Notebookcheck Logo

Samsung Xclipse 950 vs ARM Mali-G78 MP24 vs ARM Mali-G68 MP5

Samsung Xclipse 950

► remove from comparison Samsung Xclipse 950

The Samsung Xclipse 950 is a graphics chip for smartphones and tablets, integrated in the Samsung Exynos 2500 SoC. It is based on an RDNA 3 architecture including ray tracing support. It uses 8 WGPs (compared to 6 in the previous generation Xclipse 940) and offers 28% faster ray tracing in hardware.

The Exynos 2500 is manufactured in the 3nm GAA process at Samsung.

ARM Mali-G78 MP24

► remove from comparison ARM Mali-G78 MP24

The ARM Mali-G78MP24 is an integrated high-end graphics card for ARM based SoCs (mostly Android based). It was introduced late 2020 in the HiSilicon Kirin 9000 (e.g. Huawei Mate 40). It integrates all of the 24 possible cores and is based on the second generation of the Valhal architecture. According to ARM it offers two new features: asynchronous top level and fragment dependency tracking.

The graphics card is one of the fastest in Android devices of 2020 and therefore able to run all games fluently.

The GPU supports all modern graphics APIs like OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan 1.1 and OpenCL 2.0.

ARM Mali-G68 MP5

► remove from comparison ARM Mali-G68 MP5

The ARM Mali-G68 MP5 (or G68MC5) is an integrated mid-range graphics card for ARM based SoCs (mostly Android based). The MP5 version uses five of the six possible clusters / cores.

It was introduced early 2023 in the Samsung Exynos 1380 SoC. It is based on the Valhall architecture and is advertised by ARM as a "sub-premium GPU". It offers all features of the Mali-G78 series including improvements for battery runtime and machine learning.

Samsung Xclipse 950ARM Mali-G78 MP24ARM Mali-G68 MP5
Mali-G Series
Xclipse 950 8
Xclipse 940
Xclipse 920 192 @ 0.56 GHz
Mali-G78 MP24 24
Mali-G78 MP22 24
Mali-G78 MP20 24
Mali-G78 MP14 14
Mali-G77 MP11 11
Mali-G77 MP9 9
Mali-G76 MP16 16
Mali-G76 MP12 10
Mali-G76 MP10 10 @ 0.72 GHz
Mali-G68 MP5 5
Mali-G57 MP6 6
Mali-G57 MP5 5
Mali-G72 MP18 18 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G71 MP20 8 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-G72 MP12 12 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G71 MP8 8 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-G76 MP4 4 @ 0.8 GHz
Mali-G71 MP2 2 @ 0.77 GHz
Mali-G72 MP3 3 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G68 MP4 4
Mali-G52 MP6 6
Mali-G68 MP2 2
Mali-G52 MP2 2 @ 0.95 GHz
Mali-G52 MP1 1 @ 0.8 GHz
Mali-G57 MP4 4
Mali-G57 MP3 3
Mali-G57 MP2 2
Mali-G57 MP1 1
Mali-G51 MP4 4 @ 0.65 GHz
Mali-G78 MP24 24
Mali-G78 MP22 24
Mali-G78 MP20 24
Mali-G78 MP14 14
Mali-G77 MP11 11
Mali-G77 MP9 9
Mali-G76 MP16 16
Mali-G76 MP12 10
Mali-G76 MP10 10 @ 0.72 GHz
Mali-G68 MP5 5
Mali-G57 MP6 6
Mali-G57 MP5 5
Mali-G72 MP18 18 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G71 MP20 8 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-G72 MP12 12 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G71 MP8 8 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-G76 MP4 4 @ 0.8 GHz
Mali-G71 MP2 2 @ 0.77 GHz
Mali-G72 MP3 3 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G68 MP4 4
Mali-G52 MP6 6
Mali-G68 MP2 2
Mali-G52 MP2 2 @ 0.95 GHz
Mali-G52 MP1 1 @ 0.8 GHz
Mali-G57 MP4 4
Mali-G57 MP3 3
Mali-G57 MP2 2
Mali-G57 MP1 1
Mali-G51 MP4 4 @ 0.65 GHz
Pipelines8 - unified24 - unified5 - unified
Shared Memoryyesnono
technology3 nm5 nm5 nm
FeaturesOpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1
Date of Announcement09.10.2023 26.05.2020 14.09.2021
CodenameValhallValhall
ArchitectureValhallValhall
APIOpenGL ES 3.2
Link to Manufacturer Pagewww.arm.comwww.arm.com
CPU in Mali-G78 MP24GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
HiSilicon Kirin 90008 x 2050 MHz? MHz? MHz
CPU in Mali-G68 MP5GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Samsung Exynos 13808 x 2000 MHz? MHz950 MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
123332 Points (12%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
11895 Points (52%)
min: 6103     avg: 6217     median: 6224 (27%)     max: 6317 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
17612 Points (39%)
min: 7030     avg: 7122     median: 7134 (16%)     max: 7189 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
9643 Points (41%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
12146 Points (30%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0)
11256 Points (100%)
min: 5790     avg: 5815     median: 5792 (51%)     max: 5864 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Graphics
16670 Points (100%)
min: 6630     avg: 6658     median: 6647 (40%)     max: 6698 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
9138 Points (45%)
min: 4629     avg: 4724     median: 4730.5 (23%)     max: 4805 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
11573 Points (39%)
min: 4848     avg: 4966     median: 4972 (17%)     max: 5070 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
20027 Points (10%)
6923 Points (3%)
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
5151 Points (6%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
33 fps (12%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
77 fps (14%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
189 fps (14%)
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
178 fps (17%)
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
281 fps (6%)
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
411 fps (17%)
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Samsung Xclipse 950
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
499 fps (4%)
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + ARM Mali-G68 MP5
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
min: 143857     avg: 147409     median: 148214 (15%)     max: 149350 Points
Antutu v10 - AnTuTu v10 GPU
min: 136035     avg: 136272     median: 136129 (11%)     max: 136930 Points
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
336 fps (8%)
min: 41.45     avg: 41.7     median: 41.7 (1%)     max: 41.92 fps
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 GPU OpenCL
19473 Points (5%)
min: 2971     avg: 3039     median: 3042.5 (1%)     max: 3098 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 GPU Vulkan
19956 Points (5%)
min: 3039     avg: 3084     median: 3093.5 (1%)     max: 3109 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
12517 Points (4%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
3997 Points (7%)
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 4.32     avg: 5     median: 4.8 (2%)     max: 6.04 Watt

