Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core m3-8100Y vs Intel Processor N200 vs Intel Core i5-8210Y

Intel Core m3-8100Y

► remove from comparison

The Intel Core m3-8100Y is a very efficient dual-core SoC for tablets and passively cooled notebooks based on the Amber Lake generation and will be announced around August 2018. The CPU consists of two processor cores clocked at 1.1 - 3.4 GHz. Thanks to Hyper Threading, the processor can execute up to four threads simultaneously. The chips also includes the Intel HD Graphics 615 GPU, a dual-channel memory controller (DDR3L/LPDDR3) as well as VP9 and H.265 video de- and encoder.  Compared to the Kaby Lake-Y predecessors (e.g. Core m3-7Y32), Amber Lake uses the same architecture produced in the improved 14nm+ FinFET process (no 14nm++) but offers higher clock speeds at an increased TDP rating.

Architecture

Intel basically used the familiar micro architecture from the Skylake / Kaby Lake generation, so the per-MHz performance is identical.

Performance

The performance of the Y series is highly depending on the cooling solution of the laptop / tablet and the TDP settings for sustained load. Therefore, the differences between a Core m3 and a i7 may be rather slim, if the thermals are very limited. The high Turbo clock speeds in Amber Lake should however lead to a very good single thread performance for short bursts.

Graphics

The integrated Intel HD Graphics 615 GPU has 24 Execution Units (EUs) like the old HD Graphics 515 and runs with clocks between 300 and 950 MHz in combination with this processor. The performance heavily depends on the TDP limit as well as the memory configuration; with fast LPDDR3-1866 RAM in dual-channel mode, the GPU should sometimes be able to compete with the HD Graphics 520, but can also be much slower in other scenarios. Modern games from 2016 will, if at all, only run smoothly in the lowest settings.

Contrary to Skylake, Kaby Lake and Amber Lake now also supports hardware decoding for H.265/HEVC Main10 with a 10-bit color depth as well as Google's VP9 codec.

Power Consumption

The chip is manufactured in the old 14 nm+ process with FinFET transistors. The typical TDP for the Amber Lake Y-series is specified at 5 Watts (previous generations were 4.5 Watt), and can be adjusted in both directions depending on the usage scenario.

Intel Processor N200

► remove from comparison Intel N200

The Intel Processor N200 is an entry-level mobile CPU for thin and light laptops from the Alder Lake-N series. It was announced in early 2023 and offers no performance cores and 4 of the 8 efficient cores (E-cores, Gracemont architecture). The chip does not support HyperThreading and clocks with up to 3.7 GHz. The performance of the E-cores should be similar to old Skylake cores (compare to the Core i7-6700HQ). All cores can use up to 6 MB L3-cache. 

Performance

The performance is clearly lower than the Core i3-N300 and N305 due to the reduced core count. Compared to older processors, the N200 should be similar to a Core i5-8250U (4 cores with HyperThreading, 3.4 GHz, 15W) when the power limit is not restricting performance.

Features

The Alder Lake-N chips only support single channel memory with up to DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 or LPDDR5-4800. The chip also supports Quick Sync and AV1 decoding (most likely same engine as in Alder Lake). Furthermore, Wi-Fi 6E and Bluetooth 5.2 are partly integrated (but no Thunderbolt). External chips can be connected via PCIe Gen3 x9 (via the PCH).

The integrated graphics adapter is based on the Xe-architecture and offersall 32 EUs (Execution Units) operating at only 450 - 750 MHz. Due to the single channel memory, low clock speeds and low shader count, the gaming performance of the iGPU is very limited.

Power consumption

The N200 has a base power consumption of only 6 W and is therefore suited for fanless cooling. The CPU is built with a further improved 10nm SuperFin process at Intel (called Intel 7).

Intel Core i5-8210Y

► remove from comparison

The Intel Core i5-8210Y is a very efficient dual-core SoC for (passively) cooled notebooks based on the Amber Lake generation and was announced on 30th October 2018 with the new MacBook Air. The CPU consists of two processor cores clocked at 1.6 - 3.6 GHz and a TDP of 7 Watt. Thanks to Hyper Threading, the processor can execute up to four threads simultaneously. The chips also includes the Intel HD Graphics 617 GPU, a dual-channel memory controller (DDR3L/LPDDR3) as well as VP9 and H.265 video de- and encoder. Compared to the Kaby Lake-Y predecessors (e.g. Core i7-7Y75), Amber Lake uses the same architecture produced in the improved 14nm+ FinFET process (no 14nm++) but offers higher clock speeds at an increased TDP rating. The Core i5-8200Y is very similar when configured to 7 Watt (cTDP up) and offers even higher Turbo clocks, but a slightly slower GPU (-100 MHz).

Architecture

Intel basically used the familiar micro architecture from the Skylake / Kaby Lake generation, so the per-MHz performance is identical.

