Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i5-9400F vs AMD Ryzen 5 7600X

Intel Core i5-9400F

► remove from comparison Intel i5-9400F

The Intel Core i5-9400F is a six-core desktop processor based on the Coffee Lake architecture introduced in October 2018 along with the flagship Intel Core i9-9900K. The processor clocks at 2.9-4.1 GHz and can process up to 6 threads simultaneously. The Intel Core i5-9400F is manufactured in the improved 14-nm process (14nm++).

Performance

Compared to the Intel Core i5-8400, the performance could only be increased slightly. Performance increases of up to 10 percent can be expected. Both processors (old and new) still do not offer hyperthreading. The performance increase therefore only adds up to small architecture improvements and a slightly higher basic and turbo clock rate. This CPU is suitable for everyday office use, which does not require large coolers due to the low waste heat. But games are also among the application areas, because in games the Intel Core i5-9400F clearly beats the Intel Core i3-9100F. Here the six cores are paying off in the meantime. 

Graphics unit

The Intel Core i5-9400F is a processor without integrated graphics unit. If you value an iGPU, you should take a closer look at the Intel Core i5-9400, as it offers the entry level Intel UHD Graphics 630.

Power consumption

Intel puts the Thermal Design Power (TDP) at 65 watts. This means there is no need for large cooling systems, which also allows installation in very compact housings.

AMD Ryzen 5 7600X

► remove from comparison AMD R5 7600X

The AMD Ryzen 5 7600X is a fast mid-range desktop processor of the Raphael series. It offers 6 cores based on the Zen 4 architecture that supports hyperthreading (12 threads). The cores clock from 4.7 (base) up to 5.7 GHz (single core boost). When all 6 cores are fully loaded, 5.3 GHz is the max. clock speed. 

The performance of the R5 7600X is clearly better than the old Ryzen 5 5600X thanks to the improved architecture and modern 5nm process. The single core performance is very good thanks to the high turbo clock speed (-400 MHz compared to the high end CPUs like the Ryzen 9 7950X). The multi-threaded performance is of course not that competitive due to only 6 cores.

The Raphael series still uses a chiplet design with two CCD-clusters (each with 8 possible cores) in 5nm and an IO-die (including the memory controller and the Radeon Graphics iGPU) in 6nm.

The R5 7600X is rated 105 Watt TDP and Raphael is rather power hungry compared to the 5000 series.

