Notebookcheck Logo
Ayaneo Flip KB

Ayaneo Flip KB review - handheld console with great functionality powered by the less efficient AMD Ryzen 7 8840U

This is Ayaneo's first attempt at a clamshell design inspired by the classic Nintendo DS. The KB variant is powered by the AMD Ryzen 7 8840U and comes with a bright 7-inch angle-adjustable touchscreen and mini keyboard instead of the second touchscreen. Additionally, it features excellent game controllers, future-proof port selection with USB4 and OCuLink, as well as a highly-configurable AYASpace 2.0 control center.
Bogdan Solca 👁 Published 🇫🇷 🇪🇸 ...
AMD Console Gaming Handheld Radeon Ryzen (Zen) Thunderbolt Touchscreen Windows Zen 4

Verdict: elegant clamshell form-factor with midrange performance

The Flip series is Ayaneo’s first foray into handheld clamshells inspired by the classic Nintendo DS design. Unlike the Flip DS version that comes with dual touchscreens, the KB model replaces the lower screen with an RGB mini keyboard. Design-wise, the console fits neatly in the palms of your hands and all the game controllers are responsive and ergonomically placed on each side. On the display side, the IPS screen impresses with its brightness and excellent touch capabilities. Port selection offers future-proof connectors like USB4 and OCuLink plus a fast microSD card reader. AMD’s Ryzen 7 8840U CPU side might not scale too well with the 30 TDP W limit, but at least the Radeon 780M iGPU delivers decent performance. Additionally, the AYASpace 2.0 control software allows for great configurability.

As always, there are some downsides too. The first one was previously hinted at with the CPU scaling that leads to lower than average system performance, despite the relatively fast 32 DDR5X-6400 RAM and 2 TB NVMe SSD. As such, the console power efficiency is also lacking as power draw almost matches that of faster competitors. The keyboard is not really usable only with the thumbs and its left side becomes quite warm during prolonged gaming sessions that require close to full load. Even though the cooling system comes with a vapor chamber, the fan is considerably noisier than the competition in full load, but at least the fan curve can be adjusted. Last but not least, the 45 Wh battery proves to be incapable of providing a prolonged gaming experience.

Pros

+ Elegant and compact clamshell design
+ Excellent game controllers
+ Bright Display with touchscreen functionality
+ USB4 + OCuLink
+ Decent iGPU performance considering the 30 W limit
+ Fast microSD card reader
+ AYASpace 2.0 control panel

Cons

- Lower than average system performance
- Left upper side gets too warm in full load
- Keyboard not easily operable with the thumbs alone
- Console not that power efficient
- Full load fan noise above average
- Relatively short battery runtime

Price and availability

This unit was provided by Ayaneo as an early production sample and might not reflect the exact performance of the mass-produced models. The reviewed configuration is not currently available for order from the official Ayaneo store. Suggested price for this configuration is 1020 EUR or 1080 USD.

Potential Competitors in Comparison

Image
Model / Review
Price
Display
Weight
Dimensions
1.
77.1%
Ayaneo Flip KB
Ayaneo Flip KB
AMD Ryzen 7 8840U ⎘
AMD Radeon 780M ⎘
32 GB Memory, 2048 GB SSD
Amazon:
1. $19.89
PowerHOOD AC USB-C Power Ada...
2. $12.98
Puccy 4 Pack Screen Protecto...
3. $12.99
Vaxson 4-Pack Screen Protect...
List Price: 1020€
7.00"
1920x1080
368 PPI
IPS
650 g108 x 180 x 37.5 mm
2.
76.9%
GPD Win Mini 2024 7
GPD Win Mini 2024 7"
AMD Ryzen 7 8840U ⎘
AMD Radeon 780M ⎘
32 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD
Amazon:
List Price: 1000 USD
7.00"
1920x1080
315 PPI
IPS
526 g109 x 168 x 26 mm
3.
85.2% v7 (old)
Ayaneo Kun
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U ⎘
AMD Radeon 780M ⎘
64 GB Memory,  SSD
Amazon:
1. $19.95
BoxWave Screen Protector Com...
2. $19.95
BoxWave Screen Protector Com...
3. $12.98
Puccy 3 Pack Screen Protecto...
List Price: 999€
8.40"
2560x1600
359 PPI
IPS
942 g140 x 325 x 22 mm
4.
84.6%
Asus ROG Ally X
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme ⎘
AMD Radeon 780M ⎘
24 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD
Amazon: $733.68
List Price: 899€
7.00"
1920x1080
315 PPI
IPS
685 g111 x 280 x 36.9 mm
5.
77.4%
MSI Claw
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H ⎘
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU ⎘
16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD
Amazon: $533.00
List Price: 849€
7.00"
1920x1080
315 PPI
IPS
672 g117 x 294 x 33 mm

Ayaneo has already launched quite a few models before the Flip, mostly resembling the Steam Deck design. With Flip KB / DS, Ayaneo is exploring the popular DS clamshell design introduced two decades ago by Nintendo. The DS variant comes with dual touchscreen displays, while the KB model replaces the lower screen with a mini keyboard. Both come with the usual suite of game controllers and an ergonomic shape that fits comfortably into the palm of your hands.

Besides the 30 W AMD Ryzen 7 8840U APU complimented by 32 GB of LPDDR5X-6400 RAM and 2 TB WD NVMe SSD, some of the highlights for the Flip KB model from Ayaneo include a very bright 7-inch IPS touchscreen with 120 Hz refresh and almost full sRGB color gamut, adjustable angles for the display, responsive game controllers with Hall sensors, and RGB mini keyboard, vapor chamber cooling system and port selection with USB4 and OCuLink connectors.

Specifications

Ayaneo Flip KB
Processor
AMD Ryzen 7 8840U 8 x 3.3 - 5.1 GHz, 28 W PL1 / Sustained, Hawk Point-U (Zen 4)
Graphics adapter
Memory
32 GB 
, LPDDR5X-6400
Display
7.00 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 368 PPI, touchscreen, IPS, glossy: yes, 120 Hz
Mainboard
AMD K19.7 FCH, AMD K19.7 IMC
Storage
WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00, 2048 GB 
, 2 TB
Soundcard
Realtek ALC269
Connections
1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, DisplayPort Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: headphone, Card Reader: MicroSD, 1 Fingerprint Reader, Sensors: gyroscope, OCuLink
Networking
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.2
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 37.5 x 180 x 108 ( = 1.48 x 7.09 x 4.25 in)
Battery
45 Wh
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 11 Home
Additional features
Speakers: stereo, Keyboard Light: yes, AYASpace 2.0, 12 Months Warranty, game controllers: optical finger mouse, d-pad, A/B/X/Y buttons, dual Hall-sensing joysticks, dual trigger buttons, dual shoulder buttons, vibration motor
Weight
650 g ( = 22.93 oz / 1.43 pounds), Power Supply: 150 g ( = 5.29 oz / 0.33 pounds)
Price
1020 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Case and Connectivity: ergonomic design and fast ports

The case is entirely made of solid plastic, yet the weight is relatively lower than all the Steam Deck inspired models we have tested thus far due to the elegant clamshell design that allows the screen to open up at various adjustable angles. One notable feature is the replaceable ergonomic grips. Ayaneo offers anti-slip “Star Diamond” grips by default, but included in the package we also found anti-fingerprint “Galaxy” grips.

Port selection includes a full-feature USB4 connector that is also used for charging and so the console does not allow for charging and displaying to an external monitor at the same time on its own (Ayaneo has a separate dock for this). There is also a USB-C 3.2 gen 2 for data only transfers, as well as an OCuLink connector for specialized eGPUs and a fast microSD card reader plus an audio jack.