Performance

The performance of the Y series is highly depending on the cooling solution of the laptop / tablet and the TDP settings for sustained load. Therefore, the differences between a Core m3 and a i7 may be rather slim, if the thermals are very limited. The high Turbo clock speeds in Amber Lake should however lead to a very good single thread performance for short bursts.

Graphics

The integrated Intel HD Graphics 617 GPU has 24 Execution Units (EUs) like the old HD Graphics 515 and runs with clocks between 300 and 1050 MHz in combination with this processor. The performance heavily depends on the TDP limit as well as the memory configuration; with fast LPDDR3-1866 RAM in dual-channel mode, the GPU should sometimes be able to compete with the HD Graphics 520, but can also be much slower in other scenarios. Modern games from 2016 will, if at all, only run smoothly in the lowest settings.

Contrary to Skylake, Kaby Lake and Amber Lake now also supports hardware decoding for H.265/HEVC Main10 with a 10-bit color depth as well as Google's VP9 codec.

Power Consumption

The chip is manufactured in the 14 nm+ process with FinFET transistors. The typical TDP for the Amber Lake Y-series is specified at 5 Watts, but the i5-8210Y is specified at 7 Watt (for the MacBook Air).

ModelIntel Core m3-8100YIntel Processor N200Intel Core i5-8210Y
CodenameAmber Lake-YAlder Lake-NAmber Lake-Y
SeriesIntel Amber LakeIntel Alder Lake-NIntel Amber Lake
Series: Amber Lake Amber Lake-Y
Intel Core i5-10310Y1.1 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10210Y1 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8500Y1.5 - 4.2 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i3-10110Y1 - 4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8210Y1.6 - 3.6 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8200Y1.3 - 3.9 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i3-10100Y1.3 - 3.9 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core m3-8100Y « 1.1 - 3.4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 6500Y1.1 - 3.4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i3-N3051.8 - 3.8 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i3-N300 - 3.8 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N200 « 1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N97 - 3.6 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N95 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N1001 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N501 - 3.4 GHz2 / 2 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10310Y1.1 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10210Y1 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8500Y1.5 - 4.2 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i3-10110Y1 - 4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8210Y « 1.6 - 3.6 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8200Y1.3 - 3.9 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i3-10100Y1.3 - 3.9 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core m3-8100Y1.1 - 3.4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 6500Y1.1 - 3.4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Clock1100 - 3400 MHz1000 - 3700 MHz1600 - 3600 MHz
L1 Cache128 KB128 KB
L2 Cache512 KB512 KB
L3 Cache4 MB6 MB4 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 44 / 4
4 x 3.7 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core
2 / 4
TDP5 Watt6 Watt7 Watt
Technology14 nm10 nm14 nm
max. Temp.100 °C105 °C100 °C
SocketBGABGA
FeaturesDual-Channel DDR3L-1600/LPDDR3-1866 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NI, vPro, TXTDual-Channel DDR3L-1600/LPDDR3-2133 Memory Controller (16 GB max), HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NI, vPro, TXT
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 615 (300 - 950 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) (450 - 750 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 617 (300 - 1050 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
$281 U.S.$281 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.comark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - m3-8100Y
19.5 pt (32%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - N200
20.7 pt (34%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-8210Y
22.5 pt (37%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
100%
1 N200 +
45 Points (25%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
100%
1 N200 +
91 Points (2%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
100%
1 N200 +
1406 Points (1%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
100%
1 N200 +
690 Points (29%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 232     avg: 257.7     median: 243 (26%)     max: 298 Points
109%
N200 +
265 Points (29%)
312 Points (34%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 382     avg: 440.7     median: 413 (1%)     max: 527 Points
131%
N200 +
542 Points (1%)
601 Points (1%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 157     avg: 190.8     median: 179.5 (1%)     max: 247 Points
122%
N200 +
219 Points (1%)
min: 254     avg: 269.5     median: 269.5 (2%)     max: 285 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 91     avg: 101.3     median: 96.6 (27%)     max: 121 Points
117%
N200 +
113 Points (31%)
min: 127     avg: 129.5     median: 129.5 (36%)     max: 132 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 N200 +
2.7 Points (4%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
1 N200 +
1.4 Points (32%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
3850 Points (23%)
102%
1 N200 +
3937 Points (24%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
6055 Points (4%)
125%
1 N200 +
7549 Points (5%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
100%
1 N200 +
11030 Points (7%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
100%
1 N200 +
5971 Points (7%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
906 s (11%)
104%
1 N200 +
875 s (10%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
18.6 s (4%)
71%
1 N200 +
26 s (5%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
1646 Points (3%)
128%
1 N200 +
2115 Points (3%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 4937     avg: 6246     median: 6245.5 (4%)     max: 7554 MIPS
114%
N200 +
7146 MIPS (4%)
7936 MIPS (5%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 2683     avg: 2983     median: 2982.5 (35%)     max: 3282 MIPS
108%
N200 +
3230 MIPS (38%)
3405 MIPS (40%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
11.2 fps (0%)
146%
1 N200 +
16.3 fps (0%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
58.3 fps (1%)
137%
1 N200 +
80 fps (2%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 1.42     avg: 1.7     median: 1.7 (3%)     max: 1.96 fps
1.5 fps (3%)
2.3 fps (4%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.2 GB/s (5%)
