Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i7-8500Y vs Intel Celeron N4000

Intel Core i7-8500Y

► remove from comparison

The Intel Core i7-8500Y is a very efficient dual-core SoC for tablets and passively cooled notebooks based on the Amber Lake generation and will be announced around August 2018. It is the fastest Amber Lake-Y CPU at the time of announcement and consists of two processor cores clocked at 1.5 - 4.2 GHz. Thanks to Hyper Threading, the processor can execute up to four threads simultaneously. The chips also includes the Intel HD Graphics 615 GPU, a dual-channel memory controller (DDR3L/LPDDR3) as well as VP9 and H.265 video de- and encoder. Compared to the Kaby Lake-Y predecessors (e.g. Core i7-7Y75), Amber Lake uses the same architecture produced in the improved 14nm+ FinFET process (no 14nm++) but offers higher clock speeds at an increased TDP rating.

Architecture

Intel basically used the familiar micro architecture from the Skylake / Kaby Lake generation, so the per-MHz performance is identical.

Performance

The performance of the Y series is highly depending on the cooling solution of the laptop / tablet and the TDP settings for sustained load. Therefore, the differences between a Core m3 and a i7 may be rather slim, if the thermals are very limited. The high Turbo clock speeds in Amber Lake should however lead to a very good single thread performance for short bursts.

Graphics

The integrated Intel HD Graphics 615 GPU has 24 Execution Units (EUs) like the old HD Graphics 515 and runs with clocks between 300 and 950 MHz in combination with this processor. The performance heavily depends on the TDP limit as well as the memory configuration; with fast LPDDR3-1866 RAM in dual-channel mode, the GPU should sometimes be able to compete with the HD Graphics 520, but can also be much slower in other scenarios. Modern games from 2016 will, if at all, only run smoothly in the lowest settings.

Contrary to Skylake, Kaby Lake and Amber Lake now also supports hardware decoding for H.265/HEVC Main10 with a 10-bit color depth as well as Google's VP9 codec.

Power Consumption

The chip is manufactured in the second generation 14 nm+ process with FinFET transistors. The typical TDP for the Amber Lake Y-series is specified at 5 Watts (previous generations were 4.5 Watt), and can be adjusted in both directions depending on the usage scenario.

Intel Celeron N4000

► remove from comparison Intel Celeron N4000

The Intel Celeron N4000 is a dual-core SoC designed for affordable laptops and mini-PCs and was announced late 2017. It runs at 1.1 GHz to 2.6 GHz (Single Core Burst, Multi Core Burst maxes out at 2.5 GHz) and is based on the Gemini Lake platform. Similar to the Apollo Lake predecessor, the chip is manufactured on a 14 nm process with FinFETs but offers slightly improved processor cores, double the amount of L2 cache, all in a smaller package. Partial Wi-Fi 5 support is baked into the chip. Besides two CPU cores, the chip also includes a DirectX 12 capable GPU as well as a DDR4/LPDDR4 memory controller (dual-channel, up to 2400 MHz). The SoC is not replaceable as it is directly soldered to the mainboard.

Architecture

The processor architecture was slightly reworked and is now called Goldmont Plus. It features a larger L2 cache (4 MB). That means the per-clock-performance should be a bit better, but not anywhere near the Core CPUs like Kaby Lake Y.

Performance

The average N4000 in our database only just matches the Core i5-4300Y, a fairly old dual-core processor of nearly the same energy efficiency, in multi-thread performance. In other words, the Celeron is a very slow processor that's good enough for the most basic of tasks only. Expect long load times no matter the app.

Graphics

The UHD Graphics 600 (Gemini Lake) is based on Intel's Generation 9 architecture, which supports DirectX 12 and is also used for the Kaby Lake / Skylake / Apollo Lake graphics adapters (like HD Graphics 520). Equipped with 12 EUs and a clock of up to 650 MHz, the performance should be roughly on par with the older HD Graphics 500 (Apollo Lake).

The chip also includes an advanced video engine with hardware support for the playback of VP9 and H.265 (8-bit color-depth).

Power consumption

Like most other N-class Intel chips, the Celeron N4000 has a 6 W TDP (also known as the long-term power limit). This is not much at all, allowing laptop makers to build passively cooled laptops, tablets, mini-PCs around the chip. The SoC can briefly consume up to 15 W, though, depending on how a system is configured.

Last but not the least, this Celeron is manufactured on one of the old 14 nm Intel processes leading to poor, as of early 2023, energy efficiency.