Rear ports: MicroSD card reader, USB4, USB-C 3.2 Gen 2, OCuLink
Rear ports: MicroSD card reader, USB4, USB-C 3.2 Gen 2, OCuLink
Front ports: audio jack
Front ports: audio jack

Size Comparison

325 mm / 12.8 in 140 mm / 5.51 in 22 mm / 0.866 in 942 g2.08 lbs294 mm / 11.6 in 117 mm / 4.61 in 33 mm / 1.299 in 672 g1.482 lbs280 mm / 11 in 111 mm / 4.37 in 36.9 mm / 1.453 in 685 g1.51 lbs180 mm / 7.09 in 108 mm / 4.25 in 37.5 mm / 1.476 in 650 g1.433 lbs168 mm / 6.61 in 109 mm / 4.29 in 26 mm / 1.024 in 526 g1.16 lbs297 mm / 11.7 in 210 mm / 8.27 in 1 mm / 0.03937 in 5.7 g0.01257 lbs

Connectivity

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Ayaneo Flip KB
 
142.82 MB/s
Ayaneo Kun
 
132.46 MB/s -7%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (20.9 - 201, n=14, last 2 years)
114.5 MB/s -20%
Asus ROG Ally X
  (Angelbird AV Pro v60)
89.2 MB/s -38%
GPD Win Mini 2024 7"
  (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)
20.9 MB/s -85%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Asus ROG Ally X
  (Angelbird AV Pro v60)
260.1 MB/s +35%
Ayaneo Flip KB
 
193.18 MB/s
Ayaneo Kun
 
191.7 MB/s -1%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (74.7 - 260, n=13, last 2 years)
167.4 MB/s -13%
GPD Win Mini 2024 7"
  (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)
85.5 MB/s -56%
Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
Ayaneo Kun
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
1607 (1530min - 1641max) MBit/s +25%
Ayaneo Flip KB
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
1281 (706min - 1377max) MBit/s
GPD Win Mini 2024 7"
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
1059 (984min - 1093max) MBit/s -17%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
Ayaneo Kun
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
1753 (874min - 1849max) MBit/s +18%
Ayaneo Flip KB
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
1488 (1288min - 1516max) MBit/s
GPD Win Mini 2024 7"
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
1383 (1280min - 1406max) MBit/s -7%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Asus ROG Ally X
MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
1675 (1467min - 1867max) MBit/s +184%
Ayaneo Kun
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
944 (876min - 962max) MBit/s +60%
GPD Win Mini 2024 7"
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
711 (675min - 760max) MBit/s +21%
Ayaneo Flip KB
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
590 (447min - 727max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Asus ROG Ally X
MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
1686 (1452min - 1740max) MBit/s +115%
Ayaneo Kun
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
981 (888min - 1075max) MBit/s +25%
Ayaneo Flip KB
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
784 (630min - 810max) MBit/s
GPD Win Mini 2024 7"
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
715 (668min - 738max) MBit/s -9%
095190285380475570665760855950104511401235133014251520161517101805Tooltip
Ayaneo Flip KB AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1258 (706-1377)
GPD Win Mini 2024 7" AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1059 (984-1093)
Ayaneo Kun AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1607 (1530-1641)
Ayaneo Flip KB AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1487 (1288-1516)
GPD Win Mini 2024 7" AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1383 (1280-1406)
Ayaneo Kun AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1723 (874-1849)
Ayaneo Flip KB AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø784 (630-810)
GPD Win Mini 2024 7" AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø714 (668-738)
Ayaneo Kun AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø981 (888-1075)
Asus ROG Ally X AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1686 (1452-1740)
Ayaneo Flip KB AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø590 (447-727)
GPD Win Mini 2024 7" AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø711 (675-760)
Ayaneo Kun AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø944 (876-962)
Asus ROG Ally X AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1675 (1467-1867)

Input Devices

This model comes with the usual game controllers and also includes an optical finger mouse, a mini keyboard with F keys on top but without numpad and touchscreen functionality. While the d-pad, joysticks, trigger and shoulder buttons and the AYASpace interface shortcut buttons are ergonomic and can be accessed easily with average-sized hands, the small keyboard is rather hard to interact with while holding the console. A proper typing experience or more complex shortcut key combos actually require the user to lay the console down on a flat surface. Additionally, the optical finger mouse may prove glitchy especially for persons with larger thumbs. For the usual Windows tasks, the mouse functionality can be easily replaced with the responsive touchscreen.

Display: extra bright 1080p IPS touchscreen

Zoomed-in pixel matrix
Zoomed-in pixel matrix

Since this is a pre-production unit, the resolution on the display was locked at 1080p so all tests were run at  his resolution. However, this is the only issue with the display we found and Ayaneo promised to fix the problem with an update. Otherwise, this touchscreen comes with one of the brightest IPS panels we have tested on a handheld console, averaging 720 nits.

The black level is slightly raised compared to the competition, but the higher contrast helps offset this inconvenience. Backlight uniformity shows some bleeding along the left and right sides and lower corners. sRGb color reproduction is close to the maximum advertised and we managed to bring down the deltaE error under 2 with a proper calibration.

For indoor use, the glossy finish is great, yet it is not recommended for outdoor use because of pronounced glare. Viewing angles are good as well. We did not detect any PWM or flickering, and the BtW response of online 2 ms is quite impressive for this type of screen. Still, the GtG response is not that great for fast-paced shooting games.

739
cd/m²
716
cd/m²
670
cd/m²
754
cd/m²
741
cd/m²
678
cd/m²
780
cd/m²
726
cd/m²
677
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 780 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 720.1 cd/m² Minimum: 106 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 86 %
Center on Battery: 732 cd/m²
Contrast: 1512:1 (Black: 0.49 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 4.46 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.83}
calibrated: 1.94
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 4 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5.1}
69.57% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
96.63% sRGB (Argyll 3D)
69.47% Display P3 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.533
CCT: 6330 K
Ayaneo Flip KB
1920x1080, 7"
GPD Win Mini 2024 7"
TL070FVSX01-0, , 1920x1080, 7"
Ayaneo Kun
Ayaneo 2K, , 2560x1600, 8.4"
Asus ROG Ally X
TL070FVXS01-0, , 1920x1080, 7"
MSI Claw
TL070FVXS02-0, , 1920x1080, 7"
Display
-5%
23%
-3%
-2%
Display P3 Coverage
69.47
64.8
-7%
93.52
35%
66.2
-5%
67
-4%
sRGB Coverage
96.63
93.3
-3%
99.4
3%
93.4
-3%
94.4
-2%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
69.57
67
-4%
91.2
31%
68.5
-2%
69.4
0%
Response Times
-82%
-371%
-69%
-90%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
18.4 ?(5, 13.4)
8.9 ?(4.1, 4.8)
52%
24.2 ?(13.8, 10.4)
-32%
9.7 ?(4.4, 5.3)
47%
9.2 ?(4.6, 4.6)
50%
Response Time Black / White *
2 ?(1, 1)
6.3 ?(3.4, 2.9)
-215%
16.2 ?(7.6, 8.6)
-710%
5.7 ?(2.5, 3.2)
-185%
6.6 ?(3.1, 3.5)
-230%
PWM Frequency
20000
Screen
-1%
-12%
0%
6%
Brightness middle
741
493
-33%
680
-8%
484
-35%
477
-36%
Brightness
720
470
-35%
678
-6%
456
-37%
461
-36%
Brightness Distribution
86
86
0%
91
6%
88
2%
88
2%
Black Level *
0.49
0.47
4%
0.5
-2%
0.35
29%
0.32
35%
Contrast
1512
1049
-31%
1360
-10%
1383
-9%
1491
-1%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
4.46
2.36
47%
4
10%
2.9
35%
2.6
42%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
7.23
6.36
12%
9
-24%
7.1
2%
5.8
20%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
1.94
1.3
33%
1
48%
1.4
28%
1.5
23%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
4
4.4
-10%
9
-125%
4.5
-13%
3.9
2%
Gamma
2.533 87%
2.28 96%
2 110%
2.24 98%
2.17 101%
CCT
6330 103%
7142 91%
7188 90%
7534 86%
7250 90%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-29% / -14%
-120% / -56%
-24% / -10%
-29% / -10%

* ... smaller is better

Default grayscale
Default grayscale
Default color checker
Default color checker
Default saturation
Default saturation
Calibrated grayscale
Calibrated grayscale
Calibrated color checker
Calibrated color checker
Calibrated saturation
Calibrated saturation

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1 ms rise
↘ 1 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 9 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.5 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
18.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 5 ms rise
↘ 13.4 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 30 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8320 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

100% brightness
100% brightness
0% brightness
0% brightness
Backlight uniformity
Backlight uniformity
Direct sunlight
Direct sunlight
Indirect sunlight
Indirect sunlight

Performance: slower than average CPU, but decent iGPU

Testing Conditions

All the performance results were recorded with the Extreme profile enabled (unless otherwise stated), which sets FPS to unlimited, fans to auto and APU TDP to 30 W. The power plans are easily configurable through the AYASpace 2.0 pop-up UI accessible through a special button under the right side joystick. Many other settings can be configured on the fly, like the fan curves, game controllers, game launcher, app launcher etc.

