Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i5-12400F vs Intel Core i7-12700

Intel Core i5-12400F

► remove from comparison

The Intel Core i5-12400F is a fast six-core processor based on the Alder Lake architecture, which was introduced in January 2022. The processor has a base clock speed of 2.5 GHz and reaches a maximum clock speed of up to 4.4 GHz under load. As with its predecessor, the Intel Core i5-11400F, Alder-Lake also supports hyperthreading, which means that up to 12 threads can be processed simultaneously. The Intel Core i5-12400F is manufactured using the 10 nm process. There are many changes to the new architecture, which is essentially based on a hybrid architecture. However, the Intel Core i5-12400F does not fully benefit from this, as only P-cores are used under the heatspreader. Only with the faster Intel Core i5-12600K can you enjoy the performance of the combination of P and E cores. The Intel Core i5-12400F is a non-K CPU, which in turn means that there is no freely selectable multiplier, which means that the CPU is not suitable for overclocking.

Performance

Compared to the Intel Core i5-11400F , the IPC of the Intel Core i5-12400F has been significantly increased again. The performance difference between the two processors is between 10 and 20 percent in most cases. Due to the good single-thread performance, the Intel Core i5-12400F is definitely a sensible CPU to use as the basis in a gaming PC.

Graphics unit

The processors marked with an "F" in the nomenclature do not offer an integrated graphics unit. All other non-F processors can rely on the Intel Iris Xe.

Power consumption

The TDP is relatively low at 65 watts. This is the PL1 value. For Turbo, the Intel Core i5-12400F with PL2 offers a higher TDP of up to 117 watts. If all restrictions are deactivated in the BIOS, there is no time limit for the PL2 value. With the maximum 117 watts, a large cooling unit is not required.

Intel Core i7-12700

► remove from comparison Intel i7-12700

The Intel Core i7-12700F is a fast eight-core desktop processor based on the Alder Lake architecture, which was introduced in November 2021. The processor offers a base clock of 3.3 GHz and reaches up to 4.9 GHz in Turbo. In the same way, the Intel Core i7-12700K the Core i7-12700F is based on a hybrid architecture of 8P and 4E cores. The innovations of the Alder Lake-S processor compared to Rocket Lake, together with the smaller 10 nm manufacturing process, are clearly noticeable. The Intel Core i7-12700 does not offer a free multiplier, which means that overclocking is not possible.

Performance

Compared to the Intel Core i7-11700 , performance has been increased with a better IPC. The additional e-cores are also clearly noticeable in multi-threaded applications. Overall, this provides a noticeable performance boost, which also has an effect on all application areas. The 4 E-Cores provide the P-Cores with significantly more power. If all requirements are met, Intel Turbo Boost 3.0can increase the clock rate of the P-Cores to up to 4.9 GHz. The E-cores also offer a turbo and clock up to 3.6 GHz.

Graphics unit

The Intel Core i7-12700 is a processor with an integrated graphics unit. However, with the Intel UHD Graphics 770 there is only a simple iGPU which is only suitable for office use.

Power consumption

The TDP of the Intel Core i7-12700 is 65 watts, with the option to consume up to 180 watts in Turbo mode. If all restrictions are deactivated in the BIOS, the PL2 value can be achieved permanently. However, a high-quality and powerful cooling unit should be used for this.

ModelIntel Core i5-12400FIntel Core i7-12700
CodenameAlder Lake-SAlder Lake
Series Alder Lake-SIntel Alder Lake-S
Clock2500 - 4400 MHz3300 - 4900 MHz
L1 Cache480 KB1 MB
L2 Cache7.5 MB12 MB
L3 Cache17.9 MB25 MB
Cores / Threads6 / 1212 / 20
TDP65 Watt65 Watt
Technology10 nm10 nm
Die Size163 mm2215 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
Socket1700LGA 1700
FeaturesTVB, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, Quick Sync, Virtualization
Architecturex86x86
$180 U.S.$349 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerwww.intel.dewww.intel.de
Series: Alder Lake-S Alder Lake
Intel Core i9-12900K compare3.2 - 5.2 GHz16 / 24 cores30 MB L3
Intel Core i9-12900 compare2.4 - 5.1 GHz16 / 24 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i7-12700K compare2.7 - 5 GHz12 / 20 cores25 MB L3
Intel Core i7-12700F compare3.3 - 4.9 GHz12 / 20 cores25 MB L3
Intel Core i7-12700 « 3.3 - 4.9 GHz12 / 20 cores25 MB L3
Intel Core i5-12600K compare2.8 - 4.9 GHz10 / 16 cores20 MB L3
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 770 (300 - 1500 MHz)

