Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i5-1034G1 vs AMD Ryzen 5 4600HS vs AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS

Intel Core i5-1034G1

► remove from comparison Intel i3-1034G1

The Intel Core i5-1034G1 is a power efficient quad-core SoC for laptops and Ultrabooks based on the Ice -Lake-U generation that was announced in Mai 2019 (Computex). It integrates four Sunnycove processor cores (8 threads thanks to HyperThreading) clocked at 0.8 (base) - 3.6 (single core Turbo) GHz. 2 cores can reach 3.6 GHz and all four 3.3 GHz using Turbo Boost. According to Intel the Sunnycove cores achieve 18% more IPCs (Instructions per Clock)  and therefore the CPU performance should be similar to the higher clocked Whiskey-Lake predecessors (e.g. Core i5-8365U with up to 4.1 GHz).

The biggest improvement for Ice-Lake is the integrated Gen 11 graphics card called UHD Graphics G1. The Core i5-1034G1 integrates the smallest GPU, the UHD Graphics that features 32 of the 64 CUs and clocks at 300 - 1050? MHz. The faster variants include Iris Plus G4 and G7.

Other improvements for Ice Lake are the AI hardware acceleration and the partial integration of Thunderbolt and Wifi 6 in the chip. The integrated DDR4 memory controller supports modules with up to 3200 MHz (and LPDDDR4 3733).

The Core i5-1034G1 is produced in the improved 10nm+ process at Intel (2nd generation) that should offer a comparable performance to the 7nm process at TSMC. The TDP is specified at 15 Watts and therefore the CPU can be used in thin and light laptops (but usually with a fan). Intel offers a configurable TDP of 7.5 - 25 Watts for the partners resulting in significant performance differences (due to longer periods of Turbo Boost).

AMD Ryzen 5 4600HS

► remove from comparison AMD R5 4600HS

The AMD Ryzen 5 4600HS is a mobile SoC for big laptops based on the Renoir architecture. The 4600HS integrates six of the eight cores based on the Zen 2 microarchitecture. They are clocked at 3 (guaranteed base clock) to 4 GHz (Turbo) and support SMT / Hyperthreading (12 threads). The chip is manufactured on the modern 7 nm TSMC process and partly thanks to it AMD advertises a 2x improved performance per Watt for the Renoir chips. Compared to the similar named Ryzen 5 4600H, the 4600HS is the power efficient version with a TDP of 35 Watt (10 Watt less).

Due to the two deactivated cores and the slower Turbo clock speed, the Ryzen 5 4600HS should be significantly slower than the Ryzen 7 4800HS. The old top model Ryzen 7 3750H is still clearly slower due to the four Zen+ cores. Compared to the competition, the Intel Core i7-8850H (6-core Coffee Lake 2.6 - 4.3 GHz) should offer a similar performance.

In addition to the six CPU cores, the APU also integrates a Radeon RX Vega 6 integrated graphics card with 6 CUs and up to 1500 MHz. The dual channel memory controller supports DDR4-3200 and energy efficient LPDDR4-4266 RAM. Furthermore, 8 MB level 3 cache can be found on the chip. See our hub page on the Renoir Processors for more information.

The TDP of the APU is specified at 35 Watt (default). Although the TDP is 10 Watt lower than the Ryzen 5 4600H, the chip is still intended for big and relatively heavy laptops. 

AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS

► remove from comparison AMD R7 4800HS

The AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS is a mobile SoC for big laptops based on the Renoir architecture. The 4800HS integrates all eight cores based on the Zen 2 microarchitecture. They are clocked at 2.9 (guaranteed base clock) to 4.2 GHz (Turbo) and support SMT for a total of 16 threads. The chip is manufactured on the modern 7 nm TSMC process and partly thanks to it AMD advertises a 2x improved performance per Watt for the Renoir chips. The 4800HS is the 35 Watt version (-10 Watt) of the Ryzen 7 4800H.

In addition to the eight CPU cores, the APU also integrates a Radeon RX Vega 7 integrated graphics adapter with 7 CUs at up to 1,600 MHz. The dual channel memory controller supports DDR4-3200 and energy efficient LPDDR4-4266 RAM. Furthermore, 8 MB of L3 cache can be found on the chip. See our hub page on the Renoir Processors for more information.