ModelIntel Core i5-9400FAMD Ryzen 5 7600X
CodenameCoffee Lake-RRaphael (Zen4)
SeriesIntel Coffee LakeAMD Raphael (Zen 4, Ryzen 7000)
Series: Raphael (Zen 4, Ryzen 7000) Raphael (Zen4)
Intel Core i9-9900KS compare4 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9900K compare3.6 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-9700K compare3.6 - 4.9 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-9700 compare3 - 4.7 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9600K compare3.7 - 4.6 GHz6 / 6 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9900T compare2.1 - 4.4 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9400F « 2.9 - 4.1 GHz6 / 6 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i3-9100F compare3.6 - 4.2 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D compare4.2 - 5.7 GHz16 / 32 cores128 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X compare4.7 - 5.6 GHz12 / 24 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 7900 compare3.7 - 5.4 GHz12 / 24 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 7700X compare4.5 - 5.4 GHz8 / 16 cores32 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 7700 compare3.8 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores32 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D compare4.2 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores96 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 7600X « 4.7 - 5.3 GHz6 / 12 cores32 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 7600 compare3.8 - 5.1 GHz6 / 12 cores32 MB L3
Clock2900 - 4100 MHz4700 - 5300 MHz
L1 Cache384 KB384 KB
L2 Cache1.5 MB6 MB
L3 Cache9 MB32 MB
Cores / Threads6 / 66 / 12
TDP65 Watt105 Watt
Technology14 nm5 nm
Voltage100 V0.650 - 1.475V V
Die Size149 mm21x 70 (CCD) mm2 + 122 (I/O) mm2
SocketLGA 1151-2AM5 (LGA 1718)
FeaturesDual-Channel DDR4-2666 Memory Controller, AVX, AVX2, AES-NI, TSX, Quick Sync, VirtualizationMMX(+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, x86-64, AMD-V, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512F, FMA3, SHA, Precision Boost 2
Architecturex86x86
$182 U.S.
Announced
TransistorsCCD: 6,5 Mrd + IOD: 3,4 Mrd Million
max. Temp.95 °C
iGPUAMD Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) (400 - 2200 MHz)
Manufacturerwww.amd.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-9400F
28.7 pt (48%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R5 7600X
44.1 pt (73%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 15006     avg: 15252     median: 15236 (14%)     max: 15510 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1953     avg: 1964     median: 1965 (83%)     max: 1967 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
416 Points (45%)
min: 759     avg: 761     median: 761 (83%)     max: 764 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
2378 Points (6%)
min: 5882     avg: 5973     median: 5966 (15%)     max: 6076 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
984 Points (6%)
min: 2434     avg: 2504     median: 2517 (16%)     max: 2536 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
173 Points (48%)
min: 311     avg: 313.7     median: 314 (87%)     max: 315 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
11.3 Points (15%)
min: 27.79     avg: 28.3     median: 28.3 (37%)     max: 28.69 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
2 Points (46%)
min: 3.68     avg: 3.7     median: 3.7 (88%)     max: 3.72 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
6490 Points (39%)
min: 8212     avg: 8455     median: 8480 (51%)     max: 8631 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
31523 Points (23%)
min: 48381     avg: 49427     median: 49430 (36%)     max: 49837 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
40065 Points (26%)
min: 88546     avg: 90010     median: 90309 (58%)     max: 91222 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
8182 Points (10%)
min: 15797     avg: 15925     median: 15948 (19%)     max: 16010 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
198.7 s (2%)
min: 74.491     avg: 78.5     median: 78.8 (1%)     max: 82.19 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
6.8 s (1%)
min: 2.709     avg: 2.8     median: 2.8 (1%)     max: 2.933 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
5794 Points (9%)
16178 Points (26%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
25639 MIPS (15%)
min: 65569     avg: 68816     median: 69291 (40%)     max: 70615 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
4678 MIPS (55%)
min: 7661     avg: 7993     median: 8058 (95%)     max: 8101 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
64 fps (21%)
147.8 fps (49%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
234 fps (54%)
367 fps (85%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
9.1 fps (16%)
min: 20.2     avg: 20.9     median: 21 (37%)     max: 21.4 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.5 GB/s (15%)
1.1 GB/s (32%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.9 GB/s (15%)
1.8 GB/s (31%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
5.2 GB/s (14%)
13.2 GB/s (34%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 322     avg: 329.6     median: 328 (4%)     max: 344 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
468.5 Seconds (3%)
min: 202     avg: 206.1     median: 205 (1%)     max: 214 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.7 sec (14%)
min: 0.3726     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (8%)     max: 0.395 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 16979     avg: 17291     median: 17290.5 (37%)     max: 17602 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
9.3 s (2%)
7.4 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
20.8 s (1%)
16 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
499.8 s (2%)
367.1 s (2%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 82479     avg: 83000     median: 82999.5 (64%)     max: 83520 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
11185 Points (28%)
min: 25396     avg: 25731     median: 25731 (63%)     max: 26066 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
70546 Points (57%)
min: 92244     avg: 98319     median: 98318.5 (80%)     max: 104393 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
70482 Points (57%)
min: 92907     avg: 98466     median: 98466 (80%)     max: 104025 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
72413 Points (60%)
min: 94868     avg: 99772     median: 99772 (83%)     max: 104676 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
8275 Points (21%)
min: 19327     avg: 19377     median: 19377 (49%)     max: 19427 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
12616 Points (22%)
min: 30671     avg: 30681     median: 30681 (55%)     max: 30691 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
5777 Points (24%)
min: 10458     avg: 10645     median: 10645 (45%)     max: 10832 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
1139 Points (45%)
min: 2159     avg: 2212     median: 2217 (87%)     max: 2230 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
5715 Points (10%)
min: 11093     avg: 11914     median: 12003 (22%)     max: 12185 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1132 Points (5%)
min: 2070     avg: 2120     median: 2126 (9%)     max: 2137 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
5698 Points (18%)
min: 11123     avg: 11886     median: 11982 (38%)     max: 12112 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
5347 Points (53%)
min: 8596     avg: 8967     median: 9021 (90%)     max: 9048 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
21830 Points (22%)
min: 45422     avg: 47461     median: 47694 (48%)     max: 48205 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
867 ms (1%)
min: 441     avg: 447.8     median: 448 (1%)     max: 451 ms
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 295     avg: 298.3     median: 298 (82%)     max: 302 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
211 Points (38%)
min: 356     avg: 373.3     median: 370.5 (67%)     max: 395 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 2104     avg: 2186     median: 2193 (82%)     max: 2256 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
131.6 Watt (23%)
227 Watt (39%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
122.5 Watt (22%)
215 Watt (39%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
91.5 Watt (61%)
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
8 Points per Watt (6%)
11.7 Points per Watt (9%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-9400F → 100% n=41

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 5 7600X → 200% n=41

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.33
log 13. 12:42:33

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 12197 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 14615 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1752403353s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 13 Jul 2025 05:20:07 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.005s ... 0.005s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.005s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 12197 +0.004s ... 0.009s

#8 got single benchmarks 12197 +0.001s ... 0.01s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 14615 +0.004s ... 0.013s

#10 got single benchmarks 14615 +0.009s ... 0.022s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.022s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.038s ... 0.06s

#13 return log +0.002s ... 0.063s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)