AYASpace 2.0 pop-up UI
AYASpace 2.0 pop-up UI
AYASpace 2.0 System Info
AYASpace 2.0 System Info
AYASpace 2.0 Game Launcher
AYASpace 2.0 Game Launcher
AYASpace 2.0 Settings
AYASpace 2.0 Settings

Processor

The Flip KB is powered by the Ryzen 7 8840U APU, which can be configured to run between 3 W and 30 W TDP. It comes with 8 Ryzen 4 Cores and 16 threads that can boost to a maximum of 5.1 GHz. The APU is complemented by 32 GB of LPDDR5-6400 RAM. In our synthetic CPU tests, the Flip KB does not appear to be tuned for non-gaming tasks, as it generally places last or second to last. The R7 8840U implementations we have tested so far seem to be slower than the older 7840U, which is not limited to 30 W. On a positive note, the Cinebench R15 Multi Loop shows that the performance actually increases half-way.

CPU info
CPU info
Mobo
Mobo
RAM
RAM
RAM Speed
RAM Speed
Bench
Bench
HWInfo
HWInfo

Cinebench R15 Multi Loop

0125250375500625750875100011251250137515001625175018752000212522502375Tooltip
Ayaneo Flip KB AMD Ryzen 7 8840U: Ø1872 (1799.86-1946.66)
GPD Win Mini 2024 7" AMD Ryzen 7 8840U: Ø1530 (1503.99-1538.94)
Ayaneo Kun AMD Ryzen 7 7840U: Ø2405 (2346.87-2439.02)
Asus ROG Ally X AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme: Ø2187 (2041.02-2336.18)
Cinebench R20: CPU (Single Core) | CPU (Multi Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Single 64Bit | CPU Multi 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.5: Single-Core | Multi-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
684 Points +60%
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
672 Points +57%
GPD Win Mini 2024 7"
AMD Ryzen 7 8840U
670 Points +57%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (357 - 787, n=15, last 2 years)
629 Points +47%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
622 Points +46%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840U
  (427 - 680, n=5)
621 Points +45%
Ayaneo Flip KB
AMD Ryzen 7 8840U
427 Points
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
5917 Points +28%
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
5794 Points +26%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840U
  (3987 - 5336, n=5)
4817 Points +4%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
4805 Points +4%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (1521 - 6577, n=15, last 2 years)
4674 Points +1%
Ayaneo Flip KB
AMD Ryzen 7 8840U
4616 Points
GPD Win Mini 2024 7"
AMD Ryzen 7 8840U
3987 Points -14%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
GPD Win Mini 2024 7"
AMD Ryzen 7 8840U
268 Points +52%
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
262 Points +48%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
256 Points +45%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (155.1 - 304, n=14, last 2 years)
254 Points +44%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840U
  (176.6 - 275, n=5)
250 Points +42%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
246 Points +39%
Ayaneo Flip KB
AMD Ryzen 7 8840U
176.6 Points
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
2439 (2346.87min - 2439.02max) Points +25%
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
2336 (2041.02min - 2336.18max) Points +20%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840U
  (1539 - 2453, n=5)
2003 Points +3%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
1950 (1902.14min - 1950.08max) Points 0%
Ayaneo Flip KB
AMD Ryzen 7 8840U
1947 (1799.86min - 1946.66max) Points
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (689 - 2533, n=15, last 2 years)
1877 Points -4%
GPD Win Mini 2024 7"
AMD Ryzen 7 8840U
1539 (1503.99min - 1538.94max) Points -21%
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
GPD Win Mini 2024 7"
AMD Ryzen 7 8840U
315 Seconds * -11%
Ayaneo Flip KB
AMD Ryzen 7 8840U
283 Seconds *
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (189 - 588, n=13, last 2 years)
281 Seconds * +1%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840U
  (239 - 315, n=5)
264 Seconds * +7%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
246 Seconds * +13%
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
214 Seconds * +24%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
208 Seconds * +27%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
6077 MIPS +46%
GPD Win Mini 2024 7"
AMD Ryzen 7 8840U
6064 MIPS +45%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840U
  (4168 - 6469, n=5)
5727 MIPS +37%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
5490 MIPS +32%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
5318 MIPS +28%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (3653 - 6143, n=14, last 2 years)
5316 MIPS +28%
Ayaneo Flip KB
AMD Ryzen 7 8840U
4168 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
64454 MIPS +28%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
62156 MIPS +24%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840U
  (47579 - 59549, n=5)
54539 MIPS +9%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
53599 MIPS +7%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (19684 - 66618, n=14, last 2 years)
50981 MIPS +2%
Ayaneo Flip KB
AMD Ryzen 7 8840U
50223 MIPS
GPD Win Mini 2024 7"
AMD Ryzen 7 8840U
47579 MIPS -5%
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
1917 Points +50%
GPD Win Mini 2024 7"
AMD Ryzen 7 8840U
1879 Points +47%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
1780 Points +39%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840U
  (1278 - 1937, n=5)
1761 Points +38%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (875 - 2134, n=16, last 2 years)
1707 Points +34%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
1355 Points +6%
Ayaneo Flip KB
AMD Ryzen 7 8840U
1278 Points
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
10713 Points +16%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
10076 Points +9%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840U
  (8205 - 11296, n=5)
9600 Points +4%
Ayaneo Flip KB
AMD Ryzen 7 8840U
9258 Points
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (3932 - 11975, n=16, last 2 years)
8765 Points -5%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
8389 Points -9%
GPD Win Mini 2024 7"
AMD Ryzen 7 8840U
8205 Points -11%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
18.7 fps +25%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
18.6 fps +24%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (7.07 - 20.8, n=14, last 2 years)
15.4 fps +3%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840U
  (12.5 - 16.5, n=5)
15.2 fps +1%
Ayaneo Flip KB
AMD Ryzen 7 8840U
15 fps
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
14.7 fps -2%
GPD Win Mini 2024 7"
AMD Ryzen 7 8840U
12.5 fps -17%
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Ayaneo Flip KB
AMD Ryzen 7 8840U
63.8 s *
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (41.1 - 92.8, n=14, last 2 years)
55.2 s * +13%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840U
  (49 - 63.8, n=5)
53.6 s * +16%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
53.5 s * +16%
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
51.4 s * +19%
GPD Win Mini 2024 7"
AMD Ryzen 7 8840U
49.2 s * +23%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
46.2 s * +28%
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Ayaneo Flip KB
AMD Ryzen 7 8840U
0.678 sec *
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840U
  (0.4514 - 0.678, n=5)
0.512 sec * +24%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (0.4167 - 0.756, n=15, last 2 years)
0.508 sec * +25%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
0.4945 sec * +27%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
0.4912 sec * +28%
GPD Win Mini 2024 7"
AMD Ryzen 7 8840U
0.4765 sec * +30%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
0.4665 sec * +31%
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
0.4601 sec * +32%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1947 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
137.6 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
97.9 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
176.6 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
4616 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
427 Points
Cinebench R23 Single Core
1088 Points
Cinebench R23 Multi Core
11939 Points
Help

System Performance

Similar to the APU synthetic tests, the system tests performed with PCMark 10 show that the Flip KB is not particularly tuned for general tasks.

