Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i5-8400 vs Intel Core i9-11900K

Intel Core i5-8400

► remove from comparison Intel i5-8400

The Intel Core i5-8400 is a mid-range 6-core CPU. The processor belongs to the Coffee Lake generation and was presented in September 2017. It does not support Hyper-Threading, which means it can run six threads simultaneously. The base clock rate is 2.8 GHz and the CPU can speed up to 4.0 GHz under high load. Despite belonging to the new generation of CPUs, the Core i5-8400 is manufactured in an improved 14nm process.

Performance

The processor offers a strong performance increase compared to the Core i5-7400 due to its two additional cores. Single-core performance has not improved significantly compared to its Kaby Lake predecessor. As a mid-range model, the Core i5-8400 should be suitable for demanding games and programs.

Graphics

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics 630 iGPU is supposed to offer higher performance as its clock rate has been increased by 50 MHz. The build is identical to that of the Intel HD Graphics 630. We do expect a performance improvement, but as a low-end solution it will probably only display current games smoothly at reduced details - if at all.

Power Consumption

Intel specifies the TDP with 65 watts. Therefore, well-dimensioned cooling systems should easily manage to deal with the created heat. We expect increased efficiency due to the higher performance.

Intel Core i9-11900K

► remove from comparison Intel i9-11900K

The Intel Core i9-11900K is a high-end desktop CPU based on the Rocket Lake architecture. The CPU offers 8 cores and 16 threads clocked at 3.5 - 5.3 GHz (Turbo Boost 3.0 / TVB). With Turbo Boost 2.0, 5.1 GHz can be reached with a single thread. Using all cores, the CPU can clock up to 4.8 GHz. Adaptive Boost enables even higher multi-core frequencies (5.1 GHz all core Turbo) but uses a lot more power.

The TDP is rated at 125 Watt (PL1, power limit sustained load) but the PL2 is set to around 250 Watt for short term boosts (up to 56 seconds).

The Sunny Cove processor cores (known from the Ice Lake mobile CPUs) offer larger caches and an improved IPC (up to 19%). Furthermore, the chip also includes (partly) integrated WiFi 6E and Thunderbolt 4. The platform supports PCIe 4.0 and Intel DL Boost for AI acceleration.

The faster Rocket Lake-S CPUs also integrate a new Intel UHD Graphics 750 that is based on the current Intel Xe architecture (e.g. mobile Tiger Lake) and offers 32 EUs. In the 11900K, the GPU is clocked from 350 - 1300 MHz.

Performance

The average 11900K in our database is in the same league as the Ryzen 7 5800X3D, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. Which is an impressive result, as of mid 2022, and good enough for any task imaginable including content creation and professional gaming.

Power consumption

This Core i9 has a 125 W TDP, also known as the long-term power limit. Intel lets PC manufacturers reduce that value somewhat if required, 95 W being the lower limit, which would result in lower clock speeds and lower performance. The reality is, an 11900K can be much more power hungry than either of the two numbers imply simply because of its sheer might but also because it is manufactured on an old 14 nm Intel process that makes for lower-than-average, as of mid-2022, energy efficiency.

ModelIntel Core i5-8400Intel Core i9-11900K
CodenameCoffee Lake-SRocket Lake
SeriesIntel Coffee LakeIntel Rocket Lake
Series: Rocket Lake Rocket Lake
Intel Core i7-8086K compare3.7 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8700K compare3.7 - 4.7 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8700 compare3.2 - 4.6 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8600K compare3.6 - 4.3 GHz6 / 6 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8500 compare3 - 4.1 GHz6 / 6 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8400 « 2.8 - 4 GHz6 / 6 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8500T compare2.1 - 3.5 GHz6 / 6 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i9-11900K « 3.5 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-11700K compare3.6 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-11700 compare2.5 - 4.9 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i5-11600K compare3.9 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-11400F compare2.6 - 4.4 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-11400T compare1.3 - 3.7 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Clock2800 - 4000 MHz3500 - 5300 MHz
L1 Cache384 KB640 KB
L2 Cache1.5 MB4 MB
L3 Cache9 MB16 MB
Cores / Threads6 / 68 / 16
TDP65 Watt125 Watt
Technology14 nm14 nm
SocketFCLGA1151LGA1200
FeaturesDual-Channel DDR3(L)-1600/DDR4-2666 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, AES-NI, TSX-NI, Quick Sync, Virtualization, vProDDR4-3200 RAM, PCIe 4, 8 GT/s bus, DL Boost, GNA, vPro, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512F, FMA3, SHA
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 630 (350 - 1050 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) (350 - 1300 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com
max. Temp.100 °C

