Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i3-N305 vs Intel Processor N100

Intel Core i3-N305

► remove from comparison Intel i3-N305

The Intel Core i3-N305 is an entry-level mobile CPU for thin and light laptops from the Alder Lake-N series. It was announced in early 2023 and offers no performance cores and 8 efficient cores (E-cores, Gracemont architecture). The chip does not support HyperThreading and clocks with up to 3.8 GHz. The performance of the E-cores should be similar to old Skylake cores (compare to the Core i7-6700HQ). All cores can use up to 6 MB L3-cache.

Performance

We have not tested a single system built around the N305, as of September 2023. Expect the chip to be 50% to 100% faster than the N95 (4 cores, 4 threads, up to 3.4 GHz).

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solutuion of your system is.

Features

The Alder Lake-N chips only support single channel memory with up to DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 or LPDDR5-4800. The chip also supports Quick Sync and AV1 decoding (most likely same engine as in Alder Lake). Furthermore, Wi-Fi 6E and Bluetooth 5.2 are partly integrated (but no Thunderbolt). External chips can be connected via PCIe Gen3 x9 (via the PCH).

The integrated graphics adapter is based on the Xe-architecture and offersall 32 EUs (Execution Units) operating at up to 1.25 GHz. In addition to the single channel memory, the gaming performance is very limited of the iGPU.

Power consumption

The i3 has a base power consumption of 15 W and can be configured down to 9 W. The CPU is built with a further improved 10nm SuperFin process at Intel (called Intel 7).

Intel Processor N100

► remove from comparison Intel N100

The Intel Processor N100 is an entry-level mobile CPU for thin and light laptops from the Alder Lake-N series. It was announced in early 2023 and offers no performance cores and 4 of the 8 efficient cores (E-cores, Gracemont architecture). The chip does not support HyperThreading and clocks with 1 to 3.4 GHz. The performance of the E-cores should be similar to old Skylake cores (compare to the Core i7-6700HQ). All cores can use up to 6 MB L3-cache.

Performance

The average N100 in our database delivers unimpressive multi-thread benchmark scores that are most similar to those of the Core i3-1115G4. The chip is fast enough for many day-to-day tasks, but not much more than that; the other thing to keep in mind is that of the two N100-toting systems tested by us as of October 2023, both have rather high CPU power limits. The chip will be noticeably slower if limited to just six or seven Watts.

Features

The Alder Lake-N chips only support single channel memory with up to DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 or LPDDR5-4800. The chip also supports Quick Sync and AV1 decoding (most likely same engine as in Alder Lake). Furthermore, Wi-Fi 6E and Bluetooth 5.2 are partly integrated (but no Thunderbolt). External chips can be connected via PCIe Gen3 x9 (via the PCH).

The integrated graphics adapter is based on the Xe-architecture and offers only 24 of the 32 EUs (Execution Units) operating at only 450 - 750 MHz. Due to the single channel memory, low clock speeds, and low shader count, the gaming performance of the iGPU is very limited.

Power consumption

The N100 has a base power consumption of only 6 W and is therefore suited for fanless cooling. The CPU is built with a further improved 10nm SuperFin process at Intel (called Intel 7).

ModelIntel Core i3-N305Intel Processor N100
SeriesIntel Alder Lake-NIntel Alder Lake-N
CodenameAlder Lake-NAlder Lake-N
Series: Alder Lake-N Alder Lake-N
Intel Core i3-N305 « 1.8 - 3.8 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i3-N300 compare - 3.8 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N200 compare1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N97 compare - 3.6 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N95 compare - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N1001 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N50 compare1 - 3.4 GHz2 / 2 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i3-N3051.8 - 3.8 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i3-N300 compare - 3.8 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N200 compare1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N97 compare - 3.6 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N95 compare - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N100 « 1 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N50 compare1 - 3.4 GHz2 / 2 cores6 MB L3
Clock1800 - 3800 MHz1000 - 3400 MHz
L1 Cache768 KB
L2 Cache4 MB
L3 Cache6 MB6 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 8
8 x 3.8 GHz Intel Gracemont E-Core
4 / 4
4 x 3.4 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core
TDP15 Watt6 Watt
Technology10 nm10 nm
max. Temp.105 °C105 °C
SocketBGA1264BGA1264
FeaturesDDR4-3200/DDR5-4800/LPDDR5-4800 RAM (sin. chan.), PCIe 3, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHADDR4-3200/DDR5-4800/LPDDR5-4800 RAM (sin. chan.), PCIe 3, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) (1000 - 1250 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) ( - 750 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com
$128 U.S.

