Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i7-12700K vs AMD Ryzen 7 7700X

Intel Core i7-12700K

► remove from comparison Intel i7-12700K

The Intel Core i7-12700K is a high end CPU for desktops based on the Alder Lake architecture. It was first announced in November 2021 and offers 8 performance cores and 4 efficiency cores. The performance cores (P-cores) support HyperThreading, leading to 20 Threads that can be processed at once. The performance cores can clock with up to 5 GHz (Turbo Boost Max 3.0), the efficiency cores can clock with up to 3.9 GHz. All cores can use 25 MB Smart Cache. The integrated memory controller supports up to 128 GB DDR5 with 4800 MT/s (dual channel).

Thread Director (in hardware) can support the operating system to decide which thread to use on the performance or efficiency cores for the best performance.

The integrated graphics adapter is based on the Xe-architecture and called Intel UHD Graphics 770. It clocks between 300 and 1.5 GHz.

For AI tasks, the CPU also integrates GNA 3.0 and DL Boost. Quick Sync in version 8 is the same as in the Rocket Lake CPUs and supports MPEG-2, AVC, VC-1 decode, JPEG, VP8 decode, VP9, HEVC and AV1 decode in hardware.

Performance

The average 12700K in our database is way ahead of the Ryzen 7 5800X and the Ryzen 9 3900X, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. Which is a very, very impressive result, as of late 2022.

Power consumption

This Core i7 series chip has a Base power consumption of 125 W, with its highest Intel-recommended Turbo power consumption sitting at 190 W. It might be a good idea to get an AIO cooling solution for a chip this power hungry.

The i7-12700K is manufactured on Intel's fourth-generation 10 nm process marketed as Intel 7 for lower-than-average, as of early 2023, energy efficiency.

AMD Ryzen 7 7700X

► remove from comparison AMD R7 7700X

The AMD Ryzen 7 7700X is a fast high-end desktop processor of the Raphael series. It offers 8 cores based on the Zen 4 architecture that supports hyperthreading (16 threads). The cores clock from 4.5 (base) up to 5.4 GHz (single core boost). Compared to the faster Ryzen 9 CPUs (like the 7900X), the R7 offers less cores and slightly lower clock speeds.

The performance of the R7 7700X is clearly better than the old Ryzen 7 of the 5000 generation thanks to the improved architecture and modern 5nm process. Compared to Intels Alder Lake Core i7-12900K the performance is quite similar but stays behind the newer Rocket Lake i5-13600K (multi-threaded).

The Raphael series still uses a chiplet design with two CCD-clusters (each with 8 possible cores, so only one used for the 7700X) in 5nm and an IO-die (including the memory controller and the Radeon Graphics iGPU) in 6nm.

ModelIntel Core i7-12700KAMD Ryzen 7 7700X
CodenameAlder LakeRaphael (Zen4)
SeriesIntel Alder Lake-SAMD Raphael (Zen 4, Ryzen 7000)
Series: Raphael (Zen 4, Ryzen 7000) Raphael (Zen4)
Intel Core i9-12900K compare3.2 - 5.2 GHz16 / 24 cores30 MB L3
Intel Core i9-12900 compare2.4 - 5.1 GHz16 / 24 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i7-12700K « 2.7 - 5 GHz12 / 20 cores25 MB L3
Intel Core i7-12700F compare3.3 - 4.9 GHz12 / 20 cores25 MB L3
Intel Core i7-12700 compare3.3 - 4.9 GHz12 / 20 cores25 MB L3
Intel Core i5-12600K compare2.8 - 4.9 GHz10 / 16 cores20 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D compare4.2 - 5.7 GHz16 / 32 cores128 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X compare4.7 - 5.6 GHz12 / 24 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 7900 compare3.7 - 5.4 GHz12 / 24 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 7700X « 4.5 - 5.4 GHz8 / 16 cores32 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 7700 compare3.8 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores32 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D compare4.2 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores96 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 7600X compare4.7 - 5.3 GHz6 / 12 cores32 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 7600 compare3.8 - 5.1 GHz6 / 12 cores32 MB L3
Clock2700 - 5000 MHz4500 - 5400 MHz
L2 Cache12 MB8 MB
L3 Cache25 MB32 MB
Cores / Threads12 / 208 / 16
TDP125 Watt170 Watt
Technology10 nm5 nm
max. Temp.100 °C95 °C
SocketLGA1700AM5 (LGA 1718)
FeaturesDDR4-3200/DDR5-4800 RAM, PCIe 5, Thr. Dir., DL Boost, GNA, vPro Enterp., MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, HT, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHAMMX(+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, x86-64, AMD-V, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512F, FMA3, SHA, Precision Boost 2
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 770 (300 - 1500 MHz)AMD Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) (400 - 2200 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
$409 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comwww.amd.com
L1 Cache512 KB
Transistors9.9 Million
Voltage0.650 - 1.475V V
Die Size2x 70 (CCD) mm2 + 122 (I/O) mm2