Performance

The average 4800HS in our database is an impressively fast CPU that isn't afraid of picking a fight with the Intel Core i9-10980HK and the Core i7-11850H, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. The Ryzen is fast enough for nearly all apps and games you could possibly throw at it, as of mid 2022.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of your system is.

Power consumption

This Ryzen 7 has a default TDP, also known as the long-term power limit, of 35 W. Which is too high to allow for passively cooled setups.

The AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS is built with TSMC's 7 nm process leading to average, as of mid 2023, energy efficiency.

ModelIntel Core i5-1034G1AMD Ryzen 5 4600HSAMD Ryzen 7 4800HS
SeriesIntel Ice LakeAMD Renoir (Ryzen 4000 APU)AMD Renoir (Ryzen 4000 APU)
CodenameIce Lake URenoir-HS (Zen 2)Renoir-HS (Zen 2)
Series: Renoir (Ryzen 4000 APU) Renoir-HS (Zen 2)
Intel Core i7-1068G72.3 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1034G1 « 0.8 - 3.6 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS2.9 - 4.2 GHz8 / 16 cores8 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 4600HS « 3 - 4 GHz6 / 12 cores8 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS « 2.9 - 4.2 GHz8 / 16 cores8 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 4600HS3 - 4 GHz6 / 12 cores8 MB L3
Clock800 - 3600 MHz3000 - 4000 MHz2900 - 4200 MHz
L1 Cache192 KB384 KB512 KB
L2 Cache2 MB3 MB4 MB
L3 Cache6 MB8 MB8 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 86 / 128 / 16
TDP15 Watt35 Watt35 Watt
Technology10 nm7 nm7 nm
FeaturesAVX512, DL Boost, Turbo Boost 2.0XFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMTDDR4-3200/LPDDR4-4266 RAM, PCIe 3, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) (300 MHz)AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) ( - 1500 MHz)AMD Radeon RX Vega 7 ( - 1600 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
max. Temp.105 °C105 °C
SocketFP6FP6
Manufacturerwww.amd.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R7 4800HS
34.6 pt (48%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
482 Points (54%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
3869 Points (9%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 1634     avg: 1701     median: 1700.5 (11%)     max: 1767 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 186     avg: 186.5     median: 186.5 (56%)     max: 187 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
19.9 Points (26%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
2.2 Points (54%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
5705 Points (34%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
36313 Points (26%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
91.1 s (1%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
4.1 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
4642 Points (7%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
48392 MIPS (28%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
4655 MIPS (56%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
99 fps (35%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
216.5 fps (50%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
12 fps (21%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1.1 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
1.8 GB/s (31%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
10.3 GB/s (27%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
284 Seconds (2%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.6 sec (13%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
12785 Points (27%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
9.7 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
22.3 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
561 s (2%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
14924 Points (40%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
16062 Points (41%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
21217 Points (38%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 8264     avg: 8441     median: 8440.5 (36%)     max: 8617 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
1100 Points (46%)
min: 1188     avg: 1191     median: 1190.5 (50%)     max: 1193 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
6345 Points (11%)
min: 7540     avg: 7611     median: 7611 (14%)     max: 7682 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1196 Points (5%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
7878 Points (25%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
5090 Points (51%)
4630 Points (46%)
min: 5114     avg: 5134     median: 5134 (51%)     max: 5154 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
16969 Points (19%)
20170 Points (22%)
min: 28937     avg: 29224     median: 29223.5 (33%)     max: 29510 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
786 ms (1%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
214 Points (45%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
64.2 Watt (11%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
65.1 Watt (12%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
25.1 Points per Watt (19%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-1034G1 → 100% n=2

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 5 4600HS → 105% n=2

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS → 137% n=2

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.26
log 07. 17:30:01

#0 checking url part for id 11415 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11691 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 11689 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 07 May 2024 05:39:01 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.037s ... 0.038s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.038s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 11415 +0.003s ... 0.041s

#8 got single benchmarks 11415 +0.008s ... 0.049s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 11691 +0.003s ... 0.052s

#10 got single benchmarks 11691 +0.007s ... 0.059s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 11689 +0.019s ... 0.078s

#12 got single benchmarks 11689 +0.02s ... 0.098s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.098s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.153s ... 0.251s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.251s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)