be reduced to 23 Watts (cTDP Down) depending on the usage scenario. The TDP is pretty high compared to the common 15-Watt TDP for dual-core processors, but allows a better utilization of CPU and GPU Turbo.

ModelAMD PRO A8-9600BIntel Core i3-7167U
SeriesAMD Bristol RidgeIntel Kaby Lake
CodenameBristol RidgeKaby Lake
Series: Kaby Lake Kaby Lake
AMD FX-9830P compare3 - 3.7 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD PRO A12-9830B compare3 - 3.7 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD FX-9800P compare2.7 - 3.6 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD PRO A12-9800B compare2.7 - 3.6 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A12-9720P compare2.7 - 3.6 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A12-9700P compare2.5 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A10-9620P compare2.5 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A10-9600P compare2.4 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD PRO A8-9600B « 2.4 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Core i7-7700K compare4.2 - 4.5 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7700 compare3.6 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6 compare3.1 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7920HQ compare3.1 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7700T compare2.9 - 3.8 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7600K compare3.8 - 4.2 GHz4 / 4 cores8 MB L3
Intel Xeon E3-1505M v6 compare3 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7820HQ compare2.9 - 3.9 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7820HK compare2.9 - 3.9 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7700HQ compare2.8 - 3.8 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7500 compare3.4 - 3.8 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7440HQ compare2.8 - 3.8 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7567U compare3.5 - 4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7660U compare2.5 - 4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7600U compare2.8 - 3.9 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7300HQ compare2.5 - 3.5 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7500T compare2.7 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7287U compare3.3 - 3.7 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7560U compare2.4 - 3.8 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7267U compare3.1 - 3.5 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7360U compare2.3 - 3.6 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7500U compare2.7 - 3.5 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7300U compare2.6 - 3.5 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7260U compare2.2 - 3.4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7200U compare2.5 - 3.1 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i3-7100H compare3 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i3-7167U « 2.8 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7Y75 compare1.3 - 3.6 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7Y57 compare1.2 - 3.3 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7Y54 compare1.2 - 3.2 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i3-7100U compare2.4 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core m3-7Y32 compare1 - 3 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 4415U compare2.3 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Core m3-7Y30 compare1 - 2.6 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron 3965U compare2.2 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Core i3-7020U compare2.3 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Celeron 3867U compare1.8 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 3865U compare1.8 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 4425Y compare1.7 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 4415Y compare1.6 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 4410Y compare1.5 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 3965Y compare1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Clock2400 - 3300 MHz2800 MHz
L2 Cache2 MB512 KB
Cores / Threads4 / 42 / 4
TDP15 Watt28 Watt
Transistors3100 Million
Technology28 nm14 nm
Die Size250 mm2
max. Temp.90 °C100 °C
SocketFP4BGA1356
FeaturesDual-Channel DDR3/DDR4-1866 Memory Controller, PCIe 3.0 x8Dual-Channel DDR4 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NI
iGPUAMD Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge) ( - 720 MHz)Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 (300 - 1000 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerproducts.amd.comark.intel.com
L1 Cache128 KB
L3 Cache3 MB
$304 U.S.

Benchmarks

Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
203 Points (1%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
71 Points (21%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
2.4 Points (3%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
0.8 Points (21%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
2336 Points (14%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
5703 Points (4%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
577 s (7%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
16.8 s (3%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
1444 Points (2%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
13.3 fps (5%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
70 fps (16%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.2 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.3 GB/s (5%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
1.5 GB/s (4%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
2930 Points (6%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
19.5 s (4%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
43.7 s (2%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
1000 s (4%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
2081 Points (6%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
21428 Points (17%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
23396 Points (19%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
24627 Points (21%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
2071 Points (5%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
2427 Points (4%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
2139 Points (21%)
3546 Points (35%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
4506 Points (5%)
7218 Points (8%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1991 Points (27%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
4389 Points (11%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
4764 Points (8%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
1965 Points (38%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
5002 Points (8%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
2102 Points (31%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
4436 Points (36%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
3385 Points (31%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
5779 Points (11%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
5660 Points (11%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
5124 Points (13%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
2552 ms (3%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
177.7 ms (2%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
15170 Points (14%)

Average Benchmarks AMD PRO A8-9600B → 100% n=2

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i3-7167U → 163% n=2

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.27
log 16. 08:32:10

#0 checking url part for id 9948 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 8455 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 05:37:17 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.028s ... 0.03s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.03s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 9948 +0.004s ... 0.033s

#7 got single benchmarks 9948 +0.01s ... 0.044s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 8455 +0.003s ... 0.047s

#9 got single benchmarks 8455 +0.006s ... 0.053s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.053s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.185s ... 0.238s

#12 return log +0.09s ... 0.328s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)