Average Benchmarks ARM Mali-G78 MP24 → 0% n=0

Average Benchmarks ARM Mali-G68 MP5 → 0% n=0

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Diablo Immortal

Diablo Immortal

2022
low Medium
Mali-G68 MP5:
58.5  fps
Genshin Impact

Genshin Impact

2020
low
Mali-G68 MP5:
50 55.8 56 58 ~ 55 fps
med.
Mali-G68 MP5:
43 50 ~ 47 fps
ultra
Mali-G68 MP5:
34.1 36 38 39.7 ~ 37 fps
Armajet

Armajet

2020
high
Mali-G78 MP24:
60  fps
PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
Mali-G68 MP5:
30 30 30 59.6 ~ 37 fps
med.
Mali-G68 MP5:
30  fps
high
Mali-G78 MP24:
40  fps
Mali-G68 MP5:
30 30 30 39.7 39.8 ~ 34 fps
Asphalt 9: Legends

Asphalt 9: Legends

2013
low
Mali-G68 MP5:
60  fps
high
Mali-G68 MP5:
60  fps
Samsung Xclipse 950ARM Mali-G78 MP24ARM Mali-G68 MP5
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
Diablo Immortal58.5
Genshin Impact554737
PUBG Mobile40373034
Asphalt 9: Legends6060
Samsung Xclipse 950ARM Mali-G78 MP24ARM Mali-G68 MP5
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps


















< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps







1










< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

3
1

2


1
1

1







For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.33
log 25. 03:02:53

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 13074 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 10564 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 11584 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1756083773s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 22 Aug 2025 05:19:15 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.027s ... 0.027s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.027s

#8 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.027s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 13074 +0.02s ... 0.048s

#10 got single benchmarks 13074 +0.005s ... 0.053s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 10564 +0s ... 0.053s

#12 got single benchmarks 10564 +0.004s ... 0.057s

#13 getting avg benchmarks for device 11584 +0s ... 0.057s

#14 got single benchmarks 11584 +0.007s ... 0.065s

#15 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.065s

#16 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.007s ... 0.072s

#17 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.073s

#18 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.073s

#19 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.074s

#20 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.075s

#21 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.076s

#22 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.076s

#23 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.077s

#24 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.078s

#25 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.08s

#26 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.08s

#27 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.081s

#28 min, max, avg, median took s +0.002s ... 0.083s

#29 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.083s

#30 Got 25 rows for game benchmarks. +0.004s ... 0.087s

#31 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.087s

#32 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.001s ... 0.087s

#33 benchmarks composed for output. +0.003s ... 0.09s

#34 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.09s

#35 return log +0s ... 0.09s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)