PCMark 10 / Score
Asus ROG Ally X
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
7149 Points +20%
GPD Win Mini 2024 7"
Radeon 780M, R7 8840U, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G
6643 Points +12%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M
  (5940 - 7098, n=5)
6631 Points +12%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (5219 - 7471, n=15, last 2 years)
6429 Points +8%
Ayaneo Kun
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
6330 Points +7%
Ayaneo Flip KB
Radeon 780M, R7 8840U, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00
5940 Points
PCMark 10 / Essentials
Asus ROG Ally X
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
10633 Points +11%
GPD Win Mini 2024 7"
Radeon 780M, R7 8840U, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G
10620 Points +11%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M
  (9541 - 10664, n=5)
10294 Points +8%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (8427 - 11262, n=15, last 2 years)
9897 Points +4%
Ayaneo Flip KB
Radeon 780M, R7 8840U, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00
9541 Points
Ayaneo Kun
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
9483 Points -1%
PCMark 10 / Productivity
Asus ROG Ally X
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
9912 Points +32%
GPD Win Mini 2024 7"
Radeon 780M, R7 8840U, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G
9742 Points +30%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M
  (7522 - 10386, n=5)
9257 Points +23%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (7213 - 10031, n=15, last 2 years)
8585 Points +14%
Ayaneo Kun
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
8089 Points +8%
Ayaneo Flip KB
Radeon 780M, R7 8840U, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00
7522 Points
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Asus ROG Ally X
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
9408 Points +19%
Ayaneo Kun
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
8975 Points +13%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (6350 - 10026, n=15, last 2 years)
8520 Points +7%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M
  (7690 - 8762, n=5)
8328 Points +5%
Ayaneo Flip KB
Radeon 780M, R7 8840U, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00
7926 Points
GPD Win Mini 2024 7"
Radeon 780M, R7 8840U, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G
7690 Points -3%
PCMark 10 Score
5940 points
Help

DPC Latency

DPC latency is somewhat high and LatencyMon suggests that real time audio is handled with difficulty. However, the latency is in line with that of a ROG Ally X equipped with a Z1 Extreme APU, but seems to be more than double over the Ryzen 7 7840U on the Ayaneo Kun.

LatencyMon Main
LatencyMon Main
LatencyMon Drivers
LatencyMon Drivers
4K Youtube video stats and CPU core utilization
4K Youtube video stats and CPU core utilization
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
GPD Win Mini 2024 7"
Radeon 780M, R7 8840U, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G
2500.2 μs * -55%
Ayaneo Flip KB
Radeon 780M, R7 8840U, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00
1611 μs *
Asus ROG Ally X
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1486.6 μs * +8%
Ayaneo Kun
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
744.2 μs * +54%

* ... smaller is better

Storage Devices

Based on the AS SSD and DiskSpd results, the WD PC SN740 SSD on the Flip KB console places second among the compared models. The throttling test shows oscillating performance on the Flip KB, yet the average speed still comes in second place.

WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00
Sequential Read: 4189MB/s
Sequential Write: 3878MB/s
4K Read: 50.8MB/s
4K Write: 117.7MB/s
4K-64 Read: 1611MB/s
4K-64 Write: 1220MB/s
Access Time Read: 0.075ms
Access Time Write: 0.033ms
Copy ISO: 1913.24MB/s
Copy Program: 424.14MB/s
Copy Game: 1273.33MB/s
Score Read: 2081Points
Score Write: 1726Points
Score Total: 4857Points
Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Average WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00
 
69.5 pt
Ayaneo Kun
Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
68.4 pt
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
 
