Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i5-13600K vs Intel Core i5-9400F

Intel Core i5-13600K

► remove from comparison Intel i5-13600K

The Intel Core i5-13600K is a fast mid-range desktop processor of the Raptor Lake series. It includes a hybrid architecture for the CPU cores with combined 14 cores. Six fast Raptor Cove performance cores (P-cores) with HyperThreading and a clock speed of 3.5 - 5.1 GHz and eight Gracemont efficiency cores without HyperThreading and a clock speed of 2.6 - 3.9 GHz.

Thanks to the faster P-cores and more E-cores, the i5-13600K is significantly faster than the old i5-12600K (especially in multi-threaded workloads. 

The 13600K is rated at 125 Watt TDP base power (PL1) and 181 Watt Turbo Power (PL2) and therefore slightly higher than the old Core i5-12600K.

Intel Core i5-9400F

► remove from comparison Intel i5-9400F

The Intel Core i5-9400F is a six-core desktop processor based on the Coffee Lake architecture introduced in October 2018 along with the flagship Intel Core i9-9900K. The processor clocks at 2.9-4.1 GHz and can process up to 6 threads simultaneously. The Intel Core i5-9400F is manufactured in the improved 14-nm process (14nm++).

Performance

Compared to the Intel Core i5-8400, the performance could only be increased slightly. Performance increases of up to 10 percent can be expected. Both processors (old and new) still do not offer hyperthreading. The performance increase therefore only adds up to small architecture improvements and a slightly higher basic and turbo clock rate. This CPU is suitable for everyday office use, which does not require large coolers due to the low waste heat. But games are also among the application areas, because in games the Intel Core i5-9400F clearly beats the Intel Core i3-9100F. Here the six cores are paying off in the meantime. 

Graphics unit

The Intel Core i5-9400F is a processor without integrated graphics unit. If you value an iGPU, you should take a closer look at the Intel Core i5-9400, as it offers the entry level Intel UHD Graphics 630.

Power consumption

Intel puts the Thermal Design Power (TDP) at 65 watts. This means there is no need for large cooling systems, which also allows installation in very compact housings.

ModelIntel Core i5-13600KIntel Core i5-9400F
CodenameRaptor LakeCoffee Lake-R
SeriesIntel Raptor Lake-SIntel Coffee Lake
Series: Coffee Lake Coffee Lake-R
Intel Core i9-13900K compare3 - 5.8 GHz24 / 32 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13700K compare3.4 - 5.4 GHz16 / 24 cores30 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13600K « 3.5 - 5.1 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i9-14901E compare2.8 - 5.6 GHz8 / 16 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13500 compare2.5 - 4.8 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i7-14701E compare2.6 - 5.4 GHz8 / 16 cores33 MB L3
Intel Core i9-14901TE compare2.3 - 5.5 GHz8 / 16 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core i7-14701TE compare2.1 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores33 MB L3
Intel Core i5-14501TE compare2.2 - 5.1 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-14501E compare3.3 - 5.2 GHz6 / 12 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-14401E compare2.5 - 4.7 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-14401TE compare2 - 4.5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13500T compare1.6 - 4.6 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9900KS compare4 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9900K compare3.6 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-9700K compare3.6 - 4.9 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-9700 compare3 - 4.7 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9600K compare3.7 - 4.6 GHz6 / 6 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9900T compare2.1 - 4.4 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9400F « 2.9 - 4.1 GHz6 / 6 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i3-9100F compare3.6 - 4.2 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Clock3500 - 5100 MHz2900 - 4100 MHz
L2 Cache20 MB1.5 MB
L3 Cache24 MB9 MB
Cores / Threads14 / 20
6 x 5.1 GHz Intel Raptor Cove P-Core
8 x 3.9 GHz Intel Gracemont E-Core
6 / 6
TDP125 Watt65 Watt
Technology10 nm14 nm
Die Size257 mm2149 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C
SocketLGA 1700LGA 1151-2
FeaturesIntel UHD Graphics 770, DDR5 5600 MT/s, DDR4 3200 MT/sDual-Channel DDR4-2666 Memory Controller, AVX, AVX2, AES-NI, TSX, Quick Sync, Virtualization
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 770 (300 - 1500 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
$319 U.S.$182 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerwww.intel.com
L1 Cache384 KB
Voltage100 V

