Notebookcheck Logo

ARM Mali-G72 MP18 vs ARM Mali-G68 MP4

ARM Mali-G72 MP18

► remove from comparison ARM Mali-G72 MP18

The ARM Mali-G72 MP18 is an integrated high-end graphics card for ARM based SoCs (mostly Android based). It was introduced in early 2018 in the Exynos 9810 (e.g. Galaxy S9). It integrates 18 of the 32 possible cores and is based on the second generation of the Bifrost architecture. According to ARM it offers improvements in the machine learning efficiency and a bigger tile buffer for 16x anti-aliasing.

In our benchmarks it slightly below a Adreno 540 and is therefore suitable for demanding mobile games.

The GPU supports all modern graphics APIs like OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan 1.0, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12 FL11_1 and Renderscript.

ARM Mali-G68 MP4

► remove from comparison ARM Mali-G68 MP4

The ARM Mali-G68 MP4 (or G68MC4) is an integrated mid-range graphics card for ARM based SoCs (mostly Android based). The MP4 version uses four of the six possible clusters / cores.

It was introduced mid 2021 in the Mediatek Dimensity 900. It is based on the Valhall architecture and is advertised by ARM as a "sub-premium GPU". It offers all features of the Mali-G78 series including improvements for battery runtime and machine learning.

ARM Mali-G72 MP18ARM Mali-G68 MP4
Mali-G Series
Mali-G78 MP24 compare 24
Mali-G78 MP22 compare 24
Mali-G78 MP20 compare 24
Mali-G78 MP14 compare 14
Mali-G77 MP11 compare 11
Mali-G77 MP9 compare 9
Mali-G76 MP16 compare 16
Mali-G76 MP12 compare 10
Mali-G76 MP10 compare 10 @ 0.72 GHz
Mali-G68 MP5 compare 5
Mali-G57 MP6 compare 6
Mali-G57 MP5 compare 5
Mali-G72 MP18 18 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G71 MP20 compare 8 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-G72 MP12 compare 12 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G71 MP8 compare 8 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-G76 MP4 compare 4 @ 0.8 GHz
Mali-G71 MP2 compare 2 @ 0.77 GHz
Mali-G72 MP3 compare 3 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G68 MP4 4
Mali-G52 MP6 compare 6
Mali-G68 MP2 compare 2
Mali-G52 MP2 compare 2 @ 0.95 GHz
Mali-G52 MP1 compare 1 @ 0.8 GHz
Mali-G57 MP4 compare 4
Mali-G57 MP3 compare 3
Mali-G57 MP2 compare 2
Mali-G57 MP1 compare 1
Mali-G51 MP4 compare 4 @ 0.65 GHz
Mali-G78 MP24 compare 24
Mali-G78 MP22 compare 24
Mali-G78 MP20 compare 24
Mali-G78 MP14 compare 14
Mali-G77 MP11 compare 11
Mali-G77 MP9 compare 9
Mali-G76 MP16 compare 16
Mali-G76 MP12 compare 10
Mali-G76 MP10 compare 10 @ 0.72 GHz
Mali-G68 MP5 compare 5
Mali-G57 MP6 compare 6
Mali-G57 MP5 compare 5
Mali-G72 MP18 18 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G71 MP20 compare 8 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-G72 MP12 compare 12 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G71 MP8 compare 8 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-G76 MP4 compare 4 @ 0.8 GHz
Mali-G71 MP2 compare 2 @ 0.77 GHz
Mali-G72 MP3 compare 3 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G68 MP4 4
Mali-G52 MP6 compare 6
Mali-G68 MP2 compare 2
Mali-G52 MP2 compare 2 @ 0.95 GHz
Mali-G52 MP1 compare 1 @ 0.8 GHz
Mali-G57 MP4 compare 4
Mali-G57 MP3 compare 3
Mali-G57 MP2 compare 2
Mali-G57 MP1 compare 1
Mali-G51 MP4 compare 4 @ 0.65 GHz
ArchitectureBifrostValhall
Pipelines18 - unified4 - unified
Core Speed850 MHz
Shared Memorynono
APIOpenGL ES 3.2
technology16 nm5 nm
Date of Announcement01.01.2018 14.09.2021
Link to Manufacturer Pagedeveloper.arm.comwww.arm.com
CodenameValhall
CPU in Mali-G72 MP18GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Samsung Exynos 98108 x ? MHz? MHz? MHz
CPU in Mali-G68 MP4GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
MediaTek Dimensity 70508 x 2000 MHz? MHz? MHz
MediaTek Dimensity 10808 x 2000 MHz? MHz? MHz
MediaTek Dimensity 9208 x 2000 MHz? MHz? MHz
min. - max.? MHz? MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 36190     avg: 43744     median: 46610 (5%)     max: 48433 Points
48592 Points (6%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 3744     avg: 3994     median: 4054.5 (18%)     max: 4124 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 3958     avg: 4626     median: 4820 (11%)     max: 4904 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 3376     avg: 3634     median: 3435 (17%)     max: 4291 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 3697     avg: 4023     median: 3794.5 (11%)     max: 4806 Points
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
11 fps (2%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
31 fps (2%)
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 28     avg: 28.3     median: 28 (3%)     max: 29 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 24     avg: 40.5     median: 45.5 (1%)     max: 47 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 73     avg: 74     median: 73.5 (4%)     max: 76 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + ARM Mali-G72 MP18
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 80     avg: 129.3     median: 145 (1%)     max: 147 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + ARM Mali-G68 MP4
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 GPU OpenCL
min: 2304     avg: 2340     median: 2322 (1%)     max: 2394 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 GPU Vulkan
min: 2301     avg: 2326     median: 2301 (1%)     max: 2375 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
min: 8620     avg: 8803     median: 8802.5 (9%)     max: 8985 Points
min: 13104     avg: 21339     median: 23126 (23%)     max: 26121 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
min: 4747     avg: 4762     median: 4762 (8%)     max: 4777 Points
min: 4174     avg: 20568     median: 23564 (41%)     max: 27937 Points