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i3-N305
28.8 pt (40%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - N100
26.3 pt (36%)
Cinebench 2024 - CB24 CPU Single Core
65 Points (45%)
min: 60     avg: 60.5     median: 60.5 (42%)     max: 61 Points
Cinebench 2024 - CB24 CPU Multi Core
324 Points (6%)
min: 194     avg: 195     median: 195 (4%)     max: 196 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 4832     avg: 5049     median: 5092 (5%)     max: 5181 Points
min: 2038     avg: 2730     median: 2949.5 (3%)     max: 2983 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 939     avg: 983     median: 995 (42%)     max: 1001 Points
min: 868     avg: 918     median: 930 (40%)     max: 942 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 375     avg: 377     median: 376 (42%)     max: 380 Points
min: 331     avg: 349.8     median: 355 (39%)     max: 358 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 1855     avg: 1943     median: 1976 (5%)     max: 1998 Points
min: 776     avg: 1042     median: 1126.5 (3%)     max: 1139 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 828     avg: 845     median: 829 (5%)     max: 878 Points
min: 296     avg: 429.8     median: 472 (3%)     max: 479 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 163.6     avg: 165.1     median: 164.7 (50%)     max: 167 Points
min: 137     avg: 149.5     median: 153 (46%)     max: 155 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 10.6     avg: 11.3     median: 11.3 (15%)     max: 12.05 Points
min: 3.91     avg: 5     median: 5.2 (7%)     max: 5.99 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 2.04     avg: 2     median: 2 (51%)     max: 2.05 Points
min: 1.55     avg: 1.8     median: 1.8 (46%)     max: 1.87 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 5622     avg: 5651     median: 5651 (34%)     max: 5680 Points
min: 4604     avg: 4884     median: 4869 (29%)     max: 5179 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 25813     avg: 26169     median: 26168.5 (19%)     max: 26524 Points
min: 9608     avg: 13384     median: 15207 (11%)     max: 15336 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 39133     avg: 39930     median: 39929.5 (28%)     max: 40726 Points
min: 14514     avg: 20884     median: 23912 (17%)     max: 24225 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 8648     avg: 8708     median: 8708 (11%)     max: 8768 Points
min: 7171     avg: 7832     median: 8098 (10%)     max: 8227 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 246.308     avg: 1175     median: 1174.7 (14%)     max: 2103.1 s
109%
N100 +
min: 481.652     avg: 536     median: 496.8 (6%)     max: 630.2 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 8.142     avg: 35.8     median: 35.8 (7%)     max: 63.4 s
104%
N100 +
min: 15.795     avg: 16.5     median: 15.9 (3%)     max: 17.7 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 3300     avg: 3377     median: 3377 (5%)     max: 3454 Points
min: 2187     avg: 2330     median: 2372 (4%)     max: 2431 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 21080     avg: 21623     median: 21239 (12%)     max: 22551 MIPS
min: 9272     avg: 12249     median: 13216 (8%)     max: 13291 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 3871     avg: 4033     median: 4105 (49%)     max: 4123 MIPS
min: 3449     avg: 3738     median: 3771.5 (45%)     max: 3958 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 55.6     avg: 55.9     median: 55.9 (20%)     max: 56.2 fps
min: 21.8     avg: 30.1     median: 33.9 (12%)     max: 34.7 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 201.6     avg: 202.6     median: 202.6 (47%)     max: 203.5 fps
min: 105.35     avg: 150.3     median: 172.6 (40%)     max: 173 fps
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 5.41     avg: 5.5     median: 5.6 (10%)     max: 5.62 fps
min: 1.99     avg: 3.1     median: 3.4 (6%)     max: 3.49 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 0.52     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (0%)     max: 0.539 GB/s
min: 0.257     avg: 0.3     median: 0.3 (0%)     max: 0.262 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 1     avg: 1.1     median: 1.1 (18%)     max: 1.1 GB/s
min: 0.531     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (9%)     max: 0.538 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 5.1     avg: 5.5     median: 5.5 (14%)     max: 5.9 GB/s
min: 2.8     avg: 2.9     median: 2.9 (8%)     max: 2.9 GB/s
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 1152     avg: 1199     median: 1198.5 (15%)     max: 1245 Seconds
min: 1992     avg: 2024     median: 2028 (26%)     max: 2052 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 583     avg: 598     median: 589 (4%)     max: 622 Seconds
min: 1017     avg: 1174     median: 1043 (7%)     max: 1594 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.766     avg: 0.8     median: 0.8 (17%)     max: 0.786 sec
min: 0.822     avg: 0.9     median: 0.8 (18%)     max: 1.039 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
9081 Points (19%)
min: 4091     avg: 5656     median: 6435 (14%)     max: 6441 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 17.549     avg: 17.8     median: 17.8 (4%)     max: 18 s
100%
N100 +
min: 19.264     avg: 19.4     median: 19.4 (4%)     max: 19.531 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
36.5 s (2%)
100%
N100 +