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-13600K
42.9 pt (71%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-9400F
28.7 pt (48%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 24174     avg: 24221     median: 24221 (22%)     max: 24268 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1991     avg: 2001     median: 2000.5 (81%)     max: 2010 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 766     avg: 771     median: 770.5 (84%)     max: 775 Points
416 Points (45%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 9217     avg: 9241     median: 9241 (23%)     max: 9265 Points
2378 Points (6%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 3641     avg: 3642     median: 3642 (23%)     max: 3643 Points
984 Points (6%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 286     avg: 287.5     median: 287.5 (80%)     max: 289 Points
173 Points (48%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 42.2     avg: 42.3     median: 42.3 (55%)     max: 42.38 Points
11.3 Points (15%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 3.45     avg: 3.5     median: 3.5 (82%)     max: 3.48 Points
2 Points (46%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 10710     avg: 10755     median: 10754.5 (65%)     max: 10799 Points
6490 Points (39%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 67973     avg: 68880     median: 68879.5 (50%)     max: 69786 Points
31523 Points (23%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 110412     avg: 110969     median: 110969 (71%)     max: 111526 Points
40065 Points (26%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 16074     avg: 16155     median: 16154.5 (20%)     max: 16235 Points
8182 Points (10%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 172.189     avg: 174.9     median: 174.9 (2%)     max: 177.592 s
198.7 s (2%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 2.518     avg: 2.5     median: 2.5 (1%)     max: 2.527 s
6.8 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 10937     avg: 10967     median: 10967 (17%)     max: 10997 Points
5794 Points (9%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 89527     avg: 89587     median: 89587 (51%)     max: 89647 MIPS
25639 MIPS (15%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 6253     avg: 6378     median: 6377.5 (75%)     max: 6502 MIPS
4678 MIPS (55%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 198.6     avg: 198.8     median: 198.8 (5%)     max: 199 fps
64 fps (2%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 387     avg: 387.5     median: 387.5 (10%)     max: 388 fps
234 fps (6%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 27.5     avg: 27.6     median: 27.6 (48%)     max: 27.6 fps
9.1 fps (16%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1.7 GB/s (50%)
0.5 GB/s (15%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 3.1     avg: 3.2     median: 3.2 (54%)     max: 3.2 GB/s
0.9 GB/s (15%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 18.8     avg: 19.1     median: 19.1 (50%)     max: 19.4 GB/s
5.2 GB/s (14%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
224 Seconds (3%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
135 Seconds (1%)
468.5 Seconds (3%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.4048     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (9%)     max: 0.405 sec
0.7 sec (14%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
17627 Points (38%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 6.471     avg: 6.5     median: 6.5 (1%)     max: 6.58 s
9.3 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 14.876     avg: 14.9     median: 14.9 (1%)     max: 14.993 s
20.8 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 328.929     avg: 331.4     median: 331.4 (1%)     max: 333.798 s
499.8 s (2%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
97718 Points (75%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 30358     avg: 30419     median: 30419 (75%)     max: 30480 Points
11185 Points (28%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 86734     avg: 86952     median: 86952 (71%)     max: 87170 Points
70546 Points (57%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 87784     avg: 87861     median: 87860.5 (71%)     max: 87937 Points
70482 Points (57%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 88547     avg: 89321     median: 89321 (72%)     max: 90095 Points
72413 Points (58%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 26359     avg: 26394     median: 26394 (67%)     max: 26429 Points
8275 Points (21%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 35386     avg: 35395     median: 35395 (63%)     max: 35404 Points
12616 Points (22%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 17079     avg: 17102     median: 17101.5 (72%)     max: 17124 Points
5777 Points (24%)
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Single-Core
2750 Points (64%)
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Multi-Core
15890 Points (62%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1967     avg: 1973     median: 1973 (66%)     max: 1979 Points
1139 Points (38%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 16651     avg: 16671     median: 16670.5 (30%)     max: 16690 Points
5715 Points (10%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1931     avg: 1948     median: 1947.5 (8%)     max: 1964 Points
1132 Points (5%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 16497     avg: 16566     median: 16566 (52%)     max: 16635 Points
5698 Points (18%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 8618     avg: 8625     median: 8624.5 (86%)     max: 8631 Points
5347 Points (53%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 60407     avg: 61014     median: 61014 (60%)     max: 61621 Points
21830 Points (21%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 467     avg: 468     median: 468 (1%)     max: 469 ms
867 ms (1%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
288 Points (75%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 329     avg: 331     median: 331 (59%)     max: 333 Points
211 Points (38%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 2237     avg: 2254     median: 2254 (84%)     max: 2271 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 278     avg: 313     median: 313 (54%)     max: 348 Watt
131.6 Watt (23%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 245     avg: 265.5     median: 265.5 (48%)     max: 286 Watt
122.5 Watt (22%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 69.3     avg: 73.3     median: 73.3 (48%)     max: 77.3 Watt
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
min: 12.7     avg: 13.8     median: 13.8 (10%)     max: 14.9 Points per Watt
8 Points per Watt (6%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-13600K → 100% n=41

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-9400F → 49% n=41

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.34
log 27. 22:15:29

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14626 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 12197 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1761599729s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 27 Oct 2025 17:54:47 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.006s ... 0.006s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.006s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 14626 +0.005s ... 0.01s

#8 got single benchmarks 14626 +0.005s ... 0.015s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 12197 +0.004s ... 0.019s

#10 got single benchmarks 12197 +0.004s ... 0.023s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.023s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.045s ... 0.068s

#13 return log +0.003s ... 0.071s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)