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i7-12700K
41.2 pt (69%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R7 7700X
45.1 pt (75%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 17003     avg: 19784     median: 19784 (18%)     max: 22565 Points
min: 18667     avg: 19088     median: 19088 (18%)     max: 19509 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1806     avg: 1851     median: 1850.5 (78%)     max: 1895 Points
min: 1986     avg: 1987     median: 1987 (84%)     max: 1988 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 731     avg: 736     median: 735.5 (80%)     max: 740 Points
min: 772     avg: 773     median: 772.5 (84%)     max: 773 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 6953     avg: 7801     median: 7800.5 (19%)     max: 8648 Points
min: 7308     avg: 7463     median: 7462.5 (18%)     max: 7617 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
3325 Points (21%)
min: 3036     avg: 3114     median: 3113.5 (20%)     max: 3191 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
272 Points (75%)
min: 314     avg: 315     median: 315 (87%)     max: 316 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
38.4 Points (50%)
36.1 Points (47%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
3.3 Points (78%)
3.7 Points (88%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
9305 Points (56%)
8633 Points (52%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
63484 Points (46%)
56024 Points (41%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
102539 Points (65%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
15179 Points (18%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
171.2 s (2%)
61.1 s (1%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
2.7 s (1%)
2.2 s (0%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
10389 Points (16%)
14879 Points (24%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 65508     avg: 73439     median: 73438.5 (42%)     max: 81369 MIPS
min: 85624     avg: 85707     median: 85706.5 (49%)     max: 85789 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 6117     avg: 6270     median: 6269.5 (74%)     max: 6422 MIPS
min: 8052     avg: 8074     median: 8074 (95%)     max: 8096 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
179 fps (5%)
181.2 fps (5%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
349.5 fps (9%)
373.5 fps (10%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 14.9     avg: 20.5     median: 20.5 (36%)     max: 26.1 fps
min: 24.8     avg: 25.5     median: 25.5 (45%)     max: 26.1 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1.6 GB/s (47%)
1.4 GB/s (41%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
2.8 GB/s (48%)
2.3 GB/s (40%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
15.7 GB/s (41%)
17.5 GB/s (46%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 255     avg: 261     median: 261 (3%)     max: 267 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 152.3     avg: 173.1     median: 173.1 (1%)     max: 193.9 Seconds
min: 160     avg: 163     median: 163 (1%)     max: 166 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.412     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (9%)     max: 0.423 sec
min: 0.3758     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (8%)     max: 0.383 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
16827 Points (36%)
18115 Points (39%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
7.3 s (2%)
6.3 s (1%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
16.6 s (1%)
13.6 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
387 s (2%)
322.8 s (1%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
93250 Points (72%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 23129     avg: 24947     median: 24947 (61%)     max: 26765 Points
31467 Points (77%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
109742 Points (89%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
112268 Points (91%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
109389 Points (88%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 21804     avg: 23017     median: 23017 (58%)     max: 24230 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 31240     avg: 34160     median: 34159.5 (61%)     max: 37079 Points
35357 Points (63%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 13915     avg: 15550     median: 15550 (66%)     max: 17185 Points
14182 Points (60%)
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Single-Core
2580 Points (64%)
3050 Points (76%)
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Multi-Core
16200 Points (63%)
16000 Points (62%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1890     avg: 1912     median: 1911.5 (73%)     max: 1933 Points
2218 Points (84%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 12475     avg: 14016     median: 14016 (25%)     max: 15557 Points
min: 13889     avg: 14131     median: 14131 (25%)     max: 14373 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1835     avg: 1841     median: 1840.5 (8%)     max: 1846 Points
2123 Points (9%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 12318     avg: 13879     median: 13879 (44%)     max: 15440 Points
14215 Points (45%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
8133 Points (81%)
8991 Points (90%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
55786 Points (55%)
56909 Points (56%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 496     avg: 498     median: 498 (1%)     max: 500 ms
440 ms (1%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
301 Points (83%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 301     avg: 303.5     median: 303.5 (54%)     max: 306 Points
355 Points (64%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
1999 Points (75%)
min: 2297     avg: 2313     median: 2312.5 (86%)     max: 2328 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 132.1     avg: 206.6     median: 206.6 (36%)     max: 281 Watt
min: 189.8     avg: 209.9     median: 209.9 (36%)     max: 230 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
278.2 Watt (51%)
min: 196.1     avg: 218.1     median: 218.1 (40%)     max: 240 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 89.8     avg: 94     median: 94 (62%)     max: 98.2 Watt
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
12 Points per Watt (9%)
min: 13.3     avg: 14.4     median: 14.4 (11%)     max: 15.5 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-12700K → 100% n=41

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 7700X → 113% n=41

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.33
log 28. 23:36:02

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14033 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 14655 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1759095362s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 28 Sep 2025 05:17:48 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.008s ... 0.008s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.008s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 14033 +0.004s ... 0.012s

#8 got single benchmarks 14033 +0.006s ... 0.018s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 14655 +0.004s ... 0.022s

#10 got single benchmarks 14655 +0.005s ... 0.027s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.027s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.046s ... 0.074s

#13 return log +0.003s ... 0.076s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)