min: 40.352     avg: 40.5     median: 40.4 (2%)     max: 40.601 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 744.681     avg: 758     median: 758.3 (3%)     max: 772 s
100%
N100 +
min: 818.372     avg: 833     median: 818.8 (4%)     max: 862.019 s
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 28884     avg: 28911     median: 28910.5 (25%)     max: 28937 Points
min: 9434     avg: 13518     median: 15496 (14%)     max: 15625 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 8651     avg: 8896     median: 8926 (24%)     max: 9111 Points
min: 3814     avg: 5623     median: 6095.5 (16%)     max: 6486 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
55544 Points (45%)
min: 34828     avg: 45164     median: 49600 (40%)     max: 51063 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
56367 Points (46%)
min: 34083     avg: 44999     median: 49495 (40%)     max: 51420 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
61854 Points (52%)
min: 50867     avg: 52113     median: 52098 (44%)     max: 53373 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 8263     avg: 8470     median: 8567 (22%)     max: 8580 Points
min: 3203     avg: 4282     median: 4615 (12%)     max: 4693 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 11357     avg: 11598     median: 11625 (21%)     max: 11813 Points
min: 4589     avg: 6060     median: 6523.5 (12%)     max: 6602 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 3455     avg: 3514     median: 3493 (15%)     max: 3593 Points
min: 1407     avg: 2230     median: 2499 (11%)     max: 2516 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
min: 1304     avg: 1316     median: 1318 (40%)     max: 1326 Points
min: 1070     avg: 1194     median: 1229.5 (37%)     max: 1245 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
min: 4632     avg: 4798     median: 4727 (19%)     max: 5034 Points
min: 2347     avg: 3012     median: 3208.5 (13%)     max: 3282 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1050     avg: 1068     median: 1071 (45%)     max: 1083 Points
min: 946     avg: 992     median: 998 (42%)     max: 1018 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 4492     avg: 4680     median: 4644 (8%)     max: 4905 Points
min: 2038     avg: 2692     median: 2864 (5%)     max: 2896 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1006     avg: 1044     median: 1053 (5%)     max: 1072 Points
min: 982     avg: 994     median: 993 (4%)     max: 1008 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 4218     avg: 4496     median: 4497 (14%)     max: 4774 Points
min: 2424     avg: 2680     median: 2753 (9%)     max: 2862 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 4469     avg: 4633     median: 4632.5 (46%)     max: 4796 Points
min: 4390     avg: 4458     median: 4467 (45%)     max: 4518 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 16566     avg: 17128     median: 17128 (19%)     max: 17690 Points
min: 10938     avg: 11133     median: 11197 (12%)     max: 11264 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 981     avg: 986     median: 984 (1%)     max: 993 ms
100%
N100 +
min: 1004     avg: 1035     median: 1021.5 (1%)     max: 1093 ms
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 140.3     avg: 158.2     median: 145.3 (42%)     max: 189 Points
136.2 Points (39%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 179.4     avg: 185.1     median: 185.4 (39%)     max: 190.4 Points
min: 157.3     avg: 175.6     median: 178.9 (37%)     max: 187.4 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 881     avg: 907     median: 881 (34%)     max: 958 Points
min: 735     avg: 786     median: 785 (30%)     max: 839 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 i3-N305 +
min: 22.9     avg: 27.6     median: 25.5 (4%)     max: 34.5 Watt
100%
1 N100 +
min: 12.2     avg: 24     median: 27.3 (5%)     max: 29.1 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 i3-N305 +
36.9 Watt (7%)
102%
1 N100 +
min: 12.4     avg: 21.8     median: 24.3 (4%)     max: 26.1 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 i3-N305 +
min: 3.01     avg: 4.6     median: 3.5 (2%)     max: 7.2 Watt
97%
1 N100 +
min: 5.33     avg: 8.1     median: 8.6 (6%)     max: 9.98 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
100%
1 i3-N305 +
min: 5.18     avg: 5.5     median: 5.5 (6%)     max: 5.76 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
100%
1 i3-N305 +
22.4 Points per Watt (17%)
83%
1 N100 +
min: 18.3     avg: 18.7     median: 18.7 (14%)     max: 19.1 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i3-N305 → 100% n=52

Average Benchmarks Intel Processor N100 → 78% n=52

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 27. 03:55:46

#0 checking url part for id 14926 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14932 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 25 Apr 2024 05:38:32 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.026s ... 0.027s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.027s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 14926 +0.021s ... 0.049s

#7 got single benchmarks 14926 +0.022s ... 0.071s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 14932 +0.017s ... 0.089s

#9 got single benchmarks 14932 +0.025s ... 0.114s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.114s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.456s ... 0.57s

#12 return log +0.04s ... 0.61s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)