ModelIntel Core i7-8500YIntel Celeron N4000
CodenameAmber Lake-YGemini Lake
SeriesIntel Amber LakeIntel Gemini Lake
Series: Gemini Lake Gemini Lake
Intel Core i5-10310Y compare1.1 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10210Y compare1 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8500Y « 1.5 - 4.2 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i3-10110Y compare1 - 4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8210Y compare1.6 - 3.6 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8200Y compare1.3 - 3.9 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i3-10100Y compare1.3 - 3.9 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core m3-8100Y compare1.1 - 3.4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 6500Y compare1.1 - 3.4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron J4105 compare1.5 - 2.5 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Pentium Silver N5000 compare1.1 - 2.7 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron J4005 compare2 - 2.7 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron J4115 compare1.8 - 2.5 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N4100 compare1.1 - 2.4 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N4000 « 1.1 - 2.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Clock1500 - 4200 MHz1100 - 2600 MHz
L1 Cache128 KB
L2 Cache512 KB4 MB
L3 Cache4 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 42 / 2
TDP5 Watt6 Watt
Technology14 nm14 nm
max. Temp.100 °C105 °C
SocketBGABGA1090
FeaturesDual-Channel DDR3L-1600/LPDDR3-1866 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NI, vPro, TXTDDR4-2400/LPDDR4-2400 RAM, PCIe 2, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SMEP, SMAP, MPX, EIST, TM1, TM2, Turbo, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SGX
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 615 (300 - 1000 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 600 (200 - 650 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
$107 U.S.
Manufacturerark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i7-8500Y
23.5 pt (39%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Celeron N4000
14.7 pt (24%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 304     avg: 312     median: 312 (34%)     max: 320 Points
160 Points (17%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 584     avg: 588     median: 587.5 (1%)     max: 591 Points
273 Points (1%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 245     avg: 252.3     median: 246.5 (2%)     max: 271 Points
min: 121     avg: 132.7     median: 138 (1%)     max: 139 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 126     avg: 129.8     median: 130.5 (36%)     max: 132 Points
min: 65     avg: 70.3     median: 70.9 (20%)     max: 75 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 2.45     avg: 2.5     median: 2.5 (3%)     max: 2.53 Points
1.7 Points (2%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 1.43     avg: 1.5     median: 1.5 (34%)     max: 1.47 Points
0.9 Points (21%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 4898     avg: 5027     median: 5027 (30%)     max: 5156 Points
2152 Points (13%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 8493     avg: 8706     median: 8706 (6%)     max: 8919 Points
4030 Points (3%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
673 s (8%)
1007 s (12%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
15.5 s (3%)
31.9 s (6%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
2483 Points (4%)
760 Points (1%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 7982     avg: 10709     median: 10709 (6%)     max: 13436 MIPS
4114 MIPS (2%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 3568     avg: 4368     median: 4367.5 (51%)     max: 5167 MIPS
2298 MIPS (27%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
14.1 fps (0%)
9.5 fps (0%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
83.3 fps (2%)
47.3 fps (1%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
2.1 fps (4%)
0.8 fps (1%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.2 GB/s (7%)
0.1 GB/s (3%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.4 GB/s (6%)
0.1 GB/s (2%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
2.2 GB/s (6%)
0.9 GB/s (2%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 1772     avg: 1966     median: 1965.5 (14%)     max: 2159 Seconds
4736 Seconds (33%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
1.7 sec (36%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 3015     avg: 3056     median: 3056 (7%)     max: 3097 Points
2259 Points (5%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
9.3 s (2%)
25.3 s (5%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
22.4 s (1%)
57.5 s (2%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
657 s (3%)
1295 s (6%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
8123 Points (6%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 2942     avg: 3242     median: 3254.5 (8%)     max: 3516 Points
min: 1638     avg: 1713     median: 1712.5 (4%)     max: 1787 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 25064     avg: 29890     median: 28391 (23%)     max: 36216 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 26981     avg: 31559     median: 31558.5 (26%)     max: 36136 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 35630     avg: 38017     median: 38016.5 (31%)     max: 40403 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 2260     avg: 2753     median: 2896 (7%)     max: 2959 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 3308     avg: 3993     median: 4201 (7%)     max: 4261 Points
1974 Points (4%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 1204     avg: 1292     median: 1240 (5%)     max: 1431 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
1389 Points (16%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 431     avg: 433.5     median: 433.5 (16%)     max: 436 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 797     avg: 802     median: 801.5 (1%)     max: 806 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
858 Points (4%)
434 Points (2%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
1504 Points (5%)
791 Points (2%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 3910     avg: 4398     median: 4397.5 (44%)     max: 4885 Points
1862 Points (19%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 6223     avg: 7224     median: 7224 (7%)     max: 8225 Points
3219 Points (3%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
5614 Points (10%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
3245 Points (42%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 1281     avg: 1499     median: 1446 (2%)     max: 1822 ms
min: 2306     avg: 2382     median: 2381.5 (3%)     max: 2457 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
446.5 ms (5%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 22283     avg: 24377     median: 24631.5 (18%)     max: 25962 Points
15679 Points (11%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 71.2     avg: 78.6     median: 78.6 (14%)     max: 86 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
6152 Points (32%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
22786 Points (49%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
7604 Points (50%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
10205 Points (51%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-8500Y → 100% n=32

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron N4000 → 50% n=32

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.34
log 05. 21:27:40

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 10088 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 9426 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1759692460s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 04 Oct 2025 05:18:30 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.005s ... 0.006s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.006s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 10088 +0.004s ... 0.009s

#8 got single benchmarks 10088 +0.009s ... 0.019s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 9426 +0.004s ... 0.022s

#10 got single benchmarks 9426 +0.013s ... 0.036s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.036s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.036s ... 0.072s

#13 return log +0.003s ... 0.075s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)