65.1 pt
Ayaneo Flip KB
WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00
64.7 pt
MSI Claw
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
63.5 pt
Asus ROG Ally X
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
60.9 pt
DiskSpd
seq read
Ayaneo Flip KB
WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00
3494 (2414.66min - 3494.42max) MB/s
Average WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00
  (1734 - 3494, n=6)
3005 MB/s -14%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (431 - 5565, n=16, last 2 years)
2900 MB/s -17%
MSI Claw
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
2878 (2833.46min - 2878.46max) MB/s -18%
Asus ROG Ally X
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
2693 (2674.18min - 2692.74max) MB/s -23%
Ayaneo Kun
Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
463 (318.56min - 463.17max) MB/s -87%
Ayaneo Kun
Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
431 (334.87min - 430.55max) MB/s -88%
seq write
Average WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00
  (1597 - 4487, n=6)
3457 MB/s +5%
Ayaneo Flip KB
WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00
3281 (2073.66min - 3280.78max) MB/s
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (259 - 5102, n=16, last 2 years)
2865 MB/s -13%
Asus ROG Ally X
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
2768 (2498.37min - 2767.74max) MB/s -16%
MSI Claw
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
2758 (2188.17min - 2758.38max) MB/s -16%
Ayaneo Kun
Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
263 (255.13min - 262.56max) MB/s -92%
Ayaneo Kun
Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
259 (118.2min - 258.69max) MB/s -92%
seq q8 t1 read
Ayaneo Kun
Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
6987 (616.14min - 6987.16max) MB/s +36%
Ayaneo Kun
Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
6320 (613min - 6319.71max) MB/s +23%
Average WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00
  (5041 - 5265, n=6)
5175 MB/s +1%
Ayaneo Flip KB
WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00
5139 (3060.83min - 5139.28max) MB/s
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (2458 - 7005, n=16, last 2 years)
5024 MB/s -2%
Asus ROG Ally X
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
4952 (4163.75min - 4951.75max) MB/s -4%
MSI Claw
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
2458 (2277.98min - 2458.28max) MB/s -52%
seq q8 t1 write
Average WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00
  (1617 - 4595, n=6)
3790 MB/s +12%
Ayaneo Flip KB
WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00
3398 (2370.7min - 3398.23max) MB/s
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (256 - 6151, n=16, last 2 years)
3272 MB/s -4%
Asus ROG Ally X
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
3033 (2657.93min - 3033.11max) MB/s -11%
MSI Claw
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
2871 (2238.71min - 2871max) MB/s -16%
Ayaneo Kun
Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
259 (256.06min - 258.58max) MB/s -92%
Ayaneo Kun
Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
256 (243.34min - 256.39max) MB/s -92%
4k q1 t1 read
MSI Claw
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
68 (66.96min - 68max) MB/s +6%
Ayaneo Flip KB
WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00
64.1 (63.02min - 64.13max) MB/s
Average WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00
  (54 - 67.4, n=6)
60.1 MB/s -6%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (37.3 - 97.4, n=16, last 2 years)
58.8 MB/s -8%
Asus ROG Ally X
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
51.5 (50.22min - 51.53max) MB/s -20%
Ayaneo Kun
Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
39.1 (33.75min - 39.14max) MB/s -39%
Ayaneo Kun
Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
37.3 (36.41min - 37.3max) MB/s -42%
4k q1 t1 write
MSI Claw
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
226 (185.56min - 226.08max) MB/s +10%
Ayaneo Flip KB
WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00
205 (203.24min - 204.61max) MB/s
Ayaneo Kun
Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
192.3 (177.32min - 192.31max) MB/s -6%
Ayaneo Kun
Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
164.6 (149.63min - 164.58max) MB/s -20%
Average WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00
  (87.7 - 252, n=6)
180.8 MB/s -12%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (112 - 262, n=17, last 2 years)
177.7 MB/s -13%
Asus ROG Ally X
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
140.9 (139.71min - 140.94max) MB/s -31%
4k q32 t16 read
MSI Claw
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
2148 (2142.5min - 2147.8max) MB/s +69%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (86 - 4025, n=16, last 2 years)
1791 MB/s +41%
Average WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00
  (308 - 2684, n=6)
1432 MB/s +12%
Ayaneo Flip KB
WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00
1273 (466.76min - 1272.76max) MB/s
Asus ROG Ally X
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1106 (1031.05min - 1105.71max) MB/s -13%
Ayaneo Kun
Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
150.3 (144.83min - 150.29max) MB/s -88%
Ayaneo Kun
Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
86 (58.25min - 86max) MB/s -93%
4k q32 t16 write
Ayaneo Flip KB
WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00
2307 (1511.96min - 2306.7max) MB/s
Average WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00
  (209 - 2871, n=6)
1525 MB/s -34%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (89.1 - 3088, n=16, last 2 years)
1216 MB/s -47%
MSI Claw
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
542 (404.55min - 542.06max) MB/s -77%
Asus ROG Ally X
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
447 (437.78min - 446.91max) MB/s -81%
Ayaneo Kun
Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
262 MB/s -89%
Ayaneo Kun
Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
259 (220.73min - 258.5max) MB/s -89%
AS SSD
Score Total
Ayaneo Kun
Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
8425 Points +73%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (2412 - 8425, n=11, last 2 years)
5339 Points +10%
Ayaneo Flip KB
WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00
4857 Points
Average WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00
  (4065 - 6068, n=6)
4790 Points -1%
Asus ROG Ally X
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
4711 Points -3%
MSI Claw
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
4480 Points -8%
Score Read
Ayaneo Kun
Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
2527 Points +21%
MSI Claw
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
2189 Points +5%
Ayaneo Flip KB
WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00
2081 Points
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (842 - 2849, n=11, last 2 years)
2065 Points -1%
Average WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00
  (872 - 2238, n=6)
1517 Points -27%
Asus ROG Ally X
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1315 Points -37%
Score Write
Ayaneo Kun
Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
4632 Points +168%
Asus ROG Ally X
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
2787 Points +61%
Average WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00
  (1726 - 2803, n=6)
2521 Points +46%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (1161 - 4632, n=11, last 2 years)
2165 Points +25%
Ayaneo Flip KB
WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00
1726 Points
MSI Claw
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
1225 Points -29%
Seq Read
Ayaneo Kun
Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
5260 MB/s +26%
Ayaneo Flip KB
WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00
4189 MB/s
Ayaneo Flip KB
WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00
193.2 MB/s -95%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (193.2 - 5643, n=12, last 2 years)
3832 MB/s -9%
Average WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00
  (193.2 - 4236, n=7)
3593 MB/s -14%
Asus ROG Ally X
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
3524 MB/s -16%
MSI Claw
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
2601 MB/s -38%
Seq Write
Ayaneo Kun
Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
4573 MB/s +18%
Ayaneo Flip KB
WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00
3878 MB/s
Ayaneo Flip KB
WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00
80.9 MB/s -98%
Average WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00
  (80.9 - 4114, n=7)
3037 MB/s -22%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (80.9 - 5416, n=12, last 2 years)
3020 MB/s -22%
Asus ROG Ally X
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
2084 MB/s -46%
MSI Claw
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
1397 MB/s -64%
4K Read
Ayaneo Kun
Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
73.2 MB/s +44%
MSI Claw
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
64.6 MB/s +27%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (34 - 82.8, n=11, last 2 years)
58.9 MB/s +16%
Average WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00
  (50.2 - 58.5, n=6)
52.7 MB/s +4%
Ayaneo Flip KB
WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00
50.8 MB/s
Asus ROG Ally X
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
47.5 MB/s -6%
4K Write
Ayaneo Kun
Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
218 MB/s +85%
MSI Claw
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
200 MB/s +70%
Average WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00
  (117.7 - 217, n=6)
181.5 MB/s +54%
Asus ROG Ally X
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
167.9 MB/s +43%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (90.7 - 218, n=11, last 2 years)
158.4 MB/s +35%
Ayaneo Flip KB
WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00
117.7 MB/s
4K-64 Read
Ayaneo Kun
Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
1928 MB/s +20%
MSI Claw
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
1864 MB/s +16%
Ayaneo Flip KB
WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00
1611 MB/s
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (590 - 2260, n=11, last 2 years)
1590 MB/s -1%
Average WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00
  (403 - 1773, n=6)
1048 MB/s -35%
Asus ROG Ally X
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
915 MB/s -43%
4K-64 Write
Ayaneo Kun
Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
3957 MB/s +224%
Asus ROG Ally X
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
2411 MB/s +98%
Average WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00
  (1220 - 2374, n=6)
1986 MB/s +63%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (885 - 3957, n=11, last 2 years)
1768 MB/s +45%
Ayaneo Flip KB
WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00
1220 MB/s
MSI Claw
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
885 MB/s -27%
Access Time Read
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (0.025 - 0.151, n=11, last 2 years)
0.082 ms * -9%
Ayaneo Flip KB
WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00
0.075 ms *
MSI Claw
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
0.068 ms * +9%
Average WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00
  (0.022 - 0.075, n=6)
0.04183 ms * +44%
Asus ROG Ally X
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
0.03 ms * +60%
Ayaneo Kun
Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
0.029 ms * +61%
Access Time Write
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (0.016 - 0.084, n=11, last 2 years)
0.04055 ms * -23%
Ayaneo Flip KB
WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00
0.033 ms *
Average WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00
  (0.018 - 0.033, n=6)
0.02217 ms * +33%
Asus ROG Ally X
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
0.022 ms * +33%
MSI Claw
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
0.021 ms * +36%
Ayaneo Kun
Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
0.016 ms * +52%

* ... smaller is better

Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

035070010501400175021002450280031503500385042004550490052505600595063006650Tooltip
Ayaneo Flip KB WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø2624 (1934.2-3947.39)
Ayaneo Kun Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB: Ø903 (607.96-6879.08)
Ayaneo Kun Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø866 (612.58-6995.47)
Asus ROG Ally X WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø4825 (4360.49-4964.31)
MSI Claw Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø2087 (1879.68-2146.44)

GPU Performance

GPU-Z
GPU-Z

The Ryzen 7 8840U integrates a Radeon 780M GPU. Synthetic tests place the Flip KB second to last, but the situation is different in actual game scenarios.

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
13828 Points +23%
Average AMD Radeon 780M
  (7868 - 14274, n=67)
12390 Points +10%
MSI Claw
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
12205 Points +8%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (8360 - 13828, n=13, last 2 years)
11914 Points +6%
Ayaneo Flip KB
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8840U
11254 Points
GPD Win Mini 2024 7"
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8840U
10150 Points -10%
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
8775 Points +23%
MSI Claw
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
8618 Points +21%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (6580 - 9971, n=17, last 2 years)
8028 Points +13%
Average AMD Radeon 780M
  (4550 - 8904, n=69)
7700 Points +8%
Ayaneo Flip KB
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8840U
7129 Points
GPD Win Mini 2024 7"
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8840U
6683 Points -6%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
MSI Claw
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
3491 Points +37%
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
3196 Points +25%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (2058 - 4118, n=17, last 2 years)
2970 Points +16%
Average AMD Radeon 780M
  (1496 - 3196, n=69)
2696 Points +6%
Ayaneo Flip KB
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8840U
2554 Points
GPD Win Mini 2024 7"
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8840U
2444 Points -4%
3DMark 11 Performance
10973 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
6591 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
2832 points
Help

Gaming Performance

The Flip KB manages to beat the GPD model in most games, and sometimes it even beats the MSI Claw with its Arc 8-core iGPU in more demanding games like Cyberpunk and Baldur's Gate 3. Unfortunately, FSR and frame generation did not work well on the Flip KB because the early production unit had the screen resolution locked to 1080p. Ayaneo will unlock the resolution on mass-produced models. More demanding games do not hit 30 fps on ultra settings, but with FSR and FG enabled, these should see a decent boost with fps in the 30s. Older games like GTA V or Strange Brigade almost hit 60 fps on high settings.

When it comes to the influence of power profiles on the GPU performance, Balanced running at 15 W sees a ~33% decrease in performance compared to Extreme 30 W, while the Power Saver running at only 5 W sees a ~66% drop. There are no differences in performance when entering battery mode compared to powered mode.

