ERROR: No CPU found with the ID:17594

getCPUInfos: Perhaps the translation is missing or the German CPU is not selected in the page header (or a wrong one is selected) Intel Core i5-10200H vs unknown
Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i5-10200H vs unknown

Intel Core i5-10200H

► remove from comparison Intel i5-10200H

The Intel Core i5-10200H is a fast quad-core processor for laptops with four cores based on the Comet Lake-H series (4th generation of Skylake architecture). The processor clocks at between 2.4 and 4.1 GHz  and can execute up to eight threads simultaneously thanks to Hyper-Threading. According to Intel, the CPU is manufactured on 14nm (14nm++) process.

The Comet Lake architecture is similar to Coffee Lake and offers the same features and is produced in the same 14nm process. Other than the improved clock rates, the memory controller now also supports faster DDR4-2933 RAM. More information on Comet Lake and all the models and articles on it can be found here.

The Core i5-10200H supports no vPro, TXT or SIPP. These business features are available in the faster (and later released) Core i5-10400H (2.6 - 4.6 GHz).

Performance

The performance is only minimal better than the Core i5-9300H thanks to the support for faster DDR4-2933 RAM. This means, the CPU is well suited for demanding tasks, although the faster versions offer a significantly higher Turbo Boost clock speed for faster single core execution. 

Power consumption

This 10th gen Comet Lake processor has a default TDP (also known as the long-term power limit) of 45 W, a value that laptop manufacturers are allowed to reduce somewhat, 35 W being the lower limit. Doing so will result in lower clock speeds and lower performance. Either way, this CPU is too power-hungry to be used as the base of a passively cooled laptop.

Intel Core i5-10200H is built with an old, as of late 2022, 14 nm Intel process for subpar energy efficiency.

ModelIntel Core i5-10200Hunknown
CodenameComet Lake-H
SeriesIntel Comet Lake
Series: Comet Lake Comet Lake-H
Intel Core i9-10980HK2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Xeon W-10885M2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10885H2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10880H2.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10875H2.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10870H2.2 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10850H2.7 - 5.1 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Xeon W-10855M2.8 - 5.1 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10750H2.6 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10500H2.5 - 4.5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10400H2.6 - 4.6 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10300H2.5 - 4.5 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10200H « 2.4 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Clock2400 - 4100 MHz
L1 Cache256 KB
L2 Cache1 MB
L3 Cache8 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 8
TDP45 Watt
Technology14 nm
max. Temp.100 °C
SocketBGA1440
FeaturesDDR4-2933 RAM, PCIe 3, 8 GT/s bus, MMX, BMI2, AES-NI, SSE4.1, ABM, VMX, EIST, RDRAND, SSE4.2, TM1, RDSEED, SSE, AVX, FMA, SMEP, TM2, SSE2, AVX2, ADX, SMAP, HT, SGX, SSE3, Turbo, SSSE3, MPX, SST
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 610 (350 - 1050 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-10200H
28.3 pt (47%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
5372 Points (5%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
1089 Points (46%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
419 Points (46%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
2082 Points (5%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
842 Points (5%)
123%
1 unknown +
min: 1029     avg: 1038     median: 1038 (7%)     max: 1047 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
171.6 Points (48%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
21148 MIPS (12%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
4497 MIPS (53%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
6.5 fps (11%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
515 Seconds (4%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.7 sec (15%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
6233 Points (15%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
51050 Points (41%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
100%
1 unknown +
37732 Points (30%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
7729 Points (20%)
115%
1 unknown +
8923 Points (23%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
10760 Points (19%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
3613 Points (15%)
139%
1 unknown +
5039 Points (21%)
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Single-Core
1480 Points (36%)
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Multi-Core
5122 Points (20%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1093     avg: 1094     median: 1094 (42%)     max: 1095 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 3564     avg: 3845     median: 3845 (7%)     max: 4126 Points
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Multi Thread
100%
1 unknown +
13 MFLOPS (0%)
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Single Thread
100%
1 unknown +
12.8 MFLOPS (1%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
882 ms (1%)
min: 14670     avg: 14812     median: 14811.5 (17%)     max: 14953 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 0.9.1 Total Score *
100%
1 unknown +
7004 ms (66%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
100%
1 unknown +
min: 2672     avg: 2740     median: 2753 (2%)     max: 2794 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
187.3 Points (34%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
99.5 Watt (17%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
4.9 Watt (6%)
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
77 Points per Watt (57%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-10200H → 0% n=0

Average Benchmarks unknown → 0% n=0

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.34
log 19. 10:44:35

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 17594 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 12747 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 1859 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1760863474s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 19 Oct 2025 05:20:51 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.003s ... 0.003s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.003s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 17594 +0.001s ... 0.004s

#9 got single benchmarks 17594 +0s ... 0.004s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 12747 +0.004s ... 0.008s

#11 got single benchmarks 12747 +0.006s ... 0.014s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 1859 +0.001s ... 0.014s

#13 got single benchmarks 1859 +0.105s ... 0.12s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.12s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.014s ... 0.134s

#16 return log +0s ... 0.134s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)