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i9-11900K
38.1 pt (63%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
98 Points (55%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
698 Points (13%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 13825     avg: 14669     median: 14747 (14%)     max: 15519 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1604     avg: 1640     median: 1636 (69%)     max: 1693 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 619     avg: 633     median: 633 (69%)     max: 647 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 5055     avg: 5499     median: 5306 (13%)     max: 5997 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 939     avg: 943     median: 941 (6%)     max: 949 Points
min: 2238     avg: 2358     median: 2379 (15%)     max: 2436 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 167     avg: 169.5     median: 169.5 (47%)     max: 172 Points
min: 254     avg: 256.5     median: 255 (71%)     max: 262 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
11 Points (14%)
26.8 Points (35%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
1.9 Points (45%)
3.1 Points (74%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 6356     avg: 6364     median: 6363.5 (38%)     max: 6371 Points
10545 Points (64%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 30658     avg: 30790     median: 30789.5 (22%)     max: 30921 Points
62024 Points (45%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
80613 Points (51%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
14149 Points (17%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
191.8 s (2%)
77.9 s (1%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
6.2 s (1%)
4 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
5173 Points (8%)
9030 Points (14%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 54125     avg: 59047     median: 59658.5 (34%)     max: 62746 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 6174     avg: 6380     median: 6347 (75%)     max: 6652 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
61.4 fps (2%)
137 fps (3%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
223.8 fps (6%)
309.5 fps (8%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 16.6     avg: 18.2     median: 18.2 (32%)     max: 19.8 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.5 GB/s (15%)
1.2 GB/s (35%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.8 GB/s (14%)
1.9 GB/s (33%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
5 GB/s (13%)
13 GB/s (34%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
428 Seconds (5%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
488 Seconds (3%)
min: 190.3     avg: 210.8     median: 211.9 (1%)     max: 229 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.4733     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (11%)     max: 0.4981 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 i5-8400 +
9474 Points (20%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
9.5 s (2%)
6.3 s (1%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
21.6 s (1%)
13.7 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
526 s (2%)
331.4 s (1%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 i5-8400 +
35310 Points (27%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 9057     avg: 9453     median: 9453 (23%)     max: 9849 Points
min: 20149     avg: 20662     median: 20662 (51%)     max: 21175 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 74965     avg: 79326     median: 79325.5 (64%)     max: 83686 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
65891 Points (53%)
75316 Points (61%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
69971 Points (56%)
85348 Points (69%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
7891 Points (20%)
min: 18242     avg: 19567     median: 20094 (51%)     max: 20364 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 10911     avg: 11774     median: 12066 (22%)     max: 12346 Points
min: 26699     avg: 27967     median: 28121 (50%)     max: 28927 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 4372     avg: 4941     median: 4940.5 (21%)     max: 5509 Points
min: 11012     avg: 12563     median: 12902.5 (54%)     max: 13433 Points
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Single-Core
2625 Points (64%)
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Multi-Core
13521 Points (52%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1748     avg: 1796     median: 1787.5 (68%)     max: 1885 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 9547     avg: 10328     median: 10483 (19%)     max: 11035 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1863 Points (8%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
11008 Points (35%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
5104 Points (51%)
7976 Points (80%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
20500 Points (20%)
42329 Points (41%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 i5-8400 +
4996 Points (55%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 i5-8400 +
19500 Points (26%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 i5-8400 +
19334 Points (30%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 i5-8400 +
4283 Points (64%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 544     avg: 566     median: 569.5 (1%)     max: 581 ms
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 244     avg: 247     median: 247 (68%)     max: 250 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 217     avg: 268.5     median: 283.5 (51%)     max: 290 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 i5-8400 +
115 Watt (20%)
min: 197     avg: 235.6     median: 221.5 (38%)     max: 302.2 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 i5-8400 +
97 Watt (18%)
min: 243     avg: 274.3     median: 259.2 (47%)     max: 336 Watt
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
100%
1 i5-8400 +
9.7 Points per Watt (7%)
min: 7.03     avg: 8.4     median: 8.6 (6%)     max: 9.39 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-8400 → 100% n=26

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i9-11900K → 197% n=26

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.34
log 04. 09:53:21

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 9298 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 13161 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1759564401s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 04 Oct 2025 05:18:30 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.005s ... 0.005s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.005s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 9298 +0.001s ... 0.005s

#8 got single benchmarks 9298 +0.006s ... 0.011s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 13161 +0.004s ... 0.015s

#10 got single benchmarks 13161 +0.008s ... 0.023s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.023s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.038s ... 0.061s

#13 return log +0.003s ... 0.064s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)