Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i9-10910 vs AMD Ryzen 7 5700X

Intel Core i9-10910

► remove from comparison Intel i9-10910

The Intel Core i9-10910 is a high-end processor for desktops with ten cores based on the Comet Lake architecture (CML-S, 4th generation of Skylake). The processor clocks at between 3.6 and 5.0 GHz (all 10 cores up to 4.6 GHz) and can execute up to twenty threads simultaneously thanks to Hyper-Threading. The 5.0 GHz can be only achieved below 70°C core temperature (Thermal Velocity Boost of 100 MHz).

The processor is still manufactured in the old 14nm (14nm++) process. Compared to the predecessor, the Core i9-9900K, the 10900K offers increased clock speeds and two more cores.

The Comet Lake architecture is similar to Coffee Lake and offers the same features and is produced in the same 14nm process. Other than the improved clock rates, the memory controller now also supports faster DDR4-2933 RAM. More information on Comet Lake and all the models and articles on it can be found here.

Performance

Thanks to the high Turbo Boost, the CPU is the fastest gaming CPU available at the time of announcement. Using all cores, the i9 however is slower than the top Ryzen CPUs (like the Ryzen 9 3950X) which offer more cores.

Graphics

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics 630 iGPU is supposed to offer a similar performance as the UHD630 in the Core i7-9900K. As a  low-end solution it will only run current games smoothly at reduced details - if at all.

Power Consumption

Intel specifies the TDP with 125 Watts (PL1) but under full load up to 250 Watt are consumed (PL2). In default mode these 250 Watt and therefore high clock speeds can be maintained for up to 56 seconds, however, all boards offer the option to alter these settings.

AMD Ryzen 7 5700X

► remove from comparison AMD R7 5700X

The AMD Ryzen 7 5700X is a desktop processor with 8 cores and simultaneous multithreading (SMT), which means it can process 16 threads simultaneously. In April 2022, AMD presented the Ryzen 7 5700X, a new 8-core processor that is very similar to the AMD Ryzen 7 5800X. However, due to the lower TDP, there are no restrictions on the clock frequency. Nevertheless, the AMD Ryzen 7 5700X reaches up to 4.6 GHz in boost, which is only 100 MHz less than the AMD Ryzen 7 5800X. However, the base clock drops significantly to 3.4 GHz.

The performance of the AMD Ryzen 7 5700X is consistently excellent in all applications. The native 8-core can really show off its strengths, especially in multi-threaded applications, although the single-core performance has also been significantly improved compared to the older Zen 2 architecture.

The internal structure of the processor is similar to the AMD Ryzen 7 5800X. The CCX modules are also connected to each other via the I/O die, which we already know from Zen2. However, according to AMD, the Infinity Fabric should now achieve clock rates of up to 2 GHz, which in turn enables a RAM clock rate of 4,000 MHz without any loss of performance.

In terms of manufacturing processes, AMD also relies on TSCM for the 7nm production of the CPU cores in the Vermeer processors, although the I/O die is still supplied in 12 nm by Globalfoundries.

The AMD Ryzen 7 5700X is impressive in gaming thanks to the significantly improved IPC compared to Zen2. In terms of power consumption, the AMD Ryzen 7 5700X impresses with its low TDP of just 65 watts. This means that the processor can also be operated with a compact air cooler without any problems. The AMD Ryzen 7 5800X is operated with a TDP of 105 watts.

ModelIntel Core i9-10910AMD Ryzen 7 5700X
CodenameComet Lake-SVermeer (Zen 3)
SeriesIntel Comet LakeAMD Vermeer (Ryzen 5000)
Series: Vermeer (Ryzen 5000) Vermeer (Zen 3)
Intel Core i9-10850K compare3.6 - 5.2 GHz10 / 20 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10910 « 3.6 - 5 GHz10 / 20 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i3-10320 compare3.8 - 4.6 GHz4 / 8 cores7.9 MB L3
Intel Core i3-10100 compare3.6 - 4.3 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X compare3.4 - 4.9 GHz16 / 32 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X compare3.8 - 4.7 GHz8 / 16 cores32 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 5700X « 3.4 - 4.6 GHz8 / 16 cores32 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X compare3.7 - 4.6 GHz6 / 12 cores32 MB L3
Clock3600 - 5000 MHz3400 - 4600 MHz
L1 Cache640 KB512 KB
L2 Cache2.5 MB4 MB
L3 Cache20 MB32 MB
Cores / Threads10 / 208 / 16
TDP125 Watt65 Watt
Technology14 nm7 nm
max. Temp.100 °C90 °C
SocketLGA 12001331
FeaturesTVB, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, Quick Sync, VirtualizationMMX(+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, x86-64, AMD-V, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHA, Precision Boost 2
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 630
Architecturex86x86
$488 U.S.$299 U.S.
Announced
Die Size2 x 74 sq. mm; I/O = 125 sq. mm mm2
Manufacturerwww.amd.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i9-10910
34.3 pt (57%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R7 5700X
37.8 pt (63%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
13184 Points (12%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
1499 Points (63%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
501 Points (55%)
595 Points (65%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
5196 Points (13%)
5405 Points (13%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
2302 Points (15%)
2329 Points (15%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
215 Points (60%)
253 Points (70%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
25.6 Points (33%)
26.5 Points (34%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
2.4 Points (58%)
2.9 Points (70%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
8131 Points (49%)
6527 Points (39%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
57842 Points (42%)
42876 Points (31%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
74898 Points (48%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
12419 Points (15%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
89.6 s (1%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
3.4 s (1%)
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 1024m *
243.5 s (1%)
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 32m *
7.8 s (4%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
8613 Points (14%)
12478 Points (20%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
60747 MIPS (35%)
65777 MIPS (38%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
5690 MIPS (67%)
6522 MIPS (77%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
134.7 fps (45%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
305 fps (70%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
16.8 fps (30%)
17.1 fps (30%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1.2 GB/s (35%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
1.9 GB/s (33%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
13.4 GB/s (35%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
374 Seconds (5%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
208 Seconds (1%)
221 Seconds (2%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.5 sec (12%)
0.5 sec (10%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
14862 Points (32%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
7.6 s (2%)
9.5 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
16.8 s (1%)
20.4 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
432.5 s (2%)
460.7 s (2%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
77709 Points (60%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
18348 Points (45%)
20010 Points (49%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
90009 Points (73%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
90305 Points (73%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
92849 Points (77%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
20598 Points (52%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
25520 Points (46%)
27800 Points (50%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
11771 Points (50%)
10432 Points (44%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core
2186 Points (55%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core
9331 Points (36%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
2100 Points (67%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
9252 Points (38%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
1381 Points (54%)
1647 Points (64%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
10244 Points (18%)
9353 Points (17%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1587 Points (7%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
9214 Points (29%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
6928 Points (69%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
37730 Points (38%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
737 ms (1%)
579 ms (1%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
55976 Points (42%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
236 Points (65%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
236 Points (42%)
310 Points (56%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
1423 Points (53%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
185.9 Watt (32%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
155.2 Watt (28%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
40.9 Watt (27%)
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
15 Points per Watt (11%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i9-10910 → 100% n=24

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 5700X → 105% n=24

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.33
log 16. 10:47:14

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 12832 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 15075 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1752655634s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 16 Jul 2025 05:20:08 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.005s ... 0.005s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.005s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 12832 +0.006s ... 0.011s

#8 got single benchmarks 12832 +0.006s ... 0.016s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 15075 +0.005s ... 0.021s

#10 got single benchmarks 15075 +0.005s ... 0.026s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.026s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.046s ... 0.072s

#13 return log +0.003s ... 0.075s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)