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-12400F
36.2 pt (60%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i7-12700
41.2 pt (69%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
12380 Points (11%)
21751 Points (20%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
1680 Points (68%)
1894 Points (77%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
653 Points (71%)
731 Points (80%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
4740 Points (12%)
8338 Points (20%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
1759 Points (11%)
3151 Points (20%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
244 Points (68%)
272 Points (75%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
20.4 Points (26%)
36.9 Points (48%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
3 Points (70%)
3.3 Points (78%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
8389 Points (51%)
9171 Points (55%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
40690 Points (29%)
60892 Points (44%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
69819 Points (45%)
103354 Points (66%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
13664 Points (17%)
15091 Points (18%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
112.8 s (1%)
272.8 s (3%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
4.1 s (1%)
2.9 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
7816 Points (12%)
9328 Points (15%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
45043 MIPS (26%)
78331 MIPS (45%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
5476 MIPS (65%)
6292 MIPS (74%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
101.4 fps (3%)
172.4 fps (4%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
252.5 fps (6%)
347 fps (9%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
15.2 fps (27%)
25.5 fps (45%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.9 GB/s (26%)
1.5 GB/s (44%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
1.4 GB/s (24%)
2.7 GB/s (47%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
9.3 GB/s (24%)
14.5 GB/s (38%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
430 Seconds (5%)
242 Seconds (3%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
269 Seconds (2%)
151 Seconds (1%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.5 sec (10%)
0.4 sec (9%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
11892 Points (25%)
15390 Points (33%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
8.3 s (2%)
7.5 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
18.5 s (1%)
16.8 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
438.4 s (2%)
400.4 s (2%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
63413 Points (49%)
72464 Points (56%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
19436 Points (48%)
27022 Points (67%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
81984 Points (67%)
86815 Points (71%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
82024 Points (67%)
86587 Points (70%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
96264 Points (77%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
15317 Points (39%)
23193 Points (59%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
24023 Points (43%)
34681 Points (62%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
9745 Points (41%)
16400 Points (69%)
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Single-Core
2329 Points (54%)
2602 Points (60%)
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Multi-Core
9737 Points (38%)
13519 Points (52%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
1742 Points (59%)
1924 Points (65%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
9517 Points (17%)
14961 Points (27%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1673 Points (7%)
1845 Points (8%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
9368 Points (30%)
14883 Points (47%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
7548 Points (75%)
8059 Points (80%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
35098 Points (34%)
52676 Points (52%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
573 ms (1%)
508 ms (1%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
235 Points (61%)
268 Points (70%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
272 Points (49%)
314 Points (56%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
1762 Points (66%)
2016 Points (75%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
239 Watt (41%)
327 Watt (56%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
194.4 Watt (35%)
284 Watt (52%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
83.6 Watt (55%)
82.7 Watt (55%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-12400F → 100% n=49

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-12700 → 135% n=49

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.35
log 02. 22:20:02

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14994 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 14995 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1764710402s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 02 Dec 2025 08:12:07 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.004s ... 0.004s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.004s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 14994 +0.005s ... 0.009s

#8 got single benchmarks 14994 +0.005s ... 0.014s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 14995 +0.004s ... 0.018s

#10 got single benchmarks 14995 +0.004s ... 0.022s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.022s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.047s ... 0.07s

#13 return log +0.019s ... 0.089s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)