Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i5-11400T vs Intel Core i5-11400F

Intel Core i5-11400T

► remove from comparison Intel i5-11400T

The Intel Core i5-11400T is a power-efficient six-core desktop processor based on the new Rocket Lake architecture, which was introduced in March 2021. The processor clocks with a base clock of only 1.3 GHz and reaches an all-core boost of 3.7 GHz under load. Intel also gives the Rocket Lake processors the Hyperthreading feature, which allows the i5-11400T to process up to 12 threads simultaneously. As known, the Intel Core i5-11400F is manufactured in the 14 nm process. Nevertheless, many changes have been made with the Rocket Lake architecture, which is also reflected in the performance compared to the Comet Lake. 

Performance

Compared to the Intel Core i5-10400T, the Core i5-11400T offers a significantly better IPC. This can be seen clearly in the single-core benchmarks. The multi-core performance also benefits from the better IPC compared to Comet-Lake. A performance increase of up to 20 percent can be expected.

Graphics

The processors integrates a Intel UHD Graphics 730 iGPU that features 24 EUs clocked at 350 - 1200 MHz.

Power consumption

The TDP turns out relatively low with 35 watts. This is the PL1 value. For Turbo, the Intel Core i5-11400T offers a higher TDP of up to 84 watts with PL2. However, this may only be applied for a maximum of 28 seconds (dew). 

Intel Core i5-11400F

► remove from comparison Intel i5-11400F

The Intel Core i5-11400F is a fast six-core desktop processor based on the new Rocket Lake architecture, which was introduced in March 2021. The processor clocks with a base clock of 2.6 GHz and reaches an all-core boost of 4.2 GHz under load. In single-thread applications, the Intel Core i5-11400F even reaches up to 4.4 GHz. Intel also gives the Rocket Lake processors the Hyperthreading feature, which allows the i5-11400F to process up to 12 threads simultaneously. As known, the Intel Core i5-11400F is manufactured in the 14 nm process. Nevertheless, many changes have been made with the Rocket Lake architecture, which is also reflected in the performance compared to the Comet Lake. The Intel Core i5-11400F is a non-K CPU, which means that there is no freely selectable multiplier. Thus, the scope for overclocking is relatively small.

Performance

Compared to the Intel Core i5-10400F, the Core i5-11400F offers a significantly better IPC. This can be seen clearly in the single-core benchmarks. But the multi-core performance also benefits from the better IPC compared to Comet-Lake. A performance increase of up to 20 percent can be expected. The Core i5 has to do without the TVB (Thermal Velocity Boost). However, 4.2 GHz is still possible when all cores are loaded. Due to the very high single-thread performance, the Intel Core i5-11400F is best suited for video games.

Graphics

The processors marked with "F" in the nomenclature don't offer an integrated graphics unit. All other non-F processors can fall back on the Intel UHD Graphics 750 and also allow operation without a dedicated graphics card.

Power consumption

The TDP turns out relatively low with 65 watts. This is the PL1 value. For Turbo, the Intel Core i5-11400F offers a higher TDP of up to 154 watts with PL2. However, this may only be applied for a maximum of 28 seconds (dew). A good air cooler should be able to handle the resulting waste heat, so no AiO is necessary for this processor.

ModelIntel Core i5-11400TIntel Core i5-11400F
SeriesIntel Rocket LakeIntel Rocket Lake
CodenameRocket LakeRocket Lake
Series: Rocket Lake Rocket Lake
Intel Core i9-11900K compare3.5 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-11700K compare3.6 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-11700 compare2.5 - 4.9 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i5-11600K compare3.9 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-11400F2.6 - 4.4 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-11400T « 1.3 - 3.7 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i9-11900K compare3.5 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-11700K compare3.6 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-11700 compare2.5 - 4.9 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i5-11600K compare3.9 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-11400F « 2.6 - 4.4 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-11400T1.3 - 3.7 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Clock1300 - 3700 MHz2600 - 4400 MHz
L1 Cache480 KB480 KB
L2 Cache3 MB3 MB
L3 Cache12 MB12 MB
Cores / Threads6 / 126 / 12
TDP35 Watt65 Watt
Technology14 nm14 nm
Die Size276 mm2276 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketLGA1200LGA1200
FeaturesDDR4-3200 RAM, PCIe 4, 8 GT/s bus, DL Boost, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512F, FMA3, SHADDR4-3200 RAM, PCIe 4, 8 GT/s bus, DL Boost, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, MPX, EIST, TM1, TM2, HT, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) (350 - 1200 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
$182 U.S.$157 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-11400T
28 pt (39%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-11400F
36.2 pt (50%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
3891 Points (4%)
10235 Points (10%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
972 Points (41%)
1339 Points (57%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
378 Points (42%)
502 Points (56%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
1500 Points (4%)
3945 Points (10%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
642 Points (4%)
1574 Points (10%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
153 Points (46%)
210 Points (63%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
7.3 Points (9%)
17.7 Points (23%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
1.8 Points (45%)
2.2 Points (55%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
6122 Points (37%)
6210 Points (38%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
20362 Points (15%)
44220 Points (32%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
25835 Points (18%)
57417 Points (40%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
8290 Points (10%)
8876 Points (11%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
261.3 s (3%)
117.2 s (1%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
7.8 s (2%)
4.1 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
4409 Points (7%)
7147 Points (11%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
19699 MIPS (11%)
41522 MIPS (24%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
4157 MIPS (50%)
5466 MIPS (65%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
40 fps (14%)
91.5 fps (32%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
154.5 fps (36%)
258 fps (60%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
5.2 fps (9%)
13.5 fps (24%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.4 GB/s (0%)
0.8 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.6 GB/s (11%)
1.4 GB/s (24%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
4.2 GB/s (11%)
8.7 GB/s (23%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
704 Seconds (5%)
290.2 Seconds (2%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.8 sec (17%)
0.6 sec (12%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
7263 Points (15%)
13359 Points (28%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
10.1 s (2%)
7.8 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
22.2 s (1%)
16.9 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
543 s (2%)
703 s (3%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
25621 Points (22%)
57236 Points (50%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
7319 Points (20%)
15367 Points (42%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
50228 Points (41%)
71688 Points (58%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
50210 Points (41%)
71496 Points (58%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
53123 Points (45%)
74053 Points (62%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
6654 Points (17%)
13346 Points (34%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
10064 Points (18%)
21144 Points (38%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
8468 Points (36%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
1146 Points (48%)
1575 Points (66%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
3510 Points (6%)
7681 Points (14%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1130 Points (5%)
1543 Points (7%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
3495 Points (11%)
7679 Points (24%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
4855 Points (49%)
6836 Points (68%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
17082 Points (19%)
30191 Points (34%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
887 ms (1%)
654 ms (1%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
208 Points (43%)
255 Points (53%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
1125 Points (43%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
59.3 Watt (10%)
236 Watt (41%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
57.8 Watt (11%)
204 Watt (37%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
40.9 Watt (27%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
11.1 Points per Watt (8%)
7.7 Points per Watt (6%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-11400T → 100% n=44

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-11400F → 168% n=44

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 28. 10:26:23

#0 checking url part for id 14535 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 13219 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 28 Mar 2024 05:35:32 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.014s ... 0.015s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.015s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 14535 +0.017s ... 0.032s

#7 got single benchmarks 14535 +0.008s ... 0.04s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 13219 +0.019s ... 0.059s

#9 got single benchmarks 13219 +0.009s ... 0.068s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.068s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.295s ... 0.363s

#12 return log +0.023s ... 0.386s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)