169%
1 N200 +
0.3 GB/s (8%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.3 GB/s (5%)
205%
1 N200 +
0.6 GB/s (10%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
1.7 GB/s (4%)
188%
1 N200 +
3.2 GB/s (8%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
100%
1 N200 +
4297 Seconds (55%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 1893     avg: 2206     median: 2206 (16%)     max: 2519 Seconds
103%
N200 +
2150 Seconds (15%)
1680 Seconds (12%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.942     avg: 1.1     median: 1.1 (23%)     max: 1.204 sec
93%
1 N200 +
1.1 sec (25%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 N200 +
3902 Points (8%)
3544 Points (8%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
11.4 s (2%)
61%
1 N200 +
18.8 s (4%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
29.5 s (1%)
69%
1 N200 +
42.7 s (2%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
818 s (4%)
81%
1 N200 +
1011 s (4%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 N200 +
9491 Points (7%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 2165     avg: 2747     median: 2579.5 (6%)     max: 3665 Points
107%
N200 +
2765 Points (7%)
min: 3311     avg: 3571     median: 3571 (9%)     max: 3831 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 24135     avg: 26883     median: 26882.5 (22%)     max: 29630 Points
103%
1 N200 +
27649 Points (22%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 20632     avg: 22076     median: 22076 (18%)     max: 23520 Points
130%
1 N200 +
28655 Points (23%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 18736     avg: 26552     median: 26177 (21%)     max: 34742 Points
133%
N200 +
34749 Points (28%)
17419 Points (14%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 1941     avg: 2084     median: 1968 (5%)     max: 2460 Points
145%
N200 +
2848 Points (7%)
2252 Points (6%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 2692     avg: 2986     median: 2837.5 (5%)     max: 3577 Points
146%
N200 +
4135 Points (7%)
min: 3028     avg: 3110     median: 3110 (6%)     max: 3192 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 943     avg: 1061     median: 992 (4%)     max: 1248 Points
126%
N200 +
1251 Points (5%)
min: 1194     avg: 1205     median: 1204.5 (5%)     max: 1215 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core
100%
1 N200 +
956 Points (24%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core
100%
1 N200 +
1660 Points (6%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
100%
1 N200 +
853 Points (27%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
100%
1 N200 +
1375 Points (6%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 809     avg: 846     median: 845.5 (33%)     max: 882 Points
110%
1 N200 +
928 Points (36%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 1178     avg: 1397     median: 1396.5 (3%)     max: 1615 Points
110%
1 N200 +
1540 Points (3%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
765 Points (3%)
116%
N200 +
891 Points (4%)
660 Points (3%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
1279 Points (4%)
119%
N200 +
1518 Points (5%)
1433 Points (5%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
4159 Points (42%)
109%
N200 +
4552 Points (45%)
4162 Points (42%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
6934 Points (7%)
144%
N200 +
9989 Points (10%)
7474 Points (7%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
4043 Points (45%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
6676 Points (9%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
5446 Points (10%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
2702 Points (35%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
5958 Points (9%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
3081 Points (46%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
8823 Points (47%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
6189 Points (43%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
5047 Points (10%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
6364 Points (13%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
6113 Points (16%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 1295     avg: 1652     median: 1715 (2%)     max: 2163 ms
117%
N200 +
1460 ms (2%)
min: 817     avg: 906     median: 906 (1%)     max: 995 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
min: 117.4     avg: 211     median: 211 (2%)     max: 304.6 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 14701     avg: 21429     median: 20267 (15%)     max: 29318 Points
min: 29470     avg: 33003     median: 33003 (24%)     max: 36536 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 128     avg: 134.5     median: 135.5 (24%)     max: 139 Points
126%
1 N200 +
171.3 Points (31%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
5961 Points (31%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
25599 Points (55%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
9760 Points (64%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
13598 Points (68%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
100%
1 N200 +
614 Points (23%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 N200 +
14.1 Watt (2%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 N200 +
13.6 Watt (2%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 N200 +
6.1 Watt (4%)
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
100%
1 N200 +
16.1 Points per Watt (12%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core m3-8100Y → 100% n=18

Average Benchmarks Intel Processor N200 → 120% n=18

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-8210Y → 123% n=18

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.33
log 11. 16:36:12

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 10086 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 14930 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 10886 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1757601372s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 10 Sep 2025 11:38:25 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.007s ... 0.007s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.007s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 10086 +0.004s ... 0.011s

#9 got single benchmarks 10086 +0.008s ... 0.02s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 14930 +0.004s ... 0.023s

#11 got single benchmarks 14930 +0.006s ... 0.029s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 10886 +0.004s ... 0.033s

#13 got single benchmarks 10886 +0.004s ... 0.037s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.037s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.053s ... 0.091s

#16 return log +0s ... 0.091s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)