Power PlanCyberpunk PL FHD Ultra
Furmark 1.32
Extreme (30 W)
21.5 fps
28 fps
Balanced (15 W)
14.24 fps
21 fps
Power Saver (5 W)
7.12 fps
8 fps


X-Plane 11.11
1920x1080 med (fps_test=2)
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
45.1 fps +24%
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
40.6 fps +11%
Average AMD Radeon 780M
  (26.2 - 49.1, n=72)
39.4 fps +8%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (26.2 - 65, n=19, last 2 years)
38.1 fps +4%
Ayaneo Flip KB
AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M
36.5 fps
GPD Win Mini 2024 7"
AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M
33.1 fps -9%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
27.5 fps -25%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
26.2 fps -28%
1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
38.9 fps +23%
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
33.2 fps +5%
Average AMD Radeon 780M
  (24.5 - 41.5, n=71)
33.1 fps +5%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (24.5 - 50.5, n=18, last 2 years)
32.6 fps +3%
Ayaneo Flip KB
AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M
31.5 fps
GPD Win Mini 2024 7"
AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M
27.4 fps -13%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
26.7 fps -15%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
24.5 fps -22%
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty
1920x1080 Low Preset (FSR off)
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
44.1 (37.1min - 52.9max) fps +17%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
43.9 (24.5min - 62.4max) fps +16%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
43.4 (30.1min - 81.1max) fps +15%
Average AMD Radeon 780M
  (23.9 - 52.1, n=53)
39.5 fps +4%
Ayaneo Flip KB
AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M
37.8 (29.9min - 48.3max) fps
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (25 - 52.1, n=23, last 2 years)
37.7 fps 0%
GPD Win Mini 2024 7"
AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M
32.7 (27.3min - 39.1max) fps -13%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
30.9 (26.2min - 35.9max) fps -18%
1920x1080 Medium Preset (FSR off)
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
34.3 (30min - 40.3max) fps +16%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
33.9 (25.1min - 47.8max) fps +15%
Average AMD Radeon 780M
  (16.3 - 37.5, n=48)
30.5 fps +3%
Ayaneo Flip KB
AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M
29.5 (24.5min - 35.8max) fps
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (16.3 - 37.4, n=18, last 2 years)
28.5 fps -3%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
25.3 (21.8min - 29.7max) fps -14%
GPD Win Mini 2024 7"
AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M
24.8 (20.9min - 29.5max) fps -16%
1920x1080 High Preset (FSR off)
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
27.3 (18.4min - 55.6max) fps +16%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
24.8 (18.7min - 37.8max) fps +5%
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
27.2 (23.2min - 32.8max) fps +15%
Average AMD Radeon 780M
  (13.8 - 29.6, n=49)
24.3 fps +3%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (13.8 - 31.4, n=19, last 2 years)
23.8 fps +1%
Ayaneo Flip KB
AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M
23.6 (18.7min - 30.6max) fps
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
21.9 (18.9min - 26.5max) fps -7%
GPD Win Mini 2024 7"
AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M
20.1 (16.8min - 24.8max) fps -15%
1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off)
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
22.9 (19.3min - 28.9max) fps +13%
Average AMD Radeon 780M
  (11.5 - 26.3, n=45)
20.9 fps +3%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (11.5 - 28.5, n=13, last 2 years)
20.4 fps 0%
Ayaneo Flip KB
AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M
20.3 (15.7min - 26.6max) fps
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
19.8 (16.6min - 24.6max) fps -2%
GPD Win Mini 2024 7"
AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M
16.9 (14.2min - 21.8max) fps -17%
1920x1080 30min Start Ultra Preset (FSR off)
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
21.6 (7.5min, 17.9P0.1, 18.4P1 - 84.9max) fps +6%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (13.5 - 25.3, n=10, last 2 years)
20.7 fps +1%
Ayaneo Flip KB
AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M
20.4 fps
Average AMD Radeon 780M
  (13 - 24.2, n=30)
19.7 fps -3%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
16.8 (2.63min, 3.78P0.1, 15.1P1 - 82.3max) fps -18%
GTA V
1920x1080 Lowest Settings possible
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
119.7 (15.6min, 52.6P1 - 182.8max) fps +47%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
113.6 (15.2min, 52.6P1 - 190.5max) fps +40%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
101 (14.6min, 47.6P1 - 160.7max) fps +24%
Average AMD Radeon 780M
  (60.9 - 130.2, n=42)
113.9 fps +40%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (72.2 - 137, n=12, last 2 years)
104.2 fps +28%
Ayaneo Flip KB
AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M
81.2 (12.5min, 55.6P1 - 213max) fps
1920x1080 Normal/Off AF:4x
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
120.9 (6.38min, 76.9P1 - 207max) fps +52%
Average AMD Radeon 780M
  (64.9 - 133.5, n=41)
115.5 fps +45%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (77.1 - 130.2, n=10, last 2 years)
105 fps +32%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
99.6 (16.7min, 50P1 - 168.1max) fps +25%
Ayaneo Flip KB
AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M
79.6 (15.1min, 50P1 - 135max) fps
1920x1080 High/On (Advanced Graphics Off) AA:2xMSAA + FX AF:8x
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
68.4 (2.94min, 41.7P1 - 120.5max) fps +29%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
65 (2.53min, 34.5P1 - 121.2max) fps +23%
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
66.5 (11.6min, 43.5P1 - 176.5max) fps +26%
Average AMD Radeon 780M
  (32.5 - 69.4, n=62)
59.6 fps +13%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (33.6 - 76.5, n=16, last 2 years)
56.7 fps +7%
Ayaneo Flip KB
AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M
52.9 (7.78min, 37P1 - 120.9max) fps
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
39.6 (1.981min, 23.8P1 - 120max) fps -25%
1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
27.1 (7.11min, 18.9P1 - 51.4max) fps +15%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
26.7 (3.65min, 16.9P1 - 43.7max) fps +13%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
26.5 (1.496min, 15.9P1 - 89.3max) fps +12%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (14 - 32.8, n=16, last 2 years)
24.7 fps +5%
Average AMD Radeon 780M
  (12.2 - 29, n=62)
24.5 fps +4%
Ayaneo Flip KB
AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M
23.6 (4.17min, 15.9P1 - 45.9max) fps
The Witcher 3
1920x1080 Medium Graphics & Postprocessing
Average AMD Radeon 780M
  (26.6 - 59.2, n=15)
51.4 fps +27%
Ayaneo Flip KB
AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M
40.6 fps
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (n=1last 2 years)
40.6 fps 0%
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
51 fps +43%
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
49 fps +38%
Average AMD Radeon 780M
  (21.3 - 52.2, n=50)
44.1 fps +24%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
43.3 fps +22%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (27.5 - 51, n=10, last 2 years)
42.2 fps +19%
GPD Win Mini 2024 7"
AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M
41.5 (38min - 46max) fps +17%
Ayaneo Flip KB
AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M
35.6 fps
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
33.9 fps +40%
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
31.1 fps +29%
Average AMD Radeon 780M
  (14.3 - 36, n=52)
27.9 fps +15%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (17.5 - 33.9, n=11, last 2 years)
27.1 fps +12%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
25.6 fps +6%
GPD Win Mini 2024 7"
AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M
25.1 (22min - 28max) fps +4%
Ayaneo Flip KB
AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M
24.2 fps
Dota 2 Reborn
1280x720 min (0/3) fastest
Average AMD Radeon 780M
  (34.7 - 164.8, n=71)
134.7 fps +288%
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
120.7 (109.6min) fps +248%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (34.7 - 166.6, n=19, last 2 years)
109.4 fps +215%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
108.7 (96.4min) fps +213%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
103.7 (92min) fps +199%
GPD Win Mini 2024 7"
AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M
107.9 (89.9min) fps +211%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
98.6 (62.9min) fps +184%
Ayaneo Flip KB
AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M
34.7 (32.5min) fps
1920x1080 high (2/3)
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
86.5 (77.6min) fps +174%
Average AMD Radeon 780M
  (31.6 - 100.9, n=71)
79.3 fps +151%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (31.6 - 92.1, n=18, last 2 years)
71.3 fps +126%
GPD Win Mini 2024 7"
AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M
67.8 (58.5min) fps +115%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
67.4 (41.1min) fps +113%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
63.8 (56.3min) fps +102%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
62.8 (55.5min) fps +99%
Ayaneo Flip KB
AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M
31.6 (29.6min) fps
1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
76.2 (68.4min) fps +147%
Average AMD Radeon 780M
  (30.8 - 91.2, n=71)
71.3 fps +131%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (30.8 - 85, n=18, last 2 years)
66.1 fps +115%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
63.6 (41.1min) fps +106%
GPD Win Mini 2024 7"
AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M
62.2 (53.9min) fps +102%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
59.7 (52.4min) fps +94%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
58.6 (51.9min) fps +90%
Ayaneo Flip KB
AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M
30.8 (28.6min) fps
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark
1280x720 Lite Quality
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
80.7 fps +14%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
79.1 fps +11%
Ayaneo Flip KB
AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M
71.1 fps
Average AMD Radeon 780M
  (41.1 - 84.5, n=67)
70 fps -2%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (44.7 - 87.6, n=16, last 2 years)
67.8 fps -5%
GPD Win Mini 2024 7"
AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M
63.2 fps -11%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
58.5 fps -18%
1920x1080 Standard Quality
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
39.6 fps +13%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (24 - 87.6, n=17, last 2 years)
39.2 fps +11%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
38.5 fps +9%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
35.9 fps +2%
Ayaneo Flip KB
AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M
35.2 fps
Average AMD Radeon 780M
  (20.5 - 41.5, n=69)
34.8 fps -1%
GPD Win Mini 2024 7"
AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M
32.3 fps -8%
1920x1080 High Quality
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
30 fps +14%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
28.6 fps +9%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (18.4 - 34.4, n=18, last 2 years)
26.6 fps +1%
Ayaneo Flip KB
AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M
26.3 fps
Average AMD Radeon 780M
  (14.6 - 30.8, n=70)
25.9 fps -2%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
25.4 fps -3%
GPD Win Mini 2024 7"
AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M
24.5 fps -7%
Strange Brigade
1920x1080 medium AA:medium AF:4
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
71 fps +10%
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
70.1 (36.7min, 60.4P1 - 100.1max) fps +9%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (46.2 - 81.7, n=17, last 2 years)
65.8 fps +2%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
65.6 (40.1min, 55.5P1 - 88.5max) fps +2%
Ayaneo Flip KB
AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M
64.3 (31min, 51.5P1 - 91.9max) fps
Average AMD Radeon 780M
  (31.7 - 72.5, n=56)
62.2 fps -3%
GPD Win Mini 2024 7"
AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M
59.7 (48.5min, 51.9P1 - 79.3max) fps -7%
1920x1080 high AA:high AF:8
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
60 (38.9min, 46.3P1 - 89.4max) fps +13%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
59 fps +11%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
56.6 fps +6%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (37 - 67.9, n=18, last 2 years)
54.1 fps +2%
Ayaneo Flip KB
AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M
53.3 (28.5min, 39.6P1 - 80.9max) fps
Average AMD Radeon 780M
  (27.3 - 60.6, n=56)
52.5 fps -2%
GPD Win Mini 2024 7"
AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M
49.7 (37.5min, 38.4P1 - 74.2max) fps -7%
1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
51.6 (35.6min, 40.1P1 - 79.5max) fps +13%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
49.1 (35.6min, 38.9P1 - 70.1max) fps +7%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
46 fps +1%
Ayaneo Flip KB
AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M
45.7 (27.3min, 34.4P1 - 63.9max) fps
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (30 - 56.1, n=18, last 2 years)
45.7 fps 0%
Average AMD Radeon 780M
  (23.5 - 52.1, n=57)
44.8 fps -2%
GPD Win Mini 2024 7"
AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M
42.6 (32min, 33.6P1 - 62.8max) fps -7%
Baldur's Gate 3
1920x1080 Low Preset AA:SM
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
41.1 fps +27%
Average AMD Radeon 780M
  (20.2 - 44.1, n=36)
36.2 fps +12%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (20.2 - 41.1, n=12, last 2 years)
33.7 fps +4%
Ayaneo Flip KB
AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M
32.4 fps
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
31.7 fps -2%
GPD Win Mini 2024 7"
AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M
30.2 fps -7%
1920x1080 Medium Preset AA:T
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
32.1 fps +25%
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
31.4 fps +23%
Average AMD Radeon 780M
  (15.7 - 36.8, n=39)
28.8 fps +13%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (15.7 - 33.5, n=15, last 2 years)
27.4 fps +7%
Ayaneo Flip KB
AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M
25.6 fps
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
24.8 fps -3%
GPD Win Mini 2024 7"
AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M
24.3 fps -5%
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
27.5 fps +27%
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
26.6 fps +23%
Average AMD Radeon 780M
  (13.3 - 30.6, n=39)
23.8 fps +10%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (13.8 - 29.4, n=14, last 2 years)
23.6 fps +9%
Ayaneo Flip KB
AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M
21.7 fps
GPD Win Mini 2024 7"
AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M
21.1 fps -3%
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
20.7 fps -5%
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T
Ayaneo Kun
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
26.5 fps +25%
Asus ROG Ally X
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
25.8 fps +22%
Average AMD Radeon 780M
  (12.8 - 29.6, n=38)
23.2 fps +9%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (13.5 - 29.1, n=14, last 2 years)
23 fps +8%
Ayaneo Flip KB
AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M
21.2 fps
MSI Claw
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
20.3 fps -4%
GPD Win Mini 2024 7"
AMD Ryzen 7 8840U, AMD Radeon 780M
20.2 fps -5%
lowmed.highultra
GTA V (2015) 52.9 23.6
The Witcher 3 (2015) 35.6 24.2
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 34.7 33.6 31.6 30.8
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 71.1 35.2 26.3
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 42 36.5 31.5
Strange Brigade (2018) 64.3 53.3 45.7
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) 32.4 25.6 21.7 21.2
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty (2023) 37.8 29.5 23.6 20.3

