Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i5-12600K vs Intel Core i7-12700

Intel Core i5-12600K

► remove from comparison Intel i5-12600K

The Intel Core i5-12600K is a mid-range CPU for desktops based on the Alder Lake architecture. It was first announced in November 2021 and offers 6 performance cores and 4 efficiency cores. The performance cores (P-cores) support HyperThreading, leading to 16 Threads that can be processed at once. The performance cores can clock with up to 4.9 GHz, the efficiency cores can clock with up to 3.6 GHz. All cores can use 20 MB Smart Cache. The integrated memory controller supports up to 128 GB DDR5 with 4800 MT/s (dual channel).

Thread Director (in hardware) can support the operating system to decide which thread to use on the performance or efficiency cores for the best performance.

The integrated graphics adapter is based on the Xe-architecture and called Intel UHD Graphics 770. It clocks between 300 and 1.45 GHz.

For AI tasks, the CPU also integrates GNA 3.0 and DL Boost. Quick Sync in version 8 is the same as in the Rocket Lake CPUs and supports MPEG-2, AVC, VC-1 decode, JPEG, VP8 decode, VP9, HEVC and AV1 decode in hardware.

Performance

The average 12600K in our database is way ahead of the Ryzen 9 3900 and the Core i9-10900K, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. This is a very fast CPU that should have no trouble running triple-A games for at least a couple of years.

Power consumption

This Core i5 series chip has a Base power consumption of 125 W, with its maximum Intel-recommended Turbo power consumption sitting at 150 W.

The i5-12600K is built with Intel's fourth generation 10 nm process marketed as Intel 7 for lower-than-average, as of mid 2023, energy efficiency.

Intel Core i7-12700

► remove from comparison Intel i7-12700

The Intel Core i7-12700F is a fast eight-core desktop processor based on the Alder Lake architecture, which was introduced in November 2021. The processor offers a base clock of 3.3 GHz and reaches up to 4.9 GHz in Turbo. In the same way, the Intel Core i7-12700K the Core i7-12700F is based on a hybrid architecture of 8P and 4E cores. The innovations of the Alder Lake-S processor compared to Rocket Lake, together with the smaller 10 nm manufacturing process, are clearly noticeable. The Intel Core i7-12700 does not offer a free multiplier, which means that overclocking is not possible.

Performance

Compared to the Intel Core i7-11700 , performance has been increased with a better IPC. The additional e-cores are also clearly noticeable in multi-threaded applications. Overall, this provides a noticeable performance boost, which also has an effect on all application areas. The 4 E-Cores provide the P-Cores with significantly more power. If all requirements are met, Intel Turbo Boost 3.0can increase the clock rate of the P-Cores to up to 4.9 GHz. The E-cores also offer a turbo and clock up to 3.6 GHz.

Graphics unit

The Intel Core i7-12700 is a processor with an integrated graphics unit. However, with the Intel UHD Graphics 770 there is only a simple iGPU which is only suitable for office use.

Power consumption

The TDP of the Intel Core i7-12700 is 65 watts, with the option to consume up to 180 watts in Turbo mode. If all restrictions are deactivated in the BIOS, the PL2 value can be achieved permanently. However, a high-quality and powerful cooling unit should be used for this.