Average Benchmarks ARM Mali-G72 MP18 → 100% n=13

Average Benchmarks ARM Mali-G68 MP4 → 144% n=13

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Diablo Immortal

Diablo Immortal

2022
low Medium
Mali-G68 MP4:
30 30 ~ 30 fps
ultra Ultra
Mali-G68 MP4:
30 30 ~ 30 fps
Genshin Impact

Genshin Impact

2020
low
Mali-G68 MP4:
30.5 37 ~ 34 fps
ultra
Mali-G68 MP4:
27 35 ~ 31 fps
Armajet

Armajet

2020
high
Mali-G68 MP4:
30 30 59 60 60 60 79 108 112 115 118 ~ 76 fps
PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
100%
Mali-G72 MP18:
40  fps
123%
Mali-G68 MP4:
30 30 30 40 59 59 60 60 60 60 ~ 49 fps
med.
Mali-G68 MP4:
40 40 40 60 ~ 45 fps
high
100%
Mali-G72 MP18:
40  fps
93%
Mali-G68 MP4:
28 30 30 30 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 ~ 37 fps
World of Tanks Blitz

World of Tanks Blitz

2018
high
100%
Mali-G72 MP18:
59 60 ~ 60 fps
Arena of Valor

Arena of Valor

2018
low
100%
Mali-G72 MP18:
60 60 ~ 60 fps
ultra
100%
Mali-G72 MP18:
59 60 60 60 ~ 60 fps
Shadow Fight 3

Shadow Fight 3

2018
high
100%
Mali-G72 MP18:
59 60 ~ 60 fps
Battle Bay

Battle Bay

2018
high
100%
Mali-G72 MP18:
60 60 ~ 60 fps
Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
100%
Mali-G72 MP18:
30 30 ~ 30 fps
237%
Mali-G68 MP4:
71  fps
Asphalt 8: Airborne

Asphalt 8: Airborne

2013
high
100%
Mali-G72 MP18:
30  30 ~ 30 fps
Asphalt 9: Legends

Asphalt 9: Legends

2013
low
100%
Mali-G72 MP18:
30 30 ~ 30 fps
100%
Mali-G68 MP4:
30 30 30 ~ 30 fps
high
100%
Mali-G72 MP18:
30 30 ~ 30 fps
100%
Mali-G68 MP4:
30  fps
Subway Surfers

Subway Surfers

2012
high
Mali-G68 MP4:
60 60 120 ~ 80 fps

Average Gaming ARM Mali-G72 MP18 → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming ARM Mali-G68 MP4 → 130%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 108%

ARM Mali-G68 MP4lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Diablo Immortal3030
Genshin Impact3431
Armajet76
PUBG Mobile494537
Dead Trigger 271
Asphalt 9: Legends3030
Subway Surfers80
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

4


1


2
3

2







ARM Mali-G72 MP18lowmed.highultraQHD4K
PUBG Mobile4040
World of Tanks Blitz60
Arena of Valor6060
Shadow Fight 360
Battle Bay60
Dead Trigger 230
Asphalt 8: Airborne30
Asphalt 9: Legends3030
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

2
1




4
3


1






For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 03. 16:06:20

#0 checking url part for id 8770 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 10953 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 01 May 2024 05:36:19 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.129s ... 0.13s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.131s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.131s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 8770 +0.027s ... 0.158s

#8 got single benchmarks 8770 +0.011s ... 0.169s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 10953 +0.001s ... 0.17s

#10 got single benchmarks 10953 +0.061s ... 0.231s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.231s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.09s ... 0.321s

#13 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.321s

#14 Got 77 rows for game benchmarks. +0.018s ... 0.339s

#15 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.339s

#16 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.006s ... 0.346s

#17 benchmarks composed for output. +0.031s ... 0.377s

#18 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.377s

#19 return log +0.071s ... 0.448s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)