Cyberpunk 2077 ultra FPS Chart

0510152025Tooltip
Ayaneo Flip KB R7 8840U, Radeon 780M: Ø20.4 (9.45-27.28)
Asus ROG Ally X Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M: Ø21.6 (20.2-22.9)
MSI Claw Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core: Ø16.8 (12.2-19.3)

Emissions & Energy

System Noise

Even though the chassis is bulkier than most competitors, the vapor chamber cooling system is considerably louder in maximum load scenarios. Idle and medium loads are mostly in line with the competition. The fan curve can be easily adjusted in the AYASpace 2.0 suite when using less demanding games.

Noise Level

Idle
29.65 / 29.65 / 29.65 dB(A)
Load
37.78 / 52.79 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 23.83 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2023.725.822.422.124.423.72525.230.926.627.726.725.23125.222.324.325.334.525.24020.921.223.519.826.720.95025.9253525.732.725.96323.225.322.121.128.723.28023.523.622.821.72623.510020.921.420.817.124.820.91252324.622.218.619.6231602425.622.215.712.72420025.226.923.614.111.925.225028292417132831528.228.922.316.11528.240028.3302315.516.628.350026.928.320.516.214.526.963029.431.822.815.211.429.480030.432.123.715.510.830.4100035.733.724.713.910.335.7125033.935.424.814.39.833.916003737.224.112.39.837200036.439.523.414.610.436.425003741.722.719.310.837315038.940.629.116.511.238.94000424330.118.712.142500042.444.426.31611.942.463004546.623.613.511.945800037.940.221.313.511.837.91000032.635.222.213.311.932.61250032.935.118.414.511.732.91600027.428.536.134.511.727.4SPL5152.837.829.723.851N6.97.82.60.90.56.9median 32.6median 33.7median 23.4median 15.5median 11.9median 32.6Delta55.71.81.71.85hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseAyaneo Flip KB
Ayaneo Flip KB
Radeon 780M, R7 8840U, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00
GPD Win Mini 2024 7"
Radeon 780M, R7 8840U, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G
Ayaneo Kun
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, Phison M.2 2280 E18 4000GB
Asus ROG Ally X
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
MSI Claw
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS1T02
Noise
10%
5%
8%
3%
off / environment *
23.83
24.2
-2%
24.7
-4%
25.7
-8%
Idle Minimum *
29.65
24.7
17%
25.31
15%
24.7
17%
25.7
13%
Idle Average *
29.65
26.2
12%
25.31
15%
24.7
17%
31.7
-7%
Idle Maximum *
29.65
28
6%
34.5
-16%
28.5
4%
31.7
-7%
Load Average *
37.78
34.2
9%
34.9
8%
42.6
-13%
36.6
3%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra *
50.95
42.6
16%
45.5
11%
Load Maximum *
52.79
42.5
19%
50.78
4%
42.6
19%
45.5
14%
Witcher 3 ultra *
43