ModelIntel Core i5-12600KIntel Core i7-12700
SeriesIntel Alder Lake-SIntel Alder Lake-S
CodenameAlder LakeAlder Lake
Series: Alder Lake-S Alder Lake
Intel Core i9-12900K compare3.2 - 5.2 GHz16 / 24 cores30 MB L3
Intel Core i9-12900 compare2.4 - 5.1 GHz16 / 24 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i7-12700K compare2.7 - 5 GHz12 / 20 cores25 MB L3
Intel Core i7-12700F compare3.3 - 4.9 GHz12 / 20 cores25 MB L3
Intel Core i7-127003.3 - 4.9 GHz12 / 20 cores25 MB L3
Intel Core i5-12600K « 2.8 - 4.9 GHz10 / 16 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i9-12900K compare3.2 - 5.2 GHz16 / 24 cores30 MB L3
Intel Core i9-12900 compare2.4 - 5.1 GHz16 / 24 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i7-12700K compare2.7 - 5 GHz12 / 20 cores25 MB L3
Intel Core i7-12700F compare3.3 - 4.9 GHz12 / 20 cores25 MB L3
Intel Core i7-12700 « 3.3 - 4.9 GHz12 / 20 cores25 MB L3
Intel Core i5-12600K2.8 - 4.9 GHz10 / 16 cores20 MB L3
Clock2800 - 4900 MHz3300 - 4900 MHz
L2 Cache9.5 MB12 MB
L3 Cache20 MB25 MB
Cores / Threads10 / 1612 / 20
TDP125 Watt65 Watt
Technology10 nm10 nm
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketLGA1700LGA 1700
FeaturesDDR4-3200/DDR5-4800 RAM, PCIe 5, Thr. Dir., DL Boost, GNA, vPro Enterp., MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, HT, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 770 (300 - 1450 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 770 (300 - 1500 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
$289 U.S.$349 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comwww.intel.de
L1 Cache1 MB
Die Size215 mm2

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-12600K
44.9 pt (62%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i7-12700
47 pt (65%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
17491 Points (16%)
21751 Points (20%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
1907 Points (81%)
1894 Points (81%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
734 Points (82%)
731 Points (81%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
6692 Points (16%)
8338 Points (20%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
2555 Points (16%)
3151 Points (20%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
275 Points (83%)
272 Points (82%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
30 Points (39%)
36.9 Points (48%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
3.3 Points (82%)
3.3 Points (82%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
9381 Points (57%)
9171 Points (55%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
55462 Points (40%)
60892 Points (44%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
89478 Points (62%)
103354 Points (72%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
15180 Points (18%)
15091 Points (18%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
202.7 s (2%)
272.8 s (3%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
4.7 s (1%)
2.9 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
6239 Points (10%)
9328 Points (15%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
64260 MIPS (37%)
78331 MIPS (45%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
5944 MIPS (71%)
6292 MIPS (75%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
148 fps (52%)
172.4 fps (60%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
333.5 fps (77%)
347 fps (80%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
30.1 fps (53%)
25.5 fps (45%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1.3 GB/s (0%)
1.5 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
2.2 GB/s (38%)
2.7 GB/s (47%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
12.8 GB/s (33%)
14.5 GB/s (38%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
242 Seconds (3%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
189.5 Seconds (1%)
151 Seconds (1%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.4 sec (10%)
0.4 sec (9%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
15722 Points (33%)
15390 Points (33%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
7.4 s (2%)
7.5 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
16.4 s (1%)
16.8 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
363.2 s (2%)
400.4 s (2%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
85458 Points (75%)
72464 Points (63%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
25017 Points (68%)
27022 Points (73%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
78037 Points (63%)
86815 Points (71%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
79174 Points (64%)
86587 Points (70%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
77742 Points (65%)
96264 Points (81%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
20161 Points (51%)
23193 Points (59%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
29671 Points (53%)
34681 Points (62%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
13869 Points (58%)
16400 Points (69%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
1904 Points (80%)
1924 Points (81%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
12797 Points (23%)
14961 Points (27%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1821 Points (8%)
1845 Points (8%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
12746 Points (40%)
14883 Points (47%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
8223 Points (82%)
8059 Points (81%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
46557 Points (52%)
52676 Points (59%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
511 ms (1%)
508 ms (1%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
268 Points (77%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
293 Points (61%)
314 Points (65%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
1637 Points (63%)
2016 Points (77%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
256.5 Watt (44%)
327 Watt (56%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
205.9 Watt (38%)
284 Watt (52%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
82.7 Watt (55%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
12.4 Points per Watt (9%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-12600K → 100% n=46

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-12700 → 109% n=46

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 04. 14:55:36

#0 checking url part for id 13886 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14995 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 04 May 2024 05:40:37 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.019s ... 0.02s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.02s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 13886 +0.018s ... 0.038s

#7 got single benchmarks 13886 +0.011s ... 0.049s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 14995 +0.016s ... 0.065s

#9 got single benchmarks 14995 +0.009s ... 0.074s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.074s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.329s ... 0.403s

#12 return log +0.032s ... 0.435s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)