* ... smaller is better

Temperature

In idle state, both the top and bottom sides appear to be relatively warm, but mostly in line compared to other models. On the other hand, in full load, the upper side (left side of the keyboard) is warmer than the bottom side, because the fan exhausts are placed near the upper edge with the ports.

Max. Load
 48 °C
118 F
45 °C
113 F
27 °C
81 F
 
 49 °C
120 F
46 °C
115 F
28 °C
82 F
 
 42 °C
108 F
41 °C
106 F
28 °C
82 F
 
Maximum: 49 °C = 120 F
Average: 39.3 °C = 103 F
27 °C
81 F
44 °C
111 F
27 °C
81 F
34 °C
93 F
29 °C
84 F
29 °C
84 F
31 °C
88 F
32 °C
90 F
29 °C
84 F
Maximum: 44 °C = 111 F
Average: 31.3 °C = 88 F
Power Supply (max.)  49.6 °C = 121 F | Room Temperature 25.3 °C = 78 F | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Fluke 62 Max
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 39.3 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 31.6 °C / 89 F for the devices in the class Handheld / UMPC.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 49 °C / 120 F, compared to the average of 38.4 °C / 101 F, ranging from 26.6 to 55 °C for the class Handheld / UMPC.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 38 °C / 100 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 34.9 °C / 95 F, compared to the device average of 31.6 °C / 89 F.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 42 °C / 107.6 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 30.5 °C / 86.9 F (-11.5 °C / -20.7 F).
Keyboard temperatures (Idle)
Keyboard temperatures (Idle)
Back temperatures (idle)
Back temperatures (idle)
Power adapter temeperatures (idle)
Power adapter temeperatures (idle)
Front temperatures (Stress test)
Front temperatures (Stress test)
Back temperatures (Stress test)
Back temperatures (Stress test)
Power adapter temeperatures (Stress test)
Power adapter temeperatures (Stress test)

Speakers

Despite the more compact size of this model, the speakers are surprisingly loud, even louder than 2W stereo speakers on some 17-inch laptops. Of course, the downside is very weak bass frequencies.

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2024.424.124.42530.433.830.43122.730.722.74020.517.920.55031.829.831.86319.920.219.9802519.82510031.516.831.512537.814.437.816044.912.744.920050.612.350.625054.915.454.931556.51656.540058.917.458.950061.41461.463068.110.168.1800749.774100074.410.474.4125075.29.975.2160073.89.673.8200070.310.370.3250070.611.170.6315069.211.469.2400072.412.272.4500073.912.173.9630066.61266.6800064.612.264.61000068.11268.11250056.611.856.61600039.51239.5SPL83.623.883.6N57.20.557.2median 66.6median 12median 66.6Delta8.61.78.6hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseAyaneo Flip KB
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Ayaneo Flip KB audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.1% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 56% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 39% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 18%, worst was 23%
Compared to all devices tested
» 43% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 49% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Power Consumption

Idle power consumption is slightly higher compared to other competitors. Full load power consumption is the most linear among the compared models, while the Cyberpunk 2077 test shows initial variations, but the average consumption is almost in line with models powered by more powerful APUs like the Z1 and the Core Ultra 7 155H.

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 1.66 / 1.71 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 11.37 / 12.6 / 16.53 Watt
Load midlight / 55.3 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy

Power Consumption Cyberpunk / Stress Test

05101520253035404550556065Tooltip
Ayaneo Flip KB R7 8840U, Radeon 780M; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø54.9 (54.4-55.3)
GPD Win Mini 2024 7" R7 8840U, Radeon 780M; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø33.2 (31.8-34.9)
Asus ROG Ally X Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø57.4 (49.9-66.8)
MSI Claw Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø53.4 (52.1-64.5)
Ayaneo Flip KB R7 8840U, Radeon 780M; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø11.5 (10.9-12.3)
GPD Win Mini 2024 7" R7 8840U, Radeon 780M; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø6.54 (6.07-8.13)
Asus ROG Ally X Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø5.9 (4.88-7.6)
MSI Claw Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø9.74 (8.62-11)
Ayaneo Flip KB R7 8840U, Radeon 780M; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR 150cd: Ø51.1 (40.7-52.7)
Asus ROG Ally X Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR 150cd: Ø61.3 (54.4-62)
MSI Claw Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR 150cd: Ø54.4 (50.2-56.2)

Power Consumption external Monitor

No graph data

Battery Life

Wi-Fi websurfing battery runtime is the lowest in this comparison. The GPD model has a comparable battery and the same APU, but manages to last 59% longer. Demanding games like Cyberpunk 2077 deplete the battery in less than an hour, but the battery runtime can be managed efficiently by adjusting the power profile. Setting up limits like the balanced profile (15 W TDP), limiting framerate to 60 fps and lowering the brightness to 50%, a game like Strange Brigade ran for 101 minutes. Of course, less demanding games can be ran with 30 fps limits and even lower TDP settings which would allow the battery to last even more.

Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing
Asus ROG Ally X
Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M, 80 Wh
949 min +191%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (326 - 1413, n=14, last 2 years)
575 min +76%
GPD Win Mini 2024 7"
R7 8840U, Radeon 780M, 44 Wh
518 min +59%
MSI Claw
Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 53 Wh
466 min +43%
Ayaneo Flip KB
R7 8840U, Radeon 780M, 45 Wh
326 min
Battery Runtime
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra 150cd
0h 51min
WiFi Websurfing
5h 26min
Gaming
1h 41min

Notebookcheck Rating

With its elegant and compact clamshell design, the Ayaneo Flip KB offers a comfortable handheld gaming experience. The Radeon 780M GPU performance is in line even with more powerful competitors, despite the 30 W TDP limit. RAM and storage are fast enough and the screen is one of the brightest we have tested for this class. Connectivity is future proof with USB4 and OCuLink and the special control software is on point. Some downsides include the cooling system that is a bit noisy in full load and  the reduced battery runtime.

Ayaneo Flip KB - 12/02/2024 v8
Bogdan Solca

Chassis
82 / 98 → 83%
Mechanical Inputs
81%
Pointing Device
94%
Connectivity
59 / 68 → 87%
Weight
81 / 69-83 → 84%
Battery
66%
Display
74%
Games Performance
50 / 75 → 66%
Application Performance
76 / 92 → 82%
AI Performance
71%
Temperature
87%
Noise
67%
Audio
77 / 91 → 85%
Average
57%
77%
Handheld / UMPC - Weighted Average
CO2 Emissions
No Data
Materials
50%
Packaging
50%
Power Use
66.6%
Repairability
40%
Software Updates
50%
Recycle Logo Total Sustainability Score: 42.8%

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Price comparison

Read all 1 comments / answer
static version load dynamic
Loading Comments
Comment on this article
Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Reviews > Ayaneo Flip KB review - handheld console with great functionality powered by the less efficient AMD Ryzen 7 8840U
Bogdan Solca, 2024-12- 2 